throbber
United States Patent
`Makinwaet al.
`
`115
`
`ACAA
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,510,813
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Apr. 23, 1996
`
`[54] DATA PROCESSING DEVICE COMPRISING
`A TOUCH SCREEN AND A FORCE SENSOR
`
`5,119,079
`5,231,381
`
`6/1992 Hube et al. occeeseeenenee 345/146
`7/1993 Duwaer ...ssesssnessseesssssteetsnssess 345/174
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Kofi A. A. Makinwa; Theunis S.
`Baller, both of Eindhoven, Netherlands
`
`[73] Assignee: U.S. Philips Corporation, New York,
`N.Y.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 289,829
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Aug. 12, 1994
`
`[30]
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`Aug. 26, 1993
`
`[BE]
`
`Belgium 0...ssesereecenenes 09300875
`
`[51] Unt, Co iccccecsssssssssecesssssesssscsssssrsessessnssseese G09G 3/02
`[52] OLS. CU. oeccsesssessseceneees 345/173; 345/104; 345/179;
`341/33
`
`[58] Field of Search ou... 345/173, 174,
`345/175, 156, 179, 104; 178/18, 19; 341/33,
`34, 22
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`0340096
`0419145
`
`11/1989 European Pat. Off..
`3/1991
`European Pat. Off... 345/173
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Research Disclosure, No. 302, Jun. 1989, Havant GB p. 456
`RD30289—Touch Screen With Combined Force and Position
`Sensing.
`
`Primary Examiner—Richard Hjerpe
`Assistant Examiner—Doon Chow
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Leroy Eason
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A data processing device comprises a touch screen with a
`touch position sensor. The position sensor is suitable to
`detect a touch position on the screen from a change in a
`current pattern in a conductive panel. The device also
`comprises a touch force sensor provided with a second
`conductive panel which extends substantially parallel to the
`touch screen. The screen is at least partly movable relative
`to the second panelin a direction transversely of the second
`panel. The force sensoris suitable to determine a force from
`a capacitance value between the touch screen and the second
`panel. The device is suitable for the combined processing of
`the position and force detected in response to touching.
`
`4,293,734 10/1981 Pepper, Jr. on... ceseeeceeeeceeerees 178/18
`4,475,235 10/1984 Graham ......cccceceseesereseseeeensees 178/18
`
`4,723,836
`2/1988 Kone etal.
`....
`w. 345/174
`oe
`4,731,694
`3/1988 Griibmeret al.
`esescceeeee 341/33
`4/1988 Brown .........c000
`wee 345/174
`4,740,781
`
`
`4,853,498 8/1989.Meadowsetal. .. wee 178/19
`
`7/1989 Hilsum et al. 0.2...cseseeeeeeee 345/104
`4,961,968
`13 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`2122
`
`23
`
`eamaneenealf,umerardfenome
`
`dha
`
`
`SSSSSS
`I24b
`VII
`
`
`
`27
`25=26
`
`eeerrrBheeennnebifereanncen
`
`Valve Exhibit 1034
`Valve Exhibit 1034
`Valve v. Immersion
`Valve v. Immersion
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 23, 1996
`
`Sheet 1 of 2
`
`5,310,813
`
`
`
` {Nn
`
`FSRGENER
`agn
`(LLLEFAl
`1h
`7 6 15
`
`OG
`.
`
`35
`
`6
`
`30
`
`31
`
`22
`
`F 16.2
`
`21.
`
`22~—
`
`23
`
`
`
`olh SSS 2La
`ZEA egy
`
`2 26
`
`(27
`
`2
`
`FIG.4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 23, 1996
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`5,510,813
`
`
`
`RR
`
`NY
`
`
`
`
`
` Nt
`OPTIIII
`SST
`
`
`ZGVhs
`TY
`EBaaDayarDareheeyhemeDevanDoveDavenDeehemesMowetakShemiesheenSheeDhanSheaDoesSheetheeDaeaoeaeedal
`
`
`
`
`4
`AEA.EEREEE.EEREREERE
`aS
`
`
`
`
`46
`
`45
`
`POSITION
`
`NARROW BAND
`DETECTOR
`
`CORRECTION CKT. VOLTAGE DRIVE
`
`CKT. 22KHZ
`
`

`

`5,510,813
`
`1
`DATA PROCESSING DEVICE COMPRISING
`A TOUCH SCREEN AND A FORCE SENSOR
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`25
`
`30
`
`2
`An embodiment of the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention is characterized in that the first and
`the third panel are movable together relative to the second
`panel, the force sensor being suitable to apply to the first and
`the third panel the sameelectric measurementvoltage signal
`relative to the second panel. Because the same measurement
`The invention relates to a data processing device, com-
`voltages are applied to the first and the third panel, it is
`prising a touch screen with a touch position sensor which
`ensured that variations in the current to the first panel are
`comprises a first conductive panel andis suitable to detect a
`touch position on the screen from a change in a current
`caused only by the touch capacitance, whereas variations in
`paltern in the first panel. A data processing device of this
`the current to the third panel are caused exclusively by the
`kind is known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,853,498.
`force exerted. The measurementvoltage signal need concern
`During use the position sensor for example applies the
`only one component oftheelectric voltage present between
`the panels. The measurement voltage signal may be, for
`sameelectric voltage, to a plurality of locations on the first
`panel. Whenthe panel is touched or approachedbyafinger
`example one spectral component of the voltage present
`or any otherat least slightly conductive object, a capacitive
`between the panels and the layer. The other components of
`effect is produced so that current is drained from the panel.
`the voltage need not be the same.
`The position sensor can deduce the position where the touch
`An embodiment of the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention is characterized in that the first and
`surface has been touched or approached by measuring the
`amount of current drained from the various locations on the
`the third panel are provided on oppositely situated faces of
`20
`panel whereto the voltage is applied.
`a substrate. The substrate may be, for exampleaglass plate.
`Preferably, the touch force is determined simultaneously
`This can be readily implemented and offers a suitable
`mechanical
`transfer of the touch force from the touch
`with the position. In that case, for example
`surface to the third panel.
`the thickness of lines drawn by means of the position
`sensor can be adjusted in proportion to the force used,
`An embodiment of the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention is characterized in that the second
`a distinction can be made between different types of use,
`and the third panelare substantially rigidly arrangedrelative
`such as control of cursor motions or icon selection, on
`to one another, the force sensor being suitable to apply to the
`the basis of different forces,
`second and the third panel the same measurement voltage
`a selection of a menu item can be confirmed by exerting
`signal relative to the first panel. This reduces disturbances of
`additional force.
`the measurement of the touch force which are caused by
`currents to the second panel and which may occur notably
`whenthe second panelis situated substantially near an outer
`side of the device.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is an object of the invention to provide a data processing
`device which is suitable to measure the touch position as
`well as the touch force in response to touching.
`To achievethis, the data processing device in accordance
`with the invention is characterized in that the device com-
`prises a touch force sensor which is provided with a second
`conductive panel which is arranged substantially parallel to
`the touch screen which touch screen is at
`least partly
`movable relative to the second panel in a direction trans-
`versely of the second panel, the force sensor being arranged
`to determine a force from a capacitance value between the
`touch screen and the second panel, and the device being
`arranged for the combined processing of the position and
`force detected in response to touching. The touch screen and
`the second panel constitute respective plates of a capacitor.
`When a force is exerted on the touch screen, these plates
`move towards one another, so that the capacitance value of
`the capacitor changes. The capacitance valueis, therefore, a
`fully electronically measurable measure of this force.
`An embodiment of the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention is characterized in that the touch
`screen comprises a third conductive panel which is arranged
`between the first and the second panel, the force sensor
`being suitable to determine a variation of the capacitance
`value by means of a current flowing from the first and/or
`second panel
`to the third panel
`in order to charge or
`discharge the capacitance between the third panel on the one
`side and the first and/or second panelon the otherside. The
`measurementof the capacitance value in response to a touch
`force could be disturbed by the capacitance of the finger or
`the-other object touching or approaching the screen. Thus,
`the determination of the force is not unambiguous. These
`touch effects are eliminated by measuring exclusively the
`current to the third panel which constitutes an intermediate
`layer.
`
`35
`
`40
`
`50
`
`55
`
`'
`
`60
`
`65
`
`The edges of the touch screen can in principle be
`mechanically fixed relative to the second panel. The touch
`force then becomes manifest as a difference in bending of
`the touch screen and the conductive layer. A simple and
`rugged force sensor can thus berealised. However, it may be
`that in that case the sensitivity of the force sensoris too low
`when the screen is touched near the edge. The sensitivity
`may also be too low when use is made of a touch screen of
`low flexibility.
`An embodiment of the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention is characterized in that the touch
`screen and the second panelareresiliently connected to one
`another. The touch screen can thus move as a wholerelative
`to the second panel and the described sensitivity problems
`will not occur.
`
`An embodiment of the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention is characterized in that the touch
`screen is flexible, the force sensor being suitable to deter-
`mine the touch force from the measured capacitance value
`under correction from a detected touch position. The degree
`of bending of a layer is dependent on the force exerted as
`well as on the position where force is exerted. When the
`edges of the layer are fixed, bending will increase as the
`force is exerted further from the edges. Quantitative force
`measurement requires correction for this effect. Preferably,
`the touch position as measured with the touch surface is used
`for this purpose.
`An embodiment of the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention which comprises an image display
`face on which there ate provided control electrodes for
`controlling an image pattern is characterized in that the
`control electrodes form part of the second and/orthird panel.
`The force sensor can thus be combined with, for example a
`
`

`

`5,510,813
`
`4
`dependence on which threshold values are exceeded. The
`force can thus be used,for example for selecting icons or for
`implementing a “double click” function as the force is
`greater.
`These and other aspectsof the invention will be described
`in detail hereinafter with reference to Figures herein.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`3
`Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) screen, without a separate
`second panel being required. The control electrodes of an
`LCD consist of a numberofline electrodes. When used for
`the force sensor, all control electrodes carry substantially the
`same electric voltage differencerelative to the other panels,
`at least as far as the measurementvoltage signal is concerned
`(which signal need only be one componentofthe electric
`voltage between the panels as has already been stated).
`Evidently, the further voltage components on the line elec-
`trodes may contain different control voltages for the LCD.
`An embodiment of the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention is characterized in that the force
`sensoris suitable to measure the capacitance value by means
`of an alternating voltage of a frequency between harmonics
`of a line frequency for controlling the control electrodes.
`The capacitance value can be simply measured by means of
`an alternating voltage. The use of an alternating voltage
`enables disturbances of the force measurement due to other
`signals, such as the line frequency of the display, to be
`prevented by selective faltering (for example, by means of
`synchronous demodulation). For a line frequency of 15.625
`Hz, for example a measurementfrequency of 22 kHz can be
`used,
`The sources liable to disturb the force measurement, for
`example the line drive of the display interface or the display
`illumination (usually driven at frequencies beyond 25 kHz)
`FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic side elevation of a liquid crystal
`are known in advance. In that case a suitable measurement
`display (LCD) provided with a touch screen. A number of
`frequency can also be chosen in advance.
`components which are not essential to the invention have
`An embodimentof the data processing device in accor-
`been omitted for the sake of clarity. The side elevation shows
`dance with the inventionis characterizedin thatit is suitable
`successively a transparent, conductive panel 10 (for
`to perform interference measurements for several frequen-
`example, of indium tin oxide, or ITO), a glass substrate 11,
`and the LCD 14.Afirst control electrode 15 and a second
`cies of the alternating voltage, in the absence of detection of
`touching of the touch surface, and for selecting a compara-
`control electrode 17 of the LCD 14 are shown, a liquid
`tively low interference frequency for use upon measurement
`crystal layer 16 being shown therebetween. The conductive
`of the capacitance value. In that casc a suitable measurement
`panel 10 and the control electrodes 15, 17 extend across
`frequency can also be chosen in the event of unknown
`substantially the entire surface of the LCD (perpendicularly
`interference sources, for example display illumination of a
`to the plane of drawing). The glass substrate 11 and the LCD
`non-specified frequency. The detection of touching can be
`14 are connectedvia resilient elements 12a,b, for example a
`realised, for example by meansof the touch position sensor.
`tubber ring which extendsalong the entire circumference of
`The measurement frequency can be selected for once and
`the LCD 14 or along parts thereof.
`for all upon assembly or repeatedly during use. Moreover, in
`During operation the panel 10 serves as a touch position
`the absence of detection of touching, the capacitance value
`sensor. Techniques for determining the touch position on a
`can be measured in the absence of an exerted force. This
`resistive, conductive layer are known per se. An example
`value then serves as a reference in calculating the force
`can be found in the cited U.S. Pat. No. 4,853,498 and also
`exerted from the capacitance value.
`in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,293,734, In an embodiment a voltage
`is applied to the panel 10 by means of different electrodes
`An embodiment of the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention is characterized in that the second
`(not shown) using these techniques. Under the influence of
`touching,this leads to a current flow through the panel 10,
`or the third panel constitutes a system of conductortracks for
`for example via the capacitance between the panel 10 and a
`a magnetic stylus position sensor. The force sensor can thus
`touching finger and subsequently via the body of the person
`be combined with the touch surface and a magnetic position
`sensor.
`touching to ground. This results in measurable currents
`through the electrodes on the panel 10. The position of
`touching can be calculated from the ratio of these currents.
`Bytouching the panel 10, a force can be exerted on the
`panel 10 (symbolized by an arrow 18 in the Figure). In the
`case ofa freed position of the LCD 14,this force 18 will lead
`to compression of the resilient elements 12a,b and hence to
`displacement (symbolized by an arrow 19) of the panel 10
`and the glass substrate 11 in the direction of the LCD 14.If
`necessary, mechanical guides can be provided so that dis-
`placement is possible exclusively in the direction of the
`panel. The displacement 19 is proportional to the force
`exerted.
`
`An embodiment of the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention, comprising an image display face
`and being suitable to gencrate, in response to touching, an
`image pattern in a location on the image display face which
`correspondsto the detected touch position, is characterized
`in that the device is suitable to enlarge the image pattern as
`the detected force is greater. For drawing lines the image
`pattern maybe, for example a brush elementsuch asa circle.
`This pattern remains when the touch position changes; the
`user can thus draw linesof variable thickness by moving the
`touch position across the screen while varying the force.
`An embodimentof the data processing device in accor-
`dance with the invention is characterized in that the device
`is suitable to compare the detected force with several
`threshold values and to execute different operations in
`
`FIG.1 is a diagrammatic side elevation of a liquid crystal
`display (LCD) provided with a touch screen.
`FIG. 2 shows a configuration for voltage application and
`current measurement on a touch screen.
`
`FIG.3 is a diagrammatic cross-sectional view of a further
`assembly of a touch screen and an LCD.
`FIG. 4 showsa further configuration for voltage applica-
`tion and current measurement on a touch screen.
`
`FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic cross-sectional view of a further
`assembly of a touch screen and an LCD.
`FIG. 6 shows an embodimentof a circuit for processing
`the measurement of the exerted force.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`The panel 10 andthefirst control electrode 15 of the LCD
`constitute the plates of a capacitor. The capacitance value of
`this capacitor is dependent on the distance between the
`
`

`

`5,510,813
`
`5
`plates and hence on the force. Measurement of the capaci-
`tance value enables determination of the force exerted.
`Because this measurementutilizes the panel 10 and thefirst
`control electrode 17, extending substantially across the
`entire surface of the LCD 14, the capacitance value is
`comparatively high so that it can be readily measured.
`The capacitance value can in principle be measured by
`applying a knownelectric voltage between the panel 10 and
`the first control electrode 15 and by measuring the charging
`current starting to flow in response to said voltage (the
`reverse is also possible: applying a known current and
`measuring the resultant voltage).
`The measured capacitance value, however, could be dis-
`turbed by the capacitive effect of, for example a finger
`touching the panel 10. Consequently, in response to the
`voltage an additional current may start to flow to the panel
`10, without a force 18 being exerted yet. Depending on the
`relative magnitude of the effect caused by the capacitor and
`the finger, the measurement of the force could become too
`inaccurate.
`
`This problem is mitigated by choosing a suitable configu-
`ration of voltage application and current measurement. Such
`a configuration is shown diagrammatically in FIG. 2. The
`Figure shows only the components which serve to measure
`the force; voltage sources and current meters for control of
`the LCD 14 andthe position sensor have been omitted for
`the sake of clarity. The panel 10 is represented as a first
`capacitor plate 30, the first control electrode 15 of the LCD
`14 being represented as a second capacitor plate 31 and the
`second control electrode 17 of the LCD 14 as a third
`capacitor plate 32. Between thefirst capacitor plate 30 and
`the second capacitor plate 31 (the panel 10 and the first
`control electrode 15) there is arranged a voltage source 35.
`The second capacitor plate 31 and the third capacitor plate
`32 (the first and second control electrodes 15, 17 of the LCD
`14) are interconnected. (Evidently, this holds only in respect
`of the componentof the voltage between the secondplate 31
`and the third plate 32 whereby the capacitance is measured.
`Asfar as other componentsof the voltage are concerned, for
`example the components required for controlling the LCD,
`a voltage source is present between the second plate 31 and
`the third plate 32). In the supply lead to the second plate 31
`there is inserted a current meter 36; the latter measures the
`current flowing from thefirst plate 30 and the third plate 32
`to the second plate 31 (evidently, in as far as current flows
`from these plates 30, 32). The capacitance value, or at least
`the variation thereof, can be determined from theratio of the
`voltage applied to 35 to the current measured at 36 (evi-
`dently,
`the reverse is also feasible: applying current by
`meansofa current source 36 instead of the current meter and
`measuring the voltage by meansof a voltmeter 35 instead of
`the voltage source).
`The capacitive effect of touching of the panel 10 during
`use is thus eliminated. This is because the current drained
`throughthe pancl 10 ducto the finger touching the panelalso
`has to return to the assembly formed by the much screen and
`the LCD,if no net charge is to be built up in the device. The
`return current flows, for example via the second electrode 17
`of the LCD 14, whenthe latter is held by the user, but not
`via the first control electrode 15 because this electrode is
`situated between the panel 10 and the second control elec-
`trode 17. Thus, the current to the first plate 30 due to
`touching will be compensated for by the current from the
`third plate 32. Touching, therefore, causes only a current.
`flow through the current meter 36 due to the pressing
`together of the panel 10 and thefirst control electrode 15,i.e.
`due to the desired effect.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`35
`
`60
`
`63
`
`6
`In this respect it is assumed that the componentvoltages
`for control of the LCD betweenthefirst electrode 15 andthe
`second electrode 17 do not interfere with the measured
`component of the current
`through the current current
`meter 36.
`
`FIG.3 is a diagrammatic cross-sectional view of a further
`assembly of a further touch screen and an LCD. The
`cross-sectional view successively showsa first transparent,
`conductive panel 21, a glass substrate 22, a transparent
`conductive layer 23, resilient clements 24a,b, a transparent
`first control electrode 25, a liquid crystal layer 26, and a
`second control electrode 27. The first contro! electrode 25
`and the transparent conductive layer 23 constitute a second
`panel and a third panel, respectively.
`Whena force is exerted, the touch screen,i.e. the assem-
`bly formed by the first panel 21, the glass substrate 22 and
`the third panel 23, will move in the direction of thefirst
`control electrode 25, so that the capacitance value of the
`capacitor formed by the third panel 23 and thefirst control
`electrode 25 (the second panel) increases.
`An attractive method of measuring this capacitance value
`is illustrated by way of the configuration shownin FIG.4.
`FIG. 4 shows diagrammatically a first, a second and a third
`capacitor plate, 50, 51, 52, respectively, which correspond to
`the first panel 21, the third panel 23 and the second panel
`(the first control electrode 25), respectively. A voltage source
`55 is connected between the second plate 51 and the third
`plate 52. The first plate 50 and the second plate 51 are
`interconnected (which means that no voltage difference
`exists between these two plates in as far as the components
`of the voltage are concerned which are used for the force
`measurement. In the supply lead to the secondplate 51 there
`is inserted a current meter 56; the latter measures the current
`flowing from thefirst plate 50 and the third plate 52 to the
`second plate 51. In addition, a further current meter 57 is
`symbolically shown in the supply lead to thefirst plate 50.
`The operation of this configuration is the same as that
`described with reference to FIG. 2, exceptthat the voltage is
`now applied betweenthe third panel 23 and the second panel
`(the first control electrode 25), i.c. again between the two
`adjoining plates which are movablerelative to one another.
`The voltage sources for the measurement of the touch
`position andthe control of the LCD have again been omitted
`in FIG. 4. During use different voltages are applied to the
`first panel 21 and the control electrode 25 for measuring the
`touch position and for controlling the LCD, respectively.
`The further current meter 57 symbolizes a numberof current
`meters connected to thefirst panel 21 in various locations.
`These current meters serve to measure the currents to the
`first plate wherefrom the touch position is determined.
`Upon measurement of the touch position, the third panel
`23 also serves as a shield between the first panel 21 and the
`control electrode 25, 27. Stray fields from the control
`electrodes 25, 27 are intercepted by the third panel 23 sothat .
`they do not cause a current in the first panel 21. The
`measurement of the touch position, therefore, is not dis-
`turbed by stray fields (conversely, the control of the LCD is
`not disturbed by the measurement voltage on thefirst panel
`21, be it that the latter is a smaller effect).
`FIG.5 is a diagrammatic cross-sectional view of a further
`assembly of a further much screen and an LCD. The
`cross-sectional view successively showsa first conductive
`panel 40, a first control electrode 41, a liquid crystal layer
`42, a second control electrode 43, resilient elements 44a,b,
`a third panel 45, and a second panel (a conductive layer 46).
`When a force is exerted onthefirst panel 40, the assembly
`formed bythefirst panel 40, the first control electrode 41,
`
`

`

`5,510,813
`
`7
`the liquid crystal layer 42, and the second control electrode
`43 will move towards the third panel 45, so that the
`capacitance value of the capacitor formed bythe third panel
`45 and the second control electrode 43 increases. This
`capacitance value is preferably measured by means of a
`configuration as shown in FIG. 2, in which the first, the
`second and the third plate 30, 31, 32, respectively, corre-
`spond to the second control electrode 43, the third panel 45
`and the conductive layer 46 (the second panel), respectively.
`As described above,
`the conductive layer 46 serves to
`prevent undesirable capacitive effects, for example when the
`LCDis placed on a metal table.
`If necessary, a conductor pattern of a magnetic position
`sensor (also known as a digitizer tablet) can be provided
`between the second electrode 43 and the third panel 45. This
`sensor serves to measure the location where a stylus gener-
`ating magnetic fields touches the display. In that case the
`conductor pattern of the sensor can serve as a capacitor plate
`instead of the second control electrode 45.
`
`FIG. 6 shows an embodimentofa circuit for processing
`the measurement of the force exerted. This Figure com-
`prises, by way of example, the configuration of FIG. 4 with
`the first plate 50, the secondplate 51, the third plate 52, the
`voltage source 55 and the current meter 56.
`The circuit comprises a drive circuit 60 for driving the
`voltage source. The current meter is connected to a cascade
`of successively a narrow-band detector 63, a subtraction
`means 64, and a position-dependent correction means 65. A
`memory 67 for the zero force capacitance is coupled to the
`subtraction means 64. A position sensor 68 is coupled to the
`position-dependent correction means 65.
`During operation the drive circuit 60 generates an alter-
`nating voltage of a given frequency, for example 22 kHz,
`which is applied between the second plate 51 and the third
`plate 52 by means of the voltage source 55. In response
`thereto a current flows through the current meter 56. The
`current measured is applied to the narrow-band detector 62.
`The amplitude ofthe current is a measure of the capacitance
`value. The narrow-band detector 62 detects substantially
`exclusively signals of the generated frequency (22 kHz), and
`outputs a signal which is proportional to the amplitude ofthe
`current. The subtraction meanssubtracts the quiescent value
`therefrom, i.e. the current amplitude in the absence of an
`exerted force.
`
`The signal at the output of the subtraction means 64is in
`principle a measure of the force exerted. However, it has
`been found that the capacitance variation can depend not
`only on the force but also on the location wherethe forceis
`exerted. This is notably the case when the resilient elements
`24a,b are replaced by non-flexible or hardly flexible con-
`nections. In that case the capacitance variation is due mainly
`to bending ofthe glass substrate 22. The degree of bending
`of the glass substrate 22 for a given force is dependent on the
`location wherethe force is exerted. Typical bending amounts
`to 1 mm in response to a force of 10N exerted at the center
`of the substrate 22, and to substantially 0 mm in response to
`a force exerted on the connection between the second panel
`23 and the first electrode 25. For the sake of compactness of
`the device and in order to minimize parallax between the
`first panel 21 and the LCD layer 26, the distance between the
`second panel 23 and the first electrode 25 preferably is
`hardly greater than this bending; in that case the bending
`determines a substantial part of the touch force effect.
`The position-dependent correction means 65 and the
`position sensor 68 are provided to correct for the location-
`dependencyofthe relation between the touch force and the
`
`20
`
`25
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`8
`variation of the capacitance value.For the position sensor 68
`use is preferably made ofthe first panel 10. In the correction
`means the measured capacitance variation is multiplied by a
`correction factor which is dependent on the location where
`the touch force is exerted.
`
`The correction factor can in principle be calculated by
`utilizing the equations for elastic deformation of thin plates.
`This calculation can be performed either for each touch or
`only once and for all, after which the correction factor is
`stored in a look-up table in the device as a function of the
`location. However, it has been found in practice that a simple
`approximated relation between the location and the correc-
`tion factor suffices.
`
`In a simple but very suitable embodiment the correction
`factor is taken to be proportional to the distance between the
`location where the force is exerted and the nearest location
`where the third panel 23 is mechanically connected to the
`first electrode 25. In another suitable version the correction
`factor is taken to be proportional to the sum of the absolute
`values of the x and y coordinates of the touch location,
`measured relative to the centre of the screen.
`
`For the measurement frequency, for example 22 kHz is
`used; at this frequency no disturbance is experienced from
`the customary drive frequency of the control signals for the
`display (for example, 15,625 Hz) or harmonics thereof and,
`moreover, this frequency is below the frequencies used for
`background illumination (backlighting) of the LCD (typi-
`cally 25 kHz and higher). This prevents other signals from
`disturbing the force measurement. Conversely,
`this fre-
`quency is also chosen to prevent disturbances in the image
`producedonthe display by the control electrodes 25, 27, but
`this effect is smaller.
`
`The control electrode 25 at oneside ofthe liquid crystal
`layer 26 is composed of a numberof line electrodes. In as
`far as the measurement frequency (22 kHz)is concerned,all
`these electrodes receive the samepotential. Evidently, as far
`as image frequencies (necessary for generating the image)
`are concerned, different potentials are usually applied to
`differentline electrodes. This can be realised, for example by
`using respective voltage sources for controlling the image
`between a common junction and the variousline electrodes,
`said commonjunction being connectedto the third panel 23
`via the voltage source 55.
`The bandwidth of the narrow band detector 62 corre-
`spondsto the speed of force variations to be measured and
`typically amounts to a few tens of Herz, for example 50 Hz.
`The narrow-band detector 62 preferably utilizes synchro-
`nous detection under the control of the drive circuit 60.
`
`The memory 67 for the zero force is preferably loaded by
`storing the output signal of the narrow-band detector at an
`instant at which no force is exerted on the screen. The
`absence of an exerted force can be detected by meansof the
`position sensor when the latter does not measure a variation
`of the current pattern through the first panel 21, The mea-
`surement ofthe currentflow to the outer plate 50 thus serves
`for touchdetection and the measurementofthe current to the
`intermediate plate 51 serves for force measurement.
`The measurement frequency of the force sensor, gener-
`ated by the drive circuit 60, is chosen so that the other
`signals in the LCD andthe position sensor causeaslittle
`interference as possible. If necessary, in the absence of a
`touch force the interference amplitude can be measured at
`different measurement frequencies, after which one of the
`least disturbed frequencies can be chosen for force measure-
`ments. This choice of frequency can either be performed
`once and for all upon design or assembly, or be repeated at
`
`

`

`5,510,813
`
`9
`regular intervals when no force is exerted. The latter can be
`performed, for example under the control of a processor in
`the device.
`
`The measurement has been explained in conjunction with
`frequency select

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket