PTAB

Search for cases ...

Cheat Sheet
Query Builder
Jurisdiction Selector
Suggestions

Basic Search

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Clear Coverage information Done

All of these words

Any of these words

Exactly this phrase or word

None of these words

This word

Case filed between and

Most recent docket entry filed between and

With deadlines about

Has at least

Party’s Name

Firm

Attorney

Role

Publicly traded

Filter by

Search result types Dockets Documents

Opinions Motions Pleadings Exhibits

Signup
Login
More...
- Signup
- Login
- Features
- Enhance
- Pricing
- News
- About

Information

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Click below for detailed party information:

Patent Owner

VideoLabs, Inc.

Petitioner

Roku, Inc.

Assignee

PRAETOR FUND I, A SUB-FUND OF PRAETORIUM FUND I ICAV

alt+h	Toggle this page.
alt+u	Toggle Upcoming Events view.
alt+e	Export the docket to Excel.
Filtering / Searching the Docket
ctrl+f	Filter the docket.
ctrl+shift+f	Search docket and documents.
alt+s	Toggle between "Show Only" filtering modes.
alt+d, ctrl+f	System ctrl+f
escape	Clear while in docket filter.
Interactive Timeline
alt+t	Show / re-center case timeline.
alt+↑	Zoom in
alt+↓	Zoom out
alt+←	Pan left
alt+→	Pan right

Roku, Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.

IPR2025-00071 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.

Filed Nov. 11, 2024

Terminated March 31, 2025

Judges Jeffrey Smith, Stacey White, and Stephen Belisle

Case Type Inter Partes Review

Status Terminated-Settled

Challenged Patent 10/690,692

Patent No. 7,440,559 assignments

Tech Center 2600

Art Unit 2614

Inventors Ahti Muhonen, Antti-Pentti Vainio, Ari Hannikainen

Last Updated: 6 hours ago

Filing Date	#	Filing and Exhibits
Entries matching. Show All.
4/10/2025	04-10-2025-Board	Board Notice: refund approved 10: Notice: refund approved
4/1/2025	04-01-2025-Petitioner	Petitioner Other: Refund request 9: Petitioner's Request for Refund
3/31/2025	03-31-2025-Board	Event: Motion to Terminate (Granted) Board Termination Decision: Pre-DI settlement 8: Termination Decision: Pre-DI settlement
2/26/2025	02-26-2025-Petitioner	Petitioner Motion: Motion to dismiss due to settlement (pre-DI) 6: Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding Petitioner Motion: Other 7: Joint Request to Keep Settlement Confidential Petitioner Exhibit 1020: Settlement Agreement (Confidential)
12/6/2024	12-06-2024-Board	Board Notice: Notice filing date accorded 5: Notice: Notice filing date accorded
11/25/2024	11-25-2024-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Notice: Power of Attorney 3: Notice : Power of Attorney Patent Owner Notice: Mandatory Notice 4: Notice : Mandatory Notice
11/11/2024	11-11-2024-Petitioner	Petitioner Notice: Power of Attorney 1: Power of Attorney Petitioner Petition: as filed 2: Petition for Inter Partes Review Petitioner Exhibit 1001: U.S. Patent No. 7,440,559 ("'559") Petitioner Exhibit 1002: File History of U.S. Patent Application No. 10/690,692 ("'559FH") Petitioner Exhibit 1003: Declaration of Bruce McNair ("McNair") Petitioner Exhibit 1004: CV of Bruce McNair Petitioner Exhibit 1005: U.S. Patent No. 6,341,316 ("Kloba") Petitioner Exhibit 1006: U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0079038 ("Robbin") Petitioner Exhibit 1007: Starz Entm’t, LLC v. VL Collective IP, Claim Construction Order Petitioner Exhibit 1008: Netflix, Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc, IPR2023-00630, Paper 2 (Petition) Petitioner Exhibit 1009: Netflix, Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc, IPR2023-00630, Paper 10 (DI) Petitioner Exhibit 1010: Federal Judicial Caseload Statistics (June 30, 2024) Petitioner Exhibit 1011: VideoLabs, Inc. v. Roku, Inc., Defendant Roku Inc.'s Motion to Stay Petitioner Exhibit 1012: VideoLabs, Inc. v. Roku, Inc., Roku Inc’s Opening Brief ISO Motion to Stay Petitioner Exhibit 1013: VideoLabs, Inc. v. Roku, Inc., Order Granting Motion to Stay Petitioner Exhibit 1015: Netflix, Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc, IPR2023-00630, Paper 31 (FWD) Petitioner Exhibit 1016: VideoLabs, Inc. v. Roku, Inc., (Summons) Petitioner Exhibit 1017: AviaGames, Inc. v. Skillz Platform, Inc., IPR2022-00530, Paper 14 Petitioner Exhibit 1018: U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0163431 ("Ginter") Petitioner Exhibit 1019: U.S. Patent No. 5,943,422 ("Van Wie")

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Unlimited document access
Unlimited case alerts
Unlimited docket tracking
Unlimited search
Search/filter by motion
For-pay state court docs

$99/mo.

Excludes PACER and Gov’t fees

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

$4/document
$3/ docket update
$3/day new case alerts
$2/day for docket tracking
$1/search in Fed Courts
For-pay state court docs

$39.99/mo.

Add-ons include Federal Analytics, Easy Analytics, and the Analytics Workbench.

Add your payment information

Need help? Lets schedule a quick demo.

What is PACER?

PACER is a government system to access US court records.

Why do I need it?

Docket Alarm uses PACER to access Federal Court documents. Under the flat-rate plan, we pass these fees on to your account without markup.

What will I be charged?

If we already have the document in our database, you will not be charged anything. However, if we do not, then we must retrieve it from the court and incur their access fee.

PACER charges $0.10 per page with a 30 page (or $3.00) cap for all documents, except transcripts which have no cap. For example, a five page document is $0.50 and a 50 page document is $3.00. Accessing docket sheets also incurs a fee if we do not already have the full docket sheet (again, max of $3.00). These fees are only incurred for Federal Courts and Bankruptcies.

Do other courts have fees?

Certain state courts, mostly in California, charge for access to some documents. When accessing for-pay state courts, you will always be given an option to accept or decline the payment.

Basic Free Access

We’re committed to keeping the law open. We provide free searches and document/docket views a week for documents already in our system. You have pages left for free viewing.

Note: free views don't apply to documents purchased from government systems, e.g., PACER.

Welcome

Docket Alarm has relationships with many large firms such as yours.

See if your firm has an account

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Patent Owner

Petitioner

Assignee

Keyboard shortcuts

Filtering / Searching the Docket

Interactive Timeline

Roku, Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.

IPR2025-00071 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Event:

Alert Sharing

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases