throbber
’<<>E>J:L BG@ L A> OHJE=!K J>K>:J<A$
`
`Unlocking the Earth: A Short History
`of Hydraulic Fracturing (2013)
`
`Michael Quentin Morton
`
`GeoExpro, vol. 10, no. 6
`
`Cite this paper
`
`*HOGEH:=>= ?JHF ’<:=>FB:$>=M Ž
`
`->L LA> <BL:LBHG BG 21’# ’5’# HJ )AB<:@H KLQE>K
`
`Related papers
`
`*HOGEH:= : 5*, 5:<D H? L A> ;>KL J>E:L >= I:I>JK Ž
`
`)425+3*/92 4, 7)/+38 /,/)# 2+*/)’1# ’3* 2+*/’ ,/3*/3-7 *+24378 6’8 /3- 6/707 ’3* .R
`5:L 8:E;HL
`
`)HJGM<HIB: HJ <MJK>& 6>NB>OBG@ L A> <HKL K :G= ;>G>SL K H? KA:E> @:K AQ=J:MEB< ?J:<L MJBG@ "?J:<DBG@
`
`(>GC:FBG 7HN:<HHE
`
`.Q=J:MEB< ,J:<L MJBG@ BG L A> +MJHI>:G 9GBHG% 1>N>J:@BG@ L A> 9$7$ +PI>JB>G<> BG 7A:E> -:K +PIEHJ:L BHG :GR
`)AJBKL HIA .>GD>E
`
`LIBERTY EXHIBIT 1017, Page 1
`
`

`

`H IS TO R Y O F O I L
`
`Fracking has come a long way since 1857 when Preston
`Barmore lowered gunpowder into a well at Canadaway
`Creek, NY, and dropped a red-hot iron down a tube,
`resulting in an explosion that fractured the rock and
`increased the !ow of gas from the well.
`Hydraulic fracturing, as its name suggests, involves
`pumping water and sand at high pressure to fracture
`subterranean rocks. This might appear far removed
`from the mid-nineteenth century practice of ‘shooting’
`a well, which used explosives instead of water, but the
`basic principle is the same. Drillers freed-up clogged
`or non-productive wells by creating underground
`explosions to loosen rock or debris. The effect was
`often the reverse of modern fracking: a column of
`earth, water and oil would shoot out of the well head,
`a spectacle for onlookers but hardly a
`reliable industrial process.
`In 1865, Col. Edward Roberts
`and his brother developed a
`technique known as ‘super-
`incumbent !uid-tamping’,
`in which water dampened
`the explosion, preventing
`any debris blowing back up
`the hole and amplifying its
`effects. They also developed
`a nitro-glycerine
`‘torpedo’,
`replacing the black powder and
`gunpowder that had previously been
`used. Their legacy lives on with the Tallini and Otto
`Cupler Torpedo Company, which still shoots wells with
`
`Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission
`Courtesy of The Drake Well Museum,
`
`Unlocking
`the Earth
`
`A Short History of
`Hydraulic Fracturing
`
`MICHAEL QUENTIN MORTON
`
`The recent shale gas boom is a reminder that
`the effective use of hydraulic fracturing in shale
`formations is a relatively new phenomenon.
`However, this ‘fracking’ (also called 'fracing’ or
`‘fraccing’ in the technical literature) has been
`around for longer than many people realise,
`and the use of unconventional techniques
`to extract oil and gas from the ground has
`developed over more than 150 years.
`
`Drilling for shale gas, Washington County,
`Pennsylvania, in November 2010.
`
`86 GEO ExPro DECEMBER 2013
`
`Mark Schmerling, www.fractracker.org
`
`

`

`GEO ExPro DECEMBER 2013 87
`
`

`

`H IS TO R Y O F O I L
`
`rock. This mixture (or ‘proppant’) !lled
`the !ssures and propped them open,
`allowing trapped oil and gas to !ow out.
`Shale rock presented a particular
`challenge because of the dif!culty in
`accessing the hydrocarbons in these tight
`formations. In the mid-1970s, the US
`Department of Energy (DOE) and the Gas
`Research Institute (GRI), in partnership
`with private operators, began developing
`techniques to produce natural gas from
`shale. These included the use of horizontal
`wells, multi-stage fracturing, and ‘slick’
`water fracturing (GEO ExPro Vol. 9, No. 2).
`Between 1981 and 1998 a Texas
`company, Mitchell Energy and Develop-
`ment, experimented with these tech-
`niques
`in testing the Barnett Shale
`formation. Commercial success came
`when the company combined them
`with slick water, a low viscous mixture
`that could be rapidly pumped down a
`well to deliver a much higher pressure to
`the rock than before. A merger between
`Mitchell Energy and Devon Energy in
`2002 brought a rapid increase in the
`
`use of fracking with horizontal
`drilling. With other companies
`involved, fracking spread to shale
`exploration in Texas, Oklahoma,
`Arkansas, Louisiana, Pennsylvania,
`West Virginia and the Rockies.
`
`Fracking ‘Quakes
`As public awareness of fracking has
`grown, so have concerns about
`the pro cess, espec ially the large
`volume of water used, the resulting
`waste water, air pollution and
`the consequences of injecting chemicals
`deep under ground. Opponents point to
`the possible con tamination of aquifers by
`chemicals associated with fracking or by
`the escape of methane gas. According to
`geo logists, it is unlikely that the gas will rise
`far enough to reach the shallow aquifers
`that supply drinking water, although
`some researchers disagree. It appears
`that, at production sites, fracking causes
`lower leakages of methane than had been
`feared. In a number of cases, landowners
`and farmers have claimed that leaks from
`
`A hydraulic fracturing operation at a Marcellus Shale well, Pennsylvania.
`
`$(,#,+1(+/,+ 978:
`%&2 8958;
`#&*)&-24 "*’(-.&
`
`88 GEO ExPro DECEMBER 2013
`
`American Oil and Gas History Society
`
`The !rst commercial hydraulic fracking site at Duncan,
`Oklahoma, in 1949.
`
`holding ponds, spills and underground
`ruptures have polluted their water.
`than
`Microearthquakes
`(less
`magnitude 3 on the Richter Scale) are
`an integral part of fracking. They carry
`a very low risk of destructive effects
`– virtually all observed microseismic
`events associated with fracking are of
`a magnitude -0.5, well below levels
`that are noticeable to the public. Small
`earthquakes in south Texas have been
`linked to increased extraction of oil and
`brackish water in the shale boom, but
`not directly to the fracking process. Low-
`level seismic events between 2009 and
`2011 in remote areas of the Horn River
`Basin, British Columbia, were caused by
`!uid injection during hydraulic fracturing
`in proximity to pre-existing faults, but
`only one of these events could be ‘felt’
`at the earth’s surface and no damage or
`injury was caused.
`attributed
`tremors
`Most
`earth
`to fracking are associated with the
`injection of wastewater into wells deep
`underground. This can change the !uid
`balances in rocks and the stresses in
`the Earth’s crust near a fault. Generally,
`these so-called ‘disposal wells’ carry a
`small risk of induced seismicity and, in
`
`

`

`EIA ARI World Shale Gas Resources
`
`with the shale buried deeper underground
`and therefore more expensive to extract.
`According to Deutsche Bank, a well in
`Europe might cost as much as three-and-
`a-half times more than one in the US.
`The American gas industry is less
`restricted than in Europe, with hydraulic
`fracturing being exempted from the Safe
`Drinking Water Act. This contrasts with
`France, where there is a moratorium on
`fracking while an assessment of the risks
`is carried out. But some countries have
`forged ahead: in Poland, for example,
`exploration licences have been issued
`to 20 !rms, test wells have been drilled,
`and commercial production is likely to
`commence in 2014.
`In the United Kingdom, until the
`occurrence of two small earthquakes (3.2
`and 2.4) in Lancashire in 2011, fracking
`was not widely known. In fact, the process
`has been going on since the 1970s, with
`200 wells fracked onshore and even more
`in the North Sea. Various experiments
`have been tried: the Lidsey oil well, for
`example, was fracked in September 1991
`using as the fracturing agent microbial
`acid, otherwise known as Marmite, a
`yeast and vegetable extract. In theory,
`
`Marmite (and molasses) would be food
`for special bacteria, which would excrete
`acid to dissolve the carbonate rock.
`Unfortunately, it also fed the indigenous
`bacteria to produce hydrogen sulphide
`gas. The well was also fractured with a
`typical sand frack before the Marmite
`treatment, and is still producing today.
`
`Unanswered Questions
`Although the global potential of shale
`gas is vast, it is uncertain how much can
`be produced. And, although shale gas
`is cleaner to burn than conventional
`fossil fuels, its overall impact on global
`climate change is dif!cult to predict.
`Environmental concerns persist: in China,
`drilling for oil has begun in the earthquake-
`prone Sichuan region; in South Africa, the
`government has lifted a moratorium to
`allow fracking in the Karoo region, raising
`fears of damage to its ecosystem. Whatever
`fracking’s real bene!ts, one thing is certain:
`the arguments over its future risks and
`impact are set to rumble on.
`
`Acknowledgements:
`The author wishes to thank Peter Morton, Julie
`Shemeta, Eric Vaughan and Steve Wolhart for
`their assistance.
`
`West Sussex, England, 1991: the fracking !uid in the tanks is pumped into the well using Marmite
`in the fracturing process.
`
`Eric Vaughan
`
`H IS TO R Y O F O I L
`
`relation to their large number, there
`have been few recorded seismic events.
`However, a 5.7-magnitude earthquake
`in Oklahoma in 2011 has been linked
`to the disposal of wastewater from oil
`production. It appears that some areas in
`the mid-western United States are prone
`to a process called ‘dynamic triggering’
`whereby distant earthquakes might
`trigger minor earthquakes along faults
`which have been ‘critically loaded’ by
`disposal wells. If strategies are devised
`to minimise the impact of these wells on
`underground !uid balances, then the risk
`of induced seismicity will be reduced.
`
`The Hamster’s Wheel
`The International Energy Agency (IEA)
`estimates that, over the next !ve years,
`the US will account for a third of new oil
`supplies. The growth in US production is
`largely attributable to a steep rise in the
`recovery of shale oil, in which fracking
`has played a major part, unlocking major
`shale rock formations such as the Bakken
`in North Dakota and Montana.
`The tables are turning. The US is likely
`to change from the world’s leading
`importer of oil to a net exporter and,
`according to the IEA, will be self-suf!cient
`in its energy needs by 2035. It has also
`led to a refocusing of US foreign policy,
`away from an historical reliance on the
`oil-rich countries of the Middle East.
`The natural gas boom initiated by
`fracking has had a number of consequences
`(GEO ExPro, Vol. 10, No. 3). In the United
`States, with low prices resulting from the
`development of unconventional gas,
`producers are currently active in preserving
`leases for future development. Today’s
`story is more about fracking for liquids –
`natural gas liquids (aka condensate) and
`oil. Commodity prices and economics are
`driving relentless activity in the Eagle Ford
`Basin in south Texas, the Permian Basin, the
`Williston Basin in North Dakota, and the
`Utica Shale in western Pennsylvania and
`eastern Ohio. Like a hamster on a wheel,
`the producer has to keep production
`numbers up, or even rising, in order to
`satisfy investors.
`
`Fracking in Europe
`Europe’s reserves of 639 Tcf compare
`favourably with America’s 862 Tcf, but there
`are other factors to consider. European
`geology tends to be more complicated,
`
`90 GEO ExPro DECEMBER 2013
`
`LIBERTY EXHIBIT 1017, Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket