throbber
eceimdaterm/20/2012
`
`'”F°R""”'°” °"°‘°L°S”RE
`STATEMENT BY A'°P”°A"T
`(Not for submission under 37 CFR 1.99)
`
`June 8, 2009 Bonadeo Declaration
`
`June 8, 2009 Bonadeo Declaration, Exhibit 2
`
`June 8, 2009 Bonadeo Declaration, Exhibit 3
`
`HELSNO117262-69 ( 0 8)
`
`HELSN0117270-312
`
`(2 O 1 2)
`
`February 13, 2007 Statutory Declaration of Daniele Bonadeo, with Exhibit A
`
`November 21. 2007 Statutory Declaration of Giorgio Calderari. Daniele Bonadeo, Roberta Cannella. Enrioo Braglia.
`and Riccardo Braglia
`
`EFSWeb2.1.17
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONS|DERED EXCEPT WHERE UNED THROUGH.
`
`/'S.G./
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Helsinn Healthcare Exhibit 2064
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al_ v. Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`Trial PGR2016—00O07
`
`

`
`
`
`scalp? dais 12/20/2012
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`
`
`
`STATEMENT BY A'°'°”°A”T
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Not for submission under 37 CFR 1.99)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Filing Date
`
`
`First Named Inventor
`
`
`
`
`
`2011-04-14
`
`Giorgio Calderari
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_\_\_\00\l(DU‘!-B(.0
`
`_\
`
`1
`
`_\
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reddy’s Paragraph IV notice regarding all three patents (D. N.J. Case No. 12-2867) March 3 O ,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 O l 2
`
`
`
`May 11,2012 Complaint for patent infringementfiled by Helsinn and Roche (D. N.J. Case No. 12-2867)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`June 26,2012 Notice of Reddy’s motion to dismiss (D. N.J. Case No. 12-2867)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`June 26,2012 Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd.'s and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, |nc.’s memorandum of law in support of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`their motion to dismiss orfor summaryjudgment of non—infringement of U.S. patent No. 7,947,724 (D. N.J. Case No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12-2867) (including Exhibits 1-10)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Aug. 16, 2012 Notice of Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for partial summaryjudgment of infringement (D. N.J. Case No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12-2867)
`
`
`Aug. 6, 2012, Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss orfor summaryjudgment of noninfringement and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cross-motion for partial summaryjudgment of infringement (D. N.J. Case No. 12-2867) (including exhibits 1-4)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Schoneich declaration (D. N.J. Case No. 12-2867) (Including Exhibits A and 1-24)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Aug .
`
`
`
`6 ,
`
`
`
`2 O 1 2)
`
`
`
`Sept. 4, 2012 Reddy’s brief in opposition to Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for partial summaryjudgment and reply
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`memorandum of law in further support of Reddy’s motion to dismiss or for summaryjudgment of non—infringement (D.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`N.J. Case No. 12-2867) (Including Exhibits 1-4)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DeLuca Declaration (D. N.J. Case No. 12-2867) (Including exhibits A-J)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Sept .
`
`
`
`2 O ,
`
`
`
`2 O 1 2)
`
`
`
`Sept. 10, 2012 Plaintiffs‘ letter to Judge Cooper in response to Reddy’s combined opposition to Plaintiffs’ cross-motion
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for partial summary judgment and reply in support of Reddy’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`noninfringement (D. N.J. Case No. 12-2867) (including exhibits A and B)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sept. 14, 2012 Dr. Reddy’s letter in response to Plaintiffs’ September 10, 2012 letter (D. N.J. Case No. 12-2867)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A (O
`
`
`
`l\J O
`
`
`
`l\) _\
`
`
`l\Jl\J
`
`
`
`EFSWeb2.1.17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSHDEREED EXCEPT WHERE UNEE) THROUGH.
`
`
`
`/SG./’
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`
`
`
`scalp? data 12/20/2012
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
`
`
`
`STATEMENT BY A'°'°”°A”T
`(Not for submission under 37 CFR 1.99)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Filing Date
`
`
`First Named Inventor
`
`
`
`
`
`2011-04-14
`
`Giorgio Calderari
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If you wish to add additional non—patent literature document citation information please click the Add button
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXAMINER SIGNATURE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ghimgy Gemnem IIIEEM4/gmg)
`Examiner Signature
`| Date Considered
`
`
`
`*EXAM|NER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`citation if not in conformance and not considered.
`Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘See Kind Codes of USPTO Patent Documents at www.USF'TO.GOVor MPEP 901.04. 2Enter office that issued the document, by the two-letter code (WIPO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Standard ST.3). 3For Japanese patent documents, the indication of the year of the reign of the Emperor must precede the serial number of the patent document.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘Kind of document by the appropriate symbols as indicated on the document under WIPO Standard ST.16 if possible. 5Applicant is to place a check mark here if
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`English language translation is attached.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EFSWeb2.1.17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`
`
`
`/SG./’
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket