throbber
Food and Drug Administration
`Silver Spring MD 20993
`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION REQUEST
`
`
`
`
`NDA 203510
`
`Paragon BioTeck, Inc.
`c/o Point Guard Partners LLC
`Attention: Jeremy Brace, B.Sc. (Hons)
`400 N. Ashley Street, Suite 1950
`Tampa, FL 33602
`
`
`
`Dear Mr. Brace:
`
`Please refer to your New Drug Application (NDA) submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal
`Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for phenylephrine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution, 2.5% and
`10%.
`
`We are reviewing the Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls section of your submission and
`have the following comments and information requests. We request a prompt written response
`in order to continue our evaluation of your NDA.
`
`
`1. Please describe how the drug product manufacturer assures the quality of the in-coming
`drug substance and which tests are conducted in house. If the assay and impurities are
`determined by HPLC testing please describe how the drug product manufacturer has
`validated the method or verified that it is suitable for use.
`
`
`2. Provide a description of the HPLC method used for SOP SAS-037 (the UV 210 nm
`method) described in extract-migration-study. How is the reporting limit of 1 ppm
`defined? 1 ppm with reference to what?
`
`3. Conduct extraction and migration studies (in a similar fashion to those already carried
`out) for 1-3 batches after storage at 25°C/60% RH (accelerated) for 6 months and after
`storage refrigerated (long-term) through expiration. We recommend that the control be a
`sealed glass vial containing the drug product solution.
`
`4. In the description of the manufacturing Process (3.2.P.3.3) you state “Compounding and
`mixing of Phenylephrine HCl Ophthalmic Solution 2.5% (457.2 kg batch size) will occur
`in a 600 liter mixing tank equipped with a simple propeller-style mixer.” Additionally a
`600 L sterile holding tank is used. However Figures 2 and 3 show only 50 gallon mixing
`tanks. Are these 50 gallon tanks replaced with 600 L tanks when necessary and, if so,
`how does this impact on the cleanliness of the various rooms? Alternatively, is a
`different facility used? Please provide information on the validation of the holding times
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3226374
`
`Exhibit 1010- Page 1 of 4
`
`

`
`NDA 203510
`Page 2
`
`of product in the mixing and sterile holding tanks. Please indicate if metal from the
`holding or mixing tanks has been found to contaminate the product.
`
`5. In 3.2.P.3.4.1 the in-process control is given as 450-550 mOsm/Kg H2O. However in the
`specification the 10% solution is 950-1050 mOsm/Kg H2O. Please reconcile.
`
`6. Provide a description of the sampling plan and representative analyses for the Water for
`Injection.
`
`7. Specify if the light obscuration or the microscopic particle test method is used to
`determine particulates. Please provide a report verifying that it is suitable for its intended
`purpose.
`
`8. Please change the phenylephrine hydrochloride assay acceptance criterion to 90.0-
`110.0% of label claim.
`
`9. We note that the highest observed Total Impurities value is 0.02%. Please consider
`reducing the Total Impurities acceptance criterion from ≤ 1.5% to ≤ 0.5%.
`
`10. Consider adding a chiral purity test to the dug product specification or provide a
`justification for not doing so.
`
`11. Please supply batch numbers, expiration dates, and assigned purities for all the reference
`standards.
`
`12. Provide specifications for the in-coming container-closure system components.
`
`13. Provide a description (including brand, type, and composition, as far as is known) of the
`labeling materials and inks that may be used for this product. Please note that these
`should not be changed without notifying the Agency.
`
`14. Provide a Methods Validation Package. This should consist of a list of samples that
`could be supplied and links to the various analytical methods.
`
`15. You state in 3.2.P.2.5 Microbiological Attributes that “The validation of the sterilizing
`filter (Pall Fluorodyne II 0.2 μm) used in the production of Phenylephrine HCl
`Ophthalmic Solution, 2.5.% and 10% has been conducted and can be found in Sterilizing
`Filter Validation.” However the report on the Sterilizing Filter Validation appears to
`describe only the use of the 2.5% solution. Please provide a similar report using the 10%
`solution or a justification for not providing such a report.
`
`16. Test the sterilizing filter for extractables.
`
`17. Test the drug product for endotoxins on stability, at least annually.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3226374
`
`Exhibit 1010- Page 2 of 4
`
`

`
`NDA 203510
`Page 3
`
`
`
`If you have any questions, call Althea Cuff, Regulatory Health Project Manager, at (301) 796-
`4061.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`Rapti D. Madurawe, Ph.D.
`Branch Chief, Branch V
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3226374
`
`Exhibit 1010- Page 3 of 4
`
`

`
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`RAPTI D MADURAWE
`12/05/2012
`
`Reference ID: 3226374
`
`Exhibit 1010- Page 4 of 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket