throbber
PAPERS
`
`Non-invasive detection ofmalignancy by identification ofunusual
`CD44 gene activity in exfoliated cancer cells
`
`Yasuhiro Matsumura, Damian Hanbury, Joseph Smith, David Tarin
`
`Abstract
`Objective-To investigate non-invasive detection
`of cancer by testing for unusual CD44 gene activity
`in a clinical sample as an indicator of exfoliated
`tumour cells.
`Design-Case-control study.
`patients
`unselected,
`Subjects-44
`consecutive
`with bladder cancer and 46 people with no evidence
`ofneoplasia.
`Main outcome measure-Presence or absence of
`large CD44 gene products containing exon 6 deriv-
`atives in urine samples.
`Results-Novel abnormalities in the pattern of
`expression of this gene, seen specifically in tumour
`tissue, led to cloning of a newly recognised coding
`region in it (exon 6). This was tested as a probe for
`detection of exfoliated malignant cells in naturally
`voided urine. CD44 gene products extracted from
`the urine and amplified with polymerase chain
`reaction contained predicted electrophoretic band
`of 735 base pairs in 40 ofthe 44 patients with bladder
`cancer (sensitivity 91%). Products from 38 of the 46
`people with no evidence of neoplasia showed no
`such band (specificity 83%).
`Conclusions-Unusual activity of the CD44 locus
`in neoplasia and malignancy is confirmed, and
`techniques for the analysis of such activity can
`enable non-invasive investigation of patients for
`primary or recurrent bladder cancer or for other
`tumours that shed neoplastic cells into body fluids.
`
`Introduction
`Early detection of cancer is desirable since many
`cancers can be cured by surgical resection if diagnosed
`at an early stage,' 2 and this has led to the introduction
`of cancer screening programmes in many countries.
`Therefore, there is considerable incentive to find ways
`of detecting cancers early in their life history when they
`might still be localised and easily resected or destroyed.
`Bladder cancer is a common form of malignancy,
`and treatment would be greatly helped by early
`detection of primary and recurrent tumours. Current
`methods of screening by looking for microscopic
`non-specific, and urine
`cytology,
`haematuria are
`though specific, does not have the sensitivity to be used
`as a routine test for exclusion of bladder neoplasia.
`Radioimmunoassay for tumour markers such as
`carcinoembryonic antigen is not suitable for detecting
`cancer in its early stages though it can sometimes be
`used to monitor patients for increasing tumour burden
`or tumour recurrence.4 Diagnoses by urography and
`cystoscopy are effective but time consuming, expen-
`sive, invasive, and uncomfortable. They are the main
`methods for investigating symptomatic disease but are
`not suitable for routine screening for asymptomatic
`primary or recurrent tumours. Also, the workload of
`follow up cystoscopies after diagnosis and treatment to
`
`enable early detection of any recurrence is a consider-
`able burden to urology departments.
`There is therefore a need for a sensitive, reliable, and
`non-invasive method of detecting bladder cancer. We
`recently reported abnormal pattems of activity of the
`CD44 gene in tumours,5 and we have now cloned and
`sequenced a piece of complementary DNA corre-
`sponding to a new exon of this gene from a fresh
`tumour. In the present study we used this sequence
`data to confirm our previous findings of overexpression
`of the new exon in tumours and investigated the
`method's potential for detecting bladder cancer.With
`improved assay methods we could detect abnormal
`activity of the gene, and hence the likely presence of
`small numbers of exfoliated cancer cells, in naturally
`voided urine from patients with bladder cancer if the
`sample contained viable cells.
`
`Subjects and methods
`COMPLEMENTARY DNA SEQUENCING
`In our earlier study we noted that when comple-
`mentary DNA from tumour samples was amplified
`with primers P1 and P4 one of the polymerase chain
`reaction products consistently obtained was 1650 base
`pairs in size,' larger than the maximum predicted size
`of 1500 base pairs that would result from inclusion of
`transcripts from all then known exons at the insertion
`site.69 We concluded that there was an extra, unidenti-
`fied exon in the variably expressed region of the gene
`that is overexpressed in tumour tissue. We reasoned
`that this segment of complementary DNA might
`provide a sensitive and specific probe for tumour
`diagnosis and therefore isolated and characterised it.
`By using suitably chosen combinations of primers
`(data not shown), we found this exon to lie 5' to all the
`other variably expressed ones and thus to be between
`them and the 5' section (that is, upstream of the
`insertion site) of the standard portion of the gene (see
`fig 1).
`We then designed primers P3 and E4 to amplify
`
`El
`
`E3
`
`-4-
`
`F71 F-1FglF-o
`E2
`
`~~~~~~-4-
`
`ii
`E4 E5
`
`F12F
`
`Pi
`
`P2
`
`P3
`Standard
`
`SI
`
`Form
`
`3'
`
`<- 324 -
`base pairs
`
`158 .
`base pairs
`Insertion site
`(position 782-783 base pairs)
`FIG 1-Map of CD44 gene products together with positions ofprobes
`and primers. Newly identified exon labelled exon 6 in accordance with
`nomenclature ofScreaton et al'2
`
`Nuffield Department of
`Pathology, University of
`Oxford, John Radcliffe
`Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU
`Yasuhiro Matsumura, senior
`clinical research scientist
`David Tarin, Nuffield reader
`in pathology
`
`Department ofUrology,
`Churchill Hospital, Oxford
`OX3 8LJ
`Damian Hanbury, senior
`registrar
`Joseph Smith, consultant
`surgeon
`
`Correspondence to: Dr
`Tarin.
`
`BMJ 1994;308:619-24
`
`BMJ VOLUME 308
`
`5 MARCH 1994
`
`619
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1063, Page 1
`
`

`

`I2
`
`3 4
`
`5 6 7
`
`-o
`'I
`-O
`I',
`
`z17
`
`1.35-
`1.08 I
`0.87 "
`0.60.'
`
`Standard
`
`744 base pairs
`
`615 base pairs
`
`482 base pairs
`
`between the 5' end of the standard portion and exon
`1 1, using four tissue samples of breast cancer and three
`samples of normal breast tissue. As expected, we
`observed clear bands of 615 base pairs and 744 base
`pairs in the gels of the polymerase chain reaction
`products from cancer samples but not from normal
`samples (fig 2, upper panel). These were truncated
`versions of the bands of 1500 base pairs and 1650 base
`pairs seen in tumours and not in normal tissues in our
`earlier study with primers P1 and P4.' The larger band
`was therefore cut out from the gel, and the constituent
`Cancer
`Normal
`complementary DNA eluted. This was cloned into the
`% agarose)
`FIG 2-Ethidium bromide stained gel (12
`after 30 TA vector (Invitrogen), and transformed bacteria were
`amplification cycles of complementary DNA
`from four samples of
`..
`hybridised with the E4 probe. Positive clones were
`if normal breast tissue
`breast cancer (lanes 1-4) and three samples c
`analysed by the dideoxy method'" to obtain the base
`ter panel) only cancer
`(lanes 5-7). With primers P3 and E4 (uppi
`id 744 base pairs; with
`sequence of the new exon. Amplification with primers
`samples showed clear bands of 615 base pairs an
`iwed bands of482 base
`P1 and P4 produced a band of 482 base pairs, the
`primers P1 and P4 (lower panel) all samples shc
`pairs, the standardform ofCD44 transcript
`standard form of CD44 transcript, in all the samples
`(fig 2, lower panel), confirming that they contained
`satisfactory messenger RNA. Further studies with
`primers E3 and P4 indicated that no further exons lay
`downstream of E3 in the variably spliced region of the
`gene.
`
`Standard
`
`New exon (exon
`
`6)
`
`GCTACCACTTTGATGAGCAC
`CTAGTGCTACA
`I
`r S A T
`S
`T
`L M
`
`GCAACTGAGACAGCAACCA,
`AGAGGCAAGAA
`A T
`E
`T A T
`R Q E
`K
`
`ACCTGGGATTGGTTTTCATC
`;IGTTGTTT|CTA
`T W D W F
`S
`'V
`N L
`F
`L
`
`CCATCAGAGTCAAAGAATCA
`kTCITICACACA
`S
`P
`S
`E
`K N I
`H
`H
`L
`T
`
`ANALYSIS OF SOLID TISSUE SAMPLES
`We examined solid tissue samples from normal
`tissue and from tumours from patients with cancers of
`the breast, colon, and bladder. The procedures were as
`described earlier,5 and reaction products were probed
`with oligonucleotides E2, E4, and P2 to analyse
`expression of the new exon, expression of exon 11, and
`to check the quality of the complementary DNA,
`respectively.
`
`FIG 3-Sequence ofnew exon
`identified in CD44 gene.
`Underlining indicates potential
`0-glycation sites
`
`ACAACACAAATGGCTGGTA(
`T Q M AH
`T
`
`A
`6 7 8 9 0lil 121314 15
`
`1.35I-
`I .0
`087
`0.60-
`
`1.35 -
`1.08-
`0.87-
`0.60-
`
`Exon 7
`
`c
`2 3 ,4
`
`5
`
`URINE ANALYSIS
`We refined the experimental protocol with an initial
`series of urine samples from eight patients with known
`bladder cancer and eight with no evidence of the
`disease and then applied it to a larger series of subjects.
`Subjects-We examined urine samples from 90
`6 7 8
`subjects: 44 patients with bladder carcinoma proved by
`biopsy, 12 patients with inflammation of the bladder
`--
`....(cystitis), and 34 asymptomatic volunteers. Of the 46
`~people without neoplasia, 30 were males aged 18-77
`-s _
`1
`Fand 16 were females aged 7-76.
`; --- _
`~Initial analysis-About50m ofntrlyvie
`-F |
`:at1 1urine was obtained from each subject and transported
`
`-
`
`-
`
`~~of each sample was centrifuged, and the viability and
`quantity of cells in the sample were assessed by fluores-
`
`_diacetate and ethidium bromide." The remainder of
`lthe sample was centrifuged to pellet suspended cells for
`~extraction of messenger RA.
`... ...Molecular analysis-he actiity of the CD44 gene
`
`M _
`
`...
`
`,f ~~RNA to produce a complementary DNA copy of any
`X recently
`functioning
`genes
`followed
`by
`specific
`;4 amplification of the complementary DNA molecules
`.:::- i !pthat correspond to genes ofinterest with the polymerase
`chain reaction. This method allows study of the
`;L |
`| | 11 |amounts and sizes of the products assembled by a given
`-
`* |gene and therefore provides a snapshot of its activity at
`._*l |
`the time of sampling. Details of the method are given in
`
`L
`
`..
`
`0'O0
`
`G0 owI, 4S
`
`000
`day), E4 (exposed for
`FIG 4-Autoradiographs offilters probed with oligonucleotides E2 (exposed for one o
`fter amplification with
`eight hours), and P2 (exposed for two hours) in rows I, II, and III respectively aj
`pheral blood leucocytes
`primers P1 and P4. Panel A shows results for normal breast tissue (lanes 1-4), peril
`ease (lanes 8-10), and
`from healthy volunteers (lanes 5-7), sternal bone marrowfrom patients with heart dies
`1-4, (normal tissue in
`breast cancer tissue (lanes 11-15); panel B shows non-neoplastic colon tissue (lanes
`ative colitis in lane 4))
`lanes I and 3 and inflamed colonic mucosa, from Crohn's disease in lane 2 and ulcerx
`tissue (lanes 1-4) and
`and tissue from primary colonic cancer (lanes 5-8); panel C shows normal bladder
`primary bladder catcer tissue (lanes 5-8)
`
`620
`
`Results
`DETAILS OF NEWLY IDENTIFIED CD44 EXON
`The overexpressed exon we cloned and sequenced
`from fresh human tumour tissue was 129 base pairs
`long and had 34% of seine and threonine residues and
`two potential 0-glycation sites (fig 3). Its sequence is
`identical to that recently isolated from a genomic
`library of the HT-29 colon cancer cell line by Screaton
`
`BMJ voLuME 308
`
`5 MARCH 1994
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1063, Page 2
`
`

`

`et al."2 In accordance with their system
`of numbenng or
`CD44 exons, based on analysis of ger
`aomic DNA, we
`shall refer to it as exon 6.
`
`-10
`
`735 bae pairs
`
`44-base palrs
`
`17-35 base pairs
`
`484 base pairs
`
`th oligonucleotide E4
`FIG 5-Autoradiographs offilters amplified with primers El and ES and probed wit
`half). Tracks 15-28
`(upper half of each panel) and amplified with P1 and P4 and probed with P2 (lower
`nd 29-37 show results
`and 38-46 show results with urine samplesfrom bladder cancer patients. Tracks 1-14 at
`Ydy of plasmid DkNA
`with urine samples from non-neoplastic controls. Tracks 47-53 are serial dilution stu
`containing exons 6-11 (see appendix for details). Upper half of each panel shows only
`largest amplification
`pair band to confirm
`products, including 735 base pair band: lower half ofpanel shows standard 484 base
`presence ofsatisfactory messenger RNA
`
`TABLE I-Details of44 patients with bladder cancer
`
`Sex and
`Patient No age (years)
`
`No oflive cells per
`Histological stage and 10-4ml concentrated
`grade of tumours*
`urinet
`
`CD44 transcript
`levelt
`
`Lane in fig 5 if shown*
`
`smples
`Molecular analysis ofurine sa
`
`15
`16
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27,28
`39
`40
`41
`42
`43
`44
`45
`46
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`29
`30
`31
`32
`33
`34
`35
`36
`37
`38
`39
`40
`41
`42
`43
`44
`
`M75
`M62
`M69
`M76
`M53
`M57
`M76
`F69
`M44
`F56
`F62
`M69
`M81
`M51
`F72
`M80
`F50
`M62
`M64
`M47
`M69
`M74
`M65
`M62
`M64
`M78
`M75
`M76
`M56
`F71
`M87
`M64
`F87
`M71
`M65
`F81
`F81
`M56
`M59
`F64
`M66
`M84
`M72
`M78
`
`pT2 G3
`pTI G1 LO
`pT3 G3
`pT3G3L2
`pT2 G1
`pTl G1 LO
`pT3G2L1
`pTxG2LO
`pTaG1 LO
`pTI Gl L0
`pTl GI LO
`pT1 G2LO
`Necrotic debris
`pT3 G3 L2
`pT2 G2 LO
`pTl G3LO
`pTxG2LO
`pTaG1 LO
`pTl G2LO
`pTl G2 LO
`pTlG2LO
`pTI G3 LO
`pTl G1 LO
`pTl G1 LO
`pTis GI LO
`pTI G2L0
`pTl GlLO
`pTis GI LO
`pT2 G2 LO
`pTlG2LO
`pTl G2 LO
`pTl G3 LO
`pTl G1 LO
`pTl GI LO
`pTl G2LO
`pTI G1IL0
`pTl G2LO
`pTI G2LO
`pTl G2LO
`pTI G2LO
`pTl G2 LO
`pTl G3 L1
`pTa G1 LO
`pTl G1LO
`
`4-5
`1
`Many
`Many
`1
`4-5
`4-5
`2-3
`1
`4-5
`Many
`<1
`Many
`< 1
`4-5
`1
`2-3
`<1
`<1
`2-3
`<1
`< 1
`
`Many
`
`1
`5
`< 1
`
`Many
`1-2
`
`Many
`5-6
`
`2-3
`4-5
`Many
`2-3
`5-6
`Many
`2-3
`<1
`
`10-28
`10-20_10-'9
`10"-10-20
`10-22 10-
`10-19
`10-2_10-20
`10-2_10-20
`l0-22 10-21
`10-22 10-21
`10-2_10-"
`l0-22_10"-
`10-22 10-2
`10-22 10-21
`10-19
`10-20_10-19
`10-22 10-21
`10-21
`10-22_ 10-2
`10-22 l0-2
`> 10-7
`10-22 10-
`10-2'
`109
`10-20_10-19
`10-19
`10-22 10-21
`10-'9
`10-21_10-20
`10-20
`10-21_1020
`< 10-22
`< 1b22
`<10-22
`10-22 10-2
`10-21_10"20
`10-2110-20
`10-22102
`10-22 l0-
`1o-22
`0-
`10-21
`1022 l0-2
`10-21_10-20
`<10-22
`10-2210-2
`
`ancer (UICC): pTis-
`*Tumour stage and grade evaluated according to classification ofInternational Union against C
`ot extending beyond
`preinvasive carcinoma (carcinoma in situ), pTa=papillary non-invasive cancer, pTl -tumour ns
`edegree of
`the lamina propria, pT2-tumour invading superficial smooth muscle, pT3 -tumour invading d
`leep muscle, pTx-
`extent oftumour invasion cannot be assessed; G1 -high degree ofdifferentiation, G2-medium
`uperficial
`differentiation, G3-low degree ofdifferentiation; LO-no lymphatic invasion, LI -invasion of S
`lymphatics, L2 -invasion ofdeep lymphatics.
`tUrine samples concentrated 10-fold by centrifugation.
`tMole equivalents of DNA fragment used as a standard for quantification (see fig 5).
`
`ANALYSIS OF SOLID TISSUES FOR EXPRESSION OF TUMOUR
`RELATED EXONS
`When the polymerase chain reaction products were
`hybridised with radiolabelled E2 or E4 (see fig 1) all
`samples from carcinomas overexpressed several splice
`variants (fig 4, rows I and II), but the pattern of bands
`seen with each probe was different. Hence, the
`oligonucleotide probe for products of exon 6 was
`distinguishing
`neoplastic
`effective
`in
`and non-
`neoplastic samples but not significantly more sensitive
`than the E4 probe used previously, at least on samples
`from solid tissues. Subsequently, the same filters were
`stripped and hybridised with probe P2 to show that all
`samples, including normal tissues, produced the
`standard portion of CD44 (fig 4, row III). This
`confirmed that the differences observed between
`control and tumour samples when probed with E2 or
`E4 were not due to unequal loading of reaction
`products on these gels.
`The cumulative results of our studies on solid tissue
`samples are that cancers of the breast, colon, bladder,
`stomach, prostate, and thyroid in 47 different patients
`had significant overexpression of various exons of
`CD44 but corresponding normal tissues from 39
`people did not (partially shown in fig 4 and in our
`previous report5). Figure 4 shows that a few bands, all
`less than 1100 base pairs in size, were present in the
`lanes from the normal samples though the intensity of
`these bands was very weak. Bands larger than 1500
`base pairs in size were never seen in amplified gene
`products from normal tissue samples. We consider,
`therefore, that the higher the molecular size the more
`specific it is for the diagnosis of cancer.
`URINE ANALYSIS FOR MALIGNANCY WITH CD44 PROBES
`Table I shows details of the 44 patients with bladder
`cancer. If tumour cells in urine were to be expressing
`all the exons from 6 to 11 we predicted that our
`protocol should produce a 735 base pair band with
`primers El and E5 (see appendix). Figure 5 shows that
`there were clear differences between most tumour and
`non-tumour samples relative to the presence or absence
`of the 735 base pair product. The discrimination was
`not absolute, however, and we occasionally observed a
`735 base pair band in the amplification products from
`subjects with no clinical evidence of neoplasia (such as
`lanes 1, 10, 13, 32, and 35 in fig 5) and sometimes saw
`none in a patient with bladder cancer. The presence of
`the 484 base pair band showed that all the samples
`contained satisfactory messenger RNA.
`The serial dilution study shown in lanes 47-53 was
`included in this experiment to monitor the reliability of
`amplification of the target segment by the polymerase
`chain reaction under these conditions. It was possible
`to detect a signal down to 10-22 mole of the plasmid
`which was used as a standard. We therefore adopted
`this as the threshold for designating a sample as
`positive or negative for the presence of the 735 base
`pair template in the clinical samples. The overall
`results ofthe study showed that samples from 40 (9 1%)
`of the 44 patients with cancer were positive and that 38
`(83%) of the 46 from people without neoplasia were
`negative. The method therefore has a sensitivity of
`91%, specificity of 83%, a positive predictive value of
`83% (40/48), and a negative predictive value of 90%
`(38/42) for bladder cancer. Among the subjects re-
`ceiving the test the prevalence of the disease was 44%
`(40/90).
`The signal in individual samples can be roughly
`quantified by comparison with the serially diluted
`standard. For evaluation of the importance of a signal
`the results of molecular analysis should be related to
`the viable cell concentration in the urinary sediment
`after centrifugation. Table II summarises the results of
`such an analysis. Some samples from cancer patients
`
`BMJ VOLUME 308
`
`5 MARCH 1994
`
`621
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1063, Page 3
`
`

`

`TABLE II-Results of molecular analysis of urine samples from 35
`patients with bladder cancer and 26 controls* by cell number in urine.
`Values are numbers ofsubjects unless stated otherwise
`
`Result of molecular analysist
`
`No of live cells per
`10- ml concentrated
`urinet
`
`Cancer patients
`
`Controls
`
`Positive
`
`Negative
`
`Positive
`
`Negative
`
`Many
`2-10
`1-2
`<1
`
`6
`14
`3
`8
`
`2
`1
`1
`0
`
`1
`3
`1
`1
`
`2
`6
`7
`5
`
`*Urne samples from remaining nine cancer patients and 20 controls which
`were received in the early stages ofthe study, were not assessed.
`tUrine samples concentrated 1 0-fold by centrifugation.
`tResult regarded as positive if - 10-1 mole of standard DNA segment
`present and regarded as negative if < 10-"1mole present.
`
`showed a strongly staining band of 735 base pairs after
`amplification despite containing less than one cell per
`1 0-4ml of 10-fold concentrated urine (for example,
`lanes 16, 19, and 38 in fig 5). Conversely, samples from
`subjects with no clinical evidence of neoplasia did not
`produce a strong band of 735 base pairs even when they
`contained more than 10 cells per 10Q4ml. Hence the
`presence and intensity of the band is not simply related
`to the total number of cells present.
`
`Discussion
`The products of CD44 gene activity appear to
`exercise many diverse functions in the cell and at the
`cell surface,'3 and disturbances in the gene activity seen
`in tumour cells probably stem from derangement of the
`mechanisms controlling alternative splicing of this
`gene. From the present work and from our earlier
`studies5 we believe that tumour cells produce orders of
`magnitude more of the unusual transcripts from the
`CD44 locus compared with non-neoplastic cells. Even
`a sprinkling of tumour cells in a sample can therefore
`be detected under optimal conditions.
`
`EFFECT OF RIBONUCLEASES
`Such a highly sensitive method could be of great
`clinical benefit, but ribonucleases are often present in
`high concentration in biological samples that contain
`many bacteria or dead or dying eukaryotic cells.
`Thus messenger RNA from a sample can be rapidly
`degraded during extraction if the quantity of inhibitor
`added is insufficient, giving a spurious negative or
`a weak positive result. In our study two of the
`four urine samples from patients with cancer that
`were negative for the 735 base pair band contained
`numerous cells because of coexisting haematuria or
`cystitis. The RNA extraction kit which we used cannot
`cope with more than 5 x 106 cells simultaneously
`because of the amount of ribonuclease released during
`the extraction procedure. For example, lanes 27 and
`28 in figure 5 are different aliquots from a single
`sample from a patient with severe haematuria, but one
`aliquot reproducibly gave a positive signal and the
`other did not. The only difference was the starting
`urine volume used for cell pelleting before extraction:
`20 ml for lane 27 and 1 ml for lane 28. The positive result
`was obtained with the smaller starting volume, which
`fits with the suggestion that the RNA was degraded
`by ribonucleases released by blood cells in the sample.
`It is also possible that inhibitors of the polymerase
`chain reaction, known to be present in blood, could
`be present in greater concentration in gross haema-
`turia.
`The most important requirement for this method is
`to get high quality intact RNA. In our experience RNA
`is degraded gradually even at - 70°C. RNA should
`therefore be extracted and transcribed to comple-
`mentary DNA when urine samples arrive and without
`
`freezing them, which releases ribonucleases from the
`cells. Concurrent cystitis should be treated before
`urine samples are taken for examination. People with
`persistent frank haematuria should be referred directly
`to a urologist for cystoscopy without having such a
`test.
`
`RELIABILITY OF METHOD
`Most of the control urine samples (83%) were
`completely negative for the 735 base pair band. It is
`unlikely that these results were caused by technical
`failure such as RNA degradation because the standard
`form CD44 transcript constitutively expressed in all
`cell types (482 base pairs) was obtained with each
`sample (fig 5, lower panel). Conversely, eight of the 46
`control samples were positive for the 735 base pair
`band. We do not have a definitive explanation for these
`cases, but, as they gave similar results on repeat testing
`of subsequent samples, cross contamination with RNA
`or cells from tumour samples can reasonably be
`excluded. Possibly, in normal samples there are slight
`differences related to cell type in the expression of
`CD44 variants which are usually below the threshold of
`detection but which can be seen in some subjects. In
`our study the threshold for detection was set at
`maximum sensitivity on the basis of the results of the
`pilot study. Results from further studies to refine our
`method indicate that adjustment of the positions of the
`primers and probes used for amplification and check-
`ing ofgels for an abnormal pattern of CD44 activity can
`give even greater specificity of diagnosis than that
`already achieved (unpublished observations). It should
`also be remembered that in an asymptomatic population
`there may be some people who have early, reversible,
`preneoplastic changes such as dysplasia or cellular
`atypia that could be detected by an highly sensitive
`method. Of the 40 patients with bladder cancer in our
`study who had positive results, two had preinvasive
`carcinoma in situ and 28 had histologically early
`stage invasive cancer (pTisG1 and pTlG1 respec-
`tively in table I). These results indicate that disorder
`in CD44 gene expression begins early in the process of
`neoplasia.
`The CD44 method achieved reasonable specificity as
`well as good positive and negative predictive value in
`this sample of people. We have reason to believe that
`sampling,
`improvements in urine
`transport, and
`laboratory technique will further improve its sensitivity
`and specificity of detection (unpublished data). Even
`so, the method does not directly visualise the presence
`ofmalignant cells or tissue, and a policy ofconfirmation
`of a presumptive diagnosis with the aid ofmicroscopical
`techniques would be advisable.
`
`RESULTS FROM OTHER STUDIES
`Studies on CD44 gene activity by ourselves and
`others have contributed to understanding the funda-
`mental mechanisms of neoplasia and the clinical
`detection of primary and recurrent malignancy.5'1'8
`Other genes have also been studied to investigate the
`feasibility ofdiagnosing tumours by means ofmolecular
`genetics. For example, Sidransky et al reported identi-
`fication ofp53 gene mutations in exfoliated cancer cells
`in urine in three patients.'9 In parallel studies on solid
`tissue samples they found that mutations in these genes
`were present in 61% of bladder tumours. Haliassos et al
`sought evidence of H-ras gene mutations in the urine of
`21 patients with bladder cancer and reported mutations
`at codon 12 in 10 (47%) ofthem.20 In the same patients
`the prevalence of H-ras mutations in their bladder
`tissues was 66%. Such findings, together with our
`results,
`evidence
`that molecular genetic
`provide
`methods have the potential to provide powerful new
`tools for the early detection and prognostic evaluation
`ofhuman tumours.
`
`BMJ VOLUME 308
`
`5 MARCH 1994
`
`622
`
`Geneoscopy Exhibit 1063, Page 4
`
`

`

`COMPARISON WITH OTHER METHODS
`DNA based techniques are ofundisputed importance
`for the detection of oncogene related mutations in the
`analysis of cancer aetiology and of familial predis-
`position to certain types of neoplasia. Our present
`results, however, indicate that RNA based diagnostic
`techniques, which give direct evidence of abnormal
`gene activity at the time of sampling, may have
`advantages in the diagnosis of existing neoplastic
`disease. Although the incidence of mutations in known
`oncogenes is quite high in certain types of cancer, in
`most malignancies it is insufficient to be of practical
`benefit in routine clinical practice. RNA based methods
`therefore deserve attention in further research. The
`method described here, analysing expression of CD44,
`has the advantages that it can be performed in a single
`day and that it reliably ascertained the presence of
`abnormal splice variants in exfoliated cells in urine
`samples from 91% of patients with bladder cancer.
`From data already published5 1418 we know that there is
`a strong association between such abnormal CD44
`expression and the presence of malignant cells in tissue
`samples. The detection of excessive and abnormal
`CD44 activity in a clinical sample should therefore
`raise strong suspicion ofthe presence ofneoplasia.
`The sensitivity of detection obtained with this new
`method in this study of an unselected series of bladder
`tumours ofall types and stages, including early papillary
`tumours, was greater than the values recently published
`for studies on similar unselected groups using urine
`microhaematuria.2'
`cytology3' 11
`For accurate
`or
`comparison, however, it would be necessary to study
`the results of all these methods on the same set of
`samples.
`
`CONCLUSION
`We suggest that this method could become a useful
`partner to cytology and histopathology in the clinical
`investigation of bladder malignancy. It is also likely to
`have wider applications because we have recently
`successfully used it to detect abnormal CD44 expression
`in exfoliated cells in stools from patients with colorectal
`cancer but not in ones from normal subjects (Matsu-
`mura and Tarin, unpublished observations). The
`technique is not difficult for trained perponnel, but it
`needs to be performed with care because messenger
`RNA is vulnerable to degradation and the reaction can
`amplify trace contaminants to detectable levels. It is
`non-invasive, and, as samples can be batch tested, it
`would be considerably cheaper than cystoscopy for
`initial investigation for primary or recurrent bladder
`neoplasia. We therefore present it as a potentially
`convenient and practical method for cancer screening
`and for investigation of patients with suspected neo-
`plastic disease. In order to make a confident assessment
`of the predictive value of the test in the general
`population, we now need more extensive clinical
`evaluation by means of double blind trials.
`We thank the following for help with this work: L Bao, D
`Cranston, D L Darling, J Davies, M Evans, G J Fellows,
`L Kaklamanis, D Lo, S Matsumura, J O'D McGee, T
`Shirakawa, E M Southern, L Summerville, and E Yap. We
`thank other colleagues in our departments for giving us
`samples and for general cooperation and encouragement.
`
`Appendix
`Urine samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes,
`and messenger RNA was immediately extracted from the cell
`pellet using Micro-Fast Tract (Invitrogen). Complementary
`DNA was synthesised from the messenger RNA template
`using the complementary DNA Cycle Kit (Invitrogen), and
`amplification was performed with appropriate primers and
`parameters using 2-5 units of Taq polymerase in 50 ,ul
`reaction mixture. In this study of urine samples amplification
`was performed across a shorter section of the CD44 comple-
`
`Clinical implications
`
`* Early stage bladder cancer can be effectively
`treated by resection, but it is often asymptomatic
`so that affected paients who could benefit are
`difficult to identify
`* With gene amplification techniques abnormal
`activity of the CD44 gene has been found in
`tumour tissue
`* In this study abnormal CD44 activity was
`confirmed with improved techniques in tumours
`from various tissues including breast, colon,
`and bladder
`* Abnormal CD44 gene activity was also found
`in exfoliated cells in urine samples from 91% (40/
`44) of patients with bladder cancer, while no
`such abnormality was found in samples from
`83% (38/46) of non-neoplastic controls
`* Technical improvements to the assay should
`substantially increase specificity of detection,
`and this non-invasive technique may be suitable
`for early detection of primary bladder tumours
`and monitoring for recurrent disease
`
`mentary DNA in each sample to increase sensitivity and
`specificity. Primers were designed to amplify across segments
`which included the new exon on the grounds that this is
`present in the largest transcripts typical of neoplasia.
`The primers used in the study, at 1 pmol/,ul in a 50/,ul
`reaction, were P1 (5'-GACACATATTGCTTCAATGCTT-
`CAGC),P2(5'-CCTGAAGAAGATTGTACATCAGTCAC-
`AGAC), P3 (5'-TGGATCACCGACAGCACAGAC), P4 (5'-
`GATGCCAAGATGATCAGCCATlTCTGGAAT), El (5'-
`TTGATGAGCACTAGTGCTACAGCA),E2(5'-CATTTG-
`TGTTGTTGTGTGAAGATG),E3(5'-AGCCGAGAGGAC-
`AGTTCCTGG),E4(5'-TGAGATTGGGTTGAAGAAATC),
`andE5 (5'-TCCTGCTTGATGACCTCGTCCCAT). Figure
`1 shows the positions of the primers and probes, and the
`predicted size of certain amplification products obtained with
`different primer combinations were 482 base pairs (primers
`P1 and P4, standard part only), 744 base pairs (P3 and E4 with
`exon 6), 615 base pairs (P3 and E4 without exon 6), and 735
`base pairs (El and E5, cancer related band consisting of exons
`6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11).
`The complete complementary DNA solution from each
`urine sample was divided equally into two tubes: one for
`reaction with primers El and E5, to amplify the complemen-
`tary DNA transcript that was of diagnostic value (735 base
`pairs); and one for reaction with primers P1 and P4, to
`amplify the standard form of CD44 (482 base pairs) as
`an internal control of messenger RNA quality and comple-
`mentary DNA synthesis. Both tubes underwent 35 cycles of
`amplification. The cycle conditions were: 94°C for one
`minute, 55°C for one minute, and 72°C for two minutes. After
`electrophoresis the amplified products were electrophoresed,
`blotted, and probed-with phosphorus-32 labelled probe E4
`to visualise the 735 base pair band or with P2 to view standard
`form CD44.
`The TA plasmid DNA containing a complementary DNA
`insert of the same composition as the one of diagnostic interest
`(containing transcripts from all exons from 6 to 11 inclusive)
`was used as an internal standard for quantification purposes.
`This calibration series consisted of the following serial
`dilutions of 10-17, 10.-8, 10-0', 10-20, 10-21, 10-22, and 10-23 mole of
`the plasmid DNA in 50,p1 of reaction solution (primers El
`and E5, probe E4). Conditions for hybridisation, high
`stringency washing, and autoradiography with x ray film
`(Kodak) were according to standard protocols.
`
`1 KantoffPW. Bladder cancer. CurrProbl Cancer 1990;14:233-92.
`2 Winawer SJ, Schotten-field D, Frehinger BS. Colorectal cancer screening. Jf
`Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:243-53.
`3 Matzkin H, Moinuddin SM, Soloway MS. Value of urine cytology veraua
`bladder washing in bladder cancer. Urology 1992;39:201-3.
`4 Hedin A, Carlason L, Bergiund A, Hammarstrom S. A monoclonal antibody-
`enzyme inmmunoasaay for aerum carcinoembryonic antigen with increased
`specificity for carcinomas. Proc NadAcadSci USA 1983;80:3470-4.
`5 Matsumura Y, Tarin D. Significance of CD44 gene products for cancer
`diagnosis and diaease evaluation. Lancet 1992;340: 105

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket