`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: November 20, 2024
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`PROXENSE, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2024-01319
`Patent 9,679,289 B1
`
`
`Before THU A. DANG, DAVID C. MCKONE, and
`NORMAN H. BEAMER Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`DANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review
`35 U.S.C. § 314
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2024-01319
`Patent 9,679,289 B1
`
`
`Google LLC (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for inter partes review of
`claims 1–20 of U.S. Patent No. 9,679,289 B1 (“the ’289 patent”) (Paper 1)
`and a Motion for Joinder (“Motion”) (Paper 3) to join Microsoft’s instituted
`proceeding in IPR2024-00407 (“the Microsoft IPR”), along with a Notice
`Ranking Multiple Petitions (“Notice”) (Paper 4). Petitioner also
`acknowledges that it previously filed a petition (“Original Petition”) for inter
`partes review of claims 1–20 of the ’289 patent in IPR2024-00783. Notice
`1. Thus, Petitioner “requests that action on this motion be held in abeyance
`until, and only if, the Board declines to institute Petitioner’s Original
`Petition.” Id.; see also Motion 1.
`The Board has instituted an inter partes review of the ’289 patent in
`IPR2024-00783. See IPR2024-00783, Paper 12. That is, we have not
`declined to institute Petitioner’s Original Petition in IPR2024-00783. Id.
`Accordingly, the condition on which Petitioner’s Petition and Motion for
`Joinder is based, i.e., “in abeyance until, and only if, the Board declines to
`institute [in IPR2024-00783],” has not come to pass. Therefore, we deny the
`Petition and the Motion for Joinder.
`Here, Petitioner acknowledges that it “has two concurrent petitions
`challenging the validity of the same patent.” Notice 1. Although Petitioner
`provides “a ranking of the petitions in the order in which it wishes the Board
`to consider the merits” and “a succinct explanation of the differences” (id.),
`Petitioner requests that “should the Board decide to institute only a single
`petition against the ’289 patent, . . . the Board institute Petitioner’s Original
`Petition (in IPR2024-00783).” Id. Since, as discussed above, the Board has
`instituted an inter partes review of the ’289 patent in IPR2024-00783, we
`deny the Petition and the Motion for Joinder in the current IPR.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2024-01319
`Patent 9,679,289 B1
`
`
`ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby
`ORDERED that pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), an inter partes
`review is denied as to claims 1–20 of the ’289 patent; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder (Paper 3)
`is denied.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2024-01319
`Patent 9,679,289 B1
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Erika Arner
`Kara Specht
`Cory Bell
`Shawn Chang
`Safiya Aguilar
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
`erika.arner@finnegan.com
`kara.specht@finnegan.com
`cory.bell@finnegan.com
`shawn.chang@finnegan.com
`safiya.aguilar@finnegan.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`David L Hecht
`James Zak
`Hecht Partners LLP
`dhecht@hechtpartners.com
`jzak@hechtpartners.com
`proxense@hechtpartners.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
