throbber
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1982434
`
`JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
`CoZloque C4, suppZ6ment au n o 12, Tome 43, de'eembre 1982
`
`page C4-255
`
`CHARACTERISTICS OF DEFORMATION AND TRANSFORMATION PSEUDOELASTICITY I N
`Ti-Ni ALLOYS
`
`S. ~ i ~ a z a k i * , Y. ohmi* , K. ~ t s u k a * and Y. suzukiE*
`
`* ~ n s t i t u t e o f Materials Science, University of Tsukuba, Sakura-mura,
`Ibaraki-ken 305, Japan
`Y E Central Research Laboratory, Fumkawa E l e c t r i c Company, 2-9-25 Futaba-eho,
`Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141, Japan
`
`(Accepted 9 August 1982)
`
`Abstract. - Although the Ti-Ni alloy i s the most important material for
`applications, there has been no systematic work on i t s deformation behavior.
`In the present report, the effects of ageing, Ni-content and annealing right
`after cold work on the shape memory effect and on the pseudoelasticity are
`systematically investigated by tensile tests at various temperatures. Based
`on the obtained results the differences in deformation and transformation
`pseudoelasticity characteristics between Ti-Ni alloys and other B-phase
`alloys are discussed.
`Introduction. - The Ti-Ni alloy i s the most important material among many shape
`memory alloys for the applications of both the shape memory effect and the pseudo-
`elasticity, because only this one deforms more than 50% strain prior to fracture
`and the strain as large as 8% recovers by heating above Af o r unloading in a poly-
`crystalline state (1). However no systematic work has been done from fundamental
`view point on the characteristics of deformation and transformation pseudoelasticity
`for this alloy, except for a few pioneering work (21% ( 5 ) . In fact, there a r e many
`factors affecting the deformation behavior of this alloy, i.e. ageing effect, Ni-content,
`In the present report the effects of
`annealing right after cold work, and so on.
`these factors are examined systematically by tensile tests a t various temperatures
`( 77K~373K ) .
`It i s well known that the characteristics of deformation and transformation
`pseudoelasticity in Ti-Ni alloys are remarkably different from those in other B-phase
`alloys. For example, the formers are very ductile (1,6) . while the latters are not
`and shows the intergranular fracture ( 6 , 7 ) . The transformation pseudoelasticity
`is always observed in the latters at temperatures above Af (81% (101, while i t is
`not necessarily so in the former, i.e. a Ti-50at%Ni alloy usually does not exhibit
`the pseudoelasticity even above Af, while a Ti-5latsai alloy does so. This distinct
`difference will be explained by the fundamental deformation characteristics of Ti-Ni
`alloys, which are consistent with the above mentioned various effects.
`
`Specimens and Experimental Procedures.- The alloy preparation was described in
`the previous paper (1). The compositions of the alloys used were determined by
`chemical analysis to be Ti-49.8at%Ni, Ti-5O.lat%Ni, Ti-50.6atWi and Ti-51.6atWi
`( t o . latSki) ( the nominal compositions were Ti-50. Oatski, Ti-50.7at%i?i,Ti-51.Oat%Ni
`and Ti-51.5at%Ni, respectively ) . The ingots of these alloys were hot rolled and
`then cold drawn at R .T. to wire specimen with diameter of 1.0 mm. The specimens
`were then heat-treated for 3.6ks a t various temperatures in a range from 473K to
`1273K in a vacuum of
`Pa, and then rapidly quenched into ice water in order
`to investigate the effect of annealing temperature ( from here the heat-treatment
`is abbreviated as 1273K IQ for example ) .
`In order to investigate the ageing
`effect, the same alloy specimens were aged for 3.6ks below 873K followed by
`quenching into ice water after the heat treatment of 1273K IQ ( from here this
`heat treatment is abbreviated as 1273K IQ+XK
`IQ, where X ranges from 1073K to
`473K ) . After these heat-treatments, wire specimens with diameter of 1.0 mm
`and with gauge length of 30 mm long were made by electropolishing. Tensile tests
`
`PGR2015-00019 - Ex. 1021
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC., Petitioner
`
`

`
`C4-256
`
`JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
`
`were carried out with an Instron type tensile machine. Shimadzu Autograph DSS-
`10T-S type. The details of the specimen preparation and the tensile tests have
`been reported elsewhere (1,ll) .
`
`,273~ IQ
`
`Results.- As mentioned in the previous section, there are many factors affecting
`In this section the effects of (a) ageing,
`the deformation behavior of Ti-Ni alloys.
`(b) Ni-content and (c) annealing right after cold work are described in the follw-
`ing in that order.
`(a) Effect of ageing. - Heat treatments of shape memory alloys have gener-
`ally been conducted by solution treatment at high temperature followed by quench-
`ing rapidly into water in order to obtain a high temperature single phase, which
`causes the shape memory effect to appear.
`A Ti-Ni alloy, however, is an exceptional
`case which shows the shape memory ef-
`fect regardless of the heat-treatment, i.e.
`rapid quenching into water or gradual
`cooling in a furnace. Moreover, the
`characteristics of pseudoelasticity of this
`alloy in a slowly cooled specimen a r e
`
`1 2 7 3 ~ IQ
`
`1273~ IQ /- - 1 0 7 3 ~ IQ
`-
`- 9.3.-
`better than those in a rapidly quenched ' -
`
`- 6 7 3 ~ IQ / - 1273K I0
`
`a
`
`2
`
`one ( unpublished work by present au-
`thors ) . This effect can be attributed
`to the ageing effect at low temperature
`during cooling, which produces fine pre-
`cipitates. The presence of fine precipi-
`tates raises the flow s t r e s s for slip, and
`thus makes the stress-induced transfom-
`ation pseudoelastic as shown later ( Fig.
`2 1 .
`
`5
`
`1273K I0
`
`-873KIQ > 1273K I0
`
`- 7 7 3 ~ IQ
`
`1273K IQ
`
`TI-50 6ol%Nt
`
`I
`LOO
`
`.
`
`~
`
`-573K 1Q
`
`1273~ 10
`-473~ IQ
`,
`~
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`300
`
`~
`,
`,
`~
`ZOO
`Temperature LK)
`Fig. 1 E f f e c t of a q e l n g t e m p e r a t u r e on t h e
`curve
`electrical r e s ~ s t a n c e - t ~ m ~ ~ r ~ t ~ ~ ~
`a T l - 5 0 . 6 a t % ~ 1 a l l o y .
`
`~
`
`,
`
`,
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`,
`
`~
`
`,
`
`,
`
`,
`
`,
`
`~
`
`~
`
`
`
`It is convenient to examine the
`electrical resistence-temperature curve
`as a function of ageing temperature in
`order to assess the most effective tem-
`perature for ageing. Figure 1 shows
`the curves of Ti-50.6atWi alloy speci-
`mens, which were subjected to the heat-
`treatment : 1273K IQ +
`X K IQ, where X ranges
`from 1073K to 473K.
`By ageing at tempera-
`tures between 1073K and
`873K the curves change
`little. But, by ageing ;i 600
`at temperatures between
`
`800
`
`773K and 573K t h e shape '
`
`OM OR Heat-treatment
`A A
`
`1273K I0 - 773K I0
`-. 673K 10
`
`-573K
`3
`~i-50.6at%~1
`
`10
`
`of the curves depend
`strongly on ageing tem-
`perature, especially that
`aged at 673K shows the
`biggest change among
`them. The specimens
`aged at higher tempera-
`tures scarcely showed
`the pseudoelasticity at
`any deformation temper-
`ature. However, the
`specimens aged at low
`temperatures showed
`perfect pseudoelasticity
`above Af. The critical
`stresses for inducing
`
`400
`
`2
`
`(K)
`Temperature
`Fig. 2 E f f e c t of ageing on t h e c r i t i c a l s t r e s s e s
`£0, inducing martensites(ciM) and f o r reverse t r a n s -
`f ormation(og) i n a Ti-50.6at%Ni a l l o y .
`
`PGR2015-00019 - Ex. 1021
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC., Petitioner
`
`

`
`T I - ~ ~ . ~ O I % N I
`
`-
`
`j
`
`T,-50,6a,%N,
`
`TI-51.6al%N1
`
`martensites ( a M ) and for the completion of the reverse transformation ( a R ) are
`plotted against deformation temperature in Fig. 2 . Both the stresses were found
`to follow the Clausius-Clapeyron relationship in the temperature region Af<T<Tc.
`Here Tc represents the critical temperature where the plastic deformation by dis-
`location motion s t a r t s , and thus above Tc the critical stresses deviate from the
`linear relation with temperature a s shown in the figure. The specimens aged a t
`673K showed the perfect pseudoelasticity without residual strain until a~ reaches
`about 500MPa, which is the largest value among those of aged specimens.
`I t is
`concluded from these results that the ageing treatment at 673K is most effective
`in improving the characteristics of pseudoelasticity.
`(b)..affect of Ni-content. -
`Although the phase diagram of the
`Ti-Ni system is not well-established as
`y e t , there is a general agreement on the
`presence of some precipitate phases
`such as TiNi3 and/or Ti42Ni58 on the
`Ni-rich side of these diagrams (12,13) .
`Thus the ageing effect may also depend
`on Ni content a s well as on ageing tem-
`perature. The electrical resistance-tem-
`perature curves of specimens with vari- ;
`0 -
`'
`ous Ni-content whose heat-treatments
`are 1273K IQ and 1273K IQ + 673K I Q ,
`respectively, are shown in Fig. 3.
`The shape of curves and transformation
`temperatures a r e almost unchanged by
`the ageing treatment in a Ti-49.8atWi
`alloy. But, the change in the shape of
`curves by ageing a t 673K are more re-
`markable with increasing Ni-content .
`The critical stresses OM and OR are
`shown as a function of deformation tern-
`perature in Fig. 4. The values o~ in
`Ti-49.8atWi and Ti-SO. lat%Ni alloys are
`absent. because the ~seudoelasticitv was
`specimens. But
`not
`in
`in Ti-50. 6atWi and
`Ti-51.6at%Ni alloys the
`pseudoelasticity is ob-
`served in a wide tem-
`perature range, and
`the deviation of the
`stress OM from the
`linear relation with tem-
`perature is observed
`at about 6OOMPa in a
`Ti-51.6at%Ni alloy,
`which is a clear indica-
`tion for the onset of
`slip. From these re-
`sults i t is concluded
`that the effect of
`ageing is more promi-
`nent in a high Ni-
`content specimen than
`in a low Ni-content one.
`
`- 673K 10 /
`,----
`T'-50101%N1 / 1273K I0
`- 6 7 3 ~ 10
`/ s i i ~
`
`- 67% 10 " Krro
`
`1873K I0
`
`10
`
`D73K
`1273K I0
`
`- 673% 10
`
`100
`
`zoo
`Temperature (Kl
`Fig. 3 Effect of ~i-content on the electrical
`resistance-temperature curve in Ti-Ni alloys.
`
`300
`
`GI CR Ni-content
`V V 51.6at%
`
`0 . 50.6 :
`
`o ( 0 ) 50.1 r
`A (A) 49.8 '
`1273K IQ - 673K IQ
`
`/
`
`V
`
`,v'
`
`04$. YV
`
`-
`800
`
`-
`-
`600
`I -
`a"
`
`-
`
`V)
`
`-
`400
`Gi
`
`al
`z
`V) C
`,? 200-
`
`0 ,
`150
`
`200
`
`300
`250
`Temperature (K)
`Fig. 4 Effect of Ni-content onthe c r i t i c a l stresses
`for inducing martensites(aM) and for reverse trans-
`format ion (aR ) .
`
`350
`
`PGR2015-00019 - Ex. 1021
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC., Petitioner
`
`

`
`C4-258
`
`JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
`
`.z
`$
`
`/ '273K la
`/ 873K IQ
`7 7 3 ~ IQ s
`
`-
`
`
`
`11-49 8of%N1
`
`473K I0
`
`100
`
`150
`
`250
`200
`Temperature (K)
`
`300
`
`350
`
`IU
`0
`0
`
`2
`-
`$
`IU -
`w
`
`0
`
`8 0 0 -
`
`-
`C?
`2 600-
`
`V)
`V)
`
`OM OR Heat-treatment
`0 (e) 1273K I Q
`
`. 773K I Q
`
`A A 673K 10
`TI-49.8at %NI
`
`A'
`
`,A'?//
`
`A'
`
`(c) Effect of annealing right after cold work. - As mentioned previously
`the effect of ageing was most prominent in a Ti-51.6atsNi alloy and was not appre-
`ciable in a Ti-49.8at%Ni alloy. This means that a specimen with low Ni-content
`does not exhibit the pseudoelasticity even above Af, while that with high Ni-con-
`tent does so. However, we found another effect which improved remarkably the
`characteristics of pseudoelasticity even in a specimen with low Ni-content. Figure
`5 shows the effect of annealin? right after cold work on the electrical resistance-
`temperature curve of a Ti-49.8at%Ni alloy specimen, which was annealed a t each
`temperature without solution treatment after cold drawn. The curve exhibits little
`change in a specimen annealed above 873K.
`However, the curves for specimens an-
`nealed below 773K show very conspicuous
`change which is very similar to that ob-
`served in the Ti-5O.6atSNi alloy aged below
`773K. The critical stresses 9, and OR in
`the specimens annealed a t 1273K. 773K and
`673K, respectively, are plotted against
`deformation temperature in Fig. 6. The
`specimen annealed a t 1273K did not show
`the pseudoelasticity a t any deformation
`temperature and, t h u s , a~ was absent.
`However, the specimens annealed at lower
`temperatures showed the pseudoelasticity,
`and especially
`that annealed a t 673K
`shcwed the most superior characteristics
`of pseudoelasticity. The stress-strain
`curves a s a function of deformation tem-
`perature for a specimen annealed a t 673K
`and
`those for a specimen annealed a t
`1273K and then annealed a t 673K are
`compared in Fig. 7. The specimens were
`loaded and unloaded a t each deformation
`temperature, and then heated to 373K ( >Af) ~
`~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ u ; ; e
`~
`e
`.
`~
`~
`e
`c
`~
`~
`f
`~
`~
`~
`
`in order to make the total strain to be
`f o r T I - 4 9 . 8 a t 8 ~ ~ a l l o y speclrnens, W ~ I C ~
`were annealed at each ternuerature w ~ t h o u t
`separated into the recoverable strain
`P r i o r Solution treatment a f t e r cold work.
`the residual strain,
`a s shown by the
`dotted curve.
`Permanent residual
`strain more than
`one percent took
`place as shown by
`curve (a) in the
`spec~men annealed
`a t 1273K followed by
`annealing at 673K.
`4 0 0 -
`Thls residual strain 2
`caused the specimen 2
`to show the two way
`shape memory effect
`a s shown by curve
`( b ) when it was
`deformed after the
`preceding deform-
`ation. On the con-
`t r a r y , in the speci-
`
`.
`,d/
`fi
`/,// LI
`A' A'y
`m // /: l'
`/A ,,p=.=
`y
`/ .?
`w 3 " / ' / A .ko-
`I
`2 0 0
`2 5 0
`3 0 0
`(K)
`Deformation Temperature
`Fig. 6 Effect of annealing temperature on the critical
`stresses for inducing martensites(oM) and for reverse
`transformation(uR) in Ti-49.8atZNi alloy specimens,
`which were annealed at each temperature without prior
`solution treatment after cold work.
`
`2 0 0 -
`
`'
`
`~
`
`A'
`-
`
`4
`//
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`
`
`~~en~enrnf~$~2~~73K
`
`OL 150
`
`3 5 0
`
`memory effect was
`observed below As
`and the pseudoelas-
`ticity was observed
`
`PGR2015-00019 - Ex. 1021
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC., Petitioner
`
`

`
`- .-
`Strain
`
`1%)
`
`Fig. 7 Effect of annealing temperature
`on the stress-strain curves as a func-
`tion of deformation temperature in a
`Ti-49.8atZNi alloy.
`(A) Heat-treatment : 1273K IQ - 673K IQ.
`(B) Heat-treatment : 673K IQ.
`
`Strain. (%I
`
`in a wide temperature range as shown in the right-hand side of Fig. 7. The im-
`provement of the characteristics of pseudoelasticity can not be attributed to the
`ageing effect due to precipitation, because both specimens were aged for 3.6ks at
`673K. Therefore, it is most likely that the effect of annealing at lower temperatures
`is caused by the internal structure of dislocations which were introduced during
`drawing at R.T. and then rearranged by annealing so as to diminish the internal
`strain energy. The presence of such rearranged dislocations again raises the
`flow stress for slip, and thus results in the appearance of pseudoelasticity at
`temperatures above Af.
`It is also noticed in the figure that there are two plateaus in the stress-
`strain curves in low temperature range. The critical stress for the second plateau
`corresponds to the stress O M , but that for the first plateau was found to be the
`stress for rearrangement of the rhombohedral phase variants, which appear prior
`to the onset of the martensitic transformation during cooling in the absence of
`stress (5,14,15). This is confirmed by the fact that the extrapolated point of the
`latter stress corresponds to the temperature at which the rhombohedral phase is
`induced thermally. The details about this will be published soon elsewhere.
`
`Discussion. - As mentioned in the introduction, a Ti-Ni alloy is very ductile and
`the transgranular fracture with many dimples on the fracture surface is observed,
`while a Cu-Al-Ni alloy is very brittle in a polycrystalline state and the typical
`intergranular fracture occurs. These differences of deformation and fracture be-
`havior in both alloys were attributed to the large difference in the elastic anisotropy
`of these alloys (6,16,17). The elastic anisotropy of a Cu-Al-Ni alloy is known to be
`about 13 ( l a ) , while that of a Ti-Ni alloy is about 2 (19) . However, there i s an-
`If
`other important factor which controls the deformation and fracture behavior.
`a deformation mode i s available at low stress levels the stress at grain boundaries
`is easily relaxed by this deformation mode.
`In a Ti-Ni alloy which is not given a
`special heat-treatment, dislocations move easily at a stress of about 100MPa a s
`
`PGR2015-00019 - Ex. 1021
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC., Petitioner
`
`

`
`JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
`
`-2
`
`s h o w n in F i g . 6 . B u t t h e stress f o r i n d u c i n g s l i p in a Cu-Al-Ni alloy a m o u n t s t o
`a b o u t GOOMPa, w h i c h is the s a m e v a l u e of the f r a c t u r e stress in a s i n g l e crystal of
`t h a t alloy ( 1 6 ) .
`* M a n y i n v e s t i g a t i o n s have b e e n d o n e o n the t e n s i l e p r o p e r t i e s of Ti-Ni a l l o y s ,
`b u t the r e s u l t s c o f l i c t w i t h e a c h o t h e r in the e s t i m a t i o n of y i e l d s t r e s s f o r s l i p .
`Some a u t h o r s ( 2 0 ) % ( 2 2 ) s t a t e t h a t t h e y i e l d p o i n t is at the b e g i n n i n g o f t h e t h i r d
`s t a g e of d e f o r m a t i o n , b u t o t h e r s ( 1 ) t h a t s l i p o c c u r s d u r i n g the s e c o n d s t a g e .
`I t is n o w c l e a r , h o w e v e r , b y the p r e s e n t i n v e s t i g a t i o n t h a t these c o n f l i c t s in t h e
`p a s t d a t a a r e c a u s e d b y t h e d i f f e r e n c e in Ni-content a n d h e a t t r e a t m e n t o f e a c h
`s p e c i m e n .
`
`F r o m these f a c t s w e c a n c o n c l u d e that the h i g h d u c t i l i t y in the Ti-Ni alloy is
`d u e t o the low e l a s t i c a n i s o t r o p y a n d t o the low y i e l d s t r e s s f o r s l i p , while that
`t h e low d u c t i l i t y a n d b r i t t l e i n t e r g r a n u l a r f r a c t u r e in the Cu-Al-Ni alloy is d u e t o
`t h e o p p o s i t e p r o p e r t i e s . E v e n a m o n g 6 p h a s e a l l o y s , the Cu-Zn-A1 a l l o y s w i t h l o w e r
`A1 c o n t e n t is m u c h d u c t i l e t h a n the Cu-Al-Ni alloy. T h i s is b e c a u s e the y i e l d s t r e s s
`f o r s l i p i n t h e f o r m e r is m u c h l o w e r t h o n that in the l a t t e r . T h i s d i f f e r e n c e i n the
`y i e l d stress a m o n g the t w o a l l o y s are o s s i b l y r e l a t e d w i t h the crystal s t r u c t u r e s of
`t h e m a t r i x p h a s e of the t w o a l l o y s (237; the f o r m e r is of D o g t y p e o r d e r e d struc-
`t u r e , while the l a t t e r is of B 2 t y p e . B e c a u s e the B u r g e r s v e c t o r of the s u p e r d i s l o -
`c a t i o n of the f o r m e r h a s t w i c e l a r g e r t h a n t h a t of t h e latter.
`A c k n o w l e d g m e n t . - T h i s w o r k w a s p a r t i a l l y s u p p o r t e d b y t h e Grant-in-Aid f o r F u n d a -
`m e n t a l S c i e n t i f i c R e s e a r c h ( E n e r g y T o k u b e t s u , 1981) f r o m the M i n i s t r y o f E d u c a t i o n of
`J a p a n a n d p a r t i a l l y b y the R e s e a r c h G r a n t f r o m N i s s a n S c i e n c e F o u n d a t i o n .
`R e f e r e n c e s
`( 1 ) MIYAZAKI,S., O T S U K A , K . , a n d S U Z U K I , Y . , S c r i p t a Met. 1 5 (1981) 287.
`(2) C O O P E R , J . E . . B0WKER.D.E. a n d C R 0 S S . W . B . . P r o c . o f tG 15th National
`SAMPE S y m p o s i u m , L o s A n g e l e s , Calif (1969).
`[ 3) HONMA , T . , P r o c . J o i n t U . S . / J a p a n S e m i n a r o n Mechanical B e h a v i o r of Metals
`a n d A l l o y s , T r o y , U.S.A.
`(1979) 72.
`( 4 ) WASILEWSKI , R . J . , Met. T r a n s . 2 (1971) 2973.
`(5) KHAGHIN , V . N . , GJUNTER .V.E., SIVOKHA , V . P . a n d SAVVINOV,A.S.,
`o f ICOMAT-79 at B o s t o n (1979) 474.
`( 6 ) MIYAZARI , S . , OTSUKA , K . , SAKAMOTO , H . a n d SHIMIZU , K . , T r a n s . J a p a n
`I n s t . Metals 22 (1981) 244.
`(7) M I Y A Z A K I , ~ : ~ ~ ~ O T S U K A , K . , S c i . R e p . R e s . Inst. T o h o k u U n i v .
`S u p p l . 1 (1981) 111.
`a n d SHIMIZU,K., A c t a Met. 27 (1979) 585.
`(8) O T S U K A , K . , SAKA!dIOTO,H.
`(9) O T S U K A , K . a n d WAYMAN , C .M., R e v i e w s o n t h e D e f o r m a t i o n B e h a v i o r o f
`M a t e r i a l s (P . F e l t h a m , E d . ) I[, No. 2, F r e u n d P u b l i s h i n g H o u s e , (1977) p . 81.
`(10) S A T O , H . , TAKEZAWA,K. a n d S A T 0 . S . . i b i d ( 7 ) (1981) 85.
`(11) MIYAZAKI,S., I M A I , T . , O T S U K A , K . a n d SUZUKI , Y . , S c r i p t a Met. 12 (1981) 853.
`(12) P U R D Y , G . R . a n d P A R R , J . G . , T r a n s . AIME 221 (1961) 636.
`(13) WASILEWSKI , R . J. , B U T L E R , S . R . , H A N L O N , ~ . a n d WORDEN,D . , M e t . T r a n s .
`22 (1971) 229.
`,M. B. , MEXCHLE ,M. , WAYMAN , C .M. a n d HWANG .C .M., I n t . c o n f .
`( Z ~ ) ~ A L A M O N
`o n M o d u l a t e d S t r u c t u r e s , K o n a , Hawaii, A I P C o n f . P r o . N o . 53, (1979) 223.
`(15) L I N G , H . C . and KAPLOW'R., Met. T r a n s . % (1980) 77.
`(16) MIYAZARI,S., KAWA1,T. a n d O T S U K A , K . , S c r i p t a Met. 16 (1982) 431.
`(17) MELTON,K.N. a n d M E R C I E R , O . , A c t a Met. 27 (1979) 1 3 7 7
`(18) SUEZAWA,M. a n d SUMINO , K . , S c r i p t a Met. 1 0 (1976) 789.
`(19) MERCIER,O. , MELTON,K.N., GREMAUD,G. a n d HAGI, J . , J. A p p l . P h y s . 51
`(1980) 1833.
`(20) MELT0N.K.N. a n d M E R C I E R , O . , A c t a Met. 2 (1981) 393.
`(21) P E R K I N S , J . , S c r i p t a M e t . , 8 (1974) 1469.
`(22) MOHAMED,H.A. a n d WASHBGRN,J., J. M a t e r . S c i . 12 (1977) 469.
`(23) SHIMIZU, K. a n d SAKAMOTO , H . , p r i v a t e communication.
`
`P r o c .
`
`PGR2015-00019 - Ex. 1021
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC., Petitioner

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket