throbber
United States Patent (19)
`Grow et al.
`
`73) Assignee:
`
`*) Notice:
`
`(54) FECAL SAMPLE IMMUNOASSAY METHOD
`TESTING FOR HEMOGLOBIN
`75 Inventors: Michael A. Grow, San Jose; Wipin D.
`Shah, Saratoga, both of Calif.
`International Immunoassay
`Laboratories, Inc., Santa Clara, Calif.
`The portion of the term of this patent
`subsequent to Mar. 10, 2009 has been
`disclaimed.
`21) Appl. No.: 764,012
`22 Filed:
`Sep. 23, 1991
`Related U.S. Application Data
`Continuation of Ser. No. 329,455, Mar. 28, 1989, Pat.
`No. 5,094,956, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser.
`No. 10,787, Feb. 4, 1987, abandoned.
`51) Int. Cl. ............................................. G01N 33/72
`52 U.S.C. .......................................... 436/66; 436/8;
`436/17; 436/177; 436/815; 436/825
`58) Field of Search ................. 436/66, 8, 17, 63, 177,
`436/815, 825
`
`63
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`3,869,547 3/1975 Mebus et al. .
`4,200,690 4/1980 Root et al. .
`4,424,279 1/1984 Bohn et al. .
`4,533,630 8/1985 Wilkins et al. .
`4,683, 197 7/1987 Gallati.
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0030388A2 6/1981 European Pat. Off. .
`0032782A2 7/1981 European Pat. Off. .
`011 1916A1 6/1984 European Pat. Off. .
`0175326A2 3/1986 European Pat. Off. .
`
`||||||||||||||||
`US005198365A
`5,198,365
`11
`Patent Number:
`'Mar. 30, 1993
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Julkunen et al, Scand J Infect Dis 17:245-249 (1985).
`Primary Examiner-Sam Rosen
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Skjerven, Morrill,
`MacPherson, Franklin & Friel
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`A method for preparing a fecal sample for immunoassay
`testing comprising the steps of dispersing a sample of
`from 1 to less than 10 wt.% of a stool sample in an
`aqueous fecal test solution formulated with one or more
`preservatives, analyte stabilizing agents and endoge
`nous interference reducing agents. The fecal solids are
`then permitted to settle to form a liquid phase substan
`tially free from fecal solids, and the clarified liquid
`phase is removed to provide a test sample free from
`fecal solids. The fecal test solutions contain suitable
`stool stabilizers such as buffers and antimicrobial agents,
`analyte protecting agents such as proteolytic, reductive
`or oxidative enzyme inhibitors, endogenous assay inter
`fering enzyme inhibitors such as a reducing agent, and
`non-specific binding inhibitors such as animal proteins.
`The stool sample should be fresh or be fresh frozen and
`thawed immediately before dispersion in the buffer
`solution. The sample is suitable for any solid-phase in
`munoassay determination of a fecal sample analyte. A
`method for determining analyte in the stool sample
`comprises conjugating anti-analyte antibody adhered to
`a insoluble support with analyte in the clarified sample,
`and determining the presence and extent of such conju
`gation. For determining human hemoglobin in a sample
`of human stool, the aqueous fecal test solution prefera
`bly contains a proteinase inhibitor, formaldehyde and an
`animal albumin.
`
`4 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1041, Page 1
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 30, 1993
`
`5,198,365
`
`
`
`
`
`N
`
`aala
`
`N
`
`A/G/
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1041, Page 2
`
`

`

`1.
`
`FECAL SAMPLE IMMUNOASSAY METHOD
`TESTING FOR HEMOGLOBIN
`
`5
`
`O
`
`20
`
`CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATION
`This application is a continuation of application Ser.
`No. 07/329,455, filed Mar. 28, 1989, now U.S. Pat. No.
`5,094,956 which is a continuation-in-part of application
`Ser. No. 07/010,787 filed Feb. 4, 1987, now abandoned
`and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
`. FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`This invention relates to an improved method for
`analyzing fecal samples. In particular, this invention
`15
`relates to a method for preparing fecal samples for im
`munoassays, the prepared fecal sample compositions
`and to solid-phase immunoassays for determining the
`presence and quantity of analytes in the samples.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`Stool or fecal samples are routinely tested for the
`presence of parasites, fat, occult blood, viruses, bacteria
`and other organisms and chemicals in the diagnosis for
`various diseases. The stool is usually collected, placed
`in a clean container and processed for testing.
`Stool collection is usually non-invasive and theoreti
`cally ideal for testing pediatric or geriatric patients, for
`testing away from a clinical site, for frequently repeated
`tests and for determining the presence of analytes which
`are likely to be found in the digestive tract. Stool can
`also be collected with a swab or finger cot during exam
`ination and applied directly to a test surface. For micro
`scopic examination or occult blood testing, the sample
`can be spread directly on a test surface. For other tests,
`such as testing for fat, the stool may be suspended in a
`liquid medium such as water.
`Traditional sample examinations have used complex
`chemical or microbiological procedures. These proce
`dures are being rapidly replaced with immunoassay
`methods. Immunoassay techniques are highly sensitive
`and require only a small sample. Solid-phase techniques
`such as latex agglutination and enzyme immunoassays
`have been developed to such a stage of simplicity that
`they can be performed at home, at the doctor's office or
`45
`other test sites without the need for highly trained labo
`ratory technicians or expensive instruments. Applica
`tion of solid-phase immunoassay procedures to the anal
`ysis of stool samples is thus highly desirable.
`Application of immunoassay techniques to fecal anal
`50
`ysis has proven to be difficult for several reasons. Stool
`handling is disagreeable and biohazardous, and sanitary
`and inoffensive procedures for processing stool have
`proven to be awkward and frequently complex. Ana
`lytes in stool samples are frequently unstable. Weighing,
`55
`extracting and centrifuging, and storing samples are
`difficult except in a clinical laboratory equipped with
`suitable apparatus and skilled technicians.
`Constituents of stool are known to interfere with
`solid-phase immunoassays. Immunoreactants immobi
`lized on solid-phase are desorbed by stool constituents.
`Non-specific reactions occur.
`To increase the commercial use of immunoassay
`techniques for measuring analytes in stool, a number of
`problems must be solved. Instability of the analyte in
`65
`the stool, interference from stool constituents, needs for
`extensive handling of the stool, equipment contamina
`tion, and instrumentation needs must be minimized.
`
`5, 198,365
`2
`Simple preparation steps avoiding the use of expensive
`equipment and instruments are required to extend the
`use of immunoassay testing procedures to sites outside
`hospital and clinical laboratory environments.
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
`Assay procedures including the preparation of con
`centrated suspensions of 10 and 25 wt.% stool in water
`or buffer solution have been described by Vellacott et
`al, The Lancet p 18 (Jan. 3, 1981) and Jilkunen et al,
`Scand.J. Infec.D. 17:245 (1985). These were centrifuged
`and sterile-filtered to provide a sample for testing.
`Desorption of immunoreactants has been reduced by
`either heat treatment of the sample or by mixing 50 vol.
`% fetal calf serum or acid-protein buffer containing 5
`vol. 9% bovine serum albumin (BSA) with the test sam
`ple.
`Non-specificity problems have been overcome by
`heat-treating samples in the presence of a reducing
`agent.
`Current stool handling procedures include storing
`and transporting stool samples in clean containers and
`reducing deterioration of analyte by maintaining the
`sample at low temperatures. Problems of non-uniform
`ity are resolved by forming a suspension of an entire
`sample or by assaying several samples; the suspension is
`then treated by centrifugation, filtration, extraction and
`sterilization.
`Current techniques for measuring hemoglobin in
`stool exemplify the problems. A widely used semi-quan
`titative procedure for measuring hemoglobin uses gua
`iac resin paper on which the stool is reacted with hydro
`gen peroxide. The reaction of hemoglobin with guaiac
`resin forms a blue color, the intensity of which is a
`function of the quantity of hemoglobin in the sample.
`This method does not distinguish hemoglobin derived
`from animal blood in food from human hemoglobin.
`Because this method is subject to variables derived from
`chemical and biochemical interference with the hemo
`globin-guaiac resin reaction and variations in water
`content of the paper and stool, it is not truly quantita
`tive.
`A quantitative method for measuring hemoglobin in
`stool described in U.S. Pat, No. 4,378,971 involves heat
`ing a small amount of stool in a reducing acid milieu.
`Porphyrin, free from other contaminating fluorescent
`compounds, is extracted from the mixture. This proce
`dure provides a very sensitive, quantitative measure
`ment of hemoglobin in stool. However, it requires ex
`tensive handling, does not differentiate human and ani
`mal hemoglobins, and cannot be carried out rapidly.
`The radialimmunodiffusion (RID) procedure de
`scribed by Barrows, G.H. et al, Ann.J. Clin. Path.
`69:342-346 (1977) uses antibodies to human hemoglobin
`in conjunction with calibrators of known hemoglobin
`concentrations. A disk is punched out from filter paper,
`stool sample is applied to the disk, and the disk is placed
`on a RID plate. There it is allowed to react for 24 hours
`with a disk impregnated with the calibrators. This test
`has a detection limit of 0.3 mg of hemoglobin in 8 mg of
`stool. It requires overnight incubation. Use of filter
`paper limits sensitivity since all hemoglobin placed on
`the paper is not made available for the antigen-antibody
`reaction. Irreversible protein absorption may permit the
`release of as little as 5 to 10 percent of the hemoglobin
`placed on the paper.
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1041, Page 3
`
`

`

`5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`5, 198,365
`3
`4.
`fecal solids. The clarified liquid phase is removed to
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,582,811 describes a procedure includ
`ing binding hemoglobin in a sample with antibody in
`provide a test sample free from fecal solids.
`pregnated in paper, and then reacting the product with
`The preferred stool stabilizing agents include buffer
`a substrate to measure pseudoperoxidase activity of the
`ing agents, and antimicrobial agents such as antibacte
`hemoglobin.
`rial and/or antimycotic agents. The preferred analyte
`protecting agents include inhibitors of proteolytic, re
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,427,769 describes an immunological
`method involving extraction of hemoglobin applied to a
`ductive and/or oxidative enzymes. For immunoassays
`using alkaline phosphatase enzyme labels, the preferred
`guaiac resin coated paper, and measuring it with a sand
`endogenous enzyme inhibitor inhibits the activity of
`wich enzyme immunoassay technique. Kim et al, Clin.-
`endogenous alkaline phosphatase, such as formaldehyde
`Chimacta. 152:175 (1985) describes a still further ap
`10
`or equally effective enzyme inhibitors.
`proach wherein a stool sample applied to a glass fiber
`The stool sample is preferably freshly collected or
`filter is placed on a gel and allowed to incubate for 2-4
`hours. Hemoglobin is quantitatively determined down
`has been chilled to a temperature below -20°C. imme
`diately upon collection. Frozen stool is preferably then
`to a limit of 0.2 mg of hemoglobin per gram of stool
`raised to a temperature within the range of from 2 to 6'
`based on the presence or absence of a visible band.
`C. immediately before being dispersed in the aqueous
`The procedures describe above require the direct
`transfer of a stool specimen to the test system. Transfer
`fecal test solution.
`of hemoglobin from the sample to the test system is only
`The solid-phase immunoassay method of this inven
`tion for determining analyte in a fecal sample comprises
`partial. Undesirable reactions caused by stool constitu
`contacting the clarified liquid phase with a solid support
`ents are difficult to control with reagents due to their
`uniform distribution throughout the sample. Most of the
`to which an anti-analyte is adhered for a time sufficient
`to permit antibody conjugation with analyte; and deter
`procedures require a well equipped laboratory and
`mining hemoglobin adhering to the insoluble support.
`trained technicians.
`For determining human hemoglobin in a sample of
`Adams and Layman, Ann. Clin. Labs. Sci 4:343 (1974)
`describe a latex agglutination test involving blending 1
`human stool according to this method, the aqueous
`fecal solution preferably contains an inhibiting amount
`gm of stool in 100 ml of buffer solution and filtering the
`of a proteinase inhibitor, from 0.02 to 0.5 wt.% of
`suspension. This test can detect hemoglobin down to a
`formaldehyde and from 0.01 to 10 wt.% of a non
`level of 10 ml of blood per gram of stool.
`immune animal protein.
`Vellacott, et al, The Lancet. 1:18 (1981) have de
`It is an object of this invention to provide an im
`scribed a fluorescent immunoassay method in which a
`proved procedure for preparing stool samples for solid
`20% suspension of stool in water is used as a test sample.
`phase immunoassay which is simple, quick and can be
`This sample is sonicated and centrifuged prior to test
`carried out in the home or other non-laboratory site by
`1ng.
`a technically unskilled person with simple, inexpensive
`Japanese Patent Application 60173471 (Dialog Der
`resources. It is a further object of this invention to pro
`went World Patent Acc. No. 85-259806/42) describes
`35
`vide a procedure for preparing a stool sample composi
`applying stool containing an analyte to a porous nate
`tion which provides reduced interference with solid
`rial. The porous material contains a carrier to which an
`immunoassay procedures. A still further object of this
`antibody which binds with the analyte is attached. The
`invention is an improved immunoassay method for fecal
`sample is washed and contacted with further reagents to
`provide a change in spectroscopic characteristics.
`occult blood testing of stool samples.
`European Patent Application 70366 (Dialog Derwent
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`World Patent Acc. No. 83-12612K/06) describes an
`FIG. 1 is a view of a sample preparation vial suitable
`immunoperoxidase sandwich test method for determin
`ing hemoglobin, albumin or globulin in stool samples
`for use in the method of this invention
`using beads upon which antibodies for the analyte are
`FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the sample prepa
`45
`immobilized and a peroxidase labeled secondary anti
`ration vial of FIG. 1.
`body.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`This invention is a method for preparing a fecal or
`stool sample for analysis using immunological tech
`niques. This procedure is described hereinafter in con
`junction with an immunoassay procedure for determin
`ing human hemoglobin in a stool sample, by way of
`example, not by way of limitation. The sample prepara
`tion procedure described hereinbelow is equally suit
`able for preparing stool samples for determining other
`stool analytes by immunoassay methods, and the use of
`this procedure for all such applications is intended to be
`included within the scope of this invention.
`In general, the method of this invention provides a
`stabilized stool sample solution which yields an im
`proved result in immunoassays. The stool is suspended
`in an aqueous fecal test solution in a concentration of
`less than 10 wt.%. The fecal test solution contains
`agents which stabilize the stool and protect the analyte
`from deterioration. The solution also preferably con
`tains agents which reduce endogenous sources of immu
`
`SUMMARY AND OBJECTS OF THE
`INVENTION
`The method of this invention for preparing a fecal
`sample composition for immunoassay testing comprises
`forming a dispersion of 1 up to 10 wt.% and preferably
`from 1 to 5 wt.% of a stool sample in an aqueous fecal
`test solution. The aqueous fecal test solution can contain
`preservatives and endogenous interference reducing
`agents to protect the test sample components against
`assay related deterioration and the assay from interfer
`ence. The aqueous fecal test solution of this invention
`contains at least one stool stabilizing agent or at least
`one analyte stabilizing agent. The aqueous fecal test
`solution also preferably contains agents which facilitate
`the immunoassay such as at least one inhibitor of endog
`enous enzymes which may interfere with the immuno
`assay and one or more non-immune animal proteins or
`65
`polyamino acid polymers to reduce non-specific bind
`ing. Fecal solids in the dispersion are permitted to settle
`to form a clarified liquid phase substantially free from
`
`50
`
`55
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1041, Page 4
`
`

`

`10
`
`15
`
`5, 198,365
`6
`5
`lung described by Kraut, H. et al, Z. Physiol Chem.
`noassay interference and proteins to reduce non-specific
`198:97-101 (1930). The proteolytic activity inhibitor is
`binding. The clarified liquid from the stool suspension
`contains sufficient analyte for a highly accurate immu
`present in a concentration sufficient to inhibit a major
`proportion of the proteolytic activity. Aprotinin can be
`noassay determination. We have discovered that be
`present in concentrations of from 10,000 to 30,000 kalli
`cause the stool and analyte are diluted to low levels, the
`protective and inhibiting functions can be achieved
`krein inactivator units per liter of fecal test solution.
`with such low concentrations of reagents that the rea
`The aqueous fecal test solution also preferably con
`gents do not significantly interfere with the immunoas
`tains reagents which inhibit or deactivate enzymatic
`activity which may interfere with the particular immu
`say. Prior to this invention, effective stool stabilization
`and analyte protection with chemical or biochemical
`noassay procedure used. Particularly when the immu
`reagents was incompatible with immunoassay methods.
`noassay uses alkaline phosphatase labeled reagents, en
`The high reagent concentrations required greatly inter
`dogenous alkaline phosphatase naturally present in the
`fered with the immunoassays. Accordingly, expensive,
`sample presents substantial interference. If alkaline
`time-consuming non-reagent purification and stabiliza
`phosphatase levels in the sample are not adequately
`tion techniques were found necessary to prepare fecal
`suppressed by other reagents, the broadly active en
`samples for immunoassay analysis.
`zyme inhibitors or deactivators are useful. The pre
`The method of this invention for preparing a fecal
`ferred test system uses formaldehyde as an inhibitor of
`sample composition for immunoassay testing involves a
`alkaline phosphatase in the sample. Other enzyme inhib
`first step of forming a dispersion of from 1 up to less
`itors include metal chelating agents, heavy metal ions,
`than 10 wt.% and preferably from 1 to 5 wt.% of a
`20
`certain amino acids such as tyrosine and phenylalanine,
`stool sample in an aqueous fecal test solution. The aque
`and high concentrations of zinc or inorganic phos
`ous fecal test solution of this invention contains at least
`phates. Any conventional enzyme inhibitor can be used
`one stool stabilizing agent and/or at least one analyte
`to prepare the aqueous fecal test solution, if it does not
`stabilizing agent. The aqueous fecal test solution also
`interfere with the later assay procedure and particularly
`preferably contains agents which facilitate the immuno
`25
`any enzyme reactions used in the immunoassay proce
`assay such as at least one inhibitor of endogenous en
`dure. The level of enzyme inhibitor or deactivator is
`zymes which may interfere with the immunoassay and
`selected to be sufficient to achieve the level of inhibition
`one or more non-immune animal protein or polyamino
`required for the sample. For the general stool samples,
`acid polymer to reduce non-specific binding.
`alkaline phosphatase inhibitors such as formaldehyde
`For stabilizing the stool, the aqueous fecal test solu
`30
`can be used in concentrations of from 0.01 to 0.5 wt.%
`tion contains buffering agents and/or antimicrobial
`and preferably in concentrations of from 0.01 to 0.2 wt.
`agents. The aqueous fecal test solution can be buffered
`%.
`to a pH selected to increase the stability of the stool.
`A non-specific binding inhibitor is preferably present
`For hemoglobin immunoassays, a buffersolution having
`in the fecal test solution. Suitable non-specific binding
`a pH of from 7.0 to 8.0 is desirable. Any conventional
`inhibitors are non-immune water-soluble animal prote
`buffering agents can be used to prepare the test buffer
`ins and polyamino acids which would not interfere with
`solution, if they do not interfere with the later assay
`the later assay procedure and particularly any protein
`procedure and assay reagents. One example of a suitable
`measurements in the immunoassay procedure. Suitable
`buffering solution is standard phosphate buffered saline,
`animal proteins are include bovine (BSA), human
`pH 7.2 to 7.6 and preferably about 7.4.
`(HSA), rabbit (RSA), goat (GSA), sheep (SHA), and
`The stool stabilizing agent can include any biocidal or
`horse (HOSA) serum albumins, for example; serum
`biostatic agents which will inhibit microbial growth in
`gamma globulin, of the previously described animals
`the sample but will not interfere with the immunoassay.
`and other animal proteins such as ovalbumin, fibrino
`Any conventional biocidal or biostatic agent can be
`gen, thrombin, transferin, glycoproteins, etc. Suitable
`used which will not interfere with the later assay proce
`45
`water-soluble amino acid polymers include polylysine,
`dure and assay reagents. An example of suitable biocidal
`polyglutamic acid, polyalanine, polyhistidine, poly
`agents are antibiotics such as penicillin or streptomycin,
`methionine, polyproline, and the like. For assays where
`and antimycotic agents such as fungizone. A commer
`non-specific binding presents a problem, the concentra
`cial buffer solution containing these antimicrobial
`tion of the non-specific binding inhibitor can be from 0.1
`agents is available from Gibco Co., New York, N.Y.
`to 1.0 wt.% and is preferably from 1 to 5 wt.%.
`The concentration of the antibiotic and antimycotic
`The preserved aqueous fecal test solution can also
`agents is adjusted based on the activity of the reagent
`contain other protective agents including proteins, car
`selected. In general, the level is sufficient to suppress
`bohydrates, salts and the like which provide a protec
`the reproduction of the microbes and preferably is suffi
`tive function.
`cient to kill a majority of them.
`Microbial and chemical changes in the sample should
`Particularly for proteinaceous analytes, the analyte
`be inhibited and preferably completely arrested immedi
`stabilizing or protecting agent can be an inhibitor of
`ately after the sample is obtained. The stool is prefera
`enzyme activity which would affect the analyte. Inhibi
`bly dispersed in the aqueous fecal test solution immedi
`tors of proteolytic, reductive and oxidative enzymes are
`ately after being obtained, where the preservatives and
`useful. Any conventional inhibitors of proteolytic, re
`other reagents in the buffer solution will stabilize the
`ductive or oxidative enzyme activity can be used to
`sample. If the stool is to be stored or shipped before
`prepare the aqueous fecal test solution, if they do not
`testing, it should be quickly frozen to a temperature
`interfere with the later assay procedure and assay rea
`below -20 C. immediately after being obtained to
`gents. Examples of suitable proteolytic activity inhibi
`prevent chemical and microbial changes, and the sam
`tors include phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF),
`65
`ple should be maintained at this temperature until the
`pepstatin A, Bestatin, and chymostatin (Sigma Chemi
`sample is to be dispersed in the aqueous fecal test solu
`cal Co.). A suitable commercial product is the proteo
`tion. Immediately before being dispersed, the frozen
`lytic activity inhibitor aprotinin, a derivative of bovine
`
`50
`
`35
`
`55
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1041, Page 5
`
`

`

`5
`
`O
`
`5
`
`5, 198,365
`8
`7
`wich immunoassays can be carried out with a sample
`sample temperature is raised to a temperature within the
`prepared according to this invention. These procedures
`range of from 2 to 6 C.
`can use antibodies or reagent analytes labeled with a
`The fecal solids in the dispersion are then permitted
`wide variety of physically detectable labels or with
`to settle to form a liquid phase substantially free from
`active labels such as enzymes or enzyme substrates
`fecal solids and the clarified liquid phase is removed,
`which upon a further reaction yield physically detect
`providing a test sample substantially free from fecal
`able labels.
`solids.
`By way of example, the clarified liquid can be used
`FIG. 1 shows an open vial and spatula combination
`for determining human hemoglobin in the sample using
`which is suitable for treating the stool samples accord
`an anti-(human hemoglobin) antibody. For this proce
`ing to this invention, and FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional
`dure the fecal test solution preferably contains as stool
`representation thereof. The container 2 has a body 4
`stabilizing agents, buffers and antimicrobial agents; and
`made of transparent organic polymer or glass with level
`as an analyte protecting agent, a proteolytic enzyme
`or volume graduation lines 6 on the outer surface
`inhibitor. For immunoassays using a phosphatase la
`thereof. The bottom of the body is formed into a conical
`beled reagent, the aqueous fecal test solution preferably
`solids receptor 8, enclosed within a cylindrical stand 10
`which maintains the body 4 in an axially upright posi
`also contains a reducing agent and a non-specific bind
`ing inhibitor. A. aqueous fecal test solution for this assay
`tion. The cap 12 is threaded to form a sealed, threaded
`engagement with the body threads 14. A spatula-stirrer
`preferably is buffered to a pH of from 7.0 to 8.0, and
`16 having a flattened end 18 is mounted in the cap 12,
`contains a biocidal amount of an antimicrobial agent, an
`extending downward into the dispersion and settling
`inhibiting amount of a proteinase inhibitor, from 0.02 to
`cavity 20 formed by the body 4.
`0.5 wt.% and optimally from 0.02 to 0.1 wt.% of form
`The spatula or sample spoon 16 is dimensioned to
`aldehyde, and from 1 to 10 wt.% of an animal albumin.
`take a selected amount of stool and disperse it in a se
`This invention is further illustrated by the following
`lected volume of liquid 22 in the vial 2. The suspension
`specific, but non-limiting examples. Temperatures are
`given in degrees Centigrade and percents as weight
`is permitted to settle, and the solids are collected in the
`25
`conical bottom 8, leaving a clarified liquid in the upper
`percents unless otherwise specified. Examples which
`portion of the container. This container is suitable for
`are constructively reduced to practice herein are pres
`preparing dilutions of stool for qualitative immunoas
`ented in the present tense, and examples representing
`laboratory experiments previously reduced to practice
`says.
`A further dilution can be made by transferring clari
`are presented in the past tense.
`fied liquid from the vial to another container of fecal
`EXAMPLE 1
`test solution or another suitable aqueous fecal test dilu
`tion medium. For competition immunoassays, the fecal
`Fecal Occult Blood Immunoassay
`test solution or dilution medium can be used for obtain
`Goats are immunized by standard procedures with
`ing the desired dilutions. For sandwich immunoassays,
`purified human hemoglobin Variance A (Isolab PH 100,
`the fecal test solution or dilution medium can contain
`Akron, O.H.). Bleeds from the goats are tested against
`suitable reducing agents as required for the analyte
`human hemoglobin until the presence of antibodies to
`determinations.
`hemoglobin are confirmed. Polystyrene macrobeads
`Containers of the type shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2
`(6-8 mm) are suspended in the anti-serum diluted in
`are also suitable for storage and shipment of stool sam
`glycine-saline buffer, pH 8.2 to provide a coating of the
`ples dispersed in the fecal test solution. With dilution in
`goat anti-(human hemoglobin) antibody.
`an inhibitory buffer solution, the odor is minimized and
`Dialyzed calf-intestine alkaline phosphatase is mixed
`the appearance of the sample made less objectionable.
`with hemoglobin in the presence of gluteraldehyde to
`However, in the preferred method, the fresh stool is
`form a hemoglobin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate. The
`transferred into liquid medium in the container for clari
`reaction product is purified on a SEPHACYL S-300
`fication and testing.
`column (Pharmacia), eluting with tris buffer containing
`Surprisingly, the sample preparation procedure of
`MgCl2.
`this invention, when carried out with suitable reagent
`The buffered aqueous fecal test solution is 0.02 M
`inhibitors in the fecal test solution, reduces interfering
`phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 0.1 wt.%
`activities far more efficiently than the prior art methods
`sodium azide, wt.% bovine serum albumin, 10,000
`and without their complicated, lengthy and elaborate
`u/L aprotinin (TRASYLOL, Mobay Chemical, New
`procedures. The dispersion of sample in the buffer solu
`York, N.Y.) and 694 microliters/liter of formaldehyde.
`tion allows a uniform and rapid inhibitory and protec
`A stool sample (1 gm) is dispersed in 30 ml of the fecal
`tive action by the reagents. The arrest of the potential
`test solution.
`harmful effects of the stool constituents in the subse
`55
`Hemoglobin calibrator controls are made by dis
`quent immunoassay is more efficient and complete than
`solving human hemoglobin in desired concentrations in
`with the prior art procedures.
`the testing buffer solution.
`A solid-phase immunoassay for determining an ana
`The enzyme substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate
`lyte in a human stool sample according to this invention
`(SIGMA 104 phosphatase substrate tablets, Sigma
`comprises the steps of contacting the clarified liquid test
`Chemical Company, St. Louis, M.o.) is dissolved in a
`sample with a solid support to which an anti-analyte
`buffer which contains 0.05 M. NaHCO3, 0.05 M. NaCl
`antibody is adhered for a time sufficient to permit anti
`and 0.1 mM MgCl2. The tablet must be completely
`body conjugation with analyte, and determining analyte
`adhering to the insoluble support. The choice of aque
`dissolved.
`ous buffer solution inhibitors and reagents is selected to
`65
`facilitate the immunoassay procedure to be carried out.
`A wide variety of solid-phase immunoassay procedures
`including latex agglutination, competition and sand
`
`Assay Procedure
`1. Allow all assay reagents and specimens to equilibrate
`to room temperature.
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1041, Page 6
`
`

`

`10
`TABLE A-continued
`Concentration
`Calibrators (microgm/ml)
`Control
`
`ng hemoglobin/gm stool = micro
`
`Average
`O.D. (405 nm)
`500
`
`O.D. (405 nm)
`1,422
`In hemoglobin x 30
`stool wt., (ng)
`
`5
`
`10
`
`5
`
`20
`
`5, 198,365
`2. Label test tubes in duplicate for each calibrator, con
`trol and sample.
`3. Pipette 50 microliters each of calibrator, control and
`clarified stool sample solution into the bottom of each
`tube. The volume can be selected from the range of
`from 10 to 100 microliters.
`4. Pipette 1 ml of the buffer solution into each tube,
`shaking the tubes to mix.
`5. Place the required number of beads onto absorbent
`paper and drop one bead into each tube. Shake to mix
`the bead and liquid.
`6. Incubate all tubes at rm temp for 30 min. During each
`incubation, shake tubes 3 to 4 times at regular inter
`vals with sufficient force to lift the bead off the tube
`bottom.
`7. Decant or aspirate liquid from all tubes. Wash each
`bead with 5 ml of distilled water at rm temp. Decant
`or aspirate liquid from all tubes.
`8. Repeat washing step (7) two more times, and after the
`last wash, remove all residual water with an aspirator
`or invert the tubes over absorbent paper.
`9. Add 200 microliters of prepared hemoglobin-alkaline
`phosphatase conjugate solution to all tubes, and incu
`bate all tubes at rm temp for 30 min. Shake tubes 3 to
`25
`4 times during incubation. The incubation times for
`each tube must be the same. This can be accom
`plished by pipetting all reagents into all tubes in the
`same order without interruptions and in the same
`elapsed time interval.
`30
`10. Wash each bead with 5 ml of distilled water at rm
`temp. Deca

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket