throbber
United States Patent
`Johnson
`
`[:9]
`
`[54] METHOD TO PRESELECT THE SEX OF
`OFFSPRING
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor:
`
`Lawrence A. Johnson, Silver Spring.
`Md.
`
`[13] Assignee:
`
`The United States of America as
`represented by the Secretary of
`Agriculture, Washington, DC.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 692.958
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Apr.26, 1991
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`Continuation of Ser. No. 349,669, May 10. I989. aban-
`cloned.
`
`[63]
`
`Im. C1,: ............................................ .. A61K35/52
`[51]
`[52] us. CI. .................................... .. 424/561; 436/63;
`436/172; 435/2
`(531 Field of Search ................. .. 436/63. H2; 424/561
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4.:/i9'.i'S Lang ...................................42-W105
`4.083.951’
`4.191349 M1930 Bryant ............................... ..42-t.fl05
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2145112
`
`3/1935 United Kingdom .
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Culling. Handbook of Histopathlological & Histochemi~
`cal Techniques, Butterworth & Co.. London, 1974, p.
`192.
`-
`I... A. Johnson, “Flow Sorting of Intact X and ‘Y
`Chromosome-Bearing Mammalian Sperrnatozoa,“ Cy-
`tometry. Suppl. 2, p. 66 Abstract (1938).
`J. C. Conover and R. B. L. Gwatkin, "Pre—Loading of
`Mouse Oocytes with DNA—Specific Fluorochrome
`(Hoechst 33342) Permits Rapid Detection of Sper-
`rn—Oocyte Fusion." J. Reprod. Fert. 32: 631-690 (1988).
`L. A. Johnson and R. N. Clarke, "Flow Sorting of X
`and Y Chromosome-Bearing Mammalian Sperm: Acti-
`vation and Pronuclear Development of Sorted Bull,
`
`llllllllllllll||I||||lll||ll|||lI|||||||l||||||l|||ll|l||||l|||||l||||l|||l
`usoos l35759A
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,135,759
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`Aug. 4, 1992
`
`Boar, and Ram Sperm Microinjected into Hamster Oo-
`cytes," Gamete Res. 21: (1988).
`L. A. Johnson et al., "Flow Cytometry of X and Y
`Chromosome-Bearing Sperm for DNA Using an Irn-
`proved Preparation Method and Staining with Hoechst
`33342." Garnete Res. 17: 203-212 (1987).
`R. E. Hinkley et a1., “Rapid Visual Detection of Sper-
`m—Egg Fusion Using the DNA—Specific Fluorochrome
`Hoechst 33342,“ Dev. Biol. 113: 148-154 (1986).
`L. A. Johnson and D. Pin]-tel, "Modification of a
`Laser—Based Flow Cytometer for High—Re-solution
`DNA Analysis of Mammalian Spermatozoa," Cytome-
`try 1: 268-2‘.-'3 (1936).
`L. A. Johnson, “Gender Preselection in Farm Ani-
`mals,“ Research for Tomorrow, 1936 Yearbook of Ag-
`riculture. pp. 73-77 (1936).
`W. M. Grogan et al.. "DNA Analysis and Sorting of
`Viable Mouse Testis Cells,“ J. Histochem. Cytochem.
`29: 'i‘38—'.?46 (1981).
`M. R. Lolten. “Separation of Viable T and B Lympho-
`cytes Using a Cytoche-mica] Stain, Hoechst 33342," J.
`Histochem. Cytochem. 23: 36—39 (I930).
`
`Primary Exarm'ner——Douglas W. Robinson
`Assistant Examr'ner—Jean C. Witz
`Attorney. Agent. or Firm—M. Howard Silverstein; John
`D. Fado: Curtis P. Ribando
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`intact X and Y chromosome—bearing sperm populations
`of rabbits and swine were separated according to DNA
`content using a flow cytometer/cell sorter. Sperm via-
`bility was maintained by special staining techniques and
`by sorting and collecting the sperm in nutrient media.
`The sorted sperm were surgically inseminated into the
`uteri of rabbits or swine. Of the offspring born from
`does inseminated with the sorted population of X-bear-
`ing sperm. 94% were females. Of ofispring born from
`does inseminated with sorted Y-bearing sperm from the
`same ejaculate. 81% were males.
`
`26 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Exhibit No. 1010
`
`PGR of U.S. Patent 8,933,395
`
`

`
`1
`
`METHOD TO PRESELECT THE SEX OF
`OFFSPRING
`
`5,135,'lS9
`
`This application is a continuation of application Ser.
`No. 07/349,669. filed May 10. I989. now abandoned.
`
`5
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`l. Field of the Invention
`"I"his invention relates to a method of preselecting the 10
`sex of offspring by sorting sperm into X and Y chromo-
`some-bearing sperm based on differences in DNA con-
`tent.
`
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`Gender of animal offspring is important to livestock '5
`producers. Because the dairy farmer has little use for
`most bull calves, the use of sexed semen to produce only
`females would make "milk production more efficient.
`Swine fanners would produce pork more efficiently if
`they were able to market only female swine, because
`females grow faster than males.
`In beef cattle and sheep breeds. the male grows at a
`faster rate than the female and hence is preferred for
`meat production.
`In addition. the ability to specify male or female off-
`spring should shorten the time required for genetic
`improvements. since desirable traits are often associated
`with one or the other parent. Planning the sex of cattle
`offspring is already practiced on a limited basis. This
`procedure consists of removing embryos from the cow,
`identifying their potential gender. and re-implanting
`only those of the desired gender. However, an ability to
`separate sperm into male-producing and female-produo
`ing groups before they are used for artificial insemina-
`tion could enhance the overall value of offspring pro-
`duced by embryo transfer.
`Every living being has a set of paired chromosomes.
`which carry all the genetic material necessary to main-
`tain life and also to propagate new life.
`All but one pair of chromosomes are called auto-
`sornes and carry genes for all the characteristics of the
`body. such as skin, hair and eye color. mature size. and
`body characteristics. The remaining pair are called sex
`chromosomes. They carry the genetic material
`that
`specifies gender. One sex chromosome is called X. the
`other Y.
`A sperm from the male or an egg from the female
`contains one of each pair of autosomes; in addition. in
`mammals the egg always contains an X chromosome,
`while the sperm always carries either an X or Y chro-
`mosome.
`
`When a sperm and egg unite and the sperm carries the
`Y chromosome. the offspring is male (XY); however. if
`the sperm carries an X chromosome when it unites with 55
`the egg. the resulting offspring is female (XX).
`The only established and measurable difference be-
`tween X and Y sperm that is known and has been
`proved to be scientifically valid is their difference in
`deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content. The X chromo-
`some is larger and contains slightly more DNA than
`does the Y chromosome. The difference in total DNA
`between X-bearing sperm and Y-bearing sperm is 3.4%
`in boar, 3.8% in bull. and 4.2% in ram sperm.
`The amount of DNA in a spenn cell. as in most nor- 65
`mal body cells. is stable. Therefore, the DNA content of
`individual sperm can be monitored and Md to differen-
`tiate )t- and Y-bearing sperm.
`
`2
`Since the difference in DNA mass in the sex chromo-
`somes of most mammals is the only scientifically vali-
`dated. measurable difference between X- and Y-bearing
`sperm. the chromosomal constitution [Moruzzi. J. Re-
`prod. Fertil. 57: 319 (l9'i'9)] and/or measurement of
`DNA mass [Pinkel et al. (1). Science 218: 904 (1982);
`Pinkel et al. (2). Cytometry 3:
`I (1982); Johnson and
`Pinkel, Cytometry 7: 263 (1986); Johnson et al. (I).
`Gum. Res. 16: I (1987); Johnson et al. (2), Gem. Res. 1?;
`203 0937)] are the only verifiable means other than
`fertility for determining the sex-producing capability of
`a population of sperm. The literature describes many
`physical, biochemical. and functional methods that
`have purportedly sexed sperm [Amann and Seidel.
`"Prospects for Setting Mammalian Sperm," Colorado
`Assoc. Univ. Press. Boulder 0982)]; several of these
`methods have been tested for relative DNA content
`[Pinltel et al., J. Anim. Sci. 60: i303 (1985); Johnson (I).
`Theriogenoloy 29: 265 0988)}. However. no method
`has been proven in controlled experiments to actually
`affect the sex ratio of offspring.
`Previous studies have demonstrated that the differ-
`ence in DNA content between X and Y chromosome-
`bearing sperm can be repeatedly measured and the
`spenn sex ratio of a sample of semen predicted [Johnson
`and Pinkel, supra; Johnson et al. (1), supra; Johnson et
`al. (2). supra; Johnson (I). supra; Johnson (2). Cytome-
`try. Suppl. 2: 66 (Abstract) (l9B3)]. Verifiable separa-
`tion by soning of X and Y sperm based on DNA con-
`tent has been accomplished with the vole [Pinkel et al.
`(1), supra; Johnson. In “Beltsville Symposia in Agricul-
`tural Research X,“ P. C. Augustine, H. D. Danforth, &
`M. R. Bakst (eds). Martinus Nijltoff, Boston, pp.
`121-134 (1986)) and the chinchilla [(Johnson et al. (1).
`supra]. However, preparation procedures damaged
`DNA viability. The sorting of sperm nuclei from sev-
`eral mamrnaiian (bull, boar, ram, vole, chincilla} species
`into separate X and Y chromosome-bearing populations
`at purities ranging from 92 to 99% has been accom-
`plished [Johnson and Clarke, Gam. Res. 21: 335 (l98B}].
`Nuclear decondensation and pronuciear development
`was demonstrated in hamster eggs that had been mi-
`croinjected with sorted X- or Y-bearing bull, boar, or
`ram sperm [Johnson and Clarke, supra].
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is an object of this invention to provide a method
`for sorting mammalian sperm into X and Y chromo-
`some fractions based on DNA content.
`It
`is a further object of this invention to teach a
`method of staining the DNA of mammalian sperm
`while maintaining viability of the sperm.
`It is a further object of this invention to provide a
`sheath fluid adapted to be used in a cell-sorting appara-
`tus while maintaining viability of sperm cells.
`It is a further object of this invention to provide in
`collecting fluid capable of maintaining the viability of
`sorted sperm cells.
`Other objects and advantages of this invention will
`become readily apparent from the ensuing description.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`I have now demonstrated the separation. by flow
`sorting. of‘ intact. viable X and Y chromosome-bearing
`rabbit and swine sperm populations based on relative
`DNA content; surgical insemination of the sorted spenn
`into does; and the subsequent birth of sexed offspring
`
`

`
`5,135,759
`
`IS
`
`25
`
`55
`
`3
`with a phenotypic sex ratio consistent with predictions
`based on the relative DNA content of the sorted sperm
`populations.
`A flow cytometer measures the amount offluorescent
`light given off when the sperm. previously treated with
`it fluorescent dye. pass through a laser beam. The dye
`binds to the DNA. The fluorescent light is collected by
`an optical lens assembly; the signal is transported to a
`photomultiple lube, amplied. and analyzed by com-
`puter. Because the X chromosome contains more DNA
`than the Y chromosome. the female sperm (X) takes up
`more dye and gives off more fluorescent light than the
`male sperm (Y).
`For small differences in DNA to be detected between
`X and Y. the sperm must pass single file through the
`laser beam. which measures the DNA content of indi-
`vidual sperm.
`In orthogonal flow cytometry. a suspension of single
`cells stained with a fluorochrome is made to flow in a
`narrow stream intersecting an excitation source (laser 20
`bearn). As single cells pass through the beam, optical
`detectors collect the emitted light, convert the light to
`electrical signals, and the electrical signals are analyzed
`by a multichannel analyzer. The data are displayed as
`multi- or single-parameter histograms. using number of
`cells and fluorescence per cell as the coordinates.
`In order to use an orthogonal flow cytrometric sys-
`tem to differentiate between X- and Y-bearing sperm
`DNA. a beveled sample injection tip and a second fluo-
`rescence detector in the forward position is required
`[Johnson and Pinkel. supra]. This paper is herein incor-
`porated by reference. The modified system allows one
`to control the orientation of the flat ovoid sperm head
`as it passes the laser beam. Elimination of the unoriented
`sperm by electronic gating enhances precision. Typi-
`cally. 30% of sperm nuclei (without tails) are properly
`oriented as they pass the laser beam.
`In the modified Epics V flow cytometer/cell sorter.
`hydrodynamic forces exerted on the flat. ovoid mam-
`malian sperm nuclei orient the nuclei in the plane ofthe 40
`sample stream as they exit the beveled injection tip.
`Fluorescent signals are collected simultaneously by 90
`and 0 degree optical detectors, from the edge and flat
`side ofthe sperm nucleus, respectively. For sorting, the
`sample stream is broken into uniform droplets by an
`ultrasonic transducer. Droplets containing single sperm
`of the appropriate fluorescence intensity are given a
`charge and electrostatically deflected into collection
`vessels. The collected sperm nuclei then can be used for
`microinjection into eggs. Since the spenn nuclei have
`no tails, they cannot be used for normal insemination.
`Accurate measurement of mammalian sperm DNA
`content using flow cytometry and cell sorting is dill"-
`cult because the sperm nucleus is highly condensed and
`flat in shape. which makes stoichiometric staining diffi-
`cult and causes stained nuclei to have a high index of
`refraction. These factors contribute to emission of fluo-
`re-scence preferentially from the edge or thin plane of
`the sperm nucleus. In most flow cytometers and sorters,
`the direction of sample flow is orthogonal to the direc- 60
`tion of propagation of the laser beam and the optical
`axes of the fluorescence detection. Consequently. fluo-
`rescence measurement is most accurate when the spenn
`fluorescence is excited and measured on an axis perpen-
`dicular to the plane of the sperm head [I-‘inltel et al. (2),
`supra]. At relatively low sample flow rates, hydrody-
`namics are used to orient tailless sperm so that DNA
`content can be measured precisly on 60 to 80% of the
`
`4
`Sperrn passing in front of the laser beam. The modified
`Epics V system used in this study can measure the DNA
`content oftailless spenn from most species at the rate of
`50 to 150 sperm per second [Johnson and Pinltel. supra].
`Intact sperm (with tails). whether viable or nonvia-
`ble. cannot be oriented as effectively as tailless sperm
`nuclei [Johnson (2). supra]. However. a 9'0-degree de-
`tector can be used to select the population of properly
`oriented intact sperm to be measured by the 0 degree
`detector. Since no hydrodynamic orientation is at-
`tempted, thc sample flow rate can be much higher,
`which compensates somewhat for the fact that only 15
`to 20% ofintact spenn pass through the laser beam with
`proper orientation. In this invention, the overall flow
`rate was approximately 2500 intact sperm per second.
`The intact X- and Y-bearing sperm fractions were
`sorted simultaneously from the population of input
`sperm at a rate of 80-90 sperm of each type per second.
`It is, of course, of critical importance to maintain high
`viability of the intact sperm during the sorting process
`and during storage after sorting but prior to insemina-
`tion.
`
`Of the factors involved in maintaining sperm viabil-
`ity, the method of staining. the sheath fluid. and the
`collecting fluid have been found to be especially impor-
`tant.
`
`A nontoxic DNA stain must be selected. A preferred
`stain is Hoechst bisbenzimide H 33342 fluorochrotne
`(Calbiochem-Behring Co., La Jolla, Calif). To our
`knowledge. this fluorochrome is the only DNA binding
`dye that is nontoxic to sperm. Concentration of the
`fluorochrome must be minimal to avoid toxicity, and
`yet be sufficient to stain sperm uniformly and to detect
`the small differences in the DNA of)( and Y sperm with
`minimal variation. A suitable concentration was found
`to be S pg/ml. but this may be varied from 4 to 5 pg/ml.
`The sperm must be incubated with stain at sufficient
`temperature and time for staining to take place, but
`under mild enough conditions to preserve viability.
`lncubation for 1 hr at 35° C. was found to beacceptable,
`but ranges of 30" to 39' C. would also be effective.
`Incubation time has to be adjusted according to temper-
`ature; that is. 1.5 hr for 30' C.; 1 hr for 39‘ C.
`Sheath fluid used in sorting cells must be electrically
`conductive and isotonic. A concentration of IO mM
`phosphate buffered saline provided the necessary elec-
`trical properties, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin was
`added to enhance sperm viability by providing protein
`support for metabolism and viscosity for the sperm. The
`sheath fluid must be free of sugars and excess salts.
`Dilution of sperm as occurs in sorting tends to reduce
`viability of the cells. To overcome this problem, sperm
`were collected in test egg yolk extender [Graham et al..
`J. Dairy Sci. 55: 372 0972)] modified by adjusting the
`pH and adding a surfactant. Details of the composition
`of the extender are shown in Example 1. The surfactant
`is believed to enhance capacitation of the sperm prior to
`fertilization.
`
`To confirm the DNA content and predict the sex of
`the offspring of surgically inseminated X or Y sorted
`sperm fractions, an aliquot of the sorted spenn was
`sonicated to remove the tails, stained. and the nuclei
`was reanalyzed for DNA content to predict the propor-
`tion of X and Y sperm.
`Although the detailed description which follows uses
`the sorting of rabbit sperm as an example of this inven-
`tion,
`it
`is expected that the sperm of most mammals
`could be effectively sorted by following these proce-
`
`

`
`5.l35,'.+'59
`
`6
`kindling rate of near 80% and litter size of about six
`from does of this age and breed. However, the kindling
`rate across the three treatment groups averaged 28%.
`with an average litter size of 3.9. The cause ofthe appar-
`ent high rate of embryonic death is though to be due to .
`the fluorochrome binding to the DNA and/or to the
`effect of the laser beam exciting the DNA bound fluoro-
`chrome. Earlier work has shown that sorted vole sperm
`nuclei that were microinjected into hamster eggs exhib-
`ited chromosome breakage in the developing sperm
`pronucleus [Libbus et al.. Mut. Res. 182: 265 0987)].
`Those sperm had been sonicated, stained, sorted, and
`microinjected,
`ll somewhat more rigorous treatment
`than the staining and sorting used in this study.
`I have demonstrated that DNA can be used as a dif-
`ferentiating marker between X- and Y-bearing sperm,
`that DNA can be used to accurately predict the sex of
`offspring from separated X- and Y-bearing sperm popu-
`lations. and that flow sorting is an effective means for
`separating viable X- and Y-bearing sperm populations
`suitable for production of offspring.
`The following examples are intended only to further
`illustrate the invention and are not intended to limit the
`scope of the invention. which is defined by the claims.
`EXAMPLE I
`
`Semen was collected from mixed breed mature bucks
`by use of an artificial vagina. Sperm concentration was
`detennined with a hemocytometer. The semen was
`diluted with Tris bufTer, pH 6.9, to a concentration of
`10X 105 per ml. Bisbenzimide I-I 33342 lluorochrome
`was added at a concentration of5 p.g/ml. The samples
`were incubated for 1 hr at 35° C. Intact sperm were
`sorted on a modified EPICS V flow cytometer/cell
`sorter. The stained intact spenn were excited in the
`ultraviolet (UV; 361 and 364 um) lines of a 5-watt 90-5
`lnnova Argon-ion laser operating at 200 mW. Data
`were collected as 256-channel histograms. Sheath fluid
`was 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing
`0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Sperm were sorted
`into a test egg yolk extender.
`The composition of the extender was N-tris(hydrox-.
`ymethyl)-methyl-2-amino ethane sulfonic acid. 2.16 g;
`tris hydroxymethyl arninomethane, 0.51 g; dextrose. 0.1
`g; streptomycin sulfate. 0.13 g; penicillin (3. 0.08 g; egg
`yolk,
`I2.5 ml; Equex STM (Nova Chemical Sales,
`Scituato, Mass), 0.5%; and distilled water, 50 ml. This
`
`5
`dures. Those skilled in the art will recognize that minor
`modifications may be made in the procedure without
`departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
`Rabbit semen was collected. diluted, and stained with
`a lluorochrome dye. Sperm were sorted in a modified
`Epics V flow cytometer/cell sorter.
`After being sorted. sperm were surgically insemi-
`nated into the uteri of rabbits.
`The results obtained by surgical insemination of does
`with sorted intact sperm are presented in Table 1. Re-
`covery of ova 4-0 hr post-insemination indicated that
`stained sorted sperm, as well as unstained unsorted
`sperm, were capable of fertilizing rabbit ova in vivo.
`Inseminations were also made to determine the com-
`
`parability of predicted sex of offspring to phenotypic 15
`sex. As the data in Table 11 indicate. the predictability of
`the phenotypic sex based on DNA analysis of the sepa-
`rated intact sperm was very high. Reanalysis of the
`sorted Y population used for insemination indicated that
`31% of the spent: were Y-bearing. The sex ratio of 20
`offspring from these inseminations was identical to that
`predicted. These values were significantly different
`from theoretical 50:50 sex rates (P<0.003)._ Reanalysis
`of the sorted X-bearing sperm population used for in-
`semination indicated that 86% were X-bearing and 14%
`were Y-bearing sperm. The phenotypic sex of the off-
`spring from these inseminations was 94% female. which
`was different from the theoretical 50:50 (P -(0.0003).
`Inseminations were made with sorted X and Y popu-
`lations that were recombined (recombined X and Y
`group) immediately before insemination. The assump-
`tion was made that the proportions of X and Y in the
`recombined samples were equal (50:50). The pheno-
`typic sex resulting from the inserninations was 57%
`female and 43% male (Table II} and was not signifi-
`cantly different from the theoretical (50:50) sex ratio
`(p=o.4o).
`
`ABLE I
`Fertilizing Capacity of Flow-Sorted Rabbit
`Sgrmatozoa Alter Intrauterine Insemination of Docs
`Number of
`Ovulation
`Eggs
`Does
`Treatment
`Points
`Recovered
`Inseminaled
`of Sperm
`I6
`9
`2
`Unsorted
`59
`£6
`6‘
`Sorted
`‘One doe accounted for ‘l' recovered and T unferliltwd eggs.
`
`Eggs
`Fertilized
`9
`39
`
`- T
`
`TABLE II
`Predicted and Actual Sex Ratios of Offspring After Intrauterine
`Insemination of Soned X and Y Chrcmosorne-Bearing Rabbit 551111
`Total
`Percentage and Numbers of Offspring
`No. of
`Predicted
`Actual
`9!:
`9!:
`Young
`%
`%
`Born Males
`Fernales Ma|es('N')
`FemaIea(N)
`1]
`ll
`19
`81 (17)
`I9 (4)
`16
`I4
`36
`6 ll)
`94 (I5)
`I4
`50
`50
`43 (d)
`57 (B)
`
`I3 T —
`
`—
`
`47 (24;
`
`53 (27)
`
`Number of Docs
`lnserninnted Kindling
`16
`5
`14
`3
`I?
`5
`_
`47
`
`Treatment
`oifiperrn
`Sorted Y
`Sorted X
`llot:ombi.ned
`x and Y
`Total
`
`The phenotypic sex ratio of offspring born of dots in-
`seminated with either sorted X-bearing or sorted Y-
`bearing sperm was different
`[P<0.£K)02 for X and
`P<0.C0l for Y) from the theoretical (50:50) sex ratio
`expected from untreated semen.
`Embryonic mortality was significant in the does in-
`seminated with sorted intact sperm. With a reasonably
`high fertilization rate (Table I). one would expect a
`
`mixture was centrifuged, and only the supernatant was
`65 used. The sorted sperm were concentrated by incubat-
`ing at room temperature for 1 hr, after which the more
`dilute fraction was removed and the remainder was
`used for insemination 1 to 4 hr later.
`
`

`
`7
`
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`5,135,759
`
`Mature New Zealand White does were injected with
`ISO international units of human chorionic gonadotro-
`pin (HCG) to induce ovulation. which was expected to
`occur I0 hr later. Seven hours after treatment with
`HCG. the docs were surgically prepared by injection
`with Ketamine hydrochloride containing acepromazine
`and anesthetized under halothane and oxygen. The
`uterus was exposed by midline incision, and I00 pl of
`sorted or unsorted sperm was placed into the lumen of
`the anterior tip of each uterine horn through a 21-gauge
`needle. Standard management practices were used in
`caring for the rabbits. These does were sacrificed 4-0 hr
`post-insemination; uteri were flushed and recovered
`eggs evaluated. All fertilized eggs recovered were clas-
`sified as morula. The results of these experiments are
`shown in Table I.
`
`EXAMPLE 3
`
`Table II shows the results of inseminations made into
`the tip of the uterine horn: the number of does that
`kindled and the phenotypic sex of the offspring com-
`pared to the predicted sex. Predicted sex of offspring
`was based on reanalysis of sorted intact sperm to deter-
`mine relative DNA content. For reanalysis. the sorted
`sperm was sonicated for 10 sec and centrifuged at
`I5.0{}0 g, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet
`was resuspended in 9 pM bisbenzimide H 33342. Pheno-
`typic sex of the offspring was determined soon after
`birth and confirmed at later ages up to 10 weeks. Re-
`eombined X and Y is the sorted X and Y sperm popula-
`tions recombined immediately before insemination.
`EXAMPLE 4
`
`Using the methods of Examples 1. 2, and 3, viable
`swine sperm was sorted into viable X and Y chromo-
`some-bearing populations. Two litters (18 pigs) from
`surgically inseminated boar semen produced 83% fe-
`males from X-sorted sperm and 67% males from Y-
`sorted sperm.
`It is understood that the foregoing detailed descrip-
`tion is given mainly by way of illustration and that
`modification and variation may be made therein with-
`out departure from the spirit and scope ofthe invention.
`1 claim:
`1. A method for sorting intact. viable. mammalian
`sperm into X- and Y-chromosome—bearing populations
`based on DNA content, the method comprising:
`in) staining intact. viable sperm collected from a male
`mammal with a fluorescent dye capable of selec-
`tively staining DNA in living cells by incubating
`the sperm with the dye at a temperature in the
`range ofabout 30'—39‘ C. for a period of time suffi-
`ciently long for staining to take place uniformly but
`sufficiently short to preserve viability of the sperm;
`b) passing the sperm into an electrically conductive
`and isotonic viability-supporting sheath fluid to
`form a suspension of sperm which are caused to
`flow singly in a stream of sheath fluid;
`c) passing the sheath fluid containing the sperm be-
`fore an excitation light source causing the stained
`DNA to fluoresce;
`_
`d} passing the sheath fluid containing the sperm
`through both a means for detecting the fluores-
`cence of the stained DNA and also a cell sorting
`means, the means for detecting fluorescence having
`at least two detectors arranged such that a first
`
`8
`detector determines the orientation of sperm on the
`basis of magnitude of fluorescence and controls a
`second detector to measure the DNA content of
`sperm on the basis of magnitude of fluorescence of
`those sperm that have been determined to be in a
`preselected orientation;
`e) selecting by said cell sorting means the sperm hav-
`ing a DNA content corresponding to a desired
`chromosome which will produce a desired gender
`of olTspring. and separating the selected sperm
`from nonselected sperm; and
`f) collecting the selected sperm in a viability-support
`ing collecting fluid.
`2. The method of claim 1, wherein said mammal is a
`rabbit.
`3. The method of claim 1, wherein said mammal is a
`swine.
`4. The method of claim 1, wherein said mammal is a
`bovine.
`5. The method of claim 1, wherein said dye is bisben-
`zimide H333-12 fluorochrorne.
`6. The method of claim 1. wherein said incubation is
`at a temperature of about 39° C. for a period of about 1
`hr.
`7. The method of claim 1. wherein said incubation is
`at a temperature of about 35" C. for a period of about 1
`hr.
`8. The method of claim 1. wherein said incubation is
`at a temperature of about 30° C. for about 1.5 hr.
`9. The method of claim 1. wherein said sheath fluid is
`phosphate-buffered saline solution.
`the solution also
`containing |J.l% bovine serum albumin to enhance
`spenrt viability.
`1|]. The method of claim 1, wherein said collecting
`fluid is modified test egg yolk extender.
`11. The method of claim 1. wherein said sperm are
`hydrodynamically oriented in the flow of sheath fluid
`prior to being passed before said light source.
`12. The method of claim 1, wherein said sperm are
`hydrodynamically oriented in the flow of sheath fluid
`by passing the fluid in a narrow stream through and out
`ofa bevelled injection tip prior to being passed before
`said light source.
`13. A method to preselect the sex of mammalian off-
`spring comprising:
`a) sorting sperm according to the method of claim 1;
`and
`
`b) inseminating a female mammal of the same species
`as the male mammal with the selected sperm in the
`collecting fluid.
`14. A method to preselect the sex of mammalian off-
`spring comprising:
`tt) sorting spenn according to the method of claim 1;
`and
`b) fertilizing an egg obtained from a female mammal
`of the same species as the male mammal with the
`selected sperm in the collecting fluid.
`15. The method of claim 1, further comprising elimi-
`nating sperm which are not properly oriented with an
`electronic gating system before sorting by said cell
`sorting means.
`16. The method of claim 1, wherein the flow of sperm
`through the cell sorting means is regulated by an ultra-
`sonic transducer.
`
`17. The method of claim 1, wherein said spenn are
`sorted on the basis of X- or Y-chromosome DNA con-
`tent with about 90% efficiency.
`
`

`
`5,135,759
`
`9
`18. The method of claim 1, wherein said sperm are
`hydrodynarnically oriented in the flow of sheath fluid
`and sperm which are not properly oriented are elimi-
`nated by an electronic gating system prior to being
`passed before said light source.
`19. A method to preselect the sex of mammalian off-
`spring comprising:
`in) staining intact, viable sperm collected from a male
`mammal with a fluorescent dye capable of selec-
`tively staining DNA in living cells by incubating to
`sperm with the dye at a temperature in the range of
`about 30°—39' C. for a period of time sufliciently
`long for staining to take place uniformly but suff-
`ciently short to preserve viability of the sperm;
`b) passing the spenn into an electrically conductive
`and isotonic viability-supporting sheath fluid to
`form a suspension of sperm which are caused to
`flow singly in a stream of sheath fluid;
`c) passing the sheath fluid containing the sperm be-
`fore an excitation light source causing the stained
`DNA to fluoresce;
`d) passing the sheath fluid containing the sperm
`through both a means for detecting the fluores-
`cence of the stained DNA and also a cell sorting
`means to measure the DNA content of the sperm
`on the basis of magnitude of fluorescence of the
`spenn;
`e) selecting by said cell sorting means the sperm hav-
`ing a DNA content corresponding to a desired
`chromosome which will produce the desired gen-
`
`10
`der of offspring, and separating the selected sperm
`from nonselected sperm; and
`1) collecting the selected sperm in a viability-support-
`ing collecting fluid.
`20. A method for preparing intact. viable. mammalian
`sperm for sorting into X- and Y-chromosome-beating
`populations based on DNA content. the method com-
`prising staining intact, viable sperm collected from a
`male mammal with a fluorescent dye capable of selec-
`tively staining DNA in living cells by incubating the
`sperm with the dye at a temperature in the range of
`about 30'—39° C. for a period of time sufficiently long
`for staining to take place unifonnly but sufficiently
`short to preserve viability of the sperm.
`2].. The method of claim 20, wherein said mammal is
`in swine.
`22. The method of claim 20, wherein said mammal is
`a bovine.
`23. The method of claim 20, wherein said dye is bis-
`benzimide I-£33342 fiuorochrorne.
`24. The method of claim 20, wherein said incubation
`is at a temperature of about 39° C. for a period of about
`1 hr.
`25. The method of claim 20. wherein said incubation
`is at a temperature of about 35‘ C. for a period of about
`I hr.
`26. The method of claim 21. wherein said incubation
`is at a temperature of about 30‘ C. for about 1.5 hr.
`I
`I
`U
`U
`I

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket