throbber
ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. 23278.2.US.8
`PATENT
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In re Application of:
`
`Giorgio CALDERARI et al.
`
`Application No.: Not Yet Assigned
`
`Continuation-in-Part of U.S. Application
`No. 13/087,012
`
`Filed: Herewith
`
`For: LIQUID PHARMACEUTICAL
`FORMULATIONS OF PALONOSETRON
`
`) Group Art Unit: Not Yet Assigned
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Examiner: Not Yet Assigned
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Confirmation No.: Not Yet Assigned
`)
`)
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Commissioner:
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF CONTINUATION-IN-PART CLAIM SUPPORT
`REQUIRED UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.78(d)(3) AND CHOICE OF LAW
`
`As required by 37 C.F.R. § 1.78(d)(3), as amended effective November 1, 2007,
`
`the undersigned representative of the applicant provides the following information.
`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`
`Claims 1-8 of the above-identified continuation-in-part application find support
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 112 in the provisional application, 60/444,351 ("the '351 Application")
`
`filed January 30, 2003, of co pending Application No. 13/087,012 filed April 4, 2011 (see
`
`Domestic Benefit/National Stage Information in the accompanying Application Data
`
`Sheet, which e.stablishes a chain of copendency and specific reference from copending
`
`Application No. 13/087,012 back to the '351 Application). Thus, claims 1-8 have an
`
`effective filing date (EFD) prior to March 16, 2013.
`
`Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd., et al.
`v.
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A., et al.
`U.S. Patent No. 9,(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:22),(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:21)
`Reddy Exhibit 1016
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`Continuation-in-part of U.S. Application No. 13/087,012
`Identification of Claim Support
`May 23, 2013
`Page 2 of 8
`
`Claim 9 finds support under 35 U.S.C. § 112 only in newly added Example 8 of
`
`the continuation-in-part application filed herewith. Thus, claim 9 has an EFD after
`
`March 15, 2013.
`
`II. Choice of Law
`
`Hence, this application falls under both transition provisions 3(n)(1) (because of
`
`claim 9) and 3(n)(2) (because of claims 1-8) of the America Invents Act (AIA). 1 For that
`
`reason, all of claims 1-9 should, for prior art purposes, be examined solely through the
`
`lenses of AlA §§ 1 02(a)(1 ), (a)(2), and 103, as well as pre-AlA § 1 02(g). That point is
`
`clearly explained by the USPTO:
`
`[S]ection 3(n)(2) does indicate that the prov1s1ons of 35
`U.S.C. 1 02(g), 135, and 291 as in effect on March 15, 2013,
`shall apply to "each claim" of an application for patent, and
`not simply the claim or claims having an effective filing date
`
`1 SEC. 3(n)(1 ): "Except as otherwise provided in this section, the amendments made by
`this section shall take effect upon the expiration of the 18-month period beginning on
`the date of the enactment of this Act [March 16, 2013], and shall apply to any
`application for patent, and to any patent issuing thereon, that contains or contained at
`any time- (A) a claim to a claimed invention that has an effective filing date as defined
`in section 1 OO(i) of title 35, United States Code, that is on or after the effective date
`described in this paragraph [i.e., March 16, 2013]; or (B) a specific reference under
`section 120, 121, 365( c) of title 35, United States Code, to any patent or application that
`contains or contained at any time such claim." (Commentary added for emphasis.)
`
`SEC. 3(n)(2): "The provisions of sections 1 02(g), 135, and 291 of title 35, United States
`Code, as in effect on the day before the effective date set forth in paragraph (1) of this
`subsection [March 15, 2013], shall apply to each claim of an application for patent, and
`any patent issued thereon, for which the amendments made by this section also apply,
`if such application or patent contains or contained at any time- (A) a claim to an
`invention having an effective filing date as defined in section 1 OO(i) of title 35, United
`States Code, that occurs before the effective date set forth in paragraph (1) of this
`subsection [March 16, 2013]; or (B) a specific reference under section 120, 121, or
`365(c) of title 35, United States Code, to any patent or application that contains or
`contained at any time such a claim." (Commentary added for emphasis.)
`
`2
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`Continuation-in-part of U.S. Application No. 13/087,012
`Identification of Claim Support
`May 23, 2013
`Page 3 of 8
`
`that occurs before March 16, 2013, if the condition specified
`in section 3(n)(2) occurs. Therefore, "each claim" of an
`application presenting a claim to a claimed invention that has
`an effective filing date before March 16, 2013 [here claims
`1-8], but also presenting claims to a claimed invention that
`has an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013 [here
`claim 9], is subject to AlA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 and is also
`subject to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 1 02(g), 135, and 291
`as in effect on March 15, 2013.
`
`See Examination Guidelines for Implementing the First Inventor to File Provisions of the
`
`Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 78 Fed. Reg. 11,059, 11,069 (February 14, 2013)
`
`(commentary added for emphasis).
`
`Ill. Claims 1-8 Find Support in and Have an EFD of the Pre-AlA '351 Application
`
`A. Claim 1
`
`Claim 1 recites "[a] pharmaceutical single-use, unit-dose
`
`formulation
`
`for
`
`intravenous administration to a human to reduce the likelihood of cancer chemotherapy-
`
`induced nausea and vomiting, comprising a 5 ml sterile aqueous isotonic solution, said
`
`solution comprising: palonosetron hydrochloride in an amount of 0.25 mg based on the
`
`weight of its free base; from 0.005 mg/ml to 1.0 mg/ml EDTA; and from 10 mg/ml to
`
`80 mg/ml mannitol, wherein said formulation is stable at 24 months when stored at
`
`room temperature." Support for claim 1 can be found throughout the specification of
`
`the '351 Application, for instance, at:
`
`-the abstract at page 21;
`
`- page 2, lines 3-6 and lines 24-29;
`
`- page 3, lines 1-5, lines 11-20;
`
`- page 3, lines 21 to page 4, line 13;
`
`3
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`Continuation-in-part of U.S. Application No. 13/087,012
`Identification of Claim Support
`May 23, 2013
`Page 4 of 8
`
`-page 4, lines 19-21;
`
`- page 5, lines 5-15;
`
`-page 5, line 26 to page 6, line 2;
`
`- page 6, lines 16-20;
`
`-page 6, line 21 to page 7, line 1;
`
`-page 7, lines 3-6;
`
`- page 8, lines 2-5, lines 9-11, and lines 13-15;
`
`- page 9, lines 9-23;
`
`- page 10, lines 3-18; and
`
`-original claims 1, 4, 5, 8-10, 12, 33-36, 38, 39, 41, 44, 46, 47, 50-52, 54, and
`
`57.
`
`Claim 1 recites "wherein said formulation is stable at 24 months when stored at
`
`room temperature." Support for this phrase can be found throughout the specification of
`
`the '351 Application, for instance at page 3, lines 11-12, page 5, lines 5-7, and page 10,
`
`lines 9-18. On July 25, 2003, furthermore, US FDA approved Helsinn's Aloxi®
`
`(palonosetron hydrochloride injection) product, which is within the scope of the claims,
`
`for a 2 year shelf life. See Exhibit A, FDA approval letter ("[B]ased on the primary
`
`stability data submitted, we are granting a 24-month expiration period for this product.").
`
`Hence, the written description and enablement of the new claims is tightly bound to the
`
`drug product approved by FDA and within the scope of the claims.
`
`4
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`Continuation-in-part of U.S. Application No. 13/087,012
`Identification of Claim Support
`May 23, 2013
`Page 5 of 8
`
`B. Claim 2
`
`Claim 2 depends from claim 1, and recites "[t]he pharmaceutical formulation of
`
`claim 1, wherein said EDTA is in an amount of 0.5 mg/ml." Support for claim 2 can be
`
`found throughout the specification of the '351 Application, such as the support for claim
`
`1 as set forth above. Additional support may be found, for instance, at:
`
`-page 9, lines 9-11; and
`
`- page 12, Example 4.
`
`C. Claim 3
`
`Claim 3 depends from claim 1, and recites "[t]he pharmaceutical formulation of
`
`claim 1, wherein said mannitol is in an amount of 41.5 mg/ml." Support for claim 3 can
`
`be found throughout the specification of the '351 Application, such as the support for
`
`claim 1 as set forth above. Additional support may be found, for instance, at:
`
`-page 9, lines 28 to page 10, line 2;
`
`-page 11, line 25 to page 12, line 2; and
`
`- page 12, Example 4.
`
`D. Claims 4 and 5
`
`Claim 4 depends from claim 1, and recites "[t]he pharmaceutical formulation of
`
`claim 1, wherein said solution further comprises a citrate buffer." Claim 5 depends from
`
`claim 4, and recites "[t]he pharmaceutical formulation of claim 4, wherein said citrate
`
`buffer is at a concentration of 20 millimolar." Support for claims 4 and 5 can be found
`
`throughout the specification of the '351 Application, such as the support for claim 1 as
`
`set forth above. Additional support may be found, for instance, at:
`
`5
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`Continuation-in-part of U.S. Application No. 13/087,012
`Identification of Claim Support
`May 23, 2013
`Page 6 of 8
`
`- page 11, Example 2; and
`
`-pages 11-12, Example 3.
`
`E. Claim 6
`
`Claim 6 depends from claim 1, and recites "[t]he pharmaceutical formulation of
`
`claim 1, wherein said solution is buffered at a pH of 5.0 ± 0.5." Support for claim 6 can
`
`be found throughout the specification of the '351 Application, such as the support for
`
`claim 1 as set forth above. Additional support may be found, for instance, at:
`
`- page 8, lines 16-25;
`
`- page 12, Example 4; and
`
`-original claims 7, 15, 43, 56 and 69.
`
`A. Claim 7
`
`Claim 7 depends from claim 1 , and recites "[t]he pharmaceutical formulation of
`
`claim 1, wherein said EDTA is in an amount of 0.5 mg/ml, wherein said mannitol is in
`
`an amount of 41.5 mg/ml, wherein said solution further comprises a citrate buffer at a
`
`concentration of 20 millimolar, and wherein said solution is buffered at a pH of 5.0 ±
`
`0.5." Support for claim 7 can be found throughout the specification of the '351
`
`Application, such as the support for claim 1 as set forth above. Additional support may
`
`be found, for instance, at:
`
`- page 11, Example 2; and
`
`- page 12, Example 4.
`
`6
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`Continuation-in-part of U.S. Application No. 13/087,012
`Identification of Claim Support
`May 23, 2013
`Page 7 of 8
`
`B. Claim 8
`
`Claim 8 is an independent claim, reciting "[a] pharmaceutical single-use, unit-
`
`dose formulation for intravenous administration to a human to reduce the likelihood of
`
`cancer chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, comprising a 5 ml sterile aqueous
`
`isotonic solution, said solution comprising: palonosetron hydrochloride in an amount of
`
`0.25 mg based on the weight of its free base; from 0.005 mg/ml to 1.0 mg/ml EDTA;
`
`and from 1 0 mg/ml to 80 mg/ml mannitol, wherein said formulation is stable at 18
`
`months when stored at room temperature." Support for claim 8 can be found
`
`throughout the specification of the '351 Application, such as the support for claim 1 as
`
`set forth above. Additional support may be found, for instance, at:
`
`-page 5, lines 5-7.
`
`Furthermore, US FDA approved Helsinn's Aloxi® (palonosetron hydrochloride
`
`injection) product, which is within the scope of the claims, for a 2 year shelf life. See
`
`Exhibit A, FDA approval letter ("[B]ased on the primary stability data submitted, we are
`
`granting a 24-month expiration period for this product."). And of course, that which is
`
`stable at 24 months is also stable at 18 months. Hence, the written description and
`
`enablement of the new claims is tightly bound to the drug product approved by FDA and
`
`within the scope of the claims.
`
`IV. Claim 9 Finds Support Only in the Instant Application and
`Thus, Has an AlA EFD
`
`Claim 9 is an independent claim, reciting "[a] pharmaceutical single-use, unit-
`
`dose formulation for intravenous administration to a human to reduce the likelihood of
`
`7
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`Continuation-in-part of U.S. Application No. 13/087,012
`Identification of Claim Support
`May 23, 2013
`Page 8 of 8
`
`cancer chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, comprising a 50 mL sterile isotonic
`
`solution buffered at a pH of 4.8 ± 0.5 comprising: palonosetron hydrochloride in an
`
`amount of 0.75 mg based on the weight of its free base; 450.0 mg sodium chloride;
`
`EDTA; 18.5 mg sodium citrate; and 7.8 mg citric acid monohydrate, wherein said
`
`formulation is contained in an infusion bag." Support for claim 9 is found in Example 8
`
`of the continuation-in-part application filed herewith.
`
`If any fees are required for entry of this paper, please charge them to Deposit
`
`Account No. 504667.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: ~vj-~~
`Clark G. Sullivan
`Reg. No. 36,942
`
`ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY LLP
`(404) 873-8500
`( 404) 873-8501 (fax)
`Customer No.: 53449
`
`Attorney Docket No.: 23278.2.US.8
`
`8
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`Exhibit A
`
`Exhibit A
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`~SiR VICEs
`
`.,"'"~'
`{JJE
`f-""•
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`~~~ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
`
`Public Health Service
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`NDA 21-372
`
`Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`c/o August Consulting
`Attention: Craig Lehmann. Pharm. D.
`515 Capital of Texas Highway, Suite 150
`Austin, TX 787 46
`
`Dear Dr Lehmann:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated September 26, 2002, received
`September 27, 2002, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for
`Aloxi™ (palonosetron hydrochloride injection).
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions dated October 11 and November 21, 2002 and
`January 24, April 9, April24, May 15, June 6, June 9, June 13, June 16, June 18, June 20, June 25,
`July 1, July 17, and July 22, 2003.
`
`This new drug application provides for the use of Aloxi™ (palonosetron hydrochloride injection) for:
`l) the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of
`moderately and highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy, and
`the prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of
`moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.
`
`2)
`
`We completed our review of this application, as amended. It is approved, effective on the date of this
`letter, for use as recommended in the agreed-upon labeling text.
`
`Please note that, based on the primary stability data submitted, we are granting a 24-month expiration
`period for this product. When additional stability data are available, an extension of the expiration
`period may be requested by submission of a prior approval supplemental new drug application.
`
`The final printed labeling (FPL) must be identical to the enclosed labeling (text for the package insert)
`and submitted labeling (carton label submitted June 25, 2003 and immediate container label submitted
`July 1, 2003). Marketing the product with FPL that is not identical to the approved labeling text may
`render the product misbranded and an unapproved new drug.
`
`Please submit an electronic version of the FPL according to the &ruidance for industry titled Providing
`Regulatory Submissions in Electronic fonnat- NDA. Alternatively, you may submit 20 paper copies
`of the FPL as soon as it is available but no more than 30 days after it is printed. Individually mount 15
`of the copies on heavy-weight paper or similar material. For administrative purposes, designate this
`submission"FPL for approved NDA 21-372." Approval of this submission by FDA is not required
`before the labeling is used.
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`NDA 21-372
`Page 2
`
`FDA's Pediatric Rule [at 21 CFR 314.55/21 CFR 601.27] was challenged in court. On October 17,
`2002, the court ruled that FDA did not have the authority to issue the Pediatric Rule and has barred
`FDA from enforcing it. Although the government decided not to pursue an appeal in the courts, it will
`work with Congress in an effort to enact legislation requiring pharmaceutical manufacturers to conduct
`appropriate pediatric clinical trials. In addition, third party interveners have decided to appeal the
`court's decision striking down the rule. Therefore, we encourage you to submit a pediatric plan that
`describes development of your product in the pediatric population where it may be used. Please be
`aware that whether or not this pediatric plan and subsequent submission of pediatric data will be
`required depends upon passage of legislation or the success of the third party appeal. In any event, we
`hope you will decide to submit a pediatric plan and conduct the appropriate pediatric studies to provide
`important information on the safe and effective use of this drug in the relevant pediatric populations.
`
`The pediatric exclusivity provisions ofFDAMA as reauthorized by the Best Pharmaceuticals for
`Children Act are not affected by the court's ruling. Pediatric studies conducted under the terms of
`section 505A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act may result in additional marketing
`exclusivity for certain products. You should refer to the Guidance for Industry on Qualifying for
`Pediatric Exclusivity (available on our web site at www.fda.gov/cder/pediatric) for details. We
`acknowledge your June 26, 2003 "Proposed Pediatric Study Request" submitted under (b)(4)---------
`W e are reviewing your submission and will respond to your proposal in a separate letter. FDA
`generally does not consider studies submitted to an NDA before issuance of a Written Request as
`responsive to the Written Request. Applicants should obtain a Written Request before submitting
`pediatric studies to an NDA.
`
`In addition, submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you propose to use for
`this product. Submit all proposed materials in draft or mock-up form, not final print. Send one copy to
`this division and two copies of both the promotional materials and the package insert directly to:
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD-42
`Food and Drug Administration
`5600 Fishers Lane
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`Please submit one market package of the drug product when it is available.
`
`We have not completed validation of the regulatory methods. However, we expect your continued
`cooperation to resolve any problems that may be identified.
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA (21 CFR
`314.80 and 314.81). In addition, we request that you initiate a 15-day report [21 CFR 314.80(c)] for
`each ofthe following:
`• All spontaneous reports of constipation requiring hospitalization or emergency room visit
`• All spontaneous reports of possible complications of constipation such as obstruction,
`perforation, intestinal ulceration, toxic megacolon, ileus, or impaction resulting in
`hospitalization or emergency room visit
`• All spontaneous reports of any cardiovascular adverse event
`
`The MedWatch-to-Manufacturer Program provides manufacturers with copies of serious adverse event
`reports that are received directly by the FDA. New molecular entities and important new biologics
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`NDA 21-372
`Page 3
`
`qualify for inclusion for three years after approval. Your firm is eligible to receive copies of reports for
`this product. To participate in the prot:,rram, please see the enrollment instructions and program
`description details at www. fda.gov/medwatch/report/mmp.htm.
`
`Ifyou have any questions, call Brian Strongin, R.Ph., M.B.A, Regulatory Project Manager at (301)
`827-7473.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Julie Beitz, M.D.
`Deputy Director
`Office of Drug Evaluation III
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`Enclosure
`
`Exh. 1016
`
`

`
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`
`/s/
`
`Julie Beitz
`7/25/03 08:45:03 AM
`
`Exh. 1016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket