throbber
98
`
`Definition
`
`Tests for fecal occult blood detect blood in the stool that is
`not visible on gross inspection, usually less than 50 mg of
`hemoglobin per gram of stool . Normal adults usually show
`less than 2 to 3 mg/gm . Increased amounts are associated
`with a variety of benign and malignant gastrointestinal dis-
`eases, especially colonic neoplasms, and the tests are most
`often used in screening patients for such lesions .
`
`Technique
`
`Benzidine-based tests (e .g ., Hematest) have been virtually
`eliminated from use because of their excessive sensitivity,
`which results in a high frequency of false-positive reactions,
`as well as the carcinogenicity of the reagent .
`The current worldwide standard is the Hemoccult slide
`test (Smith-Kline Diagnostics), a guaiac-based test, in which
`one side of a guaiac-impregnated paper is smeared with
`stool and tested by addition of a few drops of developer
`solution (stabilized peroxide reagent) to the opposite side
`of the paper . In screening programs, the patient recovers
`stool from the toilet bowl using a wooden applicator, smears
`a small portion onto two windows of the card, and closes
`the cover. This is done on three successive days, and the
`cards are mailed for testing, as there is little degradation of
`reactive hemes in the dry, smeared specimens over a period
`of I week (fewer than 15% of samples) .
`Appearance of unequivocal blue color, of any intensity,
`within 30 seconds, is considered a positive test ; greenish
`colors, caused by oxidation of fecal bilirubin to biliverdin,
`should not be read as positive . Positive and negative control
`spots are included in the card to be sure that the reagents
`are reactive with substrate and not reactive in the absence
`of substrate . It has been found that diffusion of the hematin
`from the smeared stool into the paper is important, so that
`the reaction can be enhanced by wetting the smeared side
`of the paper with a few drops of water several minutes
`before adding the developer . However, such rehydration
`of specimens also increases the rate of false-positive reac-
`tions from plant peroxidases and meat hemes in the diet,
`and is not recommended unless there is rigid adherence to
`a restricted diet, outlined in Table 98 .1 .
`A modification of the Hemoccult test has been marketed
`(ColoScreen, Helena Laboratories) in which a selective in-
`hibitor of nonheme vegetable peroxidases has been added
`in hopes of diminishing the false-positive reactions from
`this source . Another group of tests is based on the immu-
`nologic detection of human hemoglobin or globin in the
`stool, but the tests developed thus far have been unreliable
`because of over- or undersensitivity and poor reproduci-
`bility . Both approaches might improve specificity, but nei-
`ther solves the problem of major and variable degradation
`
`LABORATORY
`
`Tests for Fecal Occult Blood
`
`J . DONALD OSTROW
`
`of hematin or globin in the intestinal lumen, a problem
`shared by Hemoccult .
`A new, promising, and almost quantitative approach
`(HemoQuant, Bioscience Labs) is to measure fecal hemes
`by the specific fluorescence of their porphyrin derivatives,
`after extraction of the porphyrins from the specimen to
`remove interfering substances. A variable (1 to 98%) pro-
`portion of unabsorbed hemoglobin/hematin is converted to
`porphyrins by intestinal bacteria (so-called intestinally con-
`verted fraction, or ICF) ; this fraction can be extracted into
`an organic solvent in the presence of citric acid . The re-
`maining intact hemes can be chemically converted to por-
`phyrins by heating in a test tube in the presence of oxalic
`acid and ferrous sulfate, and then extracted, along with the
`ICF, to yield total converted porphyrins as a measure of
`total unabsorbed hemes .
`HemoQuant is little affected by the variable degradation
`of hemes in the intestinal lumen or by the degree of hy-
`dration of the stool ; is insensitive to nonheme peroxidases,
`oral iron, and cimetidine ; and is almost quantitative . It is
`therefore highly likely to become the future test of choice,
`if it can be simplified and its cost reduced . The early hope,
`that the ICF would help to distinguish upper from lower
`gastrointestinal blood loss, has not been realized .
`Neither HemoQuant, any of the variants of the other
`new tests, nor the numerous commercial imitations of Hem-
`occult, have undergone the extensive evaluation in large
`screening programs that has documented the efficacy and
`identified the limitations in interpretation of the Hemoccult
`test . Moreover, the appropriate upper normal limits for
`fecal hemes have not been established for these new tests .
`For the present, therefore, Hemoccult is the only validated
`test appropriate for use in detection of fecal occult blood .
`
`Table 98.1
`Strict Low-peroxidase Diet for Occult Blood Screening
`
`Carrot
`Cauliflower
`Cucumber
`Grapefruit
`Green beans
`
`Mushrooms
`Parsnip
`Pumpkin
`Turnips
`Zucchini
`
`Do not ingest
`Rare red meat
`Bloodwurst
`Horseradish
`Broccoli
`Cabbage
`Cantaloupe
`Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents
`Ascorbic acid
`Aspirin
`O .K . to ingest
`Well-cooked fish and chicken
`Cooked fruits and vegetables
`Canned tuna fish
`Strawberries
`
`Bran cereals
`Peanuts
`Popcorn
`Oranges (1 a day)
`
`°Less than 50 g of the foods listed have peroxidase activity equivalent to
`1 .0 ml blood (1 mg hemoglobin per gram of stool) .
`
`489
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1049, Page 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`490
`
`VI . THE GASTROINTESTINAL SYSTEM
`
`quinone . False-positive reactions are given by other mate-
`rials that can catalyze the peroxidase reaction (Table 98 .1),
`including dietary peroxidases in vegetable and fruits, hemo-
`globin and myoglobin in red meats (especially if rare or
`raw) ; oral iron, once thought to be a problem, has been
`shown clearly not to affect the Hemoccult test . Cimetidine
`also gives false-positive reactions, but only in aspirates of
`gastric and duodenal juice, because most of this drug is
`absorbed before reaching the colon . False-negative tests oc-
`cur if high concentrations of reducing agents are present
`in the diet, especially ascorbic acid in citrus fruits and juices
`in doses of 750 mg or more daily . Drugs such as aspirin
`and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, which often
`cause erosions and bleeding of otherwise normal gastric
`mucosa, also lead to positive tests that may falsely suggest
`the presence of an intrinsic lesion . It is therefore important
`that intake of these interfering substances be eliminated for
`3 days before and 3 days during collection of the stools to
`be tested .
`
`Clinical Significance
`
`Colonic neoplasms and other gastrointestinal lesions bleed
`intermittently and in variable amounts from day to day .
`Therefore, if any of the six windows (2 per stool x 3 stools)
`yields a blue reaction, the patient should undergo more
`intensive diagnostic study to determine the source of blood
`loss . In Western nations, Hemoccult screening of truly
`asymptomatic populations aged 45 years or more has yielded
`3 to 5% positive tests on an unrestricted diet and less than
`2% positive tests on the restricted diet (Table 98 .1) . On the
`latter diet, 10 to 15% of those with positive tests will be
`found to have carcinoma and 20 to 30% to have benign
`neoplasms (e .g ., polyps), usually in the colon . Another 30
`to 60% of positive subjects will reveal other gastrointestinal
`lesions that might be responsible for occult bleeding (e .g .,
`hemorrhoids, diverticulosis, inflammatory bowel disease,
`peptic ulcer, gastritis, esophagitis, and esophageal varices) .
`Less than 15%, and usually less than 10%, of positive sub-
`jects will reveal no lesions, and most of these probably have
`false-positive tests due to vegetable peroxidases from the
`diet .
`Sixty-five to 80% of colorectal carcinomas and 20 to 40%
`of benign colonic adenomas are detected by the three-stool
`Hemoccult test . Thus, any one positive stool is an indication
`for a full work-up of the entire colon, including either air-
`contrast barium enema plus flexible (60 cm) sigmoidoscopy,
`or full colonoscopy . Flexible sigmoidoscopy or rigid proc-
`toscopy alone are satisfactory as complementary tests with
`Hemoccult in screening programs but are inadequate for
`
`Figure 98 .1
`Degradation of hemoglobin in the gastrointestinal tract and meth-
`ods to detect hemoglobin and its metabolites in feces .
`
`Basic Science
`
`As shown in Figure 98 .1, erythrocytes entering the gas-
`trointestinal lumen are usually lysed to free hemoglobin,
`which is converted to free hematin (Fes+ state) plus globin .
`Up to 15% of the hematin is absorbed and converted to
`bilirubin by microsomal heme oxygenase in the enterocytes .
`The remaining 85% may be further degraded, principally
`by colonic bacteria, to form porphyrins . The globin is di-
`gested by pancreatic and intestinal mucosal proteases to
`yield peptides and amino acids .
`Many tests have been designed to detect hemoglobin or
`its intestinal metabolites in the stool (Figure 98 .1) . Thus,
`blood released into the gastrointestinal tract can be detected
`as hemoglobin ( 51 Cr-labeled red cells, immunoassay), he-
`matin (peroxidase activity), porphyrins (fluorescence), or
`globin (immunoassay) . Most such tests have inherent un-
`reliability, however, because the proportion of hemoglobin
`degraded varies greatly among individuals . The only truly
`quantitative tests are : (1) radioassay of 51 Cr in the stool after
`intravenous administration of autologous red cells labeled
`with 51Cr-chromate on the R-chain of hemoglobin (the chro-
`mate is neither degraded nor absorbed in the intestine) ;
`and (2) measurement of total fecal porphyrins after chem-
`ical conversion of all fecal hemoglobin to porphyrins
`(HemoQuant test) . Unfortunately, these two tests are com-
`plex, cumbersome, time-consuming, and expensive . Con-
`sequently, the most widely used, established methods rely
`on the detection of undegraded hematin and hemoglobin
`by virtue of their peroxidase-like activity.
`Peroxidase-based tests (Figure 98 .2) involve the addition
`to a stool sample of a peroxide as substrate and guaiac,
`benzidine, or related compounds as a redox indicator . The
`peroxidase activity of hematin and/or hemoglobin catalyzes
`the oxidation of the colorless indicator compound to a blue
`
`Figure 98 .2
`Principle of peroxidase-based tests .
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1049, Page 2
`
`
`

`

`98 . TESTS FOR FECAL OCCULT BLOOD
`
`491
`
`further evaluation of a Hemoccult-positive stool because
`over one-third of colonic neoplasms are proximal to the
`rectosigmoid . If only benign lesions or no lesions are dis-
`covered after full examination of the colon, upper gastroin-
`testinal endoscopy is probably indicated, though its cost
`effectiveness has not been validated . If still nothing is found,
`it is probably best to evaluate if the Hemoccult test is a false-
`positive, using 51 Cr-labeled erythrocytes or the HemoQuant
`test to quantify fecal blood loss . If the presence of bleeding
`is confirmed, one may consider performance of a small
`bowel series, mesenteric angiography, and/or abdominal
`scintiscan after intravenous administration of --Tc-labeled
`erythrocytes . Unfortunately, these tests have a low yield in
`the patient with occult blood loss . The fluorescein string
`test for upper gastrointestinal blood loss has a high fre-
`quency of false-positive results and should not be used .
`Most of the colorectal neoplasms detected with Hem-
`occult screening will be either benign adenomas or Duke's
`stage A or B 1 carcinomas, with an 80% or more 5-year
`survival after resection . By contrast, in patients with symp-
`tomatic carcinoma, the proportion of 5-year survivals is less
`than 40% . Because of built-in biases in screening programs,
`however, one may merely be making the diagnosis at an
`earlier stage in the disease, without actually postponing the
`time of demise . Therefore, it is not yet proven that screen-
`ing for colon cancer actually improves survival ; long-term,
`randomized, prospective studies, well under way in New
`York and Minneapolis, should answer this important ques-
`tion .
`
`References
`
`Ahlquist DA, McGill DB, Schwartz S, et al . HemoQuant, a new
`quantitative assay for fecal hemoglobin . Comparison with Hem-
`occult . Ann Intern Med 1984 ;101 :297-302 .
`Ahlquist DA, McGill DB, Schwartz S, et al . Fecal blood levels in
`
`health and disease. A study using HemoQuant . N Engl J Med
`
`1985 ;312 :1422-28 .
`Caligiore P, MacRae FA, St . John DJB, et al . Peroxidase levels in
`food : relevance to colorectal cancer screening . Am J Clin Nutrit
`1982 ;35 :1487-1489 .
`Eddy DM, Nugent FW, Eddy JF, et al . Screening for colorectal
`cancer in a high-risk population . Results of a mathematical model.
`Gastroenterology 1987 ;92 :682-92 .
`Ellefson BS, Larson A, Schwartz S, et al . The HemoQuant test,
`remodelled for the busy clinical laboratory . Clin Chem
`1986 ;32 :1142-43 .
`Gilbertsen VA, McHugh RB, Schuman L, et al . The earlier detec-
`tion of colorectal cancers . A preliminary report of the results
`of the occult blood study . Cancer 1980 ;45 :2899-2901 .
`McDonnell, WM, Ryan JA, Soeger, DM, Elta, GH . Effect of iron
`
`on the guaiac reaction . Gastroenterology 1989 ;96 :74-78 .
`MacRae FA, St . John, DJB . Relationships between patterns of
`bleeding and Hemoccult sensitivity in patients with colorectal
`cancers or adenomas . Gastroenterology 1982 ;82:891-98 .
`MacRae FA, St John, JB, Caligiore P, et al . Optimal dietary con-
`ditions for Hemoccult testing . Gastroenterology 1982 ;82 :899-
`903 .
`Morris DW, Hansell JR., Ostrow JD, et al . Validity of fecal occult
`blood tests in hospitalized patients . Am J Dig Dis 1976 ;21 :845-
`52 .
`Ostrow JD, Mulvaney CA, Hansell JR, et al . Sensitivity and re-
`producibility of chemical tests for fecal occult blood . Am J Dig
`Dis 1973 ;18 :930-40 .
`Peterson WL, Fordtran JS . Editorial . Quantitating the occult . N
`Engl J Med 1985 ;312 :1448-50 .
`Schwartz S, Dahl J, Ellefson, M, et al . The HemoQuant test : a
`specific and quantitative determination of heme (hemoglobin)
`in feces and other materials . Clin Chem 1983 ;29 :2061-67 .
`Simon JB : Occult blood screening for colorectal carcinoma : a crit-
`ical review. Gastroenterology 1985 ;88 :820-37 .
`Winawer SJ, Andrews M, Flehinger B, et al . Progress report on
`controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing for the detection of
`colorectal neoplasia . Cancer 1980 ;45 :2959-64 .
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1049, Page 3
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket