throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GOLD STANDARD INSTRUMENTS, LLC
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case PGR2015-00019
`Patent 8,876,991 B2
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, Petitioner respectfully requests oral
`
`argument in this post-grant review of U.S. Patent No. 8,876,991 (“the ’991
`
`patent”), currently scheduled for October 19, 2016. See Paper 21.
`
`ISSUES TO BE ARGUED
`
`I. The following issues raised in the Petition:
`
`A. Whether claims 12-16 of the ’991 patent are unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 112(a) for lack of enablement;
`
`B. Whether claims 12-16 of the ’991 patent are unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 112(a) for lack of written description;
`
`C. Whether claims 12-16 of the ’991 patent are unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by US 2008/0032260 A1 to
`
`Luebke (“Luebke 2008”);
`
`D. Whether claim 15 of the ’991 patent is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103 as being obvious over Luebke 2008 alone or in view of US
`
`5,628,674 to Heath (“Heath”) or International Standard ISO 3630-1,
`
`1st ed. (1992) (“ISO 3630-1”);
`
`E. Whether claims 12-14 and 16 of the ’991 patent are unpatentable
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Grégoire Kuhn &
`
`Laurence Jordan, Fatigue and Mechanical Properties of Nickel-
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`
`Titanium Endodontic Instruments, 28 J. ENDODONTICS 716
`
`(2002) (“Kuhn”);
`
`F. Whether claim 15 of the ’991 patent is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103 as being obvious over Kuhn alone or in view of Heath or ISO
`
`3630-1.
`
`II. Rebuttal on all matters properly before the Board
`
`Petitioner also respectfully requests the ability to use audio/visual
`
`equipment to display demonstrative exhibits, including a projector, screen, and
`
`easel.
`
`
`
`Dated: Sept. 20, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey S. Ginsberg/
`Jeffrey S. Ginsberg (Reg. No. 36,148)
`Lead counsel for Petitioner US Endodontics, LLC
`
`Abhishek Bapna (Reg. No. 64,049)
`Back-up counsel for Petitioner US Endodontics, LLC
`
`Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
`1133 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036-6710
`Telephone: (212) 336-2000
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`Certificate of Service
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on September
`
`20, 2016, the foregoing PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT was served via electronic mail on the following counsel of record
`
`for the Patent Owner:
`
`Joseph Hynds
`(jhynds@rothwellfigg.com)
`R. Elizabeth Brenner-Leifer
`(ebrenner@rothwellfigg.com)
`Steven Lieberman
`(slieberman@rothwellfigg.com)
`Jason Nolan
`(jnolan@rothwellfigg.com)
`Derek Dahlgren
`(ddahlgren@rothwellfigg.com)
`C. Nichole Gifford
`(ngifford@rothwellfigg.com)
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
`607 14th Street, N.W., Ste. 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`
`
`
`
`/Abhishek Bapna/
`Abhishek Bapna (Reg. No. 64,049)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket