throbber
Trials
`Frederic Meeker; Trials
`Paul T. Qualey; John Fleming; John R. Hutchins; Joshua Davenport; KFRIESEN@SHB.COM; JMUDD@SHB.COM;
`RDYKAL@SHB.COM; RRECKERS@SHB.COM; SHBTSCOMCASTIPR@SHB.COM
`RE: IPR2024-00321, IPR2024-00322, IPR2024-00323, IPR2024-00324, IPR2024-00325, IPR2024-00326 –
`Request for Authorization for Reply
`Friday, May 17, 2024 2:17:16 PM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Date:
`
`Counsel,
`
`From the Board –
`
`Petitioner is authorized to file a five page reply on the issues identified in the email below. The reply
`is due five business days from the date of this email. Patent Owner may respond with a five page
`sur-reply due five business days from the filing of Petitioner’s reply.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Frederic Meeker <fmeeker@bannerwitcoff.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 9:44 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Paul T. Qualey <PQualey@bannerwitcoff.com>; John Fleming <JFleming@bannerwitcoff.com>;
`John R. Hutchins <JHutchins@bannerwitcoff.com>; Joshua Davenport
`<JDavenport@bannerwitcoff.com>; KFRIESEN@SHB.COM; JMUDD@SHB.COM; RDYKAL@SHB.COM;
`RRECKERS@SHB.COM; SHBTSCOMCASTIPR@SHB.COM
`Subject: IPR2024-00321, IPR2024-00322, IPR2024-00323, IPR2024-00324, IPR2024-00325, IPR2024-
`00326 – Request for Authorization for Reply
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`To the Board,
`
`Petitioner in the above-identified IPRs, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC,
`seeks authorization to file a short, 5-page reply under 37 C.F.R. § 42.108(c) to
`each of the Patent Owner’s Preliminary Responses in IPR2024-00321,
`IPR2024-00322, IPR2024-00323, IPR2024-00324, IPR2024-00325, and
`IPR2024-00326.
`
`Specifically, Petitioner seeks to address Patent Owner’s arguments in all six
`
`Exhibit 3001
`
`

`

`proceedings concerning the Fintiv factors. Further, Petitioner seeks to address
`Patent Owner’s arguments in IPR2024-00322, IPR-00324, and IPR2024-00326,
`concerning the Becton, Dickinson factors.
`
`Petitioner believes good cause exists for the request, consistent with 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.108(c). Examples of this good cause include:
`
`
`1. With regard to the Fintiv factors, Petitioner intends to address Judge
`Gilstrap’s practice regarding granting stays after institution;
`similarly, Petitioner intends to address factual and legal
`misrepresentations as to related proceedings, including clarity on
`what claims are asserted and challenged, and the likelihood of
`invalidity being resolved in pretrial.
`
`
`
`2. With regard to the Becton, Dickinson factors, Petitioner believes
`there is good cause to address Patent Owner’s arguments in
`IPR2024-00322, IPR2024-00324, and IPR2024-00326, concerning
`Danciu and Mahajan and representations about these references.
`Danciu was never cited in prosecution and does not qualify as “the
`same or substantially the same prior art or arguments [that]
`previously were presented to the Office” as required under 35 U.S.C.
`§325(d). Further, Danciu was not of record during prosecution in any
`of the patents in dispute, and Petitioner could not have reasonably
`anticipated Respondent would assert §325(d) in view of that
`reference. Petitioner further requests to address misrepresentations
`regarding Mahajan and its role in prosecution, including, for
`example, that Respondent’s argument and cited excerpt in IPR2024-
`00322 fail to show that the examiner’s view of Mahajan was
`maintained following Applicant’s May 9, 2019, Response in a Final
`Rejection dated June 12, 2019. See IPR2024-00322 POPR at 46-47;
`see also IPR2024-00322 Exs. 2001 and 2017.
`
`
`Additionally, Petitioner requests permission to file docket entries from
`Touchstream Techs., Inc. v. Google, LLC, 6-21-cv-00569 (W.D. Tex. Jun. 4,
`2021) cited by the Patent Owner as exhibits for the convenience of the Board.
`Petitioner also requests permission to file the full ’751 Patent prosecution
`history as an exhibit in IPR2024-00322, also for the convenience of the Board.
`
`Petitioner has conferred with Patent Owner on these requests and understands
`Patent Owner’s position to be as follows:
`
`

`

`
`
`Patent Owner does not oppose a Reply limited to the issue of § 325(d)
`arguments pertaining to Danciu (which Patent Owner asserts is only
`relevant to IPR2024-00322, -324, and -326), provided Patent Owner is
`permitted to file a Sur-reply of equal length. Further, with regard to filing
`(i) docket entries from the district court cited by Patent Owner and (ii)
`the complete ’751 prosecution history in IPR2024-00322, Patent Owner
`does not oppose the requests. Patent Owner disagrees, however, that
`anything in its POPRs misrepresents the facts or law pertaining to either
`the Fintiv factors or the Becton, Dickinson factors. Also, Patent Owner
`asserts that the issues presented under Fintiv and § 325(d) regarding
`Mahajan were reasonably anticipated by Petitioner when it prepared and
`filed its Petitions. Patent Owner therefore opposes any request for leave
`to file a Reply that encompasses those issues. To the extent the Board
`grants Petitioner leave to file a Reply, Patent Owner requests leave to file
`a Sur-reply of equal length.
`
`
`The parties are available for a conference call with the Board at the following
`times:
`
`
`1. Tuesday May 14, 12:00-1:30 pm EDT
`2. Wednesday May 15, 12-1:00 pm EDT
`3. Wednesday May 15, 2:30-3:30 pm EDT
`4. Friday May 17 11:00 am to 12:00 pm EDT.
`
`
`Respectfully,
`
`Fred Meeker
`
`
`FREDERIC MEEKER | ATTORNEY
`
`BANNER WITCOFF
`1100 13th Street NW, Suite 1200
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`TEL: 202.824.3116 | MAIN: 202.824.3000
`bannerwitcoff.com | fmeeker@bannerwitcoff.com
`
`PROTECTING IP. PROPELLING BUSINESS.
`
`IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This message contains information from the law firm of Banner & Witcoff, Ltd. which may be
`privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
`recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
`
`

`

`that any dissemination, distribution, retention, archiving, or copying the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
`received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket