`Chess . ' Ill
`Ainerica
`
`1
`
`EX. 1004
`
`
`
`The present work is a reprint of the library bound edition of
`Correspondence Chess in America, first published in 2000
`by McFarland.
`
`LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA
`
`Avery, Bryce D., 1965-
`Correspondence chess in America/ by Bryce D. Avery.
`cm.
`p.
`Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and indexes.
`
`ISBN 978-0-7864-7396-0
`softcover: acid free paper) §
`
`I. Correspondence chess - United States - History.
`2. Correspondence Chess League of America - History.
`I. Tide.
`3. Chess - Collections of games.
`794.1 '7 -dell
`99-48418
`GVl456.A84 2012
`
`BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING DATA ARE AVAILABLE
`
`© 2000 Bryce D. Avery. All rights reserved
`
`No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form
`or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying
`or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system,
`without permission in writingftom the publisher.
`
`Cover images© 2012 iStockphoto/Thinkstock
`
`Manufactured in the United States of America
`
`McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers
`Box 611, Jefferson, North Carolina 28640
`www.mcforlandpub.com
`
`'
`
`2
`
`
`
`Preface
`
`The story of correspondence chess in
`America is largely the story of the Corre(cid:173)
`spondence Chess League of America (CCLA).
`Its origins in 1909 make it the oldest such
`organization in America and the second old(cid:173)
`est in the world. It predates the United
`States Chess Federation by thirty years, the
`International Correspondence Chess Feder(cid:173)
`ation by almost forty years, and the other
`major American postal clubs by more than
`half a century.
`The remarkable continuity of the CCLA
`is partly due to its makeup of officers and,
`since 1938, a board of directors regularly
`elected by the membership. Unlike groups
`that depend entirely on one or two people
`and cease to function when they leave, the
`League has always had enough volunteers to
`keep going. One other key to its success is
`its status as a nonprofit organization; most
`such clubs in America are set up as money(cid:173)
`making enterprises and simply fail, whereas
`the CCLA is unhampered by any such re(cid:173)
`quirement.
`The idea for this book came from the
`1965 Horowitz and Battell book The Best of
`Chess, which contains highlights from more
`than thirty years of the magazine Chess Re(cid:173)
`view: games, fiction, cartoons, and other
`chess-related items . I first determined to put
`together a similar book containing the best
`from the CCLA magazine The Chess Corre(cid:173)
`spondent, using material that the League had
`
`published during my fourteen years of mem(cid:173)
`bership to that point.
`But I soon came to understand Robert
`Pirsig: "The further back you go, the further
`back you see you have to go ... , until what
`looked like a small problem ... turns into a
`major ... enquiry." As I delved into the
`club's history, I found many gaps, anachro(cid:173)
`nisms and errors. The impetus to expand to
`a full-length history came when I fead sev(cid:173)
`eral comments to the effect that no one can
`know anything about CCLA history before
`1933 because the records do not exist. I have
`used contextual clues from various accounts
`and found that information is indeed avail(cid:173)
`to those who look hard enough.
`able -
`This book notes the many American
`luminaries who have been involved with
`correspondence chess,
`including Frank
`Marshall, Isaac Kashdan and Reuben Fine.
`It explains why Volume 72 of The Chess
`Correspondent appears in 1999 even though
`the Correspondence Chess League of Amer(cid:173)
`ica originally dates from 1909 and its mag(cid:173)
`azine dates from 1933. It even explains the
`foundation of the long-running CCLA
`"North American" tournament and recon(cid:173)
`ciles the conflicting accounts of the found(cid:173)
`ing of the United States Postal Chess Fed(cid:173)
`eration. Appendix A contains a discussion
`of the world's first numerical system for rat(cid:173)
`ing chess players.
`In general, I have chosen a course of
`
`IX
`
`3
`
`
`
`X
`
`Preface
`
`neutrality in discussing the ebbs and flows
`of the League, downplaying internal politics
`unless unavoidable. All uncredited game
`notes are mine; in cases where the starting
`year of a game could not be verified, I have
`given my best estimate.
`
`All errors in the book are (regrettably)
`mine, and I would appreciate hearing about
`them through the publisher.
`
`Bryce D. Avery
`California, Maryland, Fall 1999
`
`4
`
`
`
`1
`In the Beginning
`(to 1909)
`
`The "modern" era of correspondence
`chess is generally traced to the London(cid:173)
`Edinburgh five-game match played between
`April 1824 and July 1828. This match was
`not the first of its kind, as many records in(cid:173)
`dicate that chess was being played one move
`at a time over a period of days long before
`1824. But the London-Edinburgh match
`stands out, especially the second game.
`
`Gamel
`Correspondence Match, 1824-1828,
`Second Game, London-Edinburgh
`Scotch Game
`
`1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4
`
`Unlike some openings which are here
`today and only a footnote tomorrow, the
`Scotch's viability even in recent world-class
`chess was demonstrated by Kasparov in his
`1990 match against Karpov.
`
`3 . ... exd4 4. Bc4 Bc5 5. c3 Qe7
`6. 0-0 dxc3 7. Nxc3 d6 8. Nd5 Qd7
`9. b4 Nxb4 10. Nxb4 Bxb4 11. Ng5
`Nh6 12. Bb2 Kf8 13. Qb3 Qe7 14. Nxf7
`Nxf7 15. Qxb4 Ne5 16. f4 Nxc4
`17. Qxc4 Qf7 18. Qc3 Be6 19. f5 Bc4
`20. Rf4 b5 21. e5 dxe5 22. Qxe5 h6
`23. Rel Rh7 24. f6 g5 25. Rf5 a5
`
`After 25 . ... aS
`
`This position has become a famous ex(cid:173)
`ample of the conditional, or "if-then," move
`in correspondence chess. Thinking that
`mate is now forced, London now commit(cid:173)
`ted itself to the following sequence by writ(cid:173)
`ing it all on the same message.
`
`26. Qc5ch Kg8 27. Rxg5ch!ff hxg5
`28. Qxg5ch
`
`Some hours after London decided on
`this sequence, a member of the club found
`that Edinburgh could safely take the rook.
`Club members then learned to their horror
`that their secretary had left the club two
`hours earlier than usual that day and had
`already mailed the faulty sequence!
`After trying to retrieve the message
`from the mail system, as impossible then
`as it is now, London sent another letter
`
`1
`
`5
`
`
`
`2
`
`Correspondence Chess in America
`
`retracting the sacrifice. Edinburgh replied
`that all legal and mailed moves were bind(cid:173)
`ing and grabbed the rook.
`
`28 . ... Kf8 29. Bd4 Be6 30. Qc5ch Kg8
`31. Qg5ch Kf8 32. Bc5ch Ke8 33. Qd5
`Ra6 34. Qb7 Qh5/ 35. f7ch Kxf7
`36. Rflch Kg6 37. Qe4ch Bf5 38. Qe8ch
`Rf7 39. Qg8ch Kf6 40. g4 Ra8 41. Qxa8
`Qxg4ch 42. Khl Rd7 43. Ba3 Kf7
`44. Qc6 Rdl 45. Qxb5 Qe4ch 46. Kgl
`Kg6 47. Qb2 Qg4ch 48. Qg2 Qxg2ch
`49. Kxg2 Bh3ch 50. Kxh3 Rxfl
`51. Be7 a4 52. a3 Rf5 0-1
`
`Edinburgh eventually won the match
`+2 -1 =2, gaining for themselves a silver cup
`and 25 guineas and instructing future play(cid:173)
`ers about the dangers of conditional moves.
`For more games between cities during the
`nineteenth century, the reader is directed to
`works by Professor Carlo Pagni.
`
`CORRESPONDENCE CHESS IN
`AMERICA
`
`The 1840s found correspondence games
`between New York City and Norfolk, Vir(cid:173)
`ginia, as well as an 1844 telegraph game be(cid:173)
`tween Baltimore and Washington, D.C. By
`1857, correspondence chess was even stirring
`over-the-board controversy, as Philadelphia
`unsuccessfully vied with New York City for
`the- honor of hosting the First American
`Chess Congress and bolstered its case by de(cid:173)
`feating New York in a correspondence game,
`one of five they contested between 18 56 and
`1864.
`The Congress Committee of Manage(cid:173)
`ment included Thomas Frere of the Brook(cid:173)
`lyn Chess Club, who wrote a chess handbook,
`a compilation of Hoyle, and a collection of
`games by Paul Morphy. Morphy, who won
`the Congress, served on the Congress Com(cid:173)
`mittee of Co-Operation and the Commit(cid:173)
`tee on the Chess Code, which took recently
`
`published Russian, English and German
`codes and tried to mold them into a code for
`America. Correspondence chess, however,
`remained a major area of the Committee's
`unresolved disagreement.
`After the American Civil War, several
`more American Chess Congresses were held
`at different times, and an ''American Chess
`Association" was even formed in 1871. This
`group lasted but five years, as it was unable
`to agree with the Philadelphia Chess Club
`on organization of the Congress marking
`the centennial of the United States.
`
`THEOPHILUS THOMPSON
`
`Only the Dubuque Chess journal, pub(cid:173)
`lished between 1870 and 1892 under various
`names, appears to have organized any do(cid:173)
`mestic correspondence tournaments during
`this time period; their events counted prob(cid:173)
`lemists William Shinkman and Theophilus
`Thompson among the players.
`Theophilus Thompson was the first
`African-American chessplayer of distinction.
`He learned chess in April 1872 at age 17
`from problemist J.K. Hanshew, who lent
`him a chess set and gave him several chess
`problems to solve. Within weeks, Thompson
`was not only solving problems, but com(cid:173)
`posing his own and contributing them to
`Dubuque Chess journal.
`Thompson played in a postal tourna(cid:173)
`ment run by Hanshew in connection with
`Hanshew's Maryland Chess Review. Though
`Shinkman won the tournament with a final
`score of 18-2, Thompson acquitted himself
`well. Today, the U.S. Chess Center in Wash(cid:173)
`ington, D.C., sponsors a Theophilus Thomp(cid:173)
`son Club where African-American young(cid:173)
`sters can learn the game.
`
`Game2
`Correspondence, circa 187 4
`Thompson-Bertolette
`Evans Gambit
`
`6
`
`
`
`1. In the Begi.nning (to 1909)
`
`3
`
`1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4
`Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. 0-0 Nf6 7. d4 0-0
`8. Nxe5 Nxe4 9. Nxf7 Rxf7 10. Bxf7ch
`Kxf7 11. d5 Ne5 12. Qd4 Bxc3 13. Nxc3
`Nxc3 14. Qxc3 d6 15. Bb2 g5 16. f4
`gxf4 17. Rxf4ch Kg8 18. Qg3ch Ng6
`19. Rf6 Bf5? 20. Rxf5 1-0
`
`MORE PRE-POSTCARD PLAY
`
`In 1879, a cable match was organized
`between an American team and a British
`squad that featured George Gossip, who won
`the 1873-4 correspondence tournament of
`Chess-players Chronicle and wrote The Chess(cid:173)
`player's Manual and a collection of games.
`Yet Gossip was defeated in both games by
`the remarkable Mrs. Ellen Gilbert, who an(cid:173)
`nounced mate in 21 moves in one game and
`mate in 35 in the other!
`In the 1880s, correspondence chess be(cid:173)
`tween individual players became more com(cid:173)
`mon throughout Europe; the French chess
`magazine La Strategie organized a corre(cid:173)
`spondence tournament as early as 1882. Pop(cid:173)
`ularizing individual correspondence chess
`in America, however, required almost ten
`years more. Even though a way had already
`been created for the "common man" to afford
`the game, not until a World Champion en(cid:173)
`dorsed the concept did correspondence
`chess between individuals become popular
`in the United States.
`
`LET THERE BE POSTCARDS
`
`The American economic basis for cor(cid:173)
`respondence chess can be credited to New
`Jersey banker John Lee, who served in Con(cid:173)
`gress from 1867 to 1873 and in 1881-1882.
`In a later interview with a local newspaper,
`Lee took well-deserved credit for inventing
`America's "penny postcard," some thirty
`years after Gossip claims its origin in Eu(cid:173)
`rope. Lee claimed to be unaware of its exis-
`
`tence in Europe, saying that the idea came
`to him while he was thinking about some(cid:173)
`thing else:
`
`[In the 1870s, postage in America was
`three cents per letter.] I think that the first
`suggestion of two-cent letter postage came
`while I was serving as postmaster in myna(cid:173)
`tive town of Boonton, New Jersey. One of
`my friends said to me one day, "Why can't
`we cut a three-cent stamp in two and then
`with each half [of the stamp], send an [un(cid:173)
`sealed] letter?"
`At the moment, I thought this remark
`no more than a joke, but it set me to think(cid:173)
`ing, and I speedily became persuaded that
`if the government should issue blank cards
`bearing a one-cent stamp, they would be
`purchased in enormous quantities, for they
`could be used either for advertising or for
`open letter-writing purposes ....
`At first, the idea did not take with mem(cid:173)
`bers of Congress, but at last, the Commit(cid:173)
`tee on Post-offices and Post-roads [of which
`Lee was the chairman] thought it was worth(cid:173)
`while to make the experiment ....
`
`The government-issued postcard did
`not increase in price for more than 75 years
`after its beginning on May 1, 1873; it was
`even less expensive than private-issue post(cid:173)
`cards, which required two cents postage,
`until 1898, when the nongovernment cards
`were reduced in price to one cent.
`
`THE WORLD CHAMPION IN
`AMERICA
`
`The narrative now turns to Wilhelm
`Steinitz, one of Europe's top players who
`left the Old World for an American visit
`and tour in 1882. He visited Philadelphia,
`Baltimore and New Orleans before spend(cid:173)
`ing time in Cuba and then in New York
`City, returning to Europe in March 1883.
`Though the time in America may have been
`good for Steinitz's constitution, however, it
`did little or nothing for his disposition. By
`
`7
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site