`Derek Vandenburgh; Trials
`Aaron W Pederson; Nate D Louwagie; Ryan Rypka; Peter M Kohlhepp; chris.mizzo@kirkland.com; Rabinowitz,
`Alan; greg.arovas@kirkland.com; Hayes, Jennifer; Stringfield, Daniel; Christopher, Angelo; Zheng, Helena
`RE: Qualcomm Inc. v. Network Systems Technologies, LLC IPR2024-01081; Samsung Elec. Co. Ltd. v. Network
`Systems Technologies, LLC IPR2024-00338
`Thursday, July 11, 2024 8:34:00 AM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Date:
`
`Counsel,
`
`From the Board –
`
`The Board considers a conference call with counsel in IPR2024-00338 and IPR2024-01081
`unnecessary. The Board intends to decide the earlier-filed motion, i.e., the motion for joinder in
`IPR2024-01081 filed on June 21, 2024, before deciding the later-filed motion, i.e., the motion to
`terminate in IPR2024-00338 filed on July 8, 2024 (based on a request for authorization submitted on
`June 28, 2024).
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Derek Vandenburgh <DVandenburgh@carlsoncaspers.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 3:11 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Aaron W Pederson <APederson@carlsoncaspers.com>; Nate D Louwagie
`<NLouwagie@carlsoncaspers.com>; Ryan Rypka <RRypka@carlsoncaspers.com>; Peter M Kohlhepp
`<PKohlhepp@carlsoncaspers.com>; chris.mizzo@kirkland.com; Rabinowitz, Alan
`<alan.rabinowitz@kirkland.com>; greg.arovas@kirkland.com; Hayes, Jennifer
`<jenhayes@nixonpeabody.com>; Stringfield, Daniel <dstringfield@nixonpeabody.com>; Christopher,
`Angelo <achristopher@nixonpeabody.com>; Zheng, Helena <hzheng@nixonpeabody.com>
`Subject: Qualcomm Inc. v. Network Systems Technologies, LLC IPR2024-01081; Samsung Elec. Co.
`Ltd. v. Network Systems Technologies, LLC IPR2024-00338
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Board,
`
`I represent Petitioner Qualcomm in IPR2024-01081. Qualcomm filed the -01081 IPR on June 21,
`2024 and moved to join an instituted IPR, Samsung v. NST, IPR2024-00338. Qualcomm’s -01081
`IPR and the instituted -00338IPR challenge the same claims of the same patent on the same
`grounds. Yesterday, Samsung and NST filed a Joint Motion to Terminate the instituted -00338 IPR.
`
`Exhibit 3001
`
`
`
`Qualcomm respectfully requests a call with the Board to discuss the possibility of the Board either
`expediting its decision on Qualcomm’s Motion for Joinder in the -01081 IPR prior to terminating the
`-00338 IPR, or delaying a ruling on the Joint Motion to Terminate in the -00338 IPR until
`Qualcomm’s motion for joinder can be taken up by the Board, as the Board has done in other similar
`cases.
`
`We are sending this email prior to conferring with counsel for Samsung and NST, because we
`wanted to make sure the Board did not act on the motion to terminate the -00338 IPR without being
`aware of Qualcomm’s joinder motion filed in the -01081 IPR. We will confer with counsel for NST
`and Samsung, and provide proposed dates and times for a call with the Board as soon as possible.
`
`Best regards,
`Derek Vandenburgh
`
`cc. Counsel of record
`
`
`
`J. Derek Vandenburgh
`Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh, &
`Lindquist, P.A.
`225 S. Sixth St., Suite 4200,
`Minneapolis,MN 55402
`Direct: 612.436.9618
`Cell: 612-991-3952
`DVandenburgh@carlsoncaspers.com
`carlsoncaspers.com
`BIO | vCard | Disclaimers
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
