throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`Civil Action No. 6:23-cv-00314-ADA
`
`THETA IP, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`












`
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S PRELIMINARY INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`IPR2023-00817
`Theta EX2012
`
`

`

`Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant” or “Apple”) by and through its counsel, hereby serves
`
`its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions on Plaintiff Theta IP, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Theta”).
`
`These Invalidity Contentions are served pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order.
`
`(Dkt. No. 25.) Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Defendant also serves herewith the document
`
`production accompanying these disclosures. These contentions set forth Defendant’s initial
`
`Invalidity Contentions with respect to the claims currently asserted by Plaintiff. Discovery is
`
`ongoing and Defendant reserves the right to amend and/or supplement these Invalidity Contentions
`
`as the case proceeds.
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`A.
`
`Asserted Patents and Asserted Claims
`
`Plaintiff’s Complaint asserts the following patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,010,330 (the “’330
`
`patent”); 10,129,825 (the “’825 patent”); 10,524,202 (the “’202 patent”); 11,564,164 (the “’164
`
`patent”); and 11,638,210 (the “’210 patent”) (collectively the “asserted patents”). On July 21,
`
`2023, Theta served its Initial Infringement Contentions. The Initial Infringement Contentions list
`
`the following asserted claims (collectively the “asserted claims”):
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’330 patent, claims 1, 23, and 29;
`
`’825 patent, claims 3, 4, and 8;
`
`’202 patent, claims 7-11 and 13;
`
`’164 patent, claims 5, 7-9, and 20; and
`
`’210 patent, claims 3, 6, and 10.
`
`B.
`
`Defendant’s Contentions are Preliminary and Exemplary
`
`Pursuant to the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 25), Defendant serves invalidity contentions in the
`
`form of “(1) a chart setting forth where in the prior art references each element of the asserted
`
`claim(s) are found, (2) an identification of any limitations the Defendant contends are indefinite
`
`1
`
`IPR2023-00817
`Theta EX2012
`
`

`

`Charted Primary and/or Secondary Reference
`
`Short Name
`
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. 2002/0160740 A1
`
`Hatcher ’740
`
`U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2003/0181181
`
`Darabi ’181
`
`U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2003/0080811
`
`Nakatani ’811
`
`U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2002/0193958
`
`Underbrink ’958
`
`Japanese Patent Pub. No. JP H10-290173
`
`Sasho ’173
`
`Japanese Patent Pub. No. 2003-069440
`
`Kawamoto ’440
`
`Japanese Patent Pub. No. JP H11-298348
`
`Tagami ’348
`
`Japanese Patent App. 2001-016121
`
`Takashi ’121
`
`Japanese Patent App. 1996-79108
`
`Okubo ’108
`
`European Patent Pub. No. EP1168645A2
`
`Rohmer ’645
`
`European Patent No. 0999649 B1
`
`Rauhala ’649
`
`WO 2000/19644
`
`Cox ’644
`
`Behbahani, “Adaptive Analog IF Signal
`Processor for a Wide-Band CMOS Wireless
`Receiver,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits,
`Vol. 36, No. 8, (Aug. 2001)
`Newman, X-Amp,™ A New 45-dB 500-MHz
`Variable Gain Amplifier (VGA) Simplifies
`Adaptive Receiver Designs, Analog Dialogue
`36-01 (2002)
`
`B.
`
`Identity of Each Item of Prior Art
`
`Exhibit No.
`A-17; B-17; C-17;
`D-17; E-17
`A-12; B-12; C-12;
`D-12; E-12
`A-25; B-25; C-25;
`D-25; E-25
`A-37; B-37; C-37;
`D-37; E-37
`A-33; B-33; C-33;
`D-33; E-33
`A-22; B-22; C-22;
`D-22; E-22
`A-35; B-35; C-35;
`D-35; E-35
`A-36; B-36; C-36;
`D-36; E-36
`A-27; B-27; C-27;
`D-27; E-27
`A-31; B-31; C-31;
`D-31; E-31
`A-30; B-30; C-30;
`D-30; E-30
`A-10; B-10; C-10;
`D-10; E-10
`
`A-4; B-4; C-4;
`D-4; E-4
`
`Behbahani 2001
`
`Newman 2002
`
`A-26; B-26; C-26;
`D-26; E-26
`
`Subject to Defendant’s reservation of rights, Defendant identifies each item of prior art that
`
`anticipates or renders obvious one or more of the asserted claims in Section II.C, below, and in the
`
`12
`
`IPR2023-00817
`Theta EX2012
`
`

`

`
`
`VIII. FURTHER RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
`
`As noted above, the asserted claims are identified above. Should Plaintiff be permitted to
`
`assert more or different claims or any other patents than it does now, Defendant will identify
`
`additional/alternative invalidity grounds and prior art as appropriate and will amend or supplement
`
`these invalidity contentions accordingly. Nothing in these contentions constitutes an admission of
`
`validity as to any other non-asserted claims, or non-asserted patents.
`
`IX. DOCUMENT PRODUCTIONS
`
`Per the Scheduling Order, Defendant is concurrently producing: “(1) all prior art
`
`referenced in the invalidity contentions, and (2) technical documents, including software where
`
`applicable, sufficient to show the operation of the accused product(s).” (Dkt. 25 at 3.) Per
`
`Rule 26, Defendant will supplement, as appropriate and as discovery continues.
`
`
`
`Dated: September 29, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Eamonn Gardner
`Christa Anderson (CA 184325) (pro hac vice)
`COOLEY LLP
`3 Embarcadero Center
`20th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-4004
`Telephone: (415) 693 2000
`Facsimile: (415) 693 2222
`canderson@cooley.com
`
`Eamonn Gardner (CO 38088) (pro hac vice)
`COOLEY LLP
`1144 15th Street
`Suite 2300
`Denver, CO 80202-2686
`Telephone: (720) 566 4000
`Facsimile: (720) 566 4099
`egardner@cooley.com
`
`Melissa R. Smith
`State Bar No. 24001351
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`
`118
`
`IPR2023-00817
`Theta EX2012
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`Email: melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`James Travis Underwood
`Texas Bar No. 24102587
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`102 N. College, Suite 800
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`Email: travis@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apple, Inc.
`
`
`119
`
`IPR2023-00817
`Theta EX2012
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket