throbber
.mmmmmnRmmmRmmnmRMMRRRRR
`
`organismal fitness (for example, metabolic
`(2, 17-21) and
`efficiency, growth rate)
`have concluded that allozyme polymor-
`phisms themselves underlie physiological
`energetic differences by virtue of their in-
`fluence on metabolite flux through central
`biochemical pathways (5, 22). Such bal-
`ancing selection on allozyme polymor-
`phisms could counter the influence of ge-
`netic drift, even in the face of population
`subdivision due to historical demographic
`events or contemporary restrictions on gene
`flow that are reflected in geographically
`divergent frequencies of neutral genetic
`markers. Hidden molecular variation that
`would also distinguish Atlantic and Gulf
`oysters may exist at the allozyme loci, but
`this possibility can in a sense be subsumed
`under the hypothesis of balancing selec-
`tion, provided that the selection operates
`with respect to the observed electromorph
`classes instead of the level of the hidden
`variation. A slower rate of evolution for
`allozymes as compared to scnRFLPs can also
`be eliminated, because both cases in oysters
`involve the population level sorting of an-
`affect both
`cestral polymorphisms that
`equally.
`Regardless of the specific underlying
`causes, the heterogeneity in geographic pat-
`scnDNA, and
`tern among allozyme,
`mtDNA data sets cannot be accommodated
`under a single evolutionary model involv-
`ing either neutrality or balancing selection
`(23). In this example where an allozyme
`survey had suggested high levels of gene
`flow, dramatic population genetic separa-
`tion nonetheless was present in both the
`nuclear and the cytoplasmic genomes. Re-
`sults of this study emphasize the need for
`caution in inferring population genetic
`structure and gene flow from any single class
`of genetic markers.
`
`REFERENCES AND NOTES
`1. N. E. Buroker, J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36, 1313
`(1979).
`2. E. Zouros, S. M. Singh, H. E. Miles, Evolution 34,
`856 (1980).
`3. T. J. Hilbish and R. K. Koehn, ibid. 39, 1302
`(1985).
`4. _, Science 229, 52 (1985).
`5. R. K. Koehn, A. J. Zera, J. G. Hall, in Evolution of
`Genes and Proteins, M. Nei and R. K. Koehn, Eds.
`(Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1983), pp. 115-136.
`6. J. B. Mitton and M. C. Grant, Annu. Rev. Ecol.
`Syst. 15, 479 (1984).
`7. N. E. Buroker, Mar. Biol. 75, 99 (1983).
`8. C. A. Reeb and J. C. Avise, Genetics 124, 397
`(1990).
`9. J. C. Avise, Oikos, in press.
`10. A. C. Wilson et al., Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 26, 375
`(1985).
`11. Sequences of the primers 5' to 3' are as follows:
`CV-7: AAGCTTTAGCCTTCAACTCAGACAA,
`AAGCTTTAAGGTAGAAGCAAATTA; CV-1 9:
`TAAGTTG11TCTGATCCTTMG, CMATrT1M-
`TACCATTGCC; CV-32: GGAAGCTTTAT-
`TATCTAACAGTCT, GGAAGCTTACAAAACAAGC-
`TCGGCTA; CV-195: GGATC AGAAGGAAAGCAA-
`CAGCAC, AACGMGATGGAACAAGGGMACT.
`
`102
`
`12. S. A. Karl, B. W. Bowen, J. C. Avise, Genetics, in
`press.
`13. Locations and sample sizes for American oysters
`in the present study are as follows: MA, Woods
`Hole, MA (n = 35); SC, Charleston, SC (23); GA,
`Cumberland Island, GA (33); FL1, New Smyma
`Beach, FL (30); FL2, Stuart, FL (29); FL3, Port
`Charlotte, FL (29); FL4, Panacea, FL (39); FL5,
`Carabelle River, FL (18); and LA, Grand Isle, LA
`(41). Living oysters were collected and placed on
`wet ice for transportation to the laboratory. Total
`cell DNA was extracted from mantle-gonad tissue
`by homogenizing in 50 mM tris-HCI (pH 8.0), 100
`mM EDTA, and 100 mM NaCI followed by one
`cycle of phenol, phenol-chloroform, and chloro-
`form extraction. RNA was removed by ribonucle-
`ase A digestion for 3 hours followed by a repeat of
`the organic extractions described above. We pre-
`cipitated DNA by adjusting the aqueous fraction
`to a final concentration of 300 mM sodium acetate
`and 70% ethanol; it was then vacuum-dried and
`resuspended in 1 x TE (10 mM tris-HCI, pH 8.0, 1
`mM EDTA).
`.l of genomic DNA was amplified in
`14. In general, 1
`a 10i-pi reaction volume with 25 pmol of each
`primer and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase, accord-
`ing to manufacturer's instructions (Promega), with
`the addition of MgCI2 and bovine serum albumin
`9g/gi,
`to a final concentration of 2.5 mM and 0.1
`respectively. PCR cycling parameters consisted
`of an initial denaturation at 950C for 2 min, 40
`cycles of denaturation at 940C for 1 min with
`annealing at 55° to 62°C for 1 min and extension at
`720C for 2 min, and a final extension at 720C for 7
`min.
`15. Approximately 10 pL. of the amplified DNA was
`digested directly with 5 units of each restriction
`enzyme in a 20-gi reaction according to the
`manufacturer's directions. Electrophoresis was
`performed in 2.5% agarose gels stained with
`ethidium bromide (180 ng/ml). Restriction pat-
`
`tems were visualized with shortwave ultraviolet
`light. Polymorphisms were indicated by the gain
`or loss of fragments in the restriction profiles.
`16. To eliminate the possibility that our nuclear loci
`mistakenly may have represented mtDNA poly-
`morphisms, we probed a Southem (DNA) blot of
`the amplified scnDNA products with purified oys-
`ter mtDNA. No bands appeared in the autoradio-
`gram except in control lanes. The hypothesis of
`mtDNA contamination is further discounted by the
`nature of the scnDNA polymorphisms themselves,
`which involved diploid genotypes with general
`conformance to Hardy-Weinberg expected geno-
`typic frequencies. This result further supports the
`idea that the loci are inherited in a Mendelian
`fashion. In addition, all pairwise comparisons of
`the four loci show insignificant deviations from
`gametic equilibrium [B. S. Weir and C. C. Cock-
`erham, in Mathematical Evolutionary Theory, M. E.
`Feldman, Ed. (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton,
`NJ, 1989), pp. 86-110].
`17. D. W. Garton, R. K. Koehn, T. M. Scott, Genetics
`108, 445 (1984).
`18. R. K. Koehn and P. M. Gaffney, Mar. Biol. 82, 1
`(1984).
`19. W. J. Diehl and R. K. Koehn, ibid. 88, 265 (1985).
`20. S. M. Singh and E. Zouros, Evolution 32, 342
`(1978).
`21. J. B. Mitton and R. K. Koehn, J. Exp. Mar. Biol.
`Ecol. 90, 73 (1985).
`22. R. K. Koehn and T. J. Hilbish, Am. Sci. 75, 134
`(1987).
`23. R. C. Lewontin and J. Krakauer, Genetics 74, 175
`(1973).
`24. M. Nei, ibid. 89, 583 (1978).
`25. We thank M. Schexnayder and S. McAlpine for
`oyster specimens. Supported by an NIH predoc-
`toral training grant to S.A.K. and by NSF grant
`BSR-9005940.
`
`4 December 1991; accepted 14 February 1992
`
`Identification of ras Oncogene Mutations in the
`Stool of Patients with Curable Colorectal Tumors
`David Sidransky, Takashi Tokino, Stanley R. Hamilton,
`Kenneth W. Kinzler, Bernard Levin, Philip Frost, Bert Vogelstein*
`Colorectal (CR) tumors are usually curable if detected before metastasis. Because genetic
`alterations are associated with the development of these tumors, mutant genes may be
`found in the stool of individuals with CR neoplasms. The stools of nine patients whose
`tumors contained mutations of K-ras were analyzed. In eight of the nine cases, the ras
`mutations were detectable in DNA purified from the stool. These patients included those
`with benign and malignant neoplasms from proximal and distal colonic epithelium. Thus,
`colorectal tumors can be detected by a noninvasive method based on the molecular
`pathogenesis of the disease.
`
`Colorectal cancer is the third most com-
`world,
`with
`the
`mon malignancy in
`570,000 new cases expected in 1992. In the
`United States alone, over 60,000 people
`
`D. Sidransky, T. Tokino, K. W. Kinzler, B. Vogelstein,
`Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Univer-
`sity, Baltimore, MD 21231.
`S. R. Hamilton, Department of Pathology and Depart-
`ment of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Balti-
`more, MD 21205.
`P. Frost, Department of Cell Biology, M. D. Anderson
`Hospital, Houston, TX 77054.
`B. Levin, Section of Gastrointestinal Oncology, M. D.
`Anderson Hospital, Houston, TX 77030.
`*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
`
`SCIENCE * VOL. 256
`
`*
`
`3 APRIL 1992
`
`will die from colorectal cancer this year (1).
`Whereas individuals with advanced disease
`have a poor prognosis, colorectal tumors
`diagnosed at an earlier stage can usually be
`cured by surgical or colonoscopic excision
`(2). Methods to detect surgically resectable
`tumors could therefore reduce deaths from
`this disease (3). The only noninvasive test
`for such a purpose involves testing stool for
`blood, but the appearance of hemoglobin in
`stool is not specific for neoplasia (4, 5).
`Tumor-derived mutations in oncogenes
`and suppressor genes potentially provide
`more specific markers (6). Mutations in
`
`Downloaded from https://www.science.org on January 10, 2024
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1035, Page 1
`
`

`

`..7t;
`
`these genes appear to be responsible for the
`initiation and progression of most human
`tumors, including those of the colon and
`rectum (7). Theoretically, colorectal tumors
`should shed cells containing these mutations
`into the stool. However, stool is a complex
`mixture consisting of diverse microorganisms,
`undigested food residues, mucus, and soluble
`and insoluble products of the gastrointestinal
`
`Mutant
`probe 2
`
`Wild-type
`
`Patient
`
`Mutant
`probe 1
`
`-
`
`2 1
`
`0 . .
`
`Flg. 1. Identification of ras mutations in stool by
`plaque hybridization. PCR products that con-
`tained the first coding exon of K-ras were
`generated from stools of patients 1, 2, and 10
`(Table 1) and cloned into a bacteriophage
`vector (16, 17). The plaque lifts were hybrid-
`ized to an oligonucleotide specific for wild-type
`Ras, an oligonucleotide specific for Val12 (mu-
`tant probe 1), and to an oligonucleotide specif-
`ic for Asp13 (mutant probe 2), as indicated (20).
`The number of plaques used for hybridization
`to the mutant specific oligonucleotides was
`fivefold higher than that used for the wild-type-
`specific oligonucleotide so that a statistically
`significant number of hybridizing plaques was
`obtained. The ratios of plaques hybridizing to
`the mutant-specific probe compared to the
`wild-type-specific probe were 0.08:1 and
`0.04:1 in patients 1 and 2, respectively.
`
`3
`
`Stool
`4 11
`1
`S
`
`.cPatientb.
`
`11
`
`Tumor
`4
`1
`
`_.
`._
`
`3
`
`vaj12
`
`..
`
`..~A-
`
`WRE
`
`tract. Furthermore, it contains numerous deg-
`most reproducible procedure was used (18).
`radative enzymes derived from cells, food, and
`Approximately 100 mg of stool frozen at
`bacteria. It was therefore unclear whether
`-80°C was diluted with 300 ,l of lysis
`mutant genes from tumor cells could survive
`buffer 1500 mM tris, 16 mM EDTA, 10 mM
`in this hostile environment and be detectable
`NaCI (pH 9.0)], and particulates and most
`in clinical specimens.
`bacteria were removed by centrifugation.
`To investigate this possibility, we exam-
`Proteins were digested with proteinase K
`ined stools from individuals with CR tumors
`and extracted with phenol and chloroform.
`for mutations of K-ras at codons 12 or 13,
`After ethanol precipitation, the DNA was
`which occur commonly in these neoplasms
`further purified by binding to glass beads.
`(8-12). We first analyzed tumors from 24
`From 0.5 to 5.0 ,ug of DNA was typically
`patients for the presence of K-ras gene mu-
`obtained. The first exon of K-ras was then
`tations. These cases comprised randomly
`PCR-amplified from this DNA as described
`chosen individuals from our clinics from
`above. Because we initially expected that
`whom we obtained stool samples before
`mutant ras would represent only a small
`bowel preparation for colonoscopy or surgery
`fraction of the total ras DNA in stool (if
`and who were subsequently found to have
`present at all), we used a sensitive tech-
`either a malignant colorectal tumor (carci-
`nique for analysis. This technique allowed
`noma) or a benign tumor (adenoma) greater
`the identification of a small fraction of
`than 1 cm in diameter. Adenomas of this
`mutant p53 genes in the urine of patients
`with advanced bladder cancers and can
`size are clinically the most important, as
`they are much more likely to progress to
`reveal the existence of even one mutant
`malignancy than smaller tumors (13, 14).
`gene among several thousand normal genes
`The first exon of K-ras gene was ampli-
`(19). The PCR products were cloned in a
`fied from DNA purified from cryostat sec-
`bacteriophage vector and the phage DNA
`tions of these tumors (15) by the polymer-
`transferred to nylon filters (20). These fil-
`ase chain reaction (PCR), (16). The PCR
`ters were then incubated with 32P-labeled
`products were cloned, and pooled clones
`oligonucleotides
`that
`recognized
`either
`were sequenced to identify mutations (17).
`wild-type K-ras, the mutant K-ras found in
`Nine of the 24 tumors (37%) were found to
`the tumor, or another mutant K-ras gene as
`contain mutations of this exon. Three dif-
`a negative control. With this assay, we
`ferent mutations were identified (Gly'2 to
`found that both patients contained mutant
`Val'2 or Asp'2; and Gly'3 to Asp'3). These
`ras in the DNA purified from their stool
`data were consistent with previous studies
`samples. The mutant genes detected in the
`that showed ras gene mutations in about
`stool were the same as those detected in the
`50% of such tumors, with 84% of the
`tumors (Val'2 in the stool and tumor of
`mutations confined to codons 12 or 13 of
`patient 1; Asp'3 in the stool of patient 2,
`K-ras (10).
`1). A control stool sample from a
`Fig.
`We next analyzed the stools from the
`patient without a ras mutation in his tumor
`first two of the nine patients. Several meth-
`contained no mutation at either of these
`ods to purify DNA were evaluated, and the
`positions (Fig. 1, patient 10).
`Table 1. Patients studied for stool ras gene mutations.
`
`Mutant
`Tumnor
`muta-
`ras
`tmiota-
`inge
`tin nstoolt
`+
`+
`+
`+
`
`Pa-
`tient
`
`Age/
`sex
`
`Tumor
`location
`
`Tumor
`type/stage*
`
`Tumor size
`(cm3)
`
`5.8 x 6.5 x 2.7
`1.5 x 1.5 x 0.6
`2.8 x 2.0 x 0.4
`2.5 x 4.7 x 1.8
`1.0 x 0.9 x 0.4
`5.9 x 6.4 x 1.7
`4.3 x 3.4 x 1.4
`4.8 x 3.0 x 1.2
`6.0 x 4.011
`12 x 6.511
`7 x 3 x 2
`2.1 x 3.1 x 0.4
`
`Val12
`Carcinoma/C
`52/F
`Rectum
`1
`Asp13
`Sigmoid colon
`63/M
`Adenoma
`2
`Asp12
`Carcinoma/C
`51/F
`Rectum
`3
`Asp12
`Carcinoma/C
`61/M
`Rectum
`4
`Asp13
`Carcinoma/A
`70/M
`Rectum
`5
`Asp12
`Carcinoma/B
`71/M
`Rectum
`6
`+
`Asp12
`Carcinoma/B
`51/F
`Ascend colon
`7
`+
`Asp13
`69/M
`Sigmoid colon
`Carcinoma/B
`8
`+
`Asp12
`Cecum
`67/M
`Adenoma
`9
`+
`Carcinoma/C
`Splenic flex
`None
`61/M
`10
`-
`Carcinoma/B
`Sigmoid colon
`None
`34/M
`11
`-
`Carcinoma/C
`Sigmoid colon
`63/M
`None
`12
`-
`42/F
`NA§
`NA
`NA
`13
`-
`NA
`NA§
`53/F
`NA
`14
`-
`NA
`NA§
`63/F
`NA
`15
`-
`*Carcinomas were classified according to Duke (13): A, confined to muscularis propria; B, extension through
`tDetermined by sequence
`muscularis propria, but confined to colon; C, metastatic to regional lymph nodes.
`tAs assessed by the plaque hybridization or Southern blot (DNA) assay
`analysis of codons 12 or 13 of K-ras.
`with three mutant specific oligomers (Val12, Asp12, and Asp13) as probes.
`§Patients 13, 14, and 15 had no
`1lOnly measurements of the external
`colorectal neoplasms found at colonoscopy (NA = not applicable).
`surfaces of these tumors were available.
`
`SCIENCE * VOL. 256
`
`*
`
`3 APRIL 1992
`
`103
`
`Fig. 2. Southern blot assay for ras mutations.
`PCR products that contained the first coding
`exon of K-ras were generated from stools and
`tumors of patients 1, 3, 4, and 1 1, as indicated
`(16). PCR products were subjected to electro-
`phoresis through a 2% agarose gel and trans-
`(21). The blots were
`ferred to nylon filters
`hybridized to oligonucleotide probes specific
`for wild-type ras (bottom), the Asp12 mutation
`(middle), or the Val12 mutation (top).
`
`Downloaded from https://www.science.org on January 10, 2024
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1035, Page 2
`
`

`

`~.
`
`lit
`
`"' gm
`go
`
`The fraction of phage plaques hybridiz-
`ing to the mutant-specific oligonucleotide
`in patients 1 and 2 was high, representing 8
`and 4%, respectively, of the phage hybrid-
`izing to the oligonucleotide specific for the
`wild-type K-ras. This suggested that a less
`sensitive, but simpler, assay could be used
`to identify mutant genes in stool samples.
`For this purpose, crude PCR products were
`simply subjected to electrophoresis through
`an agarose gel and transferred to nylon
`filters by the method of Southern (21).
`These blots were then incubated with 32p_
`labeled oligonucleotides
`that recognized
`wild-type or mutant K-ras. The Val12 mu-
`tation of patient 1 was easily observed in
`stool with the Southern blot (DNA) assay
`(Fig. 2, top). The oligonucleotide specific
`for the Asp12 mutant provided a negative
`control (Fig. 2, middle). The wild-type-
`specific oligonucleotide hybridized to DNA
`from both tumor and stool, as expected
`(Fig. 2, bottom). Similarly, Southern blot
`analysis revealed that the tumors and stool
`of the DNA from patients 3 and 4 both
`contained the Asp12 mutation, whereas
`neither hybridized to the Val12-specific oli-
`gonucleotide (Fig. 2). The ratio of mutant
`to wild-type hybridization in the stool sam-
`ples was five- to tenfold lower than that in
`the tumors, consistent with the plaque hy-
`bridization assays.
`Southern blot analysis detected muta-
`tions in stool from eight of the nine patients
`(Table 1). Mutations originating in benign
`tumors (patients 2 and 9) and malignant
`tumors were detected. Tumors as small as
`1.3 cm3 gave rise to detectable mutant
`genes in the stool (patient 2). Moreover,
`proximal as well as distal tumors (patient 9,
`cecum; patient 7, ascending colon) yielded
`positive results.
`As controls, we examined six stool sam-
`ples, three from individuals with no colo-
`rectal neoplasia and three from individuals
`with colorectal tumors that did not contain
`K-ras mutations at codons 12 or 13. In all
`six cases, strong hybridization to the wild-
`type-specific oligonucleotides, but not to
`specific
`for Val'2,
`the oligonucleotides
`Asp12, or Asp13 mutations, was observed
`(Table 1 and Figs. 1 and 2).
`We were surprised at the ease with
`which K-ras mutations were identified in
`the stool. However, rough calculations in-
`dicate that colorectal tumors could consti-
`tute a significant fraction of the human
`DNA present in stool. The colon is more
`than a meter in length, but the epithelium
`is confined to a lining only a few millime-
`ters thick. It is estimated that the normal
`adult colon contains 5 x 1010 epithelial
`cells (22). One-sixth to one-third of these
`are shed every 24 hours, giving rise to
`approximately 1010 normal cells per day
`(23). A tumor of 1 cm3 may contain more
`104
`
`than 109 cells. These cells turn over at
`similar or elevated rates compared to nor-
`mal cells (24). Thus, it is conceivable that
`more than 1% of the epithelial cells shed
`from colon into the stool could be derived
`from tumors of this size. It is also possible
`that tumor cells are more resistant to the
`degradative processes in feces or that apop-
`tosis, which degrades DNA in normally
`differentiating cells, is not fully operative in
`tumor cells.
`Mutations of ras are particularly amena-
`ble for these studies because they are pre-
`sent in both benign and malignant CR
`tumors and mutations occur at relatively
`few codons (S-12). However, ras mutations
`are found in only 50% of such tumors.
`Other mutant genes present in colorectal
`tumors (7) could probably be detected in
`the stool, which would increase the poten-
`tial sensitivity of this strategy. With the
`help of ras and other gene probes, addition-
`al studies, in which the stools from a large
`number of patients with colorectal tumors
`of varying size, stage, and anatomical posi-
`tion are analyzed, will be needed to more
`accurately determine the sensitivity of such
`tests.
`These results provide the conceptual
`and practical basis for a new approach for
`detecting the presence of colorectal tumors
`in a noninvasive fashion. The approach
`could have use in monitoring patient pop-
`ulations on different diets or treatments
`designed to minimize the incidence of co-
`lorectal neoplasia (25). It also could even-
`tually find use in screening asymptomatic
`patients, especially those at risk by virtue of
`inherited or environmental factors
`(25,
`26), for the presence of colorectal neopla-
`sia. An analysis of data from only ras probes
`suggests that some early colorectal cancers
`and premalignant lesions might be identifi-
`able through this strategy. Because colorec-
`tal tumors are so common, this approach
`has implications for public health.
`
`REFERENCES AND NOTES
`
`1. M. Shike et al., Bull. WHO 68, 377 (1990); R. W.
`Beart, Jr., in Textbook of Clinical Oncology, A. I.
`Hollieb, D. S. Fink, G. P. Murphy, Eds. (American
`Cancer Society, Atlanta, 1991), pp. 213-218.
`2. More than 90% of patients with adenomas or with
`carcinomas confined to the mucosa can be cured
`by surgical methods. About 40 to 80% of patients
`whose disease is confined to local extension or
`lymph node involvement are similarly curable, but
`less than 10% of patients with distant metastasis
`can be treated successfully. T. Rich, L. L. Gun-
`derson, J. Galdabin et al., Cancer 52, 1317
`(1983); C. E. Dukes and H. J. R. Bussey, Br. J.
`Cancer 12, 309 (1958); E. M. Copeland, L. D.
`Miller, R. S. Jones, Am. J. Surg. 116, 875 (1968);
`R. S. Grinnell, Ann. Surg. 2, 494 (1950); B. Eisen-
`berg et al., Cancer 49, 1131 (1982); D. A. August,
`R. T. Ottow, P. H. Sugarbaker, Cancer Metastasis.
`Rev. 3, 303 (1984).
`3. S. J. Winawer, D. Schottenfield, B. S. Frehinger, J.
`Natl. Cancer Inst. 83, 243 (1991).
`4. D. F. Ransohoff and C. A. Lang, N. Engi. J. Med.
`
`SCIENCE * VOL. 256
`
`*
`
`3 APRIL 1992
`
`325,37 (1991); J. J. DeCosse and J. S. Jacobson,
`ibid. 326,134 (1991); J. N. Cooper, K. O'Connor,
`S. J. Winawer, ibid., p. 136.
`5. D. M. Eddy et al., Gastroenterology 92, 682
`(1987); D. M. Eddy, Ann. Intern. Med. 113, 373
`(1990); A. B. Miller et al., Int. J. Cancer 46, 761
`(1990).
`6. J. M. Bishop, Cell 64, 235 (1991); R. A. Weinberg,
`Science 254, 1138 (1991).
`7. E. R. Fearon and B. Vogelstein, Cell 61, 759
`(1 990).
`8. J. L. Bos et al., Nature 327, 293 (1987).
`9. K. Forrester, C. Almoguera, K. Han, W. E. Grizzle,
`M. Perucho, ibid., p. 298.
`10. B. Vogelstein et al., N. Engi. J. Med. 319, 525
`(1988).
`11. C. J. Farr etal., Oncogene3, 673 (1988).
`12. P. Delattre et al., Lancet 335, 353 (1989).
`13. A. M. Cohen, B. Shank, M. A. Friedman, in Can-
`cer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, V. T.
`DeVita, S. Hellman, S. A. Rosenberg, Eds. (Up-
`pincott, Philadelphia, ed. 3,1989), pp. 895-964.
`14. S. Stryker et al., Gastroentology 93, 1009 (1987);
`T. Muto, H. J. R. Bussey, B. C. Morson, Cancer
`36, 2251 (1975); B. C. Morson, ibid. 34, 845
`(1974); H. E. Knoernschild, Surg. Forum 14, 137
`(1963); S. Welin et al., Am. J. Radiol. 90, 673
`(1963); D. F. Ransohoff and C. A. Lang, J. Am.
`Med. Assoc. 264, 76 (1990).
`15. E. R. Fearon, A. P. Feinberg, S. R. Hamilton, B.
`Vogelstein, Nature 318, 377 (1985).
`16. The sense primer was 5'-AGGAATTCATGACT-
`GAATATAAACTTGT-3', and the antisense primer
`was 5'-ATCGAATTCCTCTATTGTTGGATCATAT-
`TC-3'. These primers included Eco RI sites at their
`5' ends to facilitate cloning. PCR was performed
`[as described in S. J. Baker et al., Cancer Res. 50,
`7717 (1990)]. Thirty-five cycles were performed
`for tumor DNA and 45 cycles for stool DNA.
`17. PCR products were purified by phenol-chloroform
`extraction and ethanol precipitation. They were
`cleaved with Eco RI and repurified, and approxi-
`mately 50 ng of DNA was ligated to lambda Zap II
`vector arms (Stratagene) and packaged accord-
`ing to the manufacturer's directions. XL1 Blue
`cells (Stratagene) were infected with bacterio-
`phage, and double-stranded plasmids were ob-
`tained using a helper phage as in J. M. Nigro et al.
`[Nature 342, 705 (1989)]. At least 100 clones were
`pooled for sequencing with the primer 5-AT-
`TCGTCCACAAAATGAT-3'.
`18. The stool-lysis buffer mix was vortexed for 30 s
`and cleared by centrifugation at 12,000g for 2
`min. DNA in the supernatant was purified by
`SDS-proteinase K digestion, phenol-chloroform
`extraction, and ethanol precipitation
`[as de-
`scribed in S. E. Goeiz, S. R. Hamilton, B. Vo-
`gelstein, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 130,
`1 18 (1985)]. The DNA from stool was then further
`purified by binding to glass [B. Vogelstein and D.
`Gillespie, Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 615
`(1978)].
`19. D. Sidransky et al., Science 252, 706 (1991).
`20. XL1 cells infected with bacteriophage containing
`PCR products were plated on L-agar at a density
`of 100 to 2000 plaques per plate, transferred to
`nylon membranes, and hybridized with oligonu-
`cleotides specific for wild-type or mutant K-ras.
`The oligonucleotides used for hybridization were
`5'-GGAGCTGGTGGCGTAGGCAA-3' for
`wild-
`type ras, 5'-GGAGCTGTTGGCGTAGGCAA-3' for
`the Val12 mutant, 5'-GGAGCTGATGGCGTAG-
`GCAA-3' for the Asp12 mutant, and 5'-GGAGC-
`TGGTGACGTAGGCAA-3' for the Asp13 mutant.
`Oligonucleotides were labeled with 32p to a spe-
`cific activity of approximately 1 o8 dpm/Lg with T4
`polynucleotide kinase and hybridized as in (19).
`21. After electrophoresis through a 2% agarose gel,
`the gel was incubated in 16 mM HCI for 30 min
`and transferred to Zetabind filters (Bio-Rad) in 0.4
`M NaOH [as in K. C. Reed and D. A. Mann,
`Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 7207 (1985)]. Filters were
`hybridized as in (19).
`22. L. E. Mehi, J. Surg. Oncol. 47, 243 (1991).
`23. R. G. Shorter et al., Am. J. Digest. Dis. 9, 760
`
`Downloaded from https://www.science.org on January 10, 2024
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1035, Page 3
`
`

`

`----------------------
`
`(1964); M. Lipkin, B. Bell, P. Shercock, J. Clin. Inv.
`42, 767 (1963); W. C. MacDonald, J. S. Trier, N. B.
`Everett, Gastroenterology 46, 405 (1964).
`24. B. Tribukait, C. Hammerberg, C. Rubio, Acta
`Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scan. Sect. A 91, 89
`(1983); P. Quirke etal., J. Pathol. 151, 285 (1987);
`C. Hammarberg, B. Tribukait, U. Ohman, Acta
`Radiol. Oncol. 25, 45 (1986).
`25. M. Lipkin, Cancer Res. 48, 235 (1988); H. L.
`Newmark, M. J. Wargovich, W. R. Bruce, J. Nati.
`Cancer Inst. 72, 1323 (1984).
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`J. Utsunomiya and H. T. Lynch, Eds., Hereditary
`Colorectal Cancer (Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, 1990).
`We thank J. Sitzmann, R. Fishbein, and K. D.
`Lillemoe for providing clinical samples and P.
`Green, C. R. Robinson, A. C. Preisinger, B. Ender,
`and M. C. Olive for technical assistance. Support-
`ed by the Clayton Fund, the McAshan Fund, and
`grants CA06973 and CA35494 from the National
`Cancer Institute of NIH.
`
`17 January 1992; accepted 2 March 1992
`
`CD1 9: Lowering the Threshold for Antigen
`Receptor Stimulation of B Lymphocytes
`Robert H. Carter* and Douglas T. Fearon
`Lymphocytes must proliferate and differentiate in response to low concentrations of a vast
`array of antigens. The requirements of broad specificity and sensitivity conflict because the
`former is met by low-affinity antigen receptors, which precludes achieving the latter with
`high-affinity receptors. Coligation of the membrane protein CD1 9 with the antigen receptor
`of B lymphocytes decreased the threshold for antigen receptor-dependent stimulation by
`two orders of magnitude. B lymphocytes proliferated when approximately 100 antigen
`receptors per cell, 0.03 percent of the total, were coligated with CD1 9. The B cell resolves
`its dilemma by having an accessory protein that enables activation when few antigen
`receptors are occupied.
`
`The immune system must respond to low
`concentrations of antigen for the efficient
`elimination of infections. The growth and
`differentiation of lymphocytes are mediated
`by antigen receptors that have low affinity
`for their ligands because they are products
`of recombinatorial gene rearrangement that
`takes place in the absence of selection by
`antigen. Therefore, lymphocytes must have
`mechanisms that enable them to be stimu-
`lated when relatively few receptors have
`bound antigen. The T lymphocyte has the
`accessory membrane proteins CD4 and
`CD8, which, when coligated with the T
`cell antigen receptor (TCR) by the major
`histocompatibility complex (MHC)-pep-
`tide complex, decrease the number ofTCRs
`that must be ligated (1). No membrane
`protein of the B lymphocyte that is analo-
`gous to CD4 and CD8 has been identified.
`The CD19 membrane protein, a mem-
`ber of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfam-
`ily, is B cell-specific and is expressed at
`each developmental stage except that of the
`terminally differentiated plasma cell (2). It
`is a component of a complex that contains
`at least two other membrane proteins, com-
`plement receptor type 2 (CR2, also called
`CD21) and TAPA-1 (3). The CR2 protein
`mediates the capacity of the complement
`system to enhance the production of anti-
`body in response to low concentrations of
`Division of Molecular and Clinical Rheumatology, De-
`partment of Medicine, and the Graduate Program in
`Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of
`Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.
`*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
`
`antigen in vivo (4). Both CD19 and CR2
`augment activation of phospholipase C in B
`cells when coligated with membrane Ig
`(mIg), but independent ligation of CD19
`suppresses B cell activation (5, 6).
`To determine whether ligating CDl9 al-
`ters the capacity of mIgM to induce DNA
`synthesis, replicate samples of human B cells
`and mitomycin-treated murine L cells that
`express human FcYRII (FczRII-L cells) (7)
`were cultured for 2.5 days in the presence of
`incremental concentrations of a monoclonal
`antibody (MAb) to IgM, a saturating con-
`centration of MAb to CD19, or an equal
`irrelevant MAb,
`of an
`concentration
`MOPC-21, and interleukin-4 (IL-4). In the
`absence of anti-CD19, the lowest concen-
`tration of anti-IgM that induced incorpo-
`
`.50,
`
`CL
`
`g40O
`
`30,
`
`20
`
`C
`
`/
`
`ni1
`
`10-14
`
`1012
`
`1T10
`AtMws (M)
`
`10-8
`
`10-6
`
`ration of I3Hlthymidine by B cells above the
`background incorporation was 6.7 x 10`1
`M. In the presence of anti-CD19, this was
`reducedto6.7 x 10-3M (Fig. 1) (8, 9).At
`higher concentrations of anti-IgM, anti-
`CD19 also increased the magnitude of
`[3H~thymidine incorporation to twice that
`induced by anti-IgM alone. Anti-CD19
`alone did not induce proliferation. The liga-
`tion of CD19 both lowered the threshold for
`B cell activation by mIgM and increased the
`magnitude of the B cell response to optimal
`levels of mIgM stimulation.
`In a parallel experiment to assess the
`binding characteristics of the monoclonal
`anti-IgM, replicate samples of B cells and
`FcYRII-L cells were incubated with incre-
`mental concentrations of `251-labeled anti-
`IgM in the presence or absence of 2 x 10-7
`M unlabeled anti-IgM. Cell-bound and free
`antibody were separated, and specific bind-
`ing was calculated. The L cells alone did not
`specifically bind the radiolabeled antibody.
`Scatchard analysis showed that the anti-IgM
`bound to the mixture of B cells and L cells
`with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 1.8 X
`10-9 M, and to 2.7 x 105 sites per cell at
`saturation. The presence of anti-CD19 did
`not alter the Kd of the anti-IgM for B cells in
`the presence of FcYRII-L cells (10). There-
`fore, in Fig. 1, the threshold concentration
`of anti-IgM that induced B cell proliferation
`in the presence of anti-CD19 bound to only
`92 mIgM molecules per cell, or 0.03% of the
`total mIgM expressed per cell.
`We measured the fraction of CD19 that
`must be ligated to augment B cell prolifer-
`ation by incubating replicate samples of B
`cells and FcYRII-L cells in the presence of
`suboptimal anti-mIgM, IL-4, and incre-
`mental concentrations of anti-CD19 for 2.5
`days, after which incorporation of I3Hlthy-
`midine was assayed. The enhancing effect
`of anti-CD19 increased incrementally from
`6.7 x 10`2 M, which bound <0.2% of
`CD19, up to a saturating concentration of
`6.7 x 10-8 M (Fig. 2A). To determine
`
`Fig. 1. Enhancement of DNA synthesis in B
`lymphocytes by the coaggregation of migM
`and CD19. Replicate samples of 5 x 104 pe-
`ripheral blood B cells (8) were cultured in 0.2
`ml of RPMI-1640 with 10% fetal calf serum in
`flat-bottom culture plates with 2 x 104 mitomy-
`cin-treated fibroblastic L cells expressing hu-
`man CDw32/FczRI and recombinant IL-4 (200
`units/mI, Genzyme). The B cells were stimulat-
`ed with a range of concentrations of MAb
`DA4.4 anti-lgM (9) together with either control
`antibody MOPC-21 (0) or HD37 anti-CD19 (-).
`Cells were pulsed with [3H]thymidine for the
`last 16 hours of a 60-hour culture. Results are
`means ± SD of triplicates. Cells cultured with
`either control antibody or anti-CD19 alone in-
`corporated 2726 ± 256 and 2475 ± 255 counts
`per minute (cpm), respectively. Representative
`of four experiments.
`
`SCIENCE * VOL. 256
`
`*
`
`3 APRIL 1992
`
`105
`
`Downloaded from https://www.science.org on January 10, 2024
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1035, Page 4
`
`

`

`Identification of ras Oncogene Mutations in the Stool of Patients with Curable
`Colorectal Tumors
`David Sidransky, Takashi Tokino, Stanley R. Hamilton, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Bernard Levin, Philip Frost, and Bert Vogelstein
`
`Science 256 (5053), . DOI: 10.1126/science.1566048
`
`View the article online
`https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1566048
`Permissions
`https://www.science.org/help/reprints-and-permissions
`
`Use of this article is subject to the Terms of service
`
`Science (ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1200 New York Avenue NW,
`Washington, DC 20005. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.
`
`Downloaded from https://www.sci

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket