Case 3:24-cv-02296-JSC Document 73 Filed 05/16/24 Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`HAPTIC, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 24-cv-02296-JSC
`
`
`PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Following the initial Case Management Conference held on May 16, 2024, IT IS
`
`ORDERED:
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
`
`I.
`
`
`Deadline
`May 30, 2024
`
`May 30, 2024
`June 27, 2024
`July 15, 2024
`
`July 29, 2024
`
`Task
`Service of Preliminary Infringement Contentions,
`Identification of Priority Dates, and Production of
`Patent Documents and File Histories
`Stipulated Protective Order and ESI Order
`ADR Certification
`Service of Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and
`Production of Prior Art References
`Parties Exchange Lists of Proposed Terms for Claim
`Construction and Why the Construction Matters
`Parties Exchange Proposed Claim Constructions and
`Disclose Extrinsic Evidence
`Deadline to Meet and Confer to Narrow Disputed
`Terms and Exchange Revised List of Terms and
`Constructions
`Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement August 29, 2024
`Damages Contentions
`September 3, 2024
`Close of Claim Construction Discovery
`September 30, 2024
`Responsive Damages Contentions and Final
`October 3, 2024
`Disclosure of Non-Infringing Alternatives
`Opening Claim Construction Brief
`Responsive Claim Construction Brief
`Reply Claim Construction Brief
`Markman Hearing
`Close of Fact Discovery
`Opening Expert Reports
`
`August 12, 2024
`
`August 19, 2024
`
`October 15, 2024
`October 29, 2024
`November 5, 2024
`December 6, 2024
`February 28, 2025
`April 4, 2025
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1105
`
`

`

`Case 3:24-cv-02296-JSC Document 73 Filed 05/16/24 Page 2 of 7
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports
`Close of Expert Discovery
`Deadline to Move to Amend Pleadings
`Dispositive and Daubert Motion Filing Deadline
`
`May 2, 2025
`May 30, 2025
`May 30, 2025
`June 26, 2025
`
`A further Case Management Conference is scheduled for August 22, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. via
`
`Zoom video. An updated Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due August 15, 2024.
`
`The Court will be particularly interested in the progress of claim construction discovery.
`
`II.
`
`DISCOVERY DEADLINES
`
`All depositions must be noticed at least 30 days before the close of fact discovery. Any
`
`discovery-related letter briefs or motions are due one week after the close of fact discovery. The
`
`same rules apply to expert discovery. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 37-3. For fact witnesses, each side
`
`is limited to a total of 100 hours. Expert depositions shall be limited to seven hours, absent
`
`agreement of the parties or court order permitting more time.
`
`III.
`
`TRIAL DATE
`
`A.
`
`Jury trial will begin on September 29, 2025, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 8, 19th
`
`Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate, San Francisco, California.
`
`B.
`
`The Court is expecting the length of the trial to not exceed 5 court days. Each side
`
`is likely to be limited to 10 hours for direct and cross-examination; additional time is given for
`
`openings and closings and potentially for willfulness issues.
`
`IV.
`
`PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
`
`A Final Pretrial Conference shall be held on September 3, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., in
`
`Courtroom 8, 19th Floor. Lead trial counsel for each party shall attend.
`
`A.
`
`At least seven days prior to date of the Final Pretrial Conference the parties shall do
`
`the following:
`
`1.
`
`In lieu of preparing a Joint Pretrial Conference Statement, the parties shall
`
`meet and confer in person, and then prepare and file a jointly signed Proposed Final Pretrial Order
`
`that contains: (a) a brief description of the substance of claims and defenses which remain to be
`
`decided; (b) a statement of all relief sought; (c) all stipulated facts; (d) a joint exhibit list in
`
`numerical order, including a brief description of the exhibit and Bates numbers, a blank column
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 3:24-cv-02296-JSC Document 73 Filed 05/16/24 Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`for when it will be offered into evidence, a blank column for when it may be received into
`
`evidence, and a blank column for any limitations on its use; and (e) each party’s separate witness
`
`list for its case-in-chief witnesses (including those appearing by deposition), including, for all such
`
`witnesses (other than party plaintiffs or defendants), a short statement of the substance of his/her
`
`testimony and, separately, what, if any, non-cumulative testimony the witness will offer. For each
`
`witness, state an hour/minute time estimate for the direct examination (only). Items (d) and (e)
`
`should be submitted as appendices to the proposed order. The proposed order should also state
`
`which issues, if any, are for the Court to decide, rather than the jury.
`
`
`
`2.
`
`File a joint set of proposed instructions on substantive issues of law
`
`arranged in a logical sequence. If undisputed, an instruction shall be identified as “Stipulated
`
`Instruction No. ____ Re ___________,” with the blanks filled in as appropriate. If disputed, each
`
`version of the instruction shall be inserted together, back to back, in their logical place in the
`
`overall sequence. Each such disputed instruction shall be identified as, for example, “Disputed
`
`Instruction No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________,” with the blanks filled
`
`in as appropriate. All disputed versions of the same basic instruction shall bear the same number.
`
`Any modifications to a form instruction must be plainly identified. If a party does not have a
`
`counter version and simply contends that no such instruction in any version should be given, then
`
`that party should so state (and explain why) on a separate page inserted in lieu of an alternate
`
`version. With respect to form preliminary instructions, general instructions, or concluding
`
`instructions, please simply cite to the numbers of the requested instructions in the current edition
`
`of the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions. Other than citing the numbers, the parties shall not
`
`include preliminary, general, or concluding instructions in the packet.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`File a separate memorandum of law in support of each party’s disputed
`
`instructions, if any, organized by instruction number.
`
`
`
`4.
`
`File a joint set of proposed voir dire questions supplemented as necessary
`
`by separate requests.
`
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`File trial briefs on any controlling issues of law.
`
`File proposed verdict forms, joint or separate.
`
`3
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 3:24-cv-02296-JSC Document 73 Filed 05/16/24 Page 4 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`File and serve any objections to exhibits.
`
`File a joint simplified Statement of the Case to be read to the jury during
`
`voir dire as part of the proposed jury instructions. Unless the case is extremely complex, this
`
`statement should not exceed one page.
`
`B.
`
`Any motions in limine shall be submitted as follows: at least twenty (20) calendar
`
`days before the conference, the moving party shall serve, but not file, the opening brief. At least
`
`ten (10) calendar days before the conference, the responding party shall serve the opposition.
`
`There will be no reply. When the oppositions are received, the moving party should collate the
`
`motion and the opposition together, back-to-back, and then file the paired sets at least seven (7)
`
`calendar days before the conference. Each motion should be presented in a separate memorandum
`
`and properly identified, for example, “Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude . . . .” Each
`
`party is limited to bringing five motions in limine. The parties are encouraged to stipulate where
`
`possible, for example, as to the exclusion of witnesses from the courtroom. Each motion should
`
`address a single, separate topic, and contain no more than seven pages of briefing per side.
`
`C.
`
` Hard-copy courtesy copies of the above documents shall be delivered by NOON
`
`the day after filing. The Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order, jury instructions, and verdict form
`
`shall also be submitted via e-mail as Word attachments to jsc_settlement@cand.uscourts.gov. The
`
`Court requests that all hard-copy submissions be three-hole-punched.
`
`V.
`
`PRETRIAL ARRANGEMENTS
`
`A.
`
`Should a daily transcript and/or real-time reporting be desired, the parties shall
`
`make arrangements with Kristen Melen, Supervisor of the Court Reporting Services, at
`
`(415) 522-2079, at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the trial date.
`
`B.
`
`During trial, counsel may wish to use overhead projectors, laser-disk/computer
`
`graphics, poster blow-ups, models, or specimens of devices. Equipment should be shared by all
`
`counsel to the maximum extent possible. The Court provides no equipment other than an easel.
`
`The United States Marshal requires a court order to allow equipment into the courthouse. For
`
`electronic equipment, parties should be prepared to maintain the equipment or have a technician
`
`handy at all times. The parties shall tape extension cords to the carpet for safety. The parties may
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 3:24-cv-02296-JSC Document 73 Filed 05/16/24 Page 5 of 7
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`work with the deputy clerk, Ada Means (415-522-2015), on all courtroom-layout issues.
`
`SCHEDULING
`
`Trial will be conducted from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 or 3:00 p.m., depending on the availability
`
`of witnesses, Monday through Friday. Counsel must arrive by 8:15 a.m., or earlier as needed, for
`
`any matters to be heard out of the presence of the jury. The jury will be called at 8:30 a.m.
`
`THE JURY
`
`The Jury Office asks prospective jurors to complete an online jury questionnaire in
`
`advance of their summons date. The standard questionnaire available on the Northern District’s
`
`website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/attorneys/Internet-version_Standard-
`
`CAND-Trial_SurveyMonkey_3-2022.pdf. The parties are allowed to add 10 case specific
`
`questions to the questionnaire. The parties shall meet and confer, and to the extent possible, file a
`
`joint list of proposed questions to add to the questionnaire. To the extent that the parties cannot
`
`agree, they may submit separate proposed questions from which the Court will choose 10. The
`
`parties joint or separate submissions are due 21 days before trial. The Court will provide the
`
`parties with the survey responses the Friday before trial.
`
`In civil cases, there are no alternate jurors and the jury is selected as follows: Eighteen to
`
`twenty jurors are called to fill the jury box and the row in front of the bar, and are given numbers
`
`(1 through 20). The remaining potential jurors will be seated in the public benches. Hardship
`
`excuses will usually be considered at this point. Counsel may conduct a limited voir dire.
`
`Challenges for cause will then be addressed out of the presence of the potential jurors. The Court
`
`will consider whether to fill in the seats of the stricken jurors. If so, questions will be asked of the
`
`additional jurors and cause motions as to them will be considered. After a short recess, each side
`
`may exercise its allotment of peremptory challenges out of the presence of the potential jurors.
`
`The eight (or such other size as will constitute the jury) surviving the challenge process with the
`
`lowest numbers become the final jury. If more (or fewer) than eight jurors are to be seated, then
`
`the starting number will be adjusted. So too if more than a total of six peremptories are allowed.
`
`Once the jury selection is completed, the jurors’ names will be read again and they will be seated
`
`in the jury box and sworn. The Court may alter this procedure in its discretion and after
`
`5
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 3:24-cv-02296-JSC Document 73 Filed 05/16/24 Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`consultation with the parties.
`
`WITNESSES
`
`At the close of each trial day, all counsel shall exchange a list of witnesses for the
`
`next two full court days and the exhibits that will be used during direct examination (other than
`
`for impeachment of an adverse witness). Within 24 hours of such notice, all other counsel shall
`
`provide any objections to such exhibits and shall provide a list of all exhibits to be used with the
`
`same witness on cross-examination (other than for impeachment). The first notice shall be
`
`exchanged prior to the first day of trial. All such notices shall be provided in writing.
`
`EXHIBITS
`
`A.
`
`Prior to the Final Pretrial Conference, counsel must meet and confer in person to
`
`consider all exhibit numbers and objections and to eliminate duplicate exhibits and confusion over
`
`the precise exhibit.
`
`B.
`
`Use numbers only, not letters, for exhibits, preferably the same numbers as were
`
`used in depositions. Blocks of numbers should be assigned to fit the need of the case (e.g.,
`
`Plaintiff has 1 to 100, Defendant A has 101 to 200, Defendant B has 201 to 300, etc.). A single
`
`exhibit should be marked only once. If the plaintiff has marked an exhibit, then the defendant
`
`should not re-mark the exact document with another number. Different versions of the same
`
`document, e.g., a copy with additional handwriting, must be treated as different exhibits with
`
`different numbers. To avoid any party claiming “ownership” of an exhibit, all exhibits shall be
`
`marked and referred to as “Trial Exhibit No. _____,” not as “Plaintiff’s Exhibit” or “Defendant’s
`
`Exhibit.”
`
`C.
`
`Exhibits tags: Exhibits must be labeled in the lower right-hand corner with the
`
`exhibit number in a prominent, bold typeface.
`
`D.
`
`Counsel must consult with each other and with the deputy clerk at the end of each
`
`trial day and compare notes as to which exhibits are in evidence and any limitations thereon. If
`
`there are any differences, counsel should bring them promptly to the Court’s attention.
`
`E.
`
`The parties shall provide the Court with one official set of the record exhibits seven
`
`(7) days before the Pretrial Conference. Each exhibit must be separated with a label divider
`
`6
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 3:24-cv-02296-JSC Document 73 Filed 05/16/24 Page 7 of 7
`
`
`
`identifying the exhibit number. Spine labels should indicate the numbers of the exhibits that are in
`
`the binders. At trial, the parties shall provide individual witness exhibit binders which contain all
`
`the exhibits the parties expect to use with the witness. The parties shall provide two copies of each
`
`witness binder: one for the witness and one for the Court.
`
`F.
`
`Before the closing arguments, counsel must confer with the deputy clerk to make
`
`sure the exhibits in evidence are in good order.
`
`G.
`
`Exhibit notebooks for the jury will not be permitted without prior permission from
`
`the Court. Publication must be by poster blow-up, overhead projection, or such other method as is
`
`allowed in the circumstances. It is permissible to highlight, circle or underscore in the
`
`enlargements as long as it is clear that it was not on the original.
`
`CHARGING CONFERENCE
`
`As the trial progresses and the evidence is heard, the Court will fashion a comprehensive
`
`set of jury instructions to cover all issues actually being tried. Prior to the close of the evidence,
`
`the Court will provide a draft final charge to the parties. After a reasonable period for review, one
`
`or more charging conferences will be held at which each party may object to any passage, ask for
`
`modifications, or ask for additions. Any instruction request must be renewed specifically at the
`
`conference or it will be deemed waived, whether or not it was requested prior to trial. If, however,
`
`a party still wishes to request an omitted instruction after reviewing the Court’s draft, then it must
`
`affirmatively re-request it at the charging conference in order to give the Court a fair opportunity
`
`to correct any error. Otherwise, as stated, the request will be deemed abandoned or waived.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: May 16, 2024
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`
`JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
`United States District Judge
`
`7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`