`
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, NJ 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A. and
`Roche Palo Alto LLC
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Joseph M. O’Malley, Jr.
`Bruce M. Wexler
`Eric W. Dittmann
`David M. Conca
`Gary Ji
`Angela C. Ni
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`75 East 55th Street
`New York, NY 10022
`(212) 318-6000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`
`Mark E. Waddell
`LOEB & LOEB LLP
`345 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10154
`(212) 407-4127
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Roche Palo Alto LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`HELSINN HEALTHCARE S.A. and
`ROCHE PALO ALTO LLC,
`
`Civil Action No. 14-4274 (MLC)(DEA)
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, LTD. and
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
`PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`(Filed Electronically)
`
`Plaintiffs Helsinn Healthcare S.A. and Roche Palo Alto LLC (collectively,
`
`“Plaintiffs”), for their Amended Complaint against Defendants Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd.
`
`Helsinn Healthcare Exhibit 2084
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al. v. Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`Trial PGR2016-00007
`
`Page 1 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 2 of 39 PageID: 84
`
`and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, “Reddy” or “Defendants”), 1 hereby allege as
`
`follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Helsinn Healthcare S.A. is a Swiss corporation having its
`
`principal place of business at Via Pian Scairolo, 9, CH-6912 Lugano-Pazzallo, Switzerland.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Roche Palo Alto LLC is a company organized and existing under
`
`the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at One DNA Way, South
`
`San Francisco, California 94080-4990.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Reddy Ltd. is an Indian
`
`corporation having a place of business at 7-1-27, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy Ltd., itself and through its wholly owned subsidiary and
`
`agent Defendant Reddy Inc., a New Jersey corporation, manufactures generic drugs for sale and
`
`use throughout the United States, including in this judicial district. Reddy Ltd. has previously
`
`consented to personal jurisdiction in this Court, including in the related actions Helsinn
`
`Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 11-3962
`
`(MLC)(DEA), Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil
`
`Action No. 11-5579 (MLC)(DEA), and Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s
`
`Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 13-5815 (MLC)(DEA), the latter two of which were
`
`consolidated with Civil Action No. 11-3962, and Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s
`
`Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 12-2867 (MLC)(DEA).
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Reddy Inc. is a corporation
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, having a place of business at
`
`200 Somerset Corporate Boulevard, Floor 7, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807, and is a wholly
`
`1 Defendants have consented to Plaintiffs’ amendment of their Complaint pursuant to Fed. R.
`Civ. P. 15(a)(2).
`
`-2-
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 3 of 39 PageID: 85
`
`owned subsidiary and agent of Defendant Reddy Ltd. Upon information and belief, Reddy Inc.
`
`is registered to do business in New Jersey and does business in this judicial district. Reddy Inc.
`
`has previously consented to personal jurisdiction in this Court, including in the related actions
`
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action
`
`No. 11-3962 (MLC)(DEA), Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd., et
`
`al., Civil Action No. 11-5579 (MLC)(DEA), and Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s
`
`Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 13-5815 (MLC)(DEA), the latter two of which were
`
`consolidated with Civil Action No. 11-3962, and Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al. v. Dr. Reddy’s
`
`Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 12-2867 (MLC)(DEA).
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`5.
`
`This is a civil action concerning the infringement of United States Patent
`
`No. 8,729,094 (“the ’094 patent”) and United States Patent No. 9,066,980 (“the ’980 patent”).
`
`This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 100 et seq., and the
`
`Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-02.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`6.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant
`
`to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-02.
`
`7.
`
`This Court may declare the rights and other legal relations of the parties
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-02 because this case is an actual controversy within the Court’s
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`8.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court as to each Defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1391(b), (c), and/or (d) and 1400(b).
`
`9.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants by virtue
`
`of the fact that, inter alia, each Defendant has committed, aided, abetted, contributed to, and/or
`
`-3-
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 4 of 39 PageID: 86
`
`participated in the commission of a tortious act of patent infringement that has led to foreseeable
`
`harm and injury to Plaintiffs. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants for the
`
`additional reasons set forth below and for other reasons that will be presented to the Court if such
`
`jurisdiction is challenged.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant Reddy Ltd.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant Reddy Inc.
`
`THE PATENTS
`
`12.
`
`On May 20, 2014 the ’094 patent, titled “Liquid Pharmaceutical
`
`Formulations of Palonosetron,” was duly and legally issued to Plaintiffs as assignees. A copy of
`
`the ’094 patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`13.
`
`On June 30, 2015 the ’980 patent, titled “Liquid Pharmaceutical
`
`Formulations of Palonosetron,” was duly and legally issued to Plaintiffs as assignees. A copy of
`
`the ’980 patent is attached as Exhibit B.
`
`14.
`
`Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(1), the ’094 and ’980 patents have been
`
`listed in the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) publication titled Approved
`
`Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (also known as the “Orange Book”) as
`
`covering Helsinn’s Aloxi® brand palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous solutions.
`
`ACTS GIVING RISE TO THIS ACTION
`
`COUNT I – INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’094 PATENT BY REDDY’S ANDA
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-14 as if fully set forth herein.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy submitted ANDA No. 201533 to the
`
`FDA under § 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(j)). ANDA
`
`No. 201533 seeks the FDA approval necessary to engage in the commercial manufacture, use,
`
`sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous
`
`-4-
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 5 of 39 PageID: 87
`
`solutions prior to the expiration of the ’094 patent. ANDA No. 201533 specifically seeks FDA
`
`approval to market a generic version of Helsinn’s Aloxi® brand palonosetron hydrochloride
`
`intravenous solutions prior to the expiration of the ’094 patent.
`
`17.
`
`The ’094 patent had not been issued at the time Reddy made its
`
`§ 505(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) certification regarding Plaintiffs’ other Orange Book-listed patents.
`
`18.
`
`The ’094 patent shares the same expiration date as Plaintiffs’ other Orange
`
`Book-listed patents. By seeking FDA approval of its ANDA No. 201533 prior to expiration of
`
`Plaintiffs’ other Orange Book-listed patents, Reddy necessarily seeks approval of that ANDA
`
`prior to expiration of the ’094 patent.
`
`19.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy amended its ANDA to contain a
`
`§ 505(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) certification with respect to the ’094 patent.
`
`20.
`
`Reddy continues to seek approval of ANDA No. 201533 from the FDA
`
`and intends to continue in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or
`
`importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous solutions prior to the expiration
`
`of the ’094 patent.
`
`21.
`
`By seeking approval of its ANDA to engage in the commercial
`
`manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride
`
`intravenous solutions prior to the expiration of the ’094 patent, Reddy has infringed that patent
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`22.
`
`Reddy Ltd. and Reddy Inc. are jointly and severally liable for any
`
`infringement of the ’094 patent. This is because, upon information and belief, Reddy Ltd. and
`
`Reddy Inc. actively and knowingly caused to be submitted, assisted with, participated in,
`
`contributed to, and/or directed the submission of ANDA No. 201533 to the FDA.
`
`-5-
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 6 of 39 PageID: 88
`
`23.
`
`Reddy’s active and knowing participation in, contribution to, aiding,
`
`abetting, and/or inducement of the submission to the FDA of ANDA No. 201533 constitutes
`
`infringement of the ’094 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`24.
`
`Plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration that, if Reddy commercially
`
`manufactures, uses, offers for sale, or sells its proposed generic versions of Helsinn’s Aloxi®
`
`brand products within the United States, imports its proposed generic versions of Helsinn’s
`
`Aloxi® brand products into the United States, and/or induces or contributes to such conduct,
`
`Reddy would infringe the ’094 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), (b), and/or (c).
`
`25.
`
`Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed by Reddy’s infringing activities
`
`unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Plaintiffs do not have an adequate remedy at
`
`law.
`
`COUNT II – INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’094 PATENT
`BY REDDY’S 505(b)(2) APPLICATION
`
`Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-25 as fully set forth herein.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy submitted NDA No. 203050 to the
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`FDA under § 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)).
`
`NDA No. 203050 seeks the FDA approval necessary to engage in the commercial manufacture,
`
`use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous
`
`solutions prior to the expiration of the ’094 patent. NDA No. 203050 specifically seeks FDA
`
`approval to market and sell generic versions of Helsinn’s Aloxi® brand palonosetron
`
`hydrochloride intravenous solutions prior to the expiration of the ’094 patent.
`
`28.
`
`The ’094 patent had not issued at the time Reddy made its
`
`§ 505(b)(2)(A)(iv) certification regarding Plaintiffs’ other Orange Book-listed patents.
`
`29.
`
`The ’094 patent shares the same expiration date as Plaintiffs’ other Orange
`
`Book-listed patents. By seeking FDA approval of its NDA No. 203050 prior to expiration of
`
`-6-
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 7 of 39 PageID: 89
`
`Plaintiffs’ other Orange Book-listed patents, Reddy necessarily seeks approval of that NDA prior
`
`to expiration of the ’094 patent.
`
`30.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy amended its NDA to contain a
`
`§ 505(b)(2)(A)(iv) certification with respect to the ’094 patent.
`
`31.
`
`Reddy continues to seek approval of NDA No. 203050 from the FDA and
`
`intends to continue in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of
`
`generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous solutions prior to the expiration of the ’094
`
`patent.
`
`32.
`
`By seeking approval of its NDA to engage in the commercial manufacture,
`
`use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous
`
`solutions prior to the expiration of the ’094 patent, Reddy has infringed that patent pursuant to
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`33.
`
`Reddy Ltd. and Reddy Inc. are jointly and severally liable for any
`
`infringement of the ’094 patent. This is because, upon information and belief, Reddy Ltd. and
`
`Reddy Inc. actively and knowingly caused to be submitted, assisted with, participated in,
`
`contributed to, and/or directed the submission of NDA No. 203050 to the FDA.
`
`34.
`
`Reddy’s active and knowing participation in, contribution to, aiding,
`
`abetting, and/or inducement of the submission to the FDA of NDA No. 203050 constitutes
`
`infringement of the ’094 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`35.
`
`Plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration that, if Reddy commercially
`
`manufactures, uses, offers for sale, or sells its proposed generic versions of Helsinn’s Aloxi®
`
`brand products within the United States, imports its proposed generic versions of Helsinn’s
`
`Aloxi® brand products into the United States, and/or induces or contributes to such conduct,
`
`Reddy would infringe the ’094 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), (b), and/or (c).
`
`-7-
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 8 of 39 PageID: 90
`
`36.
`
`Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed by Reddy’s infringing activities
`
`unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Plaintiffs do not have an adequate remedy at
`
`law.
`
`COUNT III – INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’980 PATENT
`BY REDDY’S 505(b)(2) APPLICATION
`
`Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-36 as fully set forth herein.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy submitted NDA No. 203050 to the
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`FDA under § 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)).
`
`NDA No. 203050 seeks the FDA approval necessary to engage in the commercial manufacture,
`
`use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous
`
`solutions prior to the expiration of the ’980 patent. NDA No. 203050 specifically seeks FDA
`
`approval to market and sell generic versions of Helsinn’s Aloxi® brand palonosetron
`
`hydrochloride intravenous solutions prior to the expiration of the ’980 patent.
`
`39.
`
`The ’980 patent had not issued at the time Reddy made its
`
`§ 505(b)(2)(A)(iv) certification regarding Plaintiffs’ other Orange Book-listed patents.
`
`40.
`
`The ’980 patent shares the same expiration date as Plaintiffs’ other Orange
`
`Book-listed patents. By seeking FDA approval of its NDA No. 203050 prior to expiration of
`
`Plaintiffs’ other Orange Book-listed patents, Reddy necessarily seeks approval of that NDA prior
`
`to expiration of the ’980 patent.
`
`41.
`
`Upon information and belief, Reddy is required by law to either amend its
`
`NDA to contain a § 505(b)(2)(A)(iv) certification with respect to the ’980 patent, or must
`
`relinquish its request that the FDA approve NDA No. 203050 prior to the expiration of Plaintiffs’
`
`Orange Book-listed patents.
`
`42.
`
`Reddy continues to seek approval of NDA No. 203050 from the FDA and
`
`intends to continue in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of
`
`-8-
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 9 of 39 PageID: 91
`
`generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous solutions prior to the expiration of the ’980
`
`patent.
`
`43.
`
`By seeking approval of its NDA to engage in the commercial manufacture,
`
`use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation of generic palonosetron hydrochloride intravenous
`
`solutions prior to the expiration of the ’980 patent, Reddy has infringed that patent pursuant to
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`44.
`
`Reddy Ltd. and Reddy Inc. are jointly and severally liable for any
`
`infringement of the ’980 patent. This is because, upon information and belief, Reddy Ltd. and
`
`Reddy Inc. actively and knowingly caused to be submitted, assisted with, participated in,
`
`contributed to, and/or directed the submission of NDA No. 203050 to the FDA.
`
`45.
`
`Reddy’s active and knowing participation in, contribution to, aiding,
`
`abetting, and/or inducement of the submission to the FDA of NDA No. 203050 constitutes
`
`infringement of the ’980 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`46.
`
`Plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration that, if Reddy commercially
`
`manufactures, uses, offers for sale, or sells its proposed generic versions of Helsinn’s Aloxi®
`
`brand products within the United States, imports its proposed generic versions of Helsinn’s
`
`Aloxi® brand products into the United States, and/or induces or contributes to such conduct,
`
`Reddy would infringe the ’980 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), (b), and/or (c).
`
`47.
`
`Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed by Reddy’s infringing activities
`
`unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Plaintiffs do not have an adequate remedy at
`
`law.
`
`-9-
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 10 of 39 PageID: 92
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that:
`
`A.
`
`A Judgment be entered declaring that Defendants Reddy Ltd. and Reddy
`
`Inc. have infringed the ’094 patent by submitting the aforesaid ANDA;
`
`B.
`
`A Judgment be entered declaring that Defendants Reddy Ltd. and Reddy
`
`Inc. have infringed the ’094 patent by submitting the aforesaid NDA;
`
`C.
`
`A Judgment be entered declaring that Defendants Reddy Ltd. and Reddy
`
`Inc. have infringed the ’980 patent by submitting the aforesaid NDA;
`
`D.
`
`An Order be issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A) that the effective
`
`date of any approval of Defendants’ ANDA identified in this Amended Complaint be a date that
`
`is not earlier than the expiration date of the ’094 patent, or any later expiration of exclusivity for
`
`the ’094 patent to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`E.
`
`An Order be issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A) that the effective
`
`date of any approval of Defendants’ NDA identified in this Amended Complaint be a date that is
`
`not earlier than the expiration date of the ’094 patent, or any later expiration of exclusivity for
`
`the ’094 patent to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`F.
`
`An Order be issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A) that the effective
`
`date of any approval of Defendants’ NDA identified in this Amended Complaint be a date that is
`
`not earlier than the expiration date of the ’980 patent, or any later expiration of exclusivity for
`
`the ’980 patent to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`G.
`
`An Order be issued that Defendants Reddy Ltd. and Reddy Inc., their
`
`officers, agents, servants, and employees, and those persons in active concert or participation
`
`with either of them, are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from commercially
`
`manufacturing, using, offering for sale, importing, or selling the proposed generic versions of
`
`-10-
`
`Page 10 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 11 of 39 PageID: 93
`
`Helsinn’s Aloxi® brand products identified in this Amended Complaint, and any other product
`
`that infringes or induces or contributes to the infringement of the ’094 patent, prior to the
`
`expiration of the ’094 patent, including any extensions to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`H.
`
`An Order be issued that Defendants Reddy Ltd. and Reddy Inc., their
`
`officers, agents, servants, and employees, and those persons in active concert or participation
`
`with either of them, are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from commercially
`
`manufacturing, using, offering for sale, importing, or selling the proposed generic versions of
`
`Helsinn’s Aloxi® brand products identified in this Amended Complaint, and any other product
`
`that infringes or induces or contributes to the infringement of the ’980 patent, prior to the
`
`expiration of the ’980 patent, including any extensions to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`and
`
`and proper.
`
`I.
`
`Plaintiffs be awarded such other and further relief as this Court deems just
`
`-11-
`
`Page 11 of 12
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-04274-MLC-DEA Document 22 Filed 09/02/15 Page 12 of 39 PageID: 94
`
`Dated: September 2, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: s/ Charles M. Lizza
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, NJ 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`clizza@saul.com
`wbaton@saul.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A. and
`Roche Palo Alto LLC
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Joseph M. O’Malley, Jr.
`Bruce M. Wexler
`Eric W. Dittmann
`David M. Conca
`Gary Ji
`Angela C. Ni
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`75 East 55th Street
`New York, NY 10022
`(212) 318-6000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`
`Mark E. Waddell
`LOEB & LOEB LLP
`345 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10154
`(212) 407-4127
`mwaddell@loeb.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Roche Palo Alto LLC
`
`
`
`-12-
`
`Page 12 of 12