throbber
Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 25 PageID: 1
`
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, NJ 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A. and
`Roche Palo Alto LLC
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Joseph M. O(cid:146)Malley, Jr.
`Bruce M. Wexler
`Eric W. Dittmann
`David M. Conca
`Gary Ji
`Angela C. Ni
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`75 East 55th Street
`New York, NY 10022
`(212) 318-6000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`
`Mark E. Waddell
`LOEB & LOEB LLP
`345 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10154
`(212) 407-4127
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Roche Palo Alto LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`HELSINN HEALTHCARE S.A. and
`ROCHE PALO ALTO LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`DR. REDDY(cid:146)S LABORATORIES, LTD. and
`DR. REDDY(cid:146)S LABORATORIES, INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. _______________
`
`COMPLAINT FOR
`PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`(Filed Electronically)
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs Helsinn Healthcare S.A. and Roche Palo Alto LLC (collectively,
`
`(cid:147)Plaintiffs(cid:148)), for their Complaint against Defendants Dr. Reddy(cid:146)s Laboratories, Ltd. and Dr.
`
`Reddy(cid:146)s Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, (cid:147)Reddy(cid:148) or (cid:147)Defendants(cid:148)), hereby allege as follows:
`
`-1-
`
`Helsinn Healthcare Exhibit 2083
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al. v. Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`Trial PGR2016-00008
`
`Page 1 of 11
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 2 of 25 PageID: 2
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Helsinn Healthcare S.A. is a Swiss corporation having its
`
`principal place of business at Via Pian Scairolo, 9, CH-6912 Lugano-Pazzallo, Switzerland.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Roche Palo Alto LLC is a company organized and existing under
`
`the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at One DNA Way, South
`
`San Francisco, California 94080-4990.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Reddy Ltd. is an Indian
`
`corporation having a place of business at 7-1-27, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy Ltd., itself and through its wholly owned subsidiary and
`
`agent Defendant Reddy Inc., a New Jersey corporation, manufactures generic drugs for sale and
`
`use throughout the United States, including in this judicial district. Reddy Ltd. has previously
`
`consented to personal jurisdiction in this Court, including in the related actions Helsinn
`
`Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 11-3962
`
`(MLC)(DEA), Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil
`
`Action No. 11-5579 (MLC)(DEA), and Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s
`
`Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 13-5815 (MLC)(DEA), the latter two of which were
`
`consolidated with Civil Action No. 11-3962, and Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s
`
`Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 12-2867 (MLC)(DEA).
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Reddy Inc. is a corporation
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, having a place of business at
`
`200 Somerset Corporate Boulevard, Floor 7, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807, and is a wholly
`
`owned subsidiary and agent of Defendant Reddy Ltd. Upon information and belief, Reddy Inc.
`
`is registered to do business in New Jersey and does business in this judicial district. Reddy Inc.
`
`has previously consented to personal jurisdiction in this Court, including in the related actions
`
`-2-
`
`Page 2 of 11
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 3 of 25 PageID: 3
`
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 11-
`
`3962 (MLC)(DEA), Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd., et al.,
`
`Civil Action No. 11-5579 (MLC)(DEA), and Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s
`
`Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 13-5815 (MLC)(DEA), the latter two of which were
`
`consolidated with Civil Action No. 11-3962, and Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s
`
`Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 12-2867 (MLC)(DEA).
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`5.
`
`This is a civil action concerning the infringement of United States Patent
`
`No. 8,729,094 ((cid:147)the (cid:146)094 patent(cid:148)). This action arises under the patent laws of the United States,
`
`35 U.S.C. §§ 100 et seq., and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-02.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`6.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant
`
`to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-02.
`
`7.
`
`This Court may declare the rights and other legal relations of the parties
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-02 because this case is an actual controversy within the Court(cid:146)s
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`8.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court as to each Defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1391(b), (c), and/or (d) and 1400(b).
`
`9.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants by virtue
`
`of the fact that, inter alia, each Defendant has committed, aided, abetted, contributed to, and/or
`
`participated in the commission of a tortious act of patent infringement that has led to foreseeable
`
`harm and injury to Plaintiffs. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants for the
`
`additional reasons set forth below and for other reasons that will be presented to the Court if such
`
`jurisdiction is challenged.
`
`-3-
`
`Page 3 of 11
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 4 of 25 PageID: 4
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant Reddy Ltd.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant Reddy Inc.
`
`THE PATENT
`
`12.
`
`On May 20, 2014 the (cid:146)094 patent, titled (cid:147)Liquid Pharmaceutical
`
`Formulations of Palonosetron,(cid:148) was duly and legally issued to Plaintiffs as assignees. A copy of
`
`the (cid:146)094 patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`13.
`
`Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(1), the (cid:146)094 patent has been listed in the
`
`United States Food and Drug Administration ((cid:147)FDA(cid:148)) publication titled Approved Drug
`
`Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (also known as the (cid:147)Orange Book(cid:148)) as
`
`covering Helsinn(cid:146)s Aloxifi brand palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous solutions.
`
`ACTS GIVING RISE TO THIS ACTION
`
`COUNT I – INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’094 PATENT BY REDDY’S ANDA
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-13 as if fully set forth herein.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy submitted ANDA No. 201533 to the
`
`FDA under § 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(j)). ANDA
`
`No. 201533 seeks the FDA approval necessary to engage in the commercial manufacture, use,
`
`sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous
`
`solutions prior to the expiration of the (cid:146)094 patent. ANDA No. 201533 specifically seeks FDA
`
`approval to market a generic version of Helsinn(cid:146)s Aloxifi brand palonosetron hydrochloride
`
`intravenous solutions prior to the expiration of the (cid:146)094 patent.
`
`16.
`
`The (cid:146)094 patent had not been issued at the time Reddy made its
`
`§ 505(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) certification regarding Plaintiffs(cid:146) other Orange Book-listed patents.
`
`17.
`
`The (cid:146)094 patent shares the same expiration date as Plaintiffs(cid:146) other Orange
`
`Book-listed patents. By seeking FDA approval of its ANDA No. 201533 prior to expiration of
`
`-4-
`
`Page 4 of 11
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 5 of 25 PageID: 5
`
`Plaintiffs(cid:146) other Orange Book-listed patents, Reddy necessarily seeks approval of that ANDA
`
`prior to expiration of the (cid:146)094 patent.
`
`18.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy is required by law to either amend its
`
`ANDA to contain a § 505(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) certification with respect to the (cid:146)094 patent, or must
`
`relinquish its request that the FDA approve ANDA No. 201533 prior to the expiration of
`
`Plaintiffs(cid:146) Orange Book-listed patents.
`
`19.
`
`Reddy continues to seek approval of ANDA No. 201533 from the FDA
`
`and intends to continue in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or
`
`importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous solutions prior to the expiration
`
`of the (cid:146)094 patent.
`
`20.
`
`By seeking approval of its ANDA to engage in the commercial
`
`manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride
`
`intravenous solutions prior to the expiration of the (cid:146)094 patent, Reddy has infringed that patent
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`21.
`
`Reddy Ltd. and Reddy Inc. are jointly and severally liable for any
`
`infringement of the (cid:146)094 patent. This is because, upon information and belief, Reddy Ltd. and
`
`Reddy Inc. actively and knowingly caused to be submitted, assisted with, participated in,
`
`contributed to, and/or directed the submission of ANDA No. 201533 to the FDA.
`
`22.
`
`Reddy(cid:146)s active and knowing participation in, contribution to, aiding,
`
`abetting, and/or inducement of the submission to the FDA of ANDA No. 201533 constitutes
`
`infringement of the (cid:146)094 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`23.
`
`Plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration that, if Reddy commercially
`
`manufactures, uses, offers for sale, or sells its proposed generic versions of Helsinn(cid:146)s Aloxifi
`
`brand products within the United States, imports its proposed generic versions of Helsinn(cid:146)s
`
`-5-
`
`Page 5 of 11
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 6 of 25 PageID: 6
`
`Aloxifi brand products into the United States, and/or induces or contributes to such conduct,
`
`Reddy would infringe the (cid:146)094 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), (b), and/or (c).
`
`24.
`
`Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed by Reddy(cid:146)s infringing activities
`
`unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Plaintiffs do not have an adequate remedy at
`
`law.
`
`COUNT II – INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’094 PATENT
`BY REDDY’S 505(b)(2) APPLICATION
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-24 as fully set forth herein.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy submitted NDA No. 203050 to the
`
`FDA under § 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)).
`
`NDA No. 203050 seeks the FDA approval necessary to engage in the commercial manufacture,
`
`use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous
`
`solutions prior to the expiration of the (cid:146)094 patent. NDA No. 203050 specifically seeks FDA
`
`approval to market and sell generic versions of Helsinn(cid:146)s Aloxifi brand palonosetron
`
`hydrochloride intravenous solutions prior to the expiration of the (cid:146)094 patent.
`
`27.
`
`The (cid:146)094 patent had not issued at the time Reddy made its
`
`§ 505(b)(2)(A)(iv) certification regarding Plaintiffs(cid:146) other Orange Book-listed patents.
`
`28.
`
`The (cid:146)094 patent shares the same expiration date as Plaintiffs(cid:146) other Orange
`
`Book-listed patents. By seeking FDA approval of its NDA No. 203050 prior to expiration of
`
`Plaintiffs(cid:146) other Orange Book-listed patents, Reddy necessarily seeks approval of that NDA prior
`
`to expiration of the (cid:146)094 patent.
`
`29.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy is required by law to either amend its
`
`NDA to contain a § 505(b)(2)(A)(iv) certification with respect to the (cid:146)094 patent, or must
`
`relinquish its request that the FDA approve NDA No. 203050 prior to the expiration of Plaintiffs(cid:146)
`
`Orange Book-listed patents.
`
`-6-
`
`Page 6 of 11
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 7 of 25 PageID: 7
`
`30.
`
`Reddy continues to seek approval of NDA No. 203050 from the FDA and
`
`intends to continue in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of
`
`generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous solutions prior to the expiration of the (cid:146)094
`
`patent.
`
`31.
`
`By seeking approval of its NDA to engage in the commercial manufacture,
`
`use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous
`
`solutions prior to the expiration of the (cid:146)094 patent, Reddy has infringed that patent pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`32.
`
`Reddy Ltd. and Reddy Inc. are jointly and severally liable for any
`
`infringement of the (cid:146)094 patent. This is because, upon information and belief, Reddy Ltd. and
`
`Reddy Inc. actively and knowingly caused to be submitted, assisted with, participated in,
`
`contributed to, and/or directed the submission of NDA No. 203050 to the FDA.
`
`33.
`
`Reddy(cid:146)s active and knowing participation in, contribution to, aiding,
`
`abetting, and/or inducement of the submission to the FDA of NDA No. 203050 constitutes
`
`infringement of the (cid:146)094 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`34.
`
`Plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration that, if Reddy commercially
`
`manufactures, uses, offers for sale, or sells its proposed generic versions of Helsinn(cid:146)s Aloxifi
`
`brand products within the United States, imports its proposed generic versions of Helsinn(cid:146)s
`
`Aloxifi brand products into the United States, and/or induces or contributes to such conduct,
`
`Reddy would infringe the (cid:146)094 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), (b), and/or (c).
`
`35.
`
`Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed by Reddy(cid:146)s infringing activities
`
`unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Plaintiffs do not have an adequate remedy at
`
`law.
`
`-7-
`
`Page 7 of 11
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 8 of 25 PageID: 8
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that:
`
`A.
`
`A Judgment be entered declaring that Defendants Reddy Ltd. and Reddy
`
`Inc. have infringed the (cid:146)094 patent by submitting the aforesaid ANDA;
`
`B.
`
`A Judgment be entered declaring that Defendants Reddy Ltd. and Reddy
`
`Inc. have infringed the (cid:146)094 patent by submitting the aforesaid NDA;
`
`C.
`
`An Order be issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A) that the effective
`
`date of any approval of Defendants(cid:146) ANDA identified in this Complaint be a date that is not
`
`earlier than the expiration dates of the (cid:146)094 patent, or any later expiration of exclusivity for the
`
`(cid:146)094 patent to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`D.
`
`An Order be issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A) that the effective
`
`date of any approval of Defendants(cid:146) NDA identified in this Complaint be a date that is not earlier
`
`than the expiration date of the (cid:146)094 patent, or any later expiration of exclusivity for the (cid:146)094
`
`patent to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`E.
`
`An Order be issued that Defendants Reddy Ltd. and Reddy Inc., their
`
`officers, agents, servants, and employees, and those persons in active concert or participation
`
`with either of them, are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from commercially
`
`manufacturing, using, offering for sale, importing, or selling the proposed generic versions of
`
`Helsinn(cid:146)s Aloxifi brand products identified in this Complaint, and any other product that
`
`infringes or induces or contributes to the infringement of the (cid:146)094 patent, prior to the expiration
`
`of the (cid:146)094 patent, including any extensions to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled; and
`
`F.
`
`Plaintiffs be awarded such other and further relief as this Court deems just
`
`and proper.
`
`
`
`-8-
`
`Page 8 of 11
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 9 of 25 PageID: 9
`
`Dated: July 7, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: s/ Charles M. Lizza
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, NJ 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`clizza@saul.com
`wbaton@saul.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A. and
`Roche Palo Alto LLC
`
`
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Joseph M. O(cid:146)Malley, Jr.
`Bruce M. Wexler
`Eric W. Dittmann
`David M. Conca
`Gary Ji
`Angela, C. Ni
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`75 East 55th Street
`New York, NY 10022
`(212) 318-6000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`
`Mark E. Waddell
`LOEB & LOEB LLP
`345 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10154
`(212) 407-4127
`mwaddell@loeb.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Roche Palo Alto LLC
`
`-9-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 11
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 10 of 25 PageID: 10
`
`CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULES 11.2 & 40.1
`
`Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 11.2 and 40.1, I hereby certify that the matters
`
`captioned Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No.
`
`11-3962 (MLC)(DEA) and Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy Laboratories, Ltd., et al.,
`
`Civil Action No. 12-2867 (MLC)(DEA) are related to the matter in controversy because the
`
`matter in controversy involves the same plaintiffs, the common defendants Dr. Reddy(cid:146)s
`
`Laboratories, Ltd. and Dr. Reddy(cid:146)s Laboratories, Inc. ((cid:147)Reddy(cid:148)), and in all cases, Reddy is
`
`seeking FDA approval to market a generic version of the same pharmaceutical product.
`
`I further certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the matter in controversy is not
`
`the subject of any other action pending in any court, or of any pending arbitration or
`
`administrative proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: s/ Charles M. Lizza
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, NJ 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`clizza@saul.com
`wbaton@saul.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A. and
`Roche Palo Alto LLC
`
`
`
`
`-10-
`
`Dated: July 7, 2014
`
`
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Joseph M. O(cid:146)Malley, Jr.
`Bruce M. Wexler
`Eric W. Dittmann
`David M. Conca
`Gary Ji
`Angela C. Ni
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`75 East 55th Street
`New York, NY 10022
`(212) 318-6000
`josephomalley@paulhastings.com
`brucewexler@paulhastings.com
`ericdittmann@paulhastings.com
`davidconca@paulhastings.com
`garyji@paulhastings.com
`angelani@paulhastings.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`
`Page 10 of 11
`
`

`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 07/07/14 Page 11 of 25 PageID: 11
`
`Mark E. Waddell
`LOEB & LOEB LLP
`345 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10154
`(212) 407-4127
`mwaddell@loeb.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
` Roche Palo Alto LLC
`
`
`
`-11-
`
`Page 11 of 11

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket