Case b:23-cor-00L22-RGA Documents Filed O2/OU/23 Page l of 2 PageiD #: 643
`
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop8
`
`Birector of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1436
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`|
`
`|
`
`REPORTON THE
`
`FELING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`fn Comphance with 35 U.8.C. § 290 and/or 15 USC. § 1116 vou are hereby advised that a court action has been
`for the District of Delaware on the following
`
`filed in the US. Dastnct Court
`t] Trademarks or
`[vf Patents.
`(¢ [) the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`LITL LLC
`
`FILED
`2/2023
`
`LS. DISTRICT COURT
`for the District of Delaware
`
`[DEFENDANT
`
`ASUSTeK Gompurier inc., ASUS Giobal Pte. Lid., and
`| ASUS Technology Pts. Limited
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`OR TRADEMARK
`PATENT
`OF
`DER
`HOT
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK.
`
`a i
`
`See attached Addendum
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s}/ trademark(s} have been incinded:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`PATENT OR
`
`[i Cross Bill
`
`[| Other Pleading
`
`
`TRADEMARK NO.
`[(BY) DEPUTY CLERK.
`
`{n the above---enitled case, the following decision has been rendered or pudgement issued:
`DECTSIONAUBGEMENT
`
`
`Copy i—Upoen initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3-—Upontermination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-——-Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 1
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Case D:23-cor-00L22-RGA Documents Filed O2/O1/23 Page 2 of 2 Pagelb #: 644
`
`Addendum to Patent/Trademark Report — (LiITL LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc., et al.)
`
`List of Additional Patents
`
`LiTL LLC
`
`9,880,715
`
`10,564,818
`
`8,612,888
`
`01/30/2018
`
`2/18/2020
`
`12/17/2013
`
`LiTL LLC
`
`LiTL LLC
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 2
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper: 6
`Entered: October 21, 2021
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LENOVO(UNITED STATES)INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`LITL LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`Before MICHELLE N. ANKENBRAND, GARTH D. BAER,and
`BRIAN D. RANGE,Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BAER,Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`DenyingInstitution of Inter Partes Review
`35 U.S.C. § 314
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 3
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 3
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Lenovo (United States) Inc. (“Petitioner’’) filed a Petition (Paper1,
`
`“Pet.”) requesting an inter partes review of claims 1-16 and 18-22 of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,624,844 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’844 patent”). LiTL LLC (“Patent
`
`Owner”) filed a Preliminary Response. Paper 5 (“Prelim. Resp.”).
`
`Wehave authority to determine whetherto institute an inter partes
`
`review. See 35 U.S.C. § 314 (2018); 37 C.F.R. § 42.4(a) (2020). The
`
`standard for institution is set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), which providesthat
`
`an inter partes review maynotbeinstituted unless “there is a reasonable
`
`likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the
`
`claims challengedin the petition.” As discussed below, we determinethat
`
`Petitioner does not show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect
`
`to the challenged claims. Accordingly, we denyinstitution of an inter partes
`
`review.
`
`Il.
`
`A.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`Related Matters
`
`Theparties identify the following as a related matter: LiTL LLCv.
`
`Lenovo (United States), Inc. and Lenovo (Beijing) Limited, 1:20-cv-00689-
`
`RGA(D.Del.). Pet. 2; Paper 4, 1. Patent Owneralso identifies the following
`
`as related matters: IPR2021-00681, IPR2021-00786, IPR2021-00800, and
`
`IPR2021-00821. Paper4, 2.
`
`B.
`
`The ’844 Patent (Ex. 1001)
`
`The ’844 patentis titled “Portable Computer with Multiple Display
`
`Configurations.” Ex. 1001, code (54). The computer system of the °844
`
`patent describes different profiles to customize the graphical user interface
`
`in different modes, including a laptop modein which the portable computer
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 4
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 4
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`has a conventional laptop appearance, with the display inclined at a viewing
`
`angle from the base(id. at 6:26—28); an easel mode in whichthe baseofthe
`
`computerandits display stand upright forming an inverted “V,” and the
`display and keyboard are on opposite sides (id. at 7:48-61); and a frame
`
`modein which the display and baseare at a similar orientation and angle as
`
`in easel mode, but with the base lying flat on a surface and the keyboard
`
`facing down (id. at 16:3-13).
`
`Figure 17 of the ’844 patent, reproduced below,illustrates a portable
`
`computer in laptop mode. /d. at 5:13-15.
`
`FIG. 17
`
`Figure 4 of the ’844 patent, reproduced below,illustrates the portable
`
`computer in easel mode. /d. at 4:47-48.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 5
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 5
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822_
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`190
`
`FIG. 4
`
`Figure 26 of the ’844 patent, reproduced below,illustrates the portable
`
`computer configured into frame mode. Jd. at 5:35—-37.
`
`\
`Screen facing out
`
`Keyboard facing down
`into surface
`
`FIG. 26
`
`The ’844 patent explains that the display’s orientation can change
`
`based on the different modesor in response to a user’s input. Jd. at 2:42—44.
`
`C.
`
`Challenged Claims
`
`Amongchallenged claims 1-16 and 18-22, claims 1, 10, and 18 are
`independent. Claim 1 is exemplary of the claimed subject matter andis
`
`reproduced as follows:
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 6
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 6
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`1. A portable computer configurable betweena plurality of
`display modesincluding a laptop mode and an easel mode
`wherein transitions betweenthe plurality of display modes
`allows an operator to interact with a single display screen in
`each of the plurality of display modes, the portable computer
`comprising:
`a base including a keyboard;
`a main display componentrotatably coupled to the base such
`that the main display componentand the baseare rotatable with
`respect to one another about a longitudinal axis running along
`an interface between the main display componentand the base
`to transition betweenat least the laptop mode andthe easel
`mode, the main display componentincluding the single display
`screen, wherein the transition between the laptop mode andthe
`easel modeallows the operator to operate the portable computer
`while viewing the single display screen in each ofthe plurality
`of display modes, wherein
`the laptop modeis configured to display to a user on the main
`display componenta first content mode havinga first content
`display orientation with the main display componentoriented
`towards the user and the keyboard oriented to receive input
`from the user;
`the easel modeis configured to display to the user on the main
`display componenta second content mode having a second
`content display orientation with the main display component
`oriented towardsthe user and the keyboard oriented away from
`the user, wherein the first and second content display
`orientations are 180 degrees relative to each other, and wherein
`the portable computeris operable in the easel mode to enable
`the user to interact with displayed content withoutinteracting
`with the keyboard; and
`a navigation control disposedat least partially within the base
`and rotatable about the longitudinal axis, the navigation control
`configured to permit a user to control at least one of operating
`parameters of the portable computer and content displayed on
`the single display screen wherein the plurality of modes
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 7
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 7
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`includes a frame [mode'] in which the main display component
`is oriented towards the operator, the base contacts a
`substantially horizontal surface, and the keyboard faces the
`substantially horizontal surface.
`
`Ex. 1001, 17:9-51.
`
`D.—Asserted Grounds of Unpatentability
`
`Petitioner asserts the challenged claims are unpatentable based on the
`
`following grounds:
`
`
`
`
`| Claim(s) Challenged | 35 U.S.C. §?
`|.
`- Reference(s)/Basis
`1, 3-5, 7-10, 13-16
`Shimura,? Tsuji,4 Pogue?
`
`
`6 Shimura, Tsuji, Pogue,
`Escamilla®
`
`103
`Shimura, Tsuji, Pogue,
`Escamilla, Yeh’
`
`
`Shimura, Tsuji, Pogue, Lin®
`
`18, 22
`
`
`
`' Original claim 1 recites a “frame” not a “frame mode.” Ex. 1001, 17:47.
`On April 1, 2014, the Office issued a Certificate of Correction that inserts
`the word “mode” after the word “frame” in claim 1. /d. at Certificate of
`Correction.
`
`* The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) amended 35 U.S.C. § 103.
`See Pub. L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284, 285-88 (2011). As the application
`that issued as the ’844 patent wasfiled before the effective date of the
`relevant amendments, the pre-AIA version of § 103 applies.
`3 JP1994-242853 (H6-242853), published September 2, 1994 (Ex. 1003).
`Werefer to the Certified English translation (Ex. 1004, “Shimura”).
`4 US 2005/0062715 Al, published Mar. 24, 2005 (Ex. 1005, “Tsuji’”).
`> Windows XP HomeEdition: The Missing Manual(2d ed.) (David Pogue,
`Pogue Press, LLC & O’Reilly Media, Inc. 2004) (Ex. 1006, “Pogue’’).
`° US 6,724,365 B1, Apr. 20, 2004 (Ex. 1007, “Escamilla”).
`TUS 6,396,419 B1, May 28, 2002 (Ex. 1008, “Yeh”).
`8 US 2007/0013682 A1, published Jan. 18, 2007 (Ex. 1009, “Lin’”).
`
`6
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 8
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 8
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`
`
`Claim(s) Challenged|35 U.S.C. §? Reference(s)/Basis
`
`11, 12, 19, 21
`103
`Shimura, Tsuji, Pogue,
`
`
`
`Escamilla, Lin
`Pet. 3-4. Petitioner supports the asserted grounds with the Declaration of
`
`Jean Renard Ward. Ex. 1010.
`
`Ill. DISCUSSION
`
`A.
`
`Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art
`
`Petitioner contendsthat a person of ordinary skill in the art
`
`(“POSITA”)
`
`least a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical
`would have had at
`Engineering, Computer Engineering, or Computer Science, plus
`two to three years of work experience in designing hardware
`and/or software aspects of the User Interface (UI) for portable
`computing devices; the POSITA would also be familiar with
`designs of the user interface employed and displayed by the
`operating system and
`its
`organization of content
`and
`functionality. Alternatively, the POSITA would have received a
`graduate degree such as a Master’s or PhD degree with at least
`one year of work experience related to hardware and/or software
`design aspects of the UI for portable computing devices; the
`POSITA would also be familiar with designs of the user interface
`employed and displayed by the operating system and its
`organization of content and functionality.
`Pet. 15—16 (citing Ex. 1010 § 26).
`
`Patent Owner does not dispute Petitioner’s asserted level of ordinary
`
`skill in the art. See generally Prelim. Resp.
`Wefind, based on the current record, that Petitioner’s contentionis
`reasonable. For purposes ofthis Decision, we adopt the level of ordinary
`skill in the art Petitioner proposes.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 9
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 9
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`B.
`
`Claim Construction
`
`Petitioner proposes a claim construction for “content mode,” as well
`99 66
`
`as several related terms, i.e., “first content mode,”
`
`“second content mode,”
`
`and “mode(s) of content.” Pet. 16-18. We determine we neednot explicitly
`
`construe those terms to determine whetherto institute an inter partes review.
`
`See Nidec Motor Corp. v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co., 868 F.3d
`
`1013, 1017 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (“we need only construe terms‘that are in
`
`controversy, and only to the extent necessary to resolve the controversy”
`
`(quoting Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng’g, Inc., 200 F.3d 795, 803
`
`(Fed. Cir. 1999))).
`
`Wedetermine, however, that construction is necessary for “frame
`
`mode.” Claim 1 recites, among other things, “[a] portable computer
`
`configurable betweena plurality of display modes .
`
`.
`
`. wherein theplurality
`
`of modes includes a frame mode in which the main display componentis
`
`orientated towards the operator, the base contacts a substantially horizontal
`
`surface, and the keyboard faces the substantially horizontal surface.”
`
`Ex. 1001, 17:9-51; see id. at Certificate of Correction. Independent claims
`
`10 and 18 have similar “frame mode” limitations. Jd. at 18:65—-19:2, 20:25-
`
`29. The °844 patent explains that frame modeis “illustrated in FIG. 26.” Id.
`
`at 16:23. Figure 26 is reproduced below.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 10
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 10
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`Screen facing out
`
`Keyboard facing down
`into surface
`
`FIG. 26
`
`Figure 26 and the accompanyingtext characterize frame modeas having the
`keyboard face down on a surface with the screen face up, and the base and
`
`display components forming a non-zero angle 134, similar to easel mode’s
`
`inverted “V.” See id. at 16:6-13.
`
`Frame modeis distinct from “tablet mode,” which the ’844 patent
`
`acknowledges was knowninthe art. See id. at 1:32—55 (citing U.S. Patent
`Nos. 6,771,494 (Ex. 2009) and 6,266,236 (“the ’236 patent”) (Ex. 2010)). In
`
`tablet mode,the display is “rotated and folded against the base.” Jd. at 1:43—
`
`46. Tablet modeis depicted, for example, in the ’236 patent’s Figure 2,
`
`which is reproduced below.
`
`
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 11
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 11
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`“(T]he specification is always highly relevant to the claim
`
`construction analysis. Usually, it is dispositive; it is the single best guide to
`
`the meaning of a disputed term.” Philips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303,
`1315 (Fed. Cir. 2005). Consistent with the ’844 patent’s specification, for
`
`purposesof this Decision, we construe “frame mode”as having the
`keyboard face down on a surface with the screen face up, and the base and
`display components forming a non-zero angle. Frame modeis distinct from
`
`“tablet mode,” where the display is flush against the base.
`
`C.
`
`Analysis
`
`Overview ofShimura (Exs. 1003 and 1004)
`1.
`All grounds rely on Shimura. Shimura is a Japanese patent application
`
`publication (Ex. 1003), for which Petitioner provided a certified English
`translation (Ex. 1004). Shimurarelates to a personal computerthat “can
`
`adopt a modesuitable for a user environment centered on a pen input
`operation and a mouseinput operation while retaining a mode which can use
`a keyboard.” Ex. 1004, code (57). Figure 1 of Shimura, reproduced below,
`
`illustrates an example of the personal computer. Jd.
`
`(Figuee A }
`
`105 display means
`102 cover part
`105: RoTKFHh
`2:8.
`
`107: SRA 107 display
`.
`control circuit
`106:RiidRAd>F|106 display
`everse
`switch
`
`121: Beparl
` 104: 4-#-F
`
`104 keyboard
`
`10
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 12
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 12
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`As shownin Figure 1, the personal computer includes main part 101
`
`provided with keyboard 104 on the front; cover part 102 provided with
`display 105 on the front; and coupling mechanism 103, which enables the
`opening and closing of computer parts 101 and 102 andis used to couple
`one end of main part 101 and one end of cover part 102 with display 105
`
`such that cover part 102 faces main part 101. /d. Coupling mechanism 103is
`
`structured so that it can also open cover part 102 so that the orientation of
`
`cover part 102 exceeds 180° relative to main part 101. Jd. Figure 4 of
`
`Shimura, reproduced below, showsan inclined view ofthe personal
`
`computer, with main part 101 rotated nearly 360° with respect to cover part
`
`102. Id. J 16-17, Fig.4.
`
`[Figure 4]
`
`G4
`
`105 display means
`
`103 coupling part!
`
`As shownin Figure 4, coupling mechanism 103 enables the rotation of cover
`
`part 102 with respect to main part 101. Jd. J 12-13. Coupling mechanism
`103 is fastened by hinges to main part 101 and cover part 102. Id. J 12.
`
`11
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 13
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 13
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`Obviousness Analysis
`2.
`Basedonthe present record, Petitioner does not demonstrate a
`
`reasonable likelihood of showing the asserted prior art would have rendered
`
`obvious the subject matter of challenged claims 1-16 and 18-22.
`
`Independentclaims 1, 10, and 18 require a “frame mode in which the main
`
`display componentis oriented towards the operator, the base contacts a
`
`substantially horizontal surface, and the keyboard faces the substantially
`
`horizontal surface.” Ex. 1001, 17:47—51, 18:66—19:2, 20:27—30, Certificate
`
`of Correction. Forall of its asserted grounds, Petitioner relies on Shimura’s
`
`Figure 4 for teaching the claimed “frame mode.” Pet. 57, 87, 102. We agree
`
`with Patent Ownerthat Shimura’s Figure 4 does not disclose or suggest a
`
`frame mode. See Prelim. Resp. 27-32.
`
`Shimura’s Figure 4 (reproduced below,left) depicts the device’s
`
`display folded against the base—i.e., tablet mode—trather than in a frame
`
`mode wherethe base and display components form a non-zero angle similar
`
`to easel mode’s inverted “V,” as depicted in the ’844 patent’s Figure 26
`
`(reproduced below,right).
`[Figure 4}
`@a
`
`103: O6
`
`
`
`
`Keyboard facing down
`into surface
`
`Although, as Petitioner notes, Shimura teachesthat its computer can be
`
`configured to any angle between 0° to 360°, see Pet. 22 n.1 (citing Ex. 1004
`
`FIG. 26
`
`12
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 14
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 14
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`{7 8, 10, 17), that too does not disclose frame mode. This is so because, as
`
`Patent Owner explains, beyond the required opening angle, frame mode
`
`additionally requires a hinge that “must support the display to preventit
`
`from collapsing into tablet mode.” Prelim. Resp. 31. Petitioner pointsto
`
`nothing in Shimura that would indicate its hinge could support the display in
`
`frame mode. See Pet. 22, 41-42, 46-47, 53, 57, 59, 70. Thus, on the current
`
`record, Petitioner has not made a sufficient showing that the asserted
`
`combinations of Shimura and other references teach or suggest the claimed |
`plurality of modes including a “frame mode”as requiredin all the
`
`challenged claims.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`For the reasons above, we determine that Petitioner has not
`
`established a reasonable likelihood that it would prevail in showing that at
`least one of the challenged claims is unpatentable.
`
`V. ORDER
`
`In consideration of the foregoing,it is hereby:
`
`ORDEREDthatthe Petition is denied, and we do notinstitute an inter
`
`partes review of any claim of the ’844 patent based on a groundasserted in
`
`the Petition.
`
`13
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 15
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 15
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00822
`Patent 8,624,844 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Martin Bader
`Nam Kim
`Mike Kim
`Michael Hopkins
`SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
`mbader@sheppardmullin.com
`nkim@sheppardmullin.com
`mskim@sheppardmullin.com
`mhopkins@sheppardmullin.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Gerald Hrycyszyn
`Richard Giunta
`Curtis Powell
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`ghrycyszyn-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`rgiunta-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`cpowell-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`14
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 16
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 16
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFIGE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box
`450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`FILING OR 371(C) DATE
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`FIRST NAMED APPLICANT
`
`ATTY. DOCKET NO./TITLE
`
`12/170,951
`
`07/10/2008
`
`Yves Behar
`
`12039-70011]
`CONFIRMATION NO. 2004
`
`23628
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`600 ATLANTIC AVENUE
`BOSTON, MA 02210-2206
`
`POA ACCEPTANCE LETTER
`
`INOUEAA
`OOOODO0E TEL
`112
`Date Mailed: 03/31/2016
`
`NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF POWER OF ATTORNEY
`
`This is in response to the Power of Attorneyfiled 03/18/2016.
`
`The Power of Attorney in this application is accepted. Correspondencein this application will be mailed to the
`above address as provided by 37 CFR 1.33.
`
`Questions about the contents of this notice and the
`requirements it sets forth should be directed to the Office
`of Data Management, Application Assistance Unit,at
`(571) 272-4000 or (571) 272-4200 or 1-888-786-0101.
`
`/ylueng/
`
`
`page 1 of 1
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 17
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 17
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFIGE
`
`UNITTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`Q. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`FILING OR 371(C) DATE
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`FIRST NAMED APPLICANT
`
`ATTY. DOCKET NO./TITLE
`
`12/170,951
`
`07/10/2008
`
`Yves Behar
`
`12039-70011]
`CONFIRMATION NO. 2004
`
`23628
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`600 ATLANTIC AVENUE
`BOSTON, MA 02210-2206
`
`POWER OF ATTORNEYNOTICE
`
`OCMC
`OOO00006 182508/
`Date Mailed: 03/31/2016
`
`NOTICE REGARDING CHANGE OF POWER OF ATTORNEY
`
`This is in response to the Power of Attorneyfiled 03/18/2016.
`
`* The Power of Attorney to you in this application has been revoked by the assignee who hasintervened as
`provided by 37 CFR 3.71. Future correspondencewill be mailed to the new address of record(37 CFR 1.33).
`
`Questions about the contents of this notice and the
`requirements it sets forth should be directed to the Office
`of Data Management, Application Assistance Unit,at
`(571) 272-4000 or (571) 272-4200 or 1-888-786-0101.
`
`/ylueng/
`
`
`page 1 of 1
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 18
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 18
`
`

`

`
`
`NSSSARANRSSSRSSSSRRARARRRRRRSRRSSESS
`
` =
`
`~
`SEENSESSENNSSASSSSNASSANUSSESSASUSANSNSSSENNNSSNSSRNINNANANAATATENESATAAANARANSUNES
`
`PTO/S8/89 (411-08)
`Approved for use through 1 1/S6/2671. OMB 0651-0035
`LS. Patent and Trademark Offica: US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`MELEE 888, fe Seigatis aepeguaatlis waaiond 18 walecionof infomationunless ld disutays & valet OMEN container
`Under theBisnisHer
`
`
`
`
`
`POWER OF ATTORNEY TO PROSECUTE APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE USPTO
`
`i hereby revoke ait previgus powers of altomey given in the application identified inthe attached statement under|
`
`
` Aan
`| BICER ATS).
`ASASHSANSNENNN
`
`
`
`
`i hereby appoint
`
`
`
`
` ’Riagistration
`
`x } Practitioners associated with the Customer Number:
`“OR
`
`2a628
`
`_..Alenber
`
`Name
`
`Number
`
` en
`
`OOAOEetdn
`
`
`
`pepeeTITEOEPTRONerpvas
`
`
`
`
`Lannrrennnee.
`
`
`
`the undersigned before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (ISPTO) in connection with
`ey
`te
`any and all patent apniications assigned only to the undersigned according to the USPTO assignment racards or agsignmernt documents
`attached to this form in accordance with 7 CFR $.73(8).
`
`
`Please change the correspondence address for the application identified in the attached statement under 87 CFR 3.73(b} to:
`[xThe addrese associated with Customer Number:
`:
`23628
`
`ALLLAAALALATAAALEIAPAILPPLALPOOPOLLLLLa
`Boston, MA G27476
`
`
`
` Firm or
`
`Individual Name
`
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LITL EL:
`
`501 Boyiston Street
`
`
`
` fied in sach application in which this form is used, The statement under 37 CFR 3.7b) may be completed by one of
`the practitioners appointed in this form Hf the appolnted practitioner is authorized to act on behalf of the aasignee,
`
`- and must identify the application in which thie Power of Attorney Is to be Hed.
`
`
`SIGNATURE of Assignes of Record
` half of the assiznes
`se signature and title is supplied belowis authorized to act on be
`oo
`
`
` Signature Me,
`
`EErrrCéCidsésM
`3ek
`
`' KristinCarrol
`817-535-8000 _
`SSAAASSRAS
`
`Sreeet)
`
`General Counsel
`
`48584923.4
`
`::
`
`Ths
`
`s=
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 19 .
`eoHTtteeateeeeeSeSeNeeeheeeeeeNAARaa
`agaAAACRacitedtaheaCARAACQATATRRLALRAARAALRAAAALAAnegtbe
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 19
`
`

`

`Title of Invention:
`
`PORTABLE COMPUTER WITH MULTIPLE DISPLAY CONFIGURATIONS
`
`Electronic AcknowledgementReceipt
`
`Application Number:
`
`12170951
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Confirmation Number:
`
`2004
`
`
`
`eC
`
`Paymentinformation:
`
`File Listing:
`
`Information:
`
`Pages
`Multi
`File Size(Bytes)/
`DocumentDescription
`Document
`
`
`
`Number Message Digest|Part/.zip|P (if appl.)
`
`Assignee showing of ownership per 37
`CFR 3.73
`
`L203970001US02-373-EJR.pdf
`
`e4343e74dfa90e0d024a7e2ac809bacSa45
`42bfd
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 20
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 20
`
`

`

`Powerof Attorney
`
`L203990000US00-prePOA-EJR.
`pdf
`
`11ff6f04a1 80721786985cacl b8da2341fcSal
`
`326446
`
`the application.
`
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`If a new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 1810), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and of the International Filing Date (Form PCT/RO/105)will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shownon this AcknowledgementReceiptwill establish the international filing date of
`
`Information:
`
`This AcknowledgementReceipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO ofthe indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable.It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`If a new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary componentsfora filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)-(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shownonthis
`AcknowledgementReceiptwill establish the filing date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`If a timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/EO/903indicating acceptanceof the application as a
`national stage submission under35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 21
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 21
`
`

`

`PTO/SB/96 (07-09)
`Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651-0031
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unlessit displays a valid OMB control number.
`STATEMENT UNDER 37 CFR 3.73(b)
`
`Applicant/Patent Owner:
`
`LiTL LLC
`
`Filed/Issue Date:
`8,624,844
`Application No./Patent No.:
`Titled:
`PORTABLE COMPUTER WITH MULTIPLE DISPLAY CONFIGURATIONS
`
`January 7, 2014
`
`
`LiTL LLC
`,a
`Corporation
`(Type of Assignee, e.g., corporation, partnership, university, government agency,etc.)
`(Name of Assignee)
`states thatit is:
`
`1.
`the assignee of the entire right, title, and interestin;
`2. [| an assignee of less than the entire right, title, and interest in
`(The extent (by percentage) of its ownership interestis
`%); OF
`3. [| an assignee of an undividedinterestin the entirety of (a complete assignment from oneofthe joint inventors was made)
`the patent application/patent identified above byvirtue of either:
`A. [| An assignmentfrom the inventor(s) of the patent application/patentidentified above. The assignment was
`recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at Reel
`:
`Frame
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`OR
`
`A chain oftitle from the inventor(s), of the patent application/patent identified above, to the current assignee asfollows:
`B.
`
`1. From:|Yves Behar To: AQUENT LLC
`
`The document wasrecordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`system in accordance with 37 CFR § 1.6(a)(4). Dated: March 18, 2016
`
`Reel
`
`021810
`
`, Frame
`
`0331
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`AQUENT LLC
`To:
`Joshua Morenstein
`2. From:
`The document was recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`021810
`
`, Frame
`
`0331
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`AQUENT LLC
`To:
`_Christopher Hibmacronan
`3. From:
`The documentwas recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`021810
`
`, Frame
`
`0331
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`Additional documentsin the chain oftitle are listed on a supplemental sheet(s).
`
`As required by 37 CFR 3.73(b){1)(i), the documentary evidence of the chain oftitle from the original owner to the
`assignee was, or concurrently is being, submitted for recordation pursuant to 37 CFR 3.11.
`
`[NOTE: A separate copy(i.e., a true copy of the original assignment document(s)) must be submitted to Assignment
`Division in accordance with 37 CFR Part 3, to record the assignment in the records of the USPTO. See MPEP 302.08]
`
`The undersigned (whosetitle is supplied below) is authorized to act on behalf of the assignee.
`
`3/17/2016
`/Edward J. Russavage/
`Date
`Signature
`
`Edward J. Russavage
`Attorney for Assignee
`Printed or Typed Name
`Title
`
`Certificate of Electronic Filing Under 37 CFR 1.8
`| hereby certify that this paper (along with any paper referred to as being attached or enclosed) is being transmitted via the Office electronic filing
`
`Electronic Signature for Sara A. Sikorski:
`
`/Sara A. Sikorski/
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET No. L2039.70001US02
`
`PAGE 1 0F2
`
`4610349.1
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 22
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 22
`
`

`

`PTO/SB/96 (07-09)
`Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651-0031
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office;US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unlessit displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`STATEMENT UNDER 37 CEFR 3.73(b) - Supplemental Sheet
`
`Continuation of chain oftitle from the inventor(s) to the current assignee.
`
`_AQUENT LLC
`To:
`Naoya Edahiro
`4. From:
`The document wasrecordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`021810
`
`, Frame
`
`0331
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`AQUENT LLC
`To:
`Matthew David Day
`. From:
`The document wasrecordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`021810
`
`, Frame
`
`0331
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`_LiTLLLC
`To:
`AQUENT LLC
`. From:
`The documentwas recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`023871
`
`, Frame
`
`0867
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`To:
`. From:
`The document wasrecordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`To:
`. From:
`The documentwas recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`, Frame
`
`To:
`. From:
`The documentwas recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`To:
`. From:
`The documentwas recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`To:
`. From:
`The document wasrecordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`To:
`. From:
`The document wasrecordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`To:
`. From:
`The document was recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`To:
`. From:
`The document was recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`, or for which a copy thereof is attached.
`
`To:
`. From:
`The document was recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`ATTORNEY DOcKET No. L2039.70001US02
`
`PAGE 20F 2
`
`4610349.1
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 23
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 23
`
`

`

`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFIGE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`12/170,951
`
`8624844
`
`2627
`
`9200
`
`AV.
`
`Correspondence Address/Fee Address Change
`
`The following fields have been set to Customer Number 23628 on 02/05/2016
`« Correspondence Address
`« Maintenance Fee Address
`
`The address of record for Customer Number 23628is:
`
`23628
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 ATLANTIC AVENUE
`BOSTON, MA 02210-2206
`
`PART 1
`
`- ATTORNEY/APPLICANT COPY
`page 1 of 1
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 24
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 24
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARKOFFICE
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`PATENT NO.
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`: 8,624,844 B2
`: 12/170951
`
`DATED
`INVENTOR(S)
`
`: January 7, 2014
`: Yves Behar et al.
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby corrected as shownbelow:
`
`In the Claims:
`
`Column 17, Claim 1, Line 47, insert -- mode -- after the word “‘frame”’.
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`First Day of April, 2014
`
`Wivebstlhe Fo Lea
`
`Michelle K. Lee
`
`Deputy Director ofthe United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 25
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1003 - Page 25
`
`

`

`| herebycertify