throbber
Helsinn Healthcare Exhibit 2068
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al. v. Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`Trial PGR2016-00007
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`
`
`
`Receipt date: 03/27/2014
`
`
`
`
`
`33901830 ~ GAL}: 1628
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`
`
`STATEMENT BY APPLICANT
`
`
`
`
`
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Application Number
`
`
`
`I’:"”"’9NDa‘edl
`
`
`‘'3
`?""e
`"V6" °’
`Art Unit
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Complete if Known
`13/901,830
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gay 24tC2E$ERAR|
`
`'°l9'°
`1628
`
`Shir|ey V_ GEMBEH
`
`
`
`
`244168-000007-US-9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NONPATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS
`
`
`
`Expert Report of Patrick P. DeLuca, Ph.D., dated September 9, 2013 (D.N.J. Case Nos. 11-3962 and 11-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5579; consolidated) (confidentiality designation and other portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Expert Report of Paul Myrdal, Ph.D., dated September 9, 2013 (D.N.J. Case Nos. 11-3962 and 11-5579;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`consolidated) (confidentiality designation and other portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Complaint for patent infringement filed by Helsinn Healthcare S.A. and Roche Palo Alto LLC against
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc. d/b/a Bedford Laboratories regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 7,947,724, 7,947,725,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7,960,424, and 8,518,981 dated September 25, 2013 (D. Del. Case No. 13-1612).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reply Expert Report of Patrick P. DeLuca, Ph.D., dated November 22, 2013 (D.N.J. Case Nos. 11-3962 and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11-5579; consolidated) (confidentiality designation redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`Reply Expert Report of David G. Frame, Pharm. D., dated November 27, 2013 (D.N.J. Case Nos. 11-3962
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and 11-5579; consolidated) (confidentiality designation redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reply Expert Report of Jack Geltosky, Ph.D., dated November 22, 2013 (D.N.J. Case Nos. 11-3962 and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11-5579; consolidated) (confidentiality designation and other portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reply Expert Report of Lee Kirsch, Ph.D., dated November 22, 2013 (D.N.J. Case No. 11-3962 and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11-5579; consolidated) (confidentiality designation redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`Reply Expert Report of Paul Myrdal, Ph.D., dated November 22, 2013 (D.N.J. Case No. 11-3962 and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11-5579; consolidated) (confidentiality designation redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`Reply Expert Report of Dr. Bert Spilker, dated November 22, 2013 (D.N.J. Case No. 11-3962 and 11-5579;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`consolidated) (confidentiality designation and other portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Accord Healthcare, Inc. Paragraph IV Letter regarding U.S. Patent No. 8,518,981 dated October 2, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(portions redacted).
`
`
`Bedford Laboratories division of Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc. Paragraph IV Letter regarding U.S. Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 8,518,981 dated October 16, 2013 (portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sandoz Inc. Paragraph IV Letter regarding U.S. Patent No. 8,518,981 dated December 16, 2013.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. Paragraph IV Letter regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,598,218 and 8,598,219 dated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`January 21, 2014 (portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`Sandoz Inc. Paragraph IV Letter regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,598,218 and 8,598,219 dated February 3,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2014 (portions redacted).
`
`
`
`Bedford Laboratories division of Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc. Paragraph IV Letter regarding U.S. Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nos. 8,598,218 and 8,598,219 dated February 6, 2014 (portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.‘s and Auromedics Pharma LLC‘s Amended Answer, Affirmative
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defenses, and Counterclaims regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 7,947,724, 7,947,725, 7,960,424, 8,518,981,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8,598,218, and 8,598,219, dated February 11, 2014 (D. Del. Case No. 13-688).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ben Venue Laboratories, |nc.‘s Answer and Counterclaims to Amended Complaint regarding U.S. Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nos. 7,947,724, 7,947,725, 7,960,424, 8,518,981, 8,598,218, and 8,598,219, dated February 24, 2014 (D.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Del. Case No. 13-1612).
`
`
`
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement filed by Helsinn Healthcare S.A. and Roche Palo Alto LLC against Accord
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Healthcare, Inc. and Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,598,218 and 8,598,219 dated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`December 27, 2013 (D. Del. Case No. 13-2101).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cipla Limited Paragraph IV Letter regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 7,947,724, 7,947,725, 7,960,424, 8,518,981,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8,598,218, and 8,598,219 dated February 24, 2014 (portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.‘s and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, |nc.‘s Invalidity Contentions regarding U.S.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Nos. 8,518,981, 8,598,218, and 8,598,219 dated March 17, 2014 (D.N.J. Case No. 13-5815)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(confidentiality designation and other portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sandoz |nc.‘s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to L. Pat. R. 3.3 and 3.6(c) regarding U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8,518,981, 8,598,218, and 8,598,219 dated March 17, 2014 (D.N.J. Case No. 13-5815) (confidentiality
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`designation and other portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.‘s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to L. Pat. R. 3.6(c) regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,518,981, 8,598,218, and 8,598,219 dated March 17,2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(D.N.J. Case No. 13-5815) (confidentiality designation and other portions redacted).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`\l(73l\)
`
`\l(73 01
`
`766
`
`767
`
`768
`
`769
`
`770
`
`771
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`772
`
`773
`
`774
`
`775
`
`Examiner
`
`I’
`‘\
`/ ,1‘. AI’
`if“ ;
`/"{"‘i
`Date
`
`
`
`Wet utmbtht at -10%-4: -
`
`
`
`
`
`EXAMINER:
`Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`citation if not in conformance and not considered.
`Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSEBEREID EXCEPT WHERE UNEE) THRQUGH.
`
`
`
`/SQ./’
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`Page 2 of 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket