throbber
Page 1 of 15
`
`Helsinn Healthcare Exhibit 2055
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al. v. Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`Trial PGR2016-00007
`
`

`
`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 2
`
`
`FDA's Fediatric Rule [at 21 CFR 314.55/21 CFR 601.27} was challenged in court. On October 17,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2002, the court rated that FDA did not have the authority to issue the Pediatric Rule and has barred
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FDA from enforcing it. Although the government decided not to pursue an appeal in the courts, it will
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`work with Congress in an effort to enact iegislation requiring pharmaceutical manufacturers to conduct
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`appropriate pediatric clinical trials. In addition, third party interveners have decided to appeal the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`court's decision striking down the rule. Therefore, we encourage you to submit a pediatric plan that
`describes development of your product in the pediatric population where it may be used. Please be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aware‘ that whether or not this pediatric plan and subsequent submission of pediatric data will be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`required depends upon passage of legislation or the success of the third party appeal. In any event, we
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hope you wiil decide to submit a pediatric plan and conduct the appropriate pediatric studies to provide
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`important information on the safe and effective use of this drug in the relevant pediatric populations.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The pediatric exciusivity provisions of FDAMA as reauthorized by the Best Pharmaceuticals for
`Children Act are not affected by the court's ruling. Pediatric studies conducted under the terms of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`section 505A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act may result in additional marketing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`exclusivity for certain products. You should refer to the Guidance for hidustry on Qualifying for
`Pediatric Exc1usivity(availabie on our web site at www.fda.govlcder/pediatric) for details. We
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acknowledge your fume 26, 2003 “Proposed Pediatric Study Request" submitted under JND 39,797.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`We are reviewing your submission and will respond to your proposal in a separate letter. FDA.
`generally does not consider studies submitted to an NDA before issuance of 21 Written Request as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`responsive to the Written Request. Applicants should obtain a Written Request before submitting
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pediatric studies to an NDA.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In addition, submit three copies ofthe introductory promotional materials that you propose to use for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`this product. Submit all proposed materials in draft or mocleup form, not final print. Send one copy to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`this division and two copies of both the promotional materiais and the package insert directly to:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD—42
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`
`5600 Fishers Lane
`
`
`
`Rockvillc. MD 20857
`
`
`
`
`
`Please submit one market package of the drug product when it is available.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`We have not completed validation of the reguiatory methods. However, we expect your continued
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_ cooperation to resolve any problems that may be identified.
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA (21 CFR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`314.80 and 314.81). In addition, we request that you initiate a 15-day report [21 CFR. 3 i4.80(c)] for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`each of the following:
`
`
`
`
`- All spontaneous reports of constipation requiring hospitalization or emergency room visit
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0 All spontaneous reports of possible compiications of constipation such as obstruction,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`perforation, intestinal ulceration, toxic rnegacolon, ileus, or impaction resulting in
`hospitalization or emergency room visit
`
`
`
`
`
`0 Ail spontaneous reports of any cardiovascular adverse event
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The McdWatch—to—Manufactm-er Program provides nianufacturers with copies of serious adverse event
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reports that are received directly by the FDA. New molecular entities and important new biologics
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`;
`g
`'
`
`j
`:
`
`1
`
`*
`
`
`
`I
`
`Page2 of 15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HELSN0387520
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 15
`
`

`
`NDA 21-372
`Page 3
`
`
`
`
`qualify for inclusion for three years after approval. Your firm is eligible to receive copies of reports for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`this product. To paxticipate in the program, please see the enrollment instructions and program
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`description details at www. fda.gov/medwatch/reportfmm};.l1t1n.
`
`
`If you have any questions, call Brian Strongin, R.Ph., M.B.A., Regulatory Project Manager at (301)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`827-7473.
`
`
`S incerely,
`
`
`{See appended electronic sfigmmture page}
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Julie Beitz, MD.
`
`
`
`Deputy Director
`
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation HI
`
`
`
`
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`Enclosure
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HELSN0387521
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 15
`
`

`
`NDA 21-372
`Page 4
`
`Aloxlm (Palonosetron Hydrochloride) Injection
`
`I-Ielslnn 1-lealthcare S.A. NDA 21-372 Palonosetron: Proposed Labeling
`DESCRIPTION
`Alexi‘ (palonosetron hydrochloride) is an antiemetlc and antirtauseant agent. It is a selective serotonin
`subtype 3 (5-l-I13) receptor antagonist with a strong binding sflinity for this receptor Chemically,
`pelonosotron hydrochloride is: (3a§)—2-[(_S_)-1-Azabicyclo [2.2.2]oct-3-yi.]-2,3,3a,4,S,6-hexa.hydro-1-
`oxo- lHbenz[de]isoquinoline hydrochloride. The empirical formula is C19H24N20 HC1, with a
`molecular weight of 332 87 Palonosetron hydrochloride exists as a single isomer and has the
`following structural formula:
`
`4
`
`N
`
`O
`
`N\\‘
`
`H
`
`'0 H
`
`HCI.
`
`‘
`‘
`
`Q
`
`I
`'
`
`Palonosetron hydrochloride is a white to off-white crystalline powder. It is Ereely soluble in water,
`soluble in propylene glycol, and slightly soluble in ethanol and 2-propanol.
`Aloxi injection is a sterile, clear. colorless, non-pyrogenic, isotonic, buffered solution for intravenous
`administration. Bach 5-nil vial of Aloxi injection contains 0.25 mg palonosetron base as
`hydrochloride, 207.5 mg mannitol, disodium edetate and citrate bufier in water for intravenous
`administration. The pH of the solution is 4.5 to 5.5.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`
`flisnnmrlrnsndst
`
`Palonosetron is a selective 5-HT; receptor antagonist with a strong binding affinity for this receptor
`and little or no afllmty for other receptors.
`
`Cancer chemotherapy may be associated with a high incidence of nausea and vomiting, particularly
`when certain agents, such as cisplntin, are used. 5-HT; receptors are located on the nerve terminals of
`the vagus in the periphery and centrally in the chemorcceptor trigger zone of the area postrerna.
`It ls
`thought that chemotherapwuc agents produce nausea and vomiting by releasing serotonin from the
`ontcroclwomalfin cells of the small intestine and that the released serotomn then activates 5-HT;
`receptors located on vagal affercnts to initiate the vomiting reflex.
`
`iadanork of Hetshn Heeltnceru sn
`1 Pencil
`Ilzorland
`worm.
`oowmomo Helslnn l-leallhcera SA. 2003
`All lmls reserved
`
`Page 4 of 15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`HELSN0387522
`
`

`
`‘
`
`i
`
`'
`
`.
`f
`
`‘
`
`I
`
`:
`l
`
`I
`
`I
`i
`\
`
`NDA 21.372
`Page 5
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`The effect ofpalonos etron on blood pressure, heart rate, and ECG parameters including QTc were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comparable to ondansctron and dolasetron in clinical trials. In non-clinical studies palonosetron
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`possesses the ability to block ion channels involved in ventricular de- and re-polarization and to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prolong action potential duration. In clinical trials, the dose-response relationship to the QTc interval
`
`
`has not been fully evaluated.
`
`
`
`
`
`Phaz-niaeoklnetics
`
`
`
`
`Afler intravenous dosing of palonosetron in healthy subjects and cancer patients, an initial decline in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plasma concentrations is followed by a slow elimination from the body. Mean maximum plasma
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration (Cmu) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUG...) are generally dose-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`proportional over the dose range of 03-90 uglicg in healthy subjects and in cancer patients. Following
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`single N dose of palonosetron at 3 pgllcg (or 0.21 mg/70 kg) to six cancer patients, mean (iSD)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`maximum plasma concentration was estimated to be 5.6 i 5.5 ng/mL and mean AUC was 35.8 i 20.9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ngohf/IEL.
`
`
`
`
`Distribution
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Palonosetron has a volume of distribution of approximately 8.3 i 2.5 Llkg. Approximately 62% of
`palonosetron is bound to plasma proteins.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Metabolism
`
`
`
`Palonosetron is eliminated by multiple routes with approxirnately 50% metabolized to form two
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`primary metabolites: N-oxide-palonosetton and 6~S-hydroxypalonosetron. These metabolites each
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`have less than 1% of the 5-HT; receptor antagonist activity ofpalonosetron. In vitro metabolism
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`studies have suggested that CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent, CYPEA and CYP1A2 are involved in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`metabolism of palonosetron. However, clinical pharmacokinetic parameters are not significantly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`different between poor and extensive metabolizers of CYPZD6 substrates.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Elimination
`
`
`
`'
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Afier a single intravenous dose of 10 figfkg [”C]—pa1onosetron, approximately 80% of the dose was
`
`
`
`recovered within 144 hours in the urine with pal-onosetron representing approximately 40% of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`administered dose. In healthy subjects the total body clearance of palonosetron was l60 :|: 35 mLfh/kg
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`' and renal clearance was 66.51: [82 mLfhll<g . Mean terminal elimination half-life is approximately 40
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hours.
`
`
`
`ggecial Populations
`0
`I
`Geriatrics
`
`
`
`
`
`Population PK analysis and clinical Safely and efficacy data did not reveal any differences between
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cancer patients 2 65 years of age and younger patients (18 to 64 years). No dose adjustment is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`required for these patients.
`
`
`
`
`
`—I
`
`
`
`,_e
`
`I
`
`Page 5 of 15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HELSN0387523
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 15
`
`

`
`’
`
`.
`
`1
`I
`
`I
`
`‘
`
`5
`
`v
`_
`'
`
`E
`1
`
`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 6
`
`
`Race
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Intravenous paionosetron pharrnacokinetics was characterized in twenty-four healthy Japanese subjects
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`over the dose range of 3 — 90 trglkg. Total body clearance was 25% higher in Japanese subjects
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compared to Whites, however, no dose adjustment is required. The pharrnacokinetics of palonosetron
`in Blacks has not been adequately characterized.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Renal Impairment
`
`
`Mild to moderate renal impairment does notsignificantly affect palonosetron pharrnaookinetic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`parameters. Total systemic exposure increased by approximateiy 28% in severe renal impairment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`relative to healthy subjects. Dosage adjustment is not necessary in patients with any degree of renal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`impairment.
`
`
`Hepatic Impairment
`
`
`
`
`Hepatic impairment does not significantly affect total body clearance of patorrosetron compared to the-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`healthy subjects. Dosage adjustment is not necessary in patients with any degree of hepatic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`impairment.
`
`
`
`Drug-Drug Interactions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Palonosetron is eliminated from the body through both renal excretion and metabolic pathways with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the latter mediated via multiple CYP enzymes. Further in virro studies indicated that palonosetron is
`not an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYPZB6, CYPZC9, CPYZD5. CYP2Ei and CYP3A4/5 ,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(CYP2C 19 was not investigated) nor does it induce the activity of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, or CYP3A4/5.
`Therefore the potential for ciinically significant drug interactions with pslonosetron appears to be low.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A study in healthy volunteers involving single-dose IV palonosctron (0.75 mg) and steady state oral
`rnetociopramide (10 mg four times daily) dernonstrated no significant pharmacokiuetic interaction.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|
`_
`
`_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In controlled clinical trials, Aloxi injection has been safely administered with corticosteroids;
`analgesics, antiemetics/antinauseants, antispasmodics and anticholinergic agents.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Palonosetzcon did not inhibit the antitumor activity of the five chemotherapeutic agents tested (cisplatin,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cyclophospharnide, cytarabine, doxorubicin and mitornycin C) in murine tumor models.
`
`CLINICAL STUDIES
`
`
`Efficacy of single-dose palonosetron injection in preventing acute and delayed nausea and vomiting
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`induced by both moderately and highly emctogcnic chemotherapy was studied in three Phase 3 trials
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and one Phase 2 trial. In these double-blind studies, complete response rates (no emetic episodes and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`no rescue medication) and other efficacy parameters were assessed through at least 120 hours after
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page6 of 15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HELSN0387524
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 15
`
`

`
`NBA 21«372
`
`Page 7
`
`
`administration of chemotherapy. The safety and efficacy of palonoseiron in repeated courses of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`chemotherapy was also studied.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Two Phase 3, double-blind trials involving 1132 patients compared single-dose IV Alexi with either
`
`
`single-dose IV ondansetron (study 1) or dolasetron (study 2) given 30 minutes prior to moderately
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`emetogenic chemotherapy including cerboplatin, cisplatin 5 50 mglm’, cyclophosphamide < 1500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mg/m’, doxorubicin > 25 mg/In‘, cpirubiciu, irinotecan, and methotrexate > 250 mgm‘. Concomitant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`corticosteroids were not administered prophylactically in study 1 and were only used by 4-6% of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`patients in study 2. The majority of patients in these studies were women (77%), White (65%) and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`naive to previous chemotherapy (54%). The mean age was 55 years.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Highly Emetogenic Chemotheragy
`
`
`
`
`A Phase 2, double-blind, dose-ranging study evaluated the efficacy bf single-dose IV palonosetron
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fiom 0.3 to 90 pgflrg (equivalent to < 0.1 mg to 6 mg fixed dose) in 161 ehemotherapy—naive adult
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cancer patients receiving highly-emetogenic chemotherapy (either cisplatin E: 70 mg/m’ or
`
`cyclophosphamide > 1100 mg/m’). Concomitant corticosteroids were not administered
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prophylactically. Analysis of data from this trial indicates that 0.25 mg is the lowest effective dose in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preventing acute naiisea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
`
`A Phase 3, double-blind trial involving 667 patients compared single-dose W Alexi with single—dose
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IV ondansetron (study 3) given 30 minutes prior to highly emetogenic chemotherapy including
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cisplatin 2 60 mg/ml, cyclophosphamide > 1500 mglm‘, and dacarbazine. Corticosteroids were co-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`administered prophylactically before chemotherapy in 67% of patients. Of the 667 patients, 51% were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`women, 60% White, and 59% naive to previous chemotherapy. The mean age was 52 years.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Efficacy Results
`
`
`
`
`'
`
`
`
`The antiemetic activity of Aloxi was evaluated during the acute phase (0-24 hours) [Table 1], delayed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`phase (24-I20 hours) {Table 2], and overall phase (0420 hours) [Table 3] posmhemotherapy in Phase
`, 3 trials.
`
`
`
`
`i
`,
`3
`

`
`H
`
`
`
`I
`
`Page 7 of 15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HELSN0387525
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 15
`
`

`
`NDA 21-372
`
`
`Page 8
`
`
`Table 1:
`
`
`
`
`Prevention of Acute Nausea and Vomiting (0-24 hours):
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Com Iete Res - onse Rates
`
`
`
`
`“In with
`
`
`
`_
`[-1%, 32%]
`I—.——---—-4
`
`
`
`
`
`J
`
`
`
`I
`-9%, 13% I
`:——|j-I---r----r---I--I---r—-r--1
`
`-10-50 5101520251035
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dliferenec In Compute Respnnn Rate:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a lntent—ta-lreatcohort
`b 1-sicIud.l-‘ishc:-‘s exact test. SigniI'Icanca1avr:Iatu-=o,o25.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`c These studies were designed to show norrinfctiorily. A lower hound gmstcr than -—lS% demonstxates non-inferiority between Alexi and oompamlor.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`These studiesshow th'c1tA10xi was effective in the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting associated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with initial and repeat courses of moderately and highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. In study 3,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cfficacy was greater when prophylactic corticosteroids were administered concomitantly. Clinical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`superiority over other 5—HT3 receptor antagonists has not been adequately demonstrated in the acute
`phase.
`
`
`4
`
`\
`
`Page 8 of 15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HELSN0387526
`
`
`
`
`
`C°“‘P1°*°
`Response
`
`
`
`
`97.5% Confidence Interval
`
`
`
`3
`.
`.
`Alma mmus Comparator
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CI1emo-
`
`Study
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`_,
`
`l2%,13%} Emetoge
`
`Page 8 of 15
`
`

`
`Prevention of Delayed Nausea and Vomiting (24~l20 hours):
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Comlete Resonse Rates
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Moderate
`
`1y
`
`
`Emetoge
`nic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`V
`
`V
`
`_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`'
`
`
`
` ‘
`
`NDA 21-372
`Page 9
`
`
`
`
`'-
`'
`
`Table 2:
`
`
`
`p~vaIue
`
`1'
`
`
`
`43.001
`
`
`
`
`_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`74
`
`
`
`55
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`97.5% Confidence Interval
`Aloxi minus Comparator ”
`
`
`
`
`um, 30%;
`
`
`
`'
`
`'
`
`1m,2w.;
`
`
`
`
`—1u—so51n1s:uzssoas
`
`Difference In Complete Response Rain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 8
`
`9
`
`lg
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`II I.nienI—to-Ireatcohon.
`
`
`
`1) Zvsided Fisher’: exact test. Significance level at a.=0.025.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`e Thesestudies were designed to show non-infilriority. A lower bound greater than -I 5% demonstrates non—infcriori£ybetwetn Alexi and compszatnr.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`These studies show that Aloxi was effective in the prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`associated with initial and repeat courses of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"Fable 3:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|
`
`‘
`‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ondanse
`tron 32
`
`In IV
`
`Alex;
`
`(125 mg
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`5
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`: l
`
`Prevention of Overall Nausea and Vomiting (0—120 hours):
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Com lete Res onse Rates
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`% with
`
`Compie
`
`te
`
`Respons
`
`*3
`
`
`p-value
`
`"
`
`
`
`97.5% Confidence Interval
`
`
`
`Aloxi minus Comparator ”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`['1'/a.3I.°fl:]
`
`
`
`
`
`50
`
`45
`
`
`34
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15 2o 25 30 as
`10
`s
`o
`.m .5
`
`
`
`
`
`Dilferenculn Complele Response mm.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`I
`
`-
`
`I
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`a lnlent-lo-trcateuhon
`b 2-sided Fisher's exact lest. Significance lave! nm=D.0a5.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`e These studies was designed to show non-inferierily. A lower bound greater than ~15"/. demonstrates non-infitriority between Alexi and comparator.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`These studies show that Alexi was effective in the prevention of nausea and vomiting throughout the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`120 hours (5 days) following initial and repeat courses of moderately emetogenie cancer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`chemotherapy.
`
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HELSN0387527
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 15
`
`

`
`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 10
`
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`
`
`Aloxi is indicated for;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of
`moderately and highly ernetogenic cancer chemotherapy, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initia} and repeat courses of
`modcratcly crnetogenic cancer chemotherapy.
`
`
`
`
`
`1)
`
`
`
`
`2)
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`‘
`
`I
`
`‘
`'
`
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`
`
`
`-1
`
`
`Aloxi is contraindicated in patients known to have hypersensitivity to the drug or any of its
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`components.
`PRECAUTIONS
`
`
`
`General
`
`Hypersensitivity reactions may occur in patients who have exhibited hypersensitivity to other selective
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`S-HT; receptor antagonists.
`
`
`
`
`Although palonosetron has been safely administered to 192 patients with preexisting cardiac
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`impairment in the Phase 3 studies, Alexi should be administered with caution 11‘! patients who have or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`may develop prolongation of cardiac conduction intervals, particularly QTc. These include patients
`with hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia, patients taking diuretics with potential for inducing electrolyte
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`abnormalities, patients with congenital QT syndrome, patients taking anti~arrhytlunic drugs or other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drugs which lead to QT prolongation, and cumulative high dose anthracycline therapy. In 3 pivotal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`trials, ECGs were obtained at baseline and 24 hours after subjects received palonosetron or a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comparator drug. In a subset of patients ECGs were also obtained 15 minutes following dosing. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`percentage of patients (< 1%) with changes in QT and QTc intervals (either absolute values of > 500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`msec or changes of > 60 msec from baseline) was similar to that seen with the comparator drugs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Drug Interactions
`
`
`
`
`s
`
`Paionosetron is eliminated from the body through both renal excretion and metabolic pathways.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Therefore, the potential for clinically significant drug interactions with palonosetron appears to be low
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Drug-Drug Interactions section).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In a 104-week carcinogenicity study in CD-1 mice, animals were treated with oral doses of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`palonosctron at 10, 30 and 60 mg/kg/day. Treatment with paloncsctron was not tumorigcnic. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`highest tested dose produced a systemic exposure to palonosetron (Plasma AUC) of about 150 to 289
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`times the human exposure (AUC= 29.8 ng-hlml) at the recommended intravenous dose of 0.25 mg. in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a 104-week carcinogenicity study in Sprague-Dawley rats, male and female rats were treated with oral
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`doses of 15, 30 and 60 mg/kg/day and 15, 45 and 90 mg/kgfday, respectively. The highest doses
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`produced a systemic exposure to palonosetron (Plasma AUC) of 137 and 308 times the human
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HELSN0387528
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 15
`
`

`
`E
`
`,
`‘
`
`1
`
`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 11
`
`
`
`
`exposure at the recommended dose. Treatment with palonosetron produced increased incidences of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`adrenal benign pheochromocytoma and combined benign and malignant pheochromocytoma, increased
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`incidences of pancreatic Islet cell adenorna and combined adenoma and carcinoma and pituitary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acienoma in maie rats. In female rate, it produced hepatocelluiar adenorna and carcinoma and increased
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the incidences of thyroid C-cell adenoma and combined adenoma and carcinoma.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Palonosetron was not genotoxic in the Ames test, the Chinese hamster ovarian cell {CHO/I-IGPRT)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`forward mutation test, the ex vivo hepatocyte unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) test or the mouse
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`micronucieus test. It was, however, positive for clastogenic effects in the Chinese hamster ovarian
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Ci-IO) cell chromosomal aberration test.
`
`
`
`
`
`Palonosetron at oral doses up to 60 rnglkg/day (about 1894 times the recommended human intravenous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dose based on body surface area) was found to have no effect on fertility and reproductive performance
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of male and female rats.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`4
`
`
`
`Pregnancy. Teratogenic Effects: Category B
`
`
`
`
`
`Teratology studies have been performed in rats at oral doses up to 60 mglkg/day (1894 times the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`recommended human intravenous dose based on body surface area) and rabbits at oral doses up to 60
`mg/kg/day (3789 times the recommended human intravenous dose based on body surface area) and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`have revealed no evidence of impaired ‘fertility or-harm to the fetus clue to 'palonosetr-on. There are,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`however, no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Because animal reproduction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`studies are not always predictive of human response, palonosetron should be used during pregnancy
`only if clearly needed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-'5;-g
`
`-
`
`Labor and Deliver);
`
`
`
`Palonosetron has not been administered to patients undergoing labor and delivery, so its effects on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mother or child are unknown.
`
`
`
`
`
`Nursing Mothers
`
`
`
`It is not known whether palonosetron is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants and the
`_
`otential for tumorigcnicity shown for palonosetron in the rat carcinogenicity study, a decision should
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`e made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the drug to the mother‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`P b
`
`E
`‘
`
`Pediatric Use
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Safety and effectiveness in patients below the age of 18 years have not been established.
`Geriatric Use
`
`
`Of the 1374 adult cancer patients in clinical studies of palonosetrou, 316 (23%) were 2 65 years old,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`while 71 (5%) were 2 75 years old. No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`between these subjects and the younger subjects but greater sensitivity in some older individuals
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cannot be ruled out. No dose adjustments or special monitoring are required for geriatric patients,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1 1 of 15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HELSN0387529
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 15
`
`

`
`
`
`NDA 21 -3 72
`Page 12
`
`
`ADVERSE REACTIONS
`
`
`
`
`In clinical trials for the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately or highly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`emetogenic chemotherapy, 1374 adult patients received palonosetron. Adverse reactions were similar
`in frequency and severity with Alexi and ondansetron or dolasetron. Following is a listing of all
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`adverse reactions reported by P. 2% of patients in these trials (Table 4).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`;
`-
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`W
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Table 4: Adverse Reactions from Clzemotherapydnduced Nausea and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Vomiting Studies 2 2% in any Treahnent Group
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ondcnsetron
`
`
`Alexi 0.25 mg
`Event
`Doiasetrcn 100 mg
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`32 mg IV
`
`
`
`(N=633)
`
`
`W (N=194)
`
`
`
`
`(N-=41D)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ln other studies, 2 subjects experienced severe constipation following a single palonosetron dose of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`approximately 0.75 neg, three times the recommended dose. One patient received a 10 1.!g/kg oral dose
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in a post—operative nausea and vomiting study and one healthy suhj ect received a 0.75 mg IV dose in a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`phannacokinetic study.
`
`
`
`In clinical trials, the following infrequently reported adverse reactions, assessed by investigators as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`treatment-related or causality unknown, occurred following administration of Alexi to adult patients
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`receiving concomitant cancer chemotherapy:
`
`
`
`
`
`~
`
`Cardiovascular: 1%: non-sustained tachycardia, bradycardia, hypotension, < 1%: hypertension,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`myocardial ischemia, extrasystoles, sinus tachycardia, sinus arrhythmia, supraventricular extrasystoles
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and QT prolongation . In many cases, the relationship to Aloxi was unclear.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dermatological: < 1%: allergic dermatitis, rash.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hearing and Vision: *1 1% motion sickness, tinnitus, eye irritation and amblyopia.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Gastrointestinal system: 1%: diarrhea, < 1%: dyspepsia, abdominal pain, drymouth, hiccups and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`flatulence.
`
`
`‘
`
`General: 1%: weakness, < 1%: fatigue, fever, hot flash, flu-like syndrome.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Liver: < 1%: transient, asymptomatic increases in AST and/or ALT and bilirubin. These changes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`occurred predominantly in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page12of15
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HELSN0387530
`
`
`
`Page 12 of 15
`
`

`
`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 13
`
`
`
`Metaboiic: 1%:hyperI<alen1ia, < 1%: electrolyte fluctuations, hyperglycemia, metabolic acidosis,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`glycosuria, appetite decrease, anorexia.
`
`
`
`
`
`Musculoskeletalz < 1%: arthralgia.
`
`
`
`
`Nervous System: 1%: dizziness, < 1%: somnolence, insomnia, hypersomnia, paraesthesia.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Psychiatric: 1%: anxiety, < 1%: euphoric mood.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Urinary System: < 1%: urinary retention.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Vascular: < 1%: vein discoloration, vein distention.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Overdosage
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`There is no known antidote to Alexi. Overdose should be managed with supportive care. Fifty adult
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cancer patients were administered palonosetron at a dose of 90 ug/kg (equivalent to 6 mg fixed dose)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`as part of a dose ranging study. This is approximately 25 times the recommended dose of 0.25 mg.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This dose group had a similar incidence of adverse events compared to the other dose groups and no
`dose response effects were observed. Dialysis studies have not been perfomxed, however, due to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`large volume of distribution, dialysis is unlikely to be an effective treatment for palonosetron overdose.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A single intravenous close of palonosetron at 30 mg/kg (947 and 474 times the human dose for rate and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mice, respectively, based on body surface area) was lethal to rats

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket