`___________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________________________
`
`
`
`VALVE CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`
`IMMERSION CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`__________________________________
`
`Case IPR2024-00556
`Patent 8,749,507
`__________________________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`OF CLIFF WIN, JR.
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Relief Requested
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, Patent Owner Immersion Corporation.
`
`(“Immersion”) requests that the Board admit Cliff Win, Jr. pro hac vice in this inter
`
`partes review proceeding.
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts Showing Good Cause for the Board to Recognize
`
`Counsel Pro Hac Vice During the Proceeding.
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice during a proceeding, subject to the conditions set forth therein, and any
`
`others that the Board may impose. Patent Owner sets forth the following facts in
`
`support of this Motion:
`
`1. Lead counsel for Patent Owner in this proceeding, David Schumann,
`
`is a registered practitioner.
`
`2. Cliff Win, Jr. is an experienced litigation attorney and has established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`Accompanying this Motion as Exhibit 2007 is the Declaration of
`
`Cliff Win, Jr. in Support of the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`
`(“Win Decl.”). In his declaration, Mr. Win attests, among other
`
`things, that he is a member in good standing of the California State
`
`Bar. Win Dec. ¶ 3. Mr. Win further attests that he has been admitted
`
`to practice before several United States District Courts. Id. Mr. Win
`
`1
`
`
`
`further attests that he has been practicing in the field of litigation
`
`since 2010, with the majority of that time focused specifically on
`
`patent litigation. Id. ¶ 2. In addition, Mr. Win attests that his
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding is
`
`demonstrated by his review of the patent at issue, the Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review, the cited prior art, and the other evidence
`
`presented in this proceeding, as well as his representation of
`
`Immersion in the District Court action in which Immersion has
`
`accused Valve Corporation (“Valve”) of infringing U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,749,507. Id. ¶¶ 9-10.
`
`3. In his declaration, Mr. Win attests to each of the required items set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Id. ¶¶ 2-10.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Immersion respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Cliff Win, Jr. pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: June 5, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /David D. Schumann/
`
`David D. Schumann (Reg. No. 53,569)
`Folio Law Group PLLC
`Email: david.schumann@foliolaw.com
`Tel: (206) 880-1802
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`As authorized by Petitioner’s Mandatory Notices, I hereby certify that on
`
`June 5 , 2024, a copy of this document has been served in its entirety by electronic
`
`mail on Petitioner’s lead and backup counsel.
`
`Richard F. Giunta
`RGiunta-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`Thomas F. Foley
`TFoley-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`Nathan R. Speed
`NSpeed@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`
`
`By: /David D. Schumann/
`
`
`David D. Schumann (Reg. No. 53,569)
`Folio Law Group PLLC
`Email: david.schumann@foliolaw.com
`Tel: (206) 880-1802
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`Date: June 5, 2024
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
