`Deborah Sterling; David H. Holman; Tyler Liu; Gary J Speier; Peter M Kohlhepp; NLouwagie@carlsoncaspers.com
`Trials
`RE: IPR2024-00834 - Seeking Authorization to Terminate Proceeding
`Monday, February 3, 2025 12:02:45 PM
`image001.png
`image002.png
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Counsel,
`
`During the telephone conference on January 31, 2025, the parties indicated that
`they do not oppose entry of adverse judgment against Patent Owner in
`IPR2024-00834. Accordingly, and as the Board indicated during the call, the
`parties shall jointly submit a Motion to Terminate Proceeding and for Entry of
`Adverse Judgment, attaching as an exhibit the disclaimer of all claims at issue
`in IPR2024-00834.
`
`The parties shall submit the motion no later than 7 days after the date of this
`email.
`
`In addition, Petitioner filed, on January 30, 2025, a notice of intent to designate
`Mr. Kohlhepp as back-up counsel. In light of the joint motion that will be filed
`to terminate this proceeding, the Board asks Petitioner to indicate, within 2
`business days, whether Petitioner still seeks pro hac vice admission of Mr.
`Kohlhepp.
`
`Regards,
`
`Franchesca I. Alicea Villanueva
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Deborah Sterling <DSTERLING@sternekessler.com>
`Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2025 12:39 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: David H. Holman <DHOLMAN@sternekessler.com>; Tyler Liu <TLIU@sternekessler.com>; Gary J
`Speier <GSpeier@carlsoncaspers.com>; Peter M Kohlhepp <PKohlhepp@carlsoncaspers.com>;
`NLouwagie@carlsoncaspers.com
`Subject: IPR2024-00834 - Seeking Authorization to Terminate Proceeding
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`
`Ex. 3005
`IPR2024-00834
`
`
`
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Board:
`
`Patent Owner disclaimed every claim in the proceeding on January 28, 2025 (see attached). As such,
`Patent Owner is seeking authorization to file a Motion to Terminate the Proceeding so that the
`Board can enter an Order of Adverse Judgment under 37. C.F.R. § 42.73.
`
`The parties have met and conferred and Petitioner has indicated that it disagrees with Patent
`Owner’s request and instead intends to seek authorization to file a Motion for Adverse Judgement.
`Patent Owner disagrees with Petitioner’s request since Patent Owner’s disclaimer is already
`construed as a request for Adverse Judgment.
`
`Because the parties appear to be aligned with the intended outcome, but are not aligned on the
`means by which to efficiently achieve that outcome, we welcome the Board’s insight on the path
`forward that best avoids filing unnecessary papers and/or unnecessary use of the Board’s time.
`
`If needed, the parties can be available for a conference call with the Board at the following times
`(EST):
`
`Friday, January 31, at 10 – 11 am or noon – 2 pm;
`Monday, February 3, at 3 – 5 pm; and
`Tuesday, February 4, at 10 – 11:30 am or 12:30 – 2 pm.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Deborah Sterling
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
` Deborah Sterling, Ph.D. (she/her)
`Director
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
`1101 K St. NW, Washington, DC 20005
`Email: dsterling@sternekessler.com
`Direct: 202.772.8501
`
`
`
`
`Notice: The information in this electronic transmission (including any attachments)
`may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended solely for
`the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not an intended recipient or
`an authorized agent, you are hereby notified that reading, distributing, or otherwise
`disseminating or copying, or taking any action based on the contents of this
`transmission is strictly prohibited. Any unauthorized interception of this
`transmission is illegal under the law. If you have received this transmission in error,
`please immediately notify the sender by return email and then destroy all copies of
`the transmission.
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site