throbber
Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 7
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Civil Action No. 6:22-cv-00648-ADA
`
`LEXOS MEDIA IP, LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`EBAY, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`Pursuant to the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 33) and the Court’s Text Order entered on October
`
`12, 2023, Plaintiff Lexos Media, IP LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Lexos Media”) and Defendant eBay, Inc.
`
`(“Defendant” or “eBay”) (collectively the “Parties”) hereby submit their Joint Claim Construction
`
`Statement.
`
`The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 5,995,102 (the “’102 Patent”), 6,118,449 (the
`
`“’449 Patent”), and 7,975,241 (the “’241 Patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Patents”). Plaintiff
`
`has asserted that Defendant has infringed Claim 72 of the ’102 Patent, Claims 1, 38, and 53 of the
`
`’449 Patent, and Claim 35 of the ’241 Patent.
`
`Section I below identifies the terms, phrases, or clauses within the asserted claim elements
`
`of the Asserted Patents for which the Parties have agreed as to the proper construction. Section II
`
`below and Exhibits 1-3 set forth the Parties’ proposed constructions for the disputed terms,
`
`phrases, or clauses within the claim elements of the Asserted Patents, along with the identification
`
`of supporting intrinsic evidence. Section III below states the Parties’ positions regarding the length
`
`of the claim construction hearing. Section IV below addresses the expert testimony that the Parties
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Page 1
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 1 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76 Filed 10/17/23 Page 2 of 7
`
`may rely on in support of their proposed claim constructions. Section V below addresses the
`
`Parties’ current position on the need for a prehearing conference.
`
`I. Agreed Claim Construction
`
`The Parties have agreed to the construction of the claim terms, phrases, or clauses set forth
`
`hereto:1
`
`PROPOSED CLAIM TERM
`
`PARTIES’ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
`
`
`“said specific image
`includes/including content
`corresponding to at least a portion of
`said information that is to be
`displayed on said display of said
`user’s terminal”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, 53.
`
`
`
`“specified content information”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38 and 53.
`
`“content information”
`
`’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`“cursor image data”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38 and 53.
`
`
`
`
`“an image representative of at least a portion of the
`subject or topic being displayed on the screen”
`
`
`
`
`
`The term “specified content information” / “content
`information” means “information provided to a
`user’s terminal for use in the display, such as a web
`page.”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No construction
`required.
`
`
`1 If the Parties reach an agreement at a later date regarding any additional claim terms, the Parties
`plan to supplement this Joint Claim Construction Statement to reflect this agreement.
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Page 2
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 2 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76 Filed 10/17/23 Page 3 of 7
`
`PROPOSED CLAIM TERM
`
`PARTIES’ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
`
`
`“an instruction operable to modify the display of a
`cursor image”
`
`
`
`
`“computer code for modifying the display of the
`cursor image”
`
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No construction
`required.
`
`eBay agrees that “modifying” and “transforming”
`are each broad enough to include the concept of
`“replacing” the cursor image.
`
`
`
`“cursor display instruction”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38 and 53; ’241 Patent,
`Claim 35.
`
`
`“cursor display code”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38 and 53.
`
`
`“modifying [an initial cursor
`image]”
`
`“modify [said cursor image]”
`
`“modifying [a cursor image]”
`
`“modified” [cursor image]
`
`“transforming [said initial cursor
`image]”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38 and 53; ’241 Patent,
`Claim 35.
`
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Page 3
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 3 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76 Filed 10/17/23 Page 4 of 7
`
`PROPOSED CLAIM TERM
`
`PARTIES’ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
`
`
`“corresponding to” as used in the
`phrases:
`
`
`“cursor image data corresponding to a
`specific image”
`
`“said specific image includes/including
`content corresponding to at least a
`portion of said information that is to be
`displayed on said display of said user’s
`terminal”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38 and 53
`
`
`“promotional material”
`
`’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No construction
`required.
`
`
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`This term is subject to the printed matter doctrine and
`is not entitled to patentable weight.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`II. Disputed Claim Constructions
`
`The charts identifying each party’s proposed construction of each disputed claim term,
`
`phrase, or clause, together with an identification of all intrinsic evidence are set forth in the exhibits
`
`attached hereto:
`
`CHART
`
`Parties’ Joint Claim Construction Chart
`
`Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Chart Identifying Supporting Evidence
`
`Defendant’s Claim Construction Chart Identifying Supporting Evidence
`
`EXHIBIT(S)
`
`Exhibit 1
`
`Exhibit 2
`
`Exhibit 3
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Page 4
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 4 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76 Filed 10/17/23 Page 5 of 7
`
`III. Length of Claim Construction Hearing
`
`According to the Court’s Order Setting Markman Hearing Held in Person (Dkt. 71), the
`
`Claim Construction Hearing is scheduled to be held on November 9, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. in Waco,
`
`Texas before Judge Derek T. Gilliland.
`
`The Claim Construction Hearing is currently scheduled for a two hour block. The Parties
`
`believe this will be sufficient to cover all disputed terms.
`
`IV. Witness Testimony at Claim Construction Hearing
`
`The Parties do not propose to call any witnesses, including experts, to provide live
`
`testimony at the Claim Construction hearing. Defendant intends to rely on the declaration
`
`submitted by Dr. Kevin Almeroth in support of its Opening Claim Construction Brief. See Dkt.
`
`54-1.
`
`V. Other Issues
`
`Plaintiff does not believe that there are any other issues which might appropriately be taken
`
`up at a prehearing conference prior to the Claim Construction Hearing. Defendant notes for the
`
`Court that, as of the date of this filing, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 34) and Motion to
`
`Transfer (Dkt. 38, 43) remain pending.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Page 5
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 5 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76 Filed 10/17/23 Page 6 of 7
`
`Dated: October 17, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`BUETHER JOE & COUNSELORS, LLC
`
`By: /s/ Eric W. Buether
`Eric W. Buether
`Texas State Bar No. 03316880
`Eric.Buether@BJCIPLaw.com
`Christopher M. Joe
`Texas State Bar No. 00787770
`Chris.Joe@BJCIPLaw.com
`Kenneth P. Kula
`Texas State Bar No. 24004749
`Ken.Kula@BJCIPLaw.com
`Michael W. Doell
`Texas State Bar No. 24127525
`Mike.Doell@BJCIPLaw.com
`1700 Pacific Avenue
`Suite 4750
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone:
`(214) 466-1271
`Facsimile:
`(214) 635-1827
`
`
`SETHLAW PLLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Sandeep Seth
`Sandeep Seth
`Texas State Bar No. 18043000
`ss@sethlaw.com
`700 Milam Street, Suite 1300
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Telephone:
`(713) 244-5017
`Facsimile:
`(713) 244-5017
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`LEXOS MEDIA IP, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`
`By: /s/ Joshua L. Raskin
` Joshua L. Raskin
` Joshua.raskin@gtlaw.com
` Brian Prew
` Prewb@gtlaw.com
` Vimal M. Kapadia
` Vimal.kapadia@gtlaw.com
` Kathryn E. Albanese
` Katie.albanese@gtlaw.com
` One Vanderbilt Avenue
` New York, NY 10017
` Telephone: 212.801.9200
` Facsimile: 212.801.6400
`
` Janis E. Clements
` Texas Bar No. 04365500
` clementsj@gtlaw.com
` 300 West 6th Street, Suite 2050
` Austin, TX 78701
` Telephone: (512) 320-7232
` Facsimile: (512) 320-7210
`
`Attorneys for Defendant eBay Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Page 6
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 6 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76 Filed 10/17/23 Page 7 of 7
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system per Local Rule on this 17th day of October 2023. Any other counsel of record
`
`will be served by facsimile transmission and first class mail.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Eric W. Buether
`Eric W. Buether
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that that counsel for the Parties have met and conferred
`
`on the 17th day of October 2023 regarding the content herein, and the Parties are in agreement with
`
`this Joint Submission.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Eric W. Buether
`Eric W. Buether
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Page 7
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 7 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-1 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 4
`
`(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:20)
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 8 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-1 Filed 10/17/23 Page 2 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendant’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`
`“cursor”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, 53; ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`
`No construction is proper or required
`because the term “cursor,” standing
`alone, is not a claim term.
`
`
`
`
`“a movable marker that indicates the location
`that will be affected by an input device”
`
`[Proposed by Defendant]
`
`
`“cursor image” and “initial cursor
`image”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, 53; ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`[Proposed by Both Parties]
`
`
`
`“a movable image on a display screen
`whose position can be controlled
`through a user interface”
`
`Amazon Case Claim Construction Order
`at 14
`
`
`
`“an image of the movable marker that
`indicates the location that will be affected by
`an input device”
`
`Defendant proposes that the construction of
`“cursor image” should be applied
`consistently throughout the Asserted Patents,
`including as used in the phrase “modified
`cursor image,” which was a term proposed
`by Plaintiff.
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 9 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-1 Filed 10/17/23 Page 3 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendant’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`
`“server” (computer or system)
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, 53.
`
`[Proposed by Plaintiff]
`
`
`“specific image”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`[Proposed by Both Parties]
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No construction
`required.
`
`Plaintiff contends that the plain and
`ordinary meaning of the term is not “a
`single computer” in “a network shared
`by multiple users.”
`
`eBay contends that the plain and ordinary
`meaning of the term requires “a [single]
`computer in a network shared by multiple
`users.” (Dkt. 54 at 16–18).
`
`
`“pre-generated shape and appearance of a
`cursor image”
`
`
`The term “specific image” has its plain
`and ordinary meaning. No construction
`is required.
`
`Amazon Case Claim Construction Order
`at 21
`
`The phrase “said specific image
`includes/including content
`corresponding to at least a portion of
`said information that is to be displayed
`on said display of said user's terminal”
`means “an image representative of at
`least a portion of the subject or topic
`being displayed on the screen.”
`
`Agreed claim construction, supra
`
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 10 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-1 Filed 10/17/23 Page 4 of 4
`
`Defendant’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`
`Indefinite.
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning, but not
`requiring tracking with a “one-for-one
`linear relationship between the
`movement of the modified cursor
`image and the visual image”
`
`Amazon Case Claim Construction Order
`at 19
`
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/Clause
`for Claim Construction
`“modifying the cursor image to include
`the visual image and displaying the
`modified cursor image, wherein the
`visual image includes promotional
`material, and the visual image tracks a
`movement of the modified cursor
`image”
`
`[Proposed by Defendant]
`
`“the visual image tracks a movement of
`the modified cursor image”
`
`See ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`[Proposed by Both Parties]
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 11 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-2 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 4
`
`(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:3)2
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 12 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-2 Filed 10/17/23 Page 2 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic Evidence1
`
`
`“cursor”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, 53; ‘241 Patent Claim 35.
`
`[Proposed by eBay]
`
`
`“cursor image” and “initial cursor
`image”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 27, 53; ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`[Proposed by Both Parties]
`
`
`
`No construction is proper or required
`because the term “cursor,” standing
`alone, is not a claim term.
`
`
`
`
`Amazon Claim Construction Order at 10-11,
`22.
`
`102 Patent, at 14:28-46
`
`
`Amazon Case Claim Construction Order at
`14, 21.
`
`
`“a movable image on a display screen
`whose position can be controlled
`through a user interface”
`
`Amazon Case Claim Construction Order
`at 21
`
`
`
`1 All references to the Asserted Patents are related to the ‘102 Patent unless otherwise noted.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 13 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-2 Filed 10/17/23 Page 3 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`
`“server” (computer or system)
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 27, 53;
`
`[Proposed by Lexos]
`
`
`“specific image”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`[Proposed by Both Parties]
`
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`Plaintiff contends that the plain and
`ordinary meaning of the term is not “a
`single computer” in “a network shared
`by multiple users.”
`
`
`The term “specific image” has its plain
`and ordinary meaning. No construction
`is required.
`
`Amazon Case Claim Construction Order
`at 17
`
`The phrase “said specific image
`includes/including content
`corresponding to at least a portion of
`said information that is to be displayed
`on said display of said user's terminal”
`means “an image representative of at
`least a portion of the subject or topic
`being displayed on the screen.”
`
`Agreed claim construction, supra
`
`
`Supporting Intrinsic Evidence1
`
`
`SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 2:13-
`CV-0937-JRG, 2015 WL 1906016, at *13
`(E.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2015).
``102 Patent, Figure 2.
`
`
`
`
`Lexos Media IP, LLC v. APMEX, Inc., No.
`216CV00747JRGRSP, 2017 WL 1021366,
`at *2 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2017).
`
`Amazon Case Claim Construction Order at
`17
`
``102 Patent, Abstract.
``102 Patent, 2:58-62;
``102 Patent, 3:4-10;
``102 Patent, 3:48-50;
``102 Patent, 3:62 to 4:3;
``102 Patent, 7:7-9.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 14 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-2 Filed 10/17/23 Page 4 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`
`“tracks a movement”
`
`See `241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`[Proposed by Both Parties]
`
`
`
`
`
`“Plain and ordinary meaning, but not
`requiring tracking with a “one-for-one
`linear relationship between the
`movement of the modified cursor
`image and the visual image”
`
`Amazon Case Claim Construction Order
`at 19
`
`
`Supporting Intrinsic Evidence1
`
`
`Amazon Case Claim Construction Order at
`19
`
``102 Patent, 9:39-65
``102 Patent, 16:14-20.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 15 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-3 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 9
`
`(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:3)3
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 16 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-3 Filed 10/17/23 Page 2 of 9
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`DEFENDANT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING INTRINSIC EVIDENCE
`
`Defendant’s Proposed Claim Construction
`“a movable marker that indicates the location
`that will be affected by an input device”
`
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause for
`Claim Construction
`
`“cursor”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent, Claims 1, 38,
`53; ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`[Proposed by Defendant]
`
`
`Supporting Intrinsic
`Evidence
`• ’102 patent at Abstract.
`• ’102 patent at 3:25–3:35.
`• ’102 patent at 3:35–50.
`• ’102 patent at 3:51–4:3.
`• ’102 patent at 4:32–49.
`• ’102 patent at 7:1–15.
`• ’102 patent at 7:49–55.
`• ’102 patent at 8:28–37.
`• ’102 patent at 8:57–59.
`• ’102 patent at 9:39–45.
`• ’102 patent at 11:17–22.
`• ’102 patent at 11:47–58.
`• ’102 patent at 12:60–62.
`• ’102 patent at 13:13–16.
`• ’102 patent at 13:38–41.
`• ’102 patent at 14:28–31.
`• ’102 patent at 14:54–59.
`• ’102 patent at 16:15–20.
`• ’102 patent at 17:15–24.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 2.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 3.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 4.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 5.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 6.
`
`DEFENDANT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 17 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-3 Filed 10/17/23 Page 3 of 9
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause for
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendant’s Proposed Claim Construction
`
`“cursor image” and “initial cursor image”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent, Claims 1, 38,
`53; ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`“an image of the movable marker that indicates
`the location that will be affected by an input
`device”
`
`Defendant proposes that the construction of
`“cursor image” should be applied consistently
`
`
`1 The Related Patents include U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,065,057 and 7,111,254.
`
`Supporting Intrinsic
`Evidence
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 7.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 8.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 9.
`• Corresponding citations
`from other Asserted
`Patents.
`• Claim language from the
`Asserted Patents and
`Related Patents.1
`• Statements made in the
`file histories of the
`Asserted Patents and
`Related Patents.
`• Intrinsic evidence
`identified in eBay’s claim
`construction briefing.
`• Intrinsic evidence
`identified in the
`Declaration of Kevin C.
`Almeroth, Ph.D.
`• ’102 patent at Abstract.
`• ’102 patent at 3:26–3:34.
`• ’102 patent at 3:35–50.
`• ’102 patent at 3:51–4:3.
`• ’102 patent at 7:1–15.
`
`DEFENDANT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 18 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-3 Filed 10/17/23 Page 4 of 9
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause for
`Claim Construction
`[Proposed by Both Parties]
`
`
`Defendant’s Proposed Claim Construction
`throughout the Asserted Patents, including as
`used in the phrase “modified cursor image,”
`which was a term proposed by Plaintiff.
`
`Supporting Intrinsic
`Evidence
`• ’102 patent at 7:49–55.
`• ’102 patent at 8:28–37.
`• ’102 patent at 8:57–59.
`• ’102 patent at 9:39–45.
`• ’102 patent at 11:17–22.
`• ’102 patent at 11:47–58.
`• ’102 patent at 12:60–62.
`• ’102 patent at 13:13–16.
`• ’102 patent at 13:38–41.
`• ’102 patent at 14:54–59.
`• ’102 patent at 16:15–20.
`• ’102 patent at 17:15–24.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 2.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 3.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 4.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 5.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 6.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 7.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 8.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 9.
`• Corresponding citations
`from other Asserted
`Patents.
`• Claim language from the
`Asserted Patents and
`Related Patents.
`
`DEFENDANT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 19 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-3 Filed 10/17/23 Page 5 of 9
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause for
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendant’s Proposed Claim Construction
`
`“pre-generated shape and appearance of a cursor
`image”
`
`“specific image”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent, Claims 1, 38,
`and 53.
`
`[Proposed by Both Parties]
`
`
`
`Supporting Intrinsic
`Evidence
`• Statements made in the
`file histories of the
`Asserted Patents and
`Related Patents.
`• Intrinsic evidence
`identified in eBay’s claim
`construction briefing.
`• Intrinsic evidence
`identified in the
`Declaration of Kevin C.
`Almeroth, Ph.D.
`• ’102 patent at Abstract.
`• ’102 patent at 2:40–43.
`• ’102 patent at 2:58–62.
`• ’102 patent at 6:35–46.
`• ’102 patent at 8:52–61.
`• ’102 patent at 15:44–49.
`• ’102 patent at 11:53–55.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 2.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 3.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 4.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 5.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 6.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 7.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 8.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 9.
`• Corresponding citations
`from other Asserted
`Patents.
`
`DEFENDANT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 20 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-3 Filed 10/17/23 Page 6 of 9
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause for
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendant’s Proposed Claim Construction
`
`“server” (computer or system)
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent, Claims 1, 38,
`53.
`
`[Proposed by Plaintiff]
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No construction
`required.
`Defendant contends that the plain and ordinary
`meaning of the term requires “a [single]
`computer in a network shared by multiple users.”
`
`
`Supporting Intrinsic
`Evidence
`• Claim language from the
`Asserted Patents and
`Related Patents.
`• Statements made in the
`file histories of the
`Asserted Patents and
`Related Patents.
`• ’102 patent File History,
`Dec. 14, 1998, Response
`to Office Action at 35–37.
`• Intrinsic evidence
`identified in eBay’s claim
`construction briefing.
`• Intrinsic evidence
`identified in the
`Declaration of Kevin C.
`Almeroth, Ph.D.
`• ’102 patent at Abstract.
`• ’102 patent at 4:4–12.
`• ’102 patent at 5:13–14.
`• ’102 patent at 5:37–38.
`• ’102 patent at 5:38–41.
`• ’102 patent at 5:63–6:6.
`• ’102 patent at 6:53–61.
`• ’102 patent at 7:1–7.
`• ’102 patent at 7:14–28.
`• ’102 patent at 8:1–8.
`• ’102 patent at 8:18–23.
`
`DEFENDANT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 21 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-3 Filed 10/17/23 Page 7 of 9
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause for
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendant’s Proposed Claim Construction
`
`“modifying the cursor image to include the visual
`image and displaying the modified cursor image,
`wherein the visual image includes promotional
`material, and the visual image tracks a movement
`of the modified cursor image”
`
`
`Indefinite.
`
`Supporting Intrinsic
`Evidence
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 1.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 2.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 3.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 6.
`• Corresponding citations
`from other Asserted
`Patents.
`• Claim language from the
`Asserted Patents and
`Related Patents.
`• Statements made in the
`file histories of the
`Asserted Patents and
`Related Patents.
`• Intrinsic evidence
`identified in eBay’s claim
`construction briefing.
`• Intrinsic evidence
`identified in the
`Declaration of Kevin C.
`Almeroth, Ph.D.
`• ’102 patent at Abstract.
`• ’102 patent at 9:60–62.
`• ’102 patent at 10:39–65.
`• ’102 patent at 14:34–39.
`• ’102 patent at 16:14–20.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 2.
`
`DEFENDANT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 22 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-3 Filed 10/17/23 Page 8 of 9
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Defendant’s Proposed Claim Construction
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause for
`Claim Construction
`[Proposed by Defendant]
`
`“the visual image tracks a movement of the
`modified cursor image”
`
`[Proposed by Both Parties]
`
`’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`
`Supporting Intrinsic
`Evidence
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 3.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 4.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 6.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 7.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 8.
`• ’102 patent at FIG. 9.
`• Corresponding citations
`from other Asserted
`Patents.
`• Claim language from the
`Asserted Patents and
`Related Patents.
`• Statements made in the
`file histories of the
`Asserted Patents and
`Related Patents.
`• ’241 patent File History,
`Feb. 18, 2011, Examiner’s
`Amendment at 2–5.
`• ’241 Patent Notice of
`Allowance, Reasons for
`Allowance at 5–6.
`• Intrinsic evidence
`identified in eBay’s claim
`construction briefing.
`• Intrinsic evidence
`identified in the
`
`DEFENDANT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 23 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00648-ADA Document 76-3 Filed 10/17/23 Page 9 of 9
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause for
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendant’s Proposed Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic
`Evidence
`Declaration of Kevin C.
`Almeroth, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1017, Page 24 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket