throbber
Case 6:23-cv-00320-ADA Document 31 Filed 08/18/23 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`PROXENSE, LLC,
`
`Civil Action No. 6:23-cv-00320-ADA
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the Court hereby ORDERS that the
`
`following schedule will govern deadlines up to and including trial of this matter:
`
`Deadline
`
`Item
`
`07-24-2023
`
`Deadline for Plaintiff to serve preliminary infringement contentions.
`
`07-31-2023
`
`08-21-2023
`
`09-18-2023
`
`10-02-2023
`10-16-2023
`
`Parties’ Proposed Date for Initial Case Management Conference
`
`Deadline for Defendant to file a motion for inter-district transfer. After
`this deadline, movants must seek leave of Court and show good cause for
`the delay.
`
`Defendant serves preliminary invalidity contentions in the form of (1) a
`chart setting forth where in the prior art references each element of the
`asserted claim(s) are found, (2) an identification of any limitations the
`Defendant contends are indefinite or lack written description under
`section 112, and (3) an identification of any claims the Defendant
`contends are directed to ineligible subject matter under section 101.
`Defendant shall also produce (1) all prior art referenced in the invalidity
`contentions, and (2) technical documents, including software where
`applicable, sufficient to show the operation of the accused product(s).
`Parties exchange claim terms for construction.
`Parties exchange proposed claim constructions.
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1008
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00320-ADA Document 31 Filed 08/18/23 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`10-23-2023
`
`10-30-2023
`
`11-06-2023
`
`12-01-2023
`12-20-2023
`
`01-05-2024
`01-10-2024
`
`01-19-20242
`1 business day after
`Markman hearing
`
`6 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`8 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The parties shall disclose any
`extrinsic evidence, including the identity of any expert witness they may
`rely upon with respect to claim construction or indefiniteness. With
`respect to any expert identified, the parties shall identify the scope of the
`topics for the witness’s expected testimony.1 With respect to items of
`extrinsic evidence, the parties shall identify each such item by production
`number or produce a copy of any such item if not previously produced.
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms in dispute and exchange
`revised list of terms/constructions.
`Defendant files Opening claim construction brief, including any
`arguments that any claim terms are indefinite.
`Plaintiff files Responsive claim construction brief.
`Defendant files Reply claim construction brief.
`
`Parties to jointly email the law clerks (see OGP at 1) to confirm their
`Markman date and to notify if any venue or jurisdictional motions remain
`unripe for resolution.
`Plaintiff files a Sur-Reply claim construction brief.
`Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement and email the law
`clerks an editable copy.
`
`Parties submit optional technical tutorials to the Court and technical
`advisor (if appointed).
`Markman Hearing at 9:00 a.m.
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve Initial Disclosures per Rule 26(a).
`
`Deadline to add parties.
`
`Deadline to serve Final Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. After
`this date, leave of Court is required for any amendment to infringement or
`invalidity contentions. This deadline does not relieve the parties of their
`obligation to seasonably amend if new information is identified after
`initial contentions.
`
`
`1 Any party may utilize a rebuttal expert in response to a brief where expert testimony is relied upon by the other
`party.
`2 All deadlines hereafter follow the original Markman hearing date and do not change if the Court delays the
`Markman hearing.
`
`
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00320-ADA Document 31 Filed 08/18/23 Page 3 of 4
`
`16 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`26 weeks after
`Markman
`
`
`30 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`31 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`35 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`38 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`39 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`
`40 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`42 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`44 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`8 weeks before trial
`
`45 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`
`
`
`
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required unless the
`amendment adds patents or patent claims. (Note: This includes
`amendments in response to a 12(c) motion.)
`Deadline for the first of two meet and confers to discuss significantly
`narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior art references at
`issue. Unless the parties agree to the narrowing, they are ordered to
`contact the Court’s law clerk to arrange a teleconference with the Court
`to resolve the disputed issues.
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`
`Opening Expert Reports.
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`
`Deadline for the second of two meet and confers to discuss narrowing
`the number of claims asserted and prior art references at issue to triable
`limits. If it helps the parties determine these limits, the parties are
`encouraged to contact the Court’s law clerk for an estimate of the
`amount of trial time anticipated per side. The parties shall file a Joint
`Report within 5 business days regarding the results of the meet and
`confer.
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`
`See General Issues Note #7 regarding providing copies of the briefing to
`the Court and the technical advisor (if appointed).
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists,
`deposition designations).
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`
`Parties to jointly email the Court’s law clerk (See OGP at 1) to confirm
`their pretrial conference and trial dates.
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures; file Motions in limine.
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`Case 6:23-cv-00320-ADA Document 31 Filed 08/18/23 Page 4 of 4
`
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury instructions,
`exhibits lists, witness lists, deposition designations); file oppositions to
`motions in limine
`File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting. If a
`daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is requested
`for trial, the party or parties making said request shall file a notice with
`the Court and email the Court Reporter, Kristie Davis at
`kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com
`Deadline to file replies to motions in limine.
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections and
`disputes on motions in limine.
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial disclosures
`and disputes on motions in limine.
`
`Final Pretrial Conference. Held in person unless otherwise requested.
`
`Jury Selection/Trial.
`
`46 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`47 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`
`48 weeks after
`Markman hearing
`3 business days
`before Final Pretrial
`Conference.
`49 weeks after
`Markman hearing (or
`as soon as practicable)
`52 weeks after
`Markman hearing (or
`as soon as
`practicable)3
`
`SIGNED this 18th day of August, 2023.
`
`3 If the actual trial date materially differs from the Court’s default schedule, the Court will consider reasonable
`amendments to the case schedule post-Markman that are consistent with the Court’s default deadlines in light of the
`actual trial date.
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket