Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 2 of 15
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`“synchronization
`code”
`
`’251 patent,
`claims 1, 8, 9,
`11, 19, 20, 22
`
`’528 patent,
`claims 1, 12,
`16, 25, 27
`
`No construction
`necessary. This term
`should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is
`“an identifier that
`can be used to
`facilitate a
`connection between
`two or more
`devices.”
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`Pages 2, 3, 10, 16, and
`17 of Exhibit A to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-2, 4-3, 4-10, 4-
`16, and 4-17).
`
`Pages 3, 6, 13 and 19 of
`Exhibit B to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-25, 4-28, 4-35,
`and 4-41).
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`“a unique identifier
`associated with a
`particular display
`device [or content
`presentation
`device]”
`
`Exhibit 7 (Ex. A-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 6, 7,
`10, 25, 26, 27, 34.
`
`Exhibit 8 (Ex. A-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 6,
`13, 24, 27, 32.
`
`Exhibit 10 (Ex. B-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 2, 3,
`12, 13, 24- 26.
`
`Exhibit 11 (Ex. B-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 2, 4,
`10, 13, 22, 23.
`
`Exhibit 13 (Ex. C-1
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 2, 4,
`8-10, 13, 14.
`
`Exhibit 14 (Ex. C-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`
`- 1 -
`
`Comcast, Ex. 1121
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 3 of 15
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`“storing”/”store” No construction
`necessary. This term
`should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is
`“placing in a
`location for
`subsequent use.”
`
`’251 patent,
`claims 1, 4,
`11-15, 22
`
`’528 patent,
`claims 1-7,
`10, 16-24, 27,
`28, 30
`
`’289 patent,
`claims 1, 5, 6,
`10, 15, 161
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is:
`
`“persistently
`retaining data or
`instructions to
`enable subsequent
`retrieval” / “to
`persistently retain
`data or instructions
`to enable
`subsequent
`retrieval”
`
`Pages 3, 6, 10, and 14-
`16 of Exhibit A to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-3, 4-6, 4-10,
`and 4-13 to 4-16).
`
`Pages 6, 16, 19, and 22
`of Exhibit B to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-28, 4-38, 4-41,
`and 4-44).
`
`Pages 5, 9, 11, 13, and
`15-17 of Exhibit C to
`Touchstream’s
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Contentions) at pp. 3, 4,
`9, 11, 14.
`
`Exhibit 7 (Ex. A-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 10,
`20, 24, 27, 32-34.
`
`Exhibit 8 (Ex. A-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 13,
`19-21, 23, 27, 30, 31,
`35-37.
`
`Exhibit 9 (Ex. A-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 13,
`19, 30, 40, 50, 52, 56,
`62, 70, 72.
`
`Exhibit 10 (Ex. B-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`
`1 Touchstream reserves its right to object to Vizbee’s identification of claims 4, 14, and 15 of the ’251 patent, claims 2-7, 10, 17-24,
`and 30 of the ’528 patent, and claims 5 and 15 of the ’289 patent on the grounds that these claims were not identified in the parties’
`claim constructions pursuant to Section 8(b) of the Court’s Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order.
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 4 of 15
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-51, 4-55, 4-57,
`4-59, and 4-61 to 4-63).
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Contentions) at pp. 3, 7,
`11, 13, 18-20, 22, 23,
`26.
`
`Exhibit 11 (Ex. B-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 4, 7,
`8, 10, 13, 16, 17, 19-23,
`30, 33.
`
`Exhibit 12 (Ex. B-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 4, 8,
`11, 16, 20, 21, 25, 26,
`30, 32.
`
`Exhibit 13 (Ex. C-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 4, 6,
`7, 10-14.
`
`Exhibit 14 (Ex. C-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 4, 6-
`9, 11-14, 16, 17.
`
`Exhibit 15 (Ex. C-3 to
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 5 of 15
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`“programming
`code”
`
`No construction
`necessary. This term
`should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is
`“instructions for a
`computer.”
`
`’251 patent,
`claims 1, 3,
`11-13, 22
`
`’528 patent,
`claims 1, 9,
`14, 16, 24, 27,
`28, 29
`
`’289 patent,
`claims 1, 2, 4,
`6, 8, 10, 12,
`14, 16
`
`
`
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 5-7,
`9-13.
`
`“display-device- or
`media-player-
`specific executable
`code”
`
`Exhibit 7 (Ex. A-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 16,
`20, 23, 32, 33, 35, 38.
`
`Exhibit 8 (Ex. A-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 15,
`18, 22, 27, 30, 31, 35-
`37.
`
`Exhibit 9 (Ex. A-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 15-
`18, 32, 34, 36, 50-52,
`54, 55, 71, 73.
`
`Exhibit 10 (Ex. B-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 6, 7,
`10, 18, 19, 21, 22, 27,
`31.
`
`Pages 5, 6, 8, 14-15, 17
`and 18 of Exhibit A to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-5, 4-6, 4-8, 4-
`13 to 4-15, 4-17, and 4-
`18).
`
`Pages 6-8, 10, 12, 13,
`15-18, 20, 21, and 23 of
`Exhibit B to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-28 to 4-30, 4-
`32, 4-34, 4-35, 4-37 to
`4-40, 4-42, 4-43, and 4-
`45).
`
`Pages 6, 7, 10, 11, 13,
`14, 17, and 18 of
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 6 of 15
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`Exhibit C to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-52, 4-53, 4-56,
`4-57, 4-59, 4-60, 4-63,
`and 4-64).
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Exhibit 11 (Ex. B-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 5, 7,
`9, 10, 12, 16, 17, 19, 22,
`26, 28, 31, 33.
`
`Exhibit 12 (Ex. B-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 5-7,
`13, 14, 20-24, 31-33.
`
`Exhibit 13 (Ex. C-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 6, 7,
`11-14, 16.
`
`Exhibit 14 (Ex. C-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 5, 6,
`8, 10, 12, 14-17.
`
`Exhibit 15 (Ex. C-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 5, 6,
`8, 10, 11, 13.
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 7 of 15
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`Pages 5, 6, and 12-14 of
`Exhibit A to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-5, 4-6, and 4-12
`to 4-14).
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`“a device- and
`media-player-
`independent
`command”
`
`Exhibit 7 (Ex. A-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 14,
`16, 19, 20, 32, 33.
`
`Exhibit 10 (Ex. B-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 5-8,
`16, 18, 19.
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`’251 patent,
`claims 1, 11
`
`“universal
`playback control
`command”
`
`No construction
`necessary. This term
`should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is
`“command for
`controlling playing
`of content.”
`
`’251 patent,
`claims 1, 11,
`22
`
`“playback
`control
`command”
`
`No construction
`necessary. This term
`should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is
`“command for
`controlling playing
`of content.”
`
`Pages 5, 13, and 17-19
`of Exhibit A to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-5, 4-13, and 4-
`17 to 4-19).
`
`“a device- and
`media-player-
`independent
`command”
`
`- 6 -
`
`Exhibit 13 (Ex. C-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 6,
`11, 12.
`
`Exhibit 7 (Ex. A-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 19,
`32, 35, 37, 38.
`
`Exhibit 10 (Ex. B-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 7,
`18, 28, 29, 31-33, 35
`
`Exhibit 13 (Ex. C-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 8 of 15
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`“media player”
`
`No construction
`necessary. This term
`should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is
`“a computer
`application operable
`to present content
`and control
`presentation of
`content.”
`
`’251 patent,
`claims 1, 2, 3,
`4, 11, 12, 13,
`22, 26
`
`’528 patent,
`claims 1, 8,
`10, 14, 16, 23,
`24, 27, 28, 30
`
`’289 patent,
`claims 1, 2, 5,
`6, 8, 10, 11,
`12, 15, 16
`
`Contentions) at pp. 6,
`12, 14-16.
`
`Exhibit 7 (Ex. A-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 1,
`11, 14, 16, 19-24, 27,
`32-40.
`
`Exhibit 8 (Ex. A-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 1, 6,
`15-18, 21,23, 27, 30-32,
`35-37.
`
`Exhibit 9 (Ex. A-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 1, 9,
`11, 15-17, 19, 27, 28,
`32, 34-36, 46, 48, 49,
`51-54, 56, 60, 67, 68,
`70, 71, 73, 74.
`
`Exhibit 10 (Ex. B-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 1, 4-
`
`“software
`application for
`playing video
`content”
`
`Pages 1, 4-10, 12-19,
`and 22 of Exhibit A to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-1, 4-4 to 4-10,
`4-12 to 4-19, and 4-22).
`
`Pages 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10-
`13, and 15-24 of
`Exhibit B to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-23, 4-26, 4-27,
`4-29, 4-30, 4-32 to 4-
`35, and 4-37 to 4-46).
`
`Pages 1 and 4-18 of
`Exhibit C to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`
`- 7 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 9 of 15
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`at pp. 4-47 and 4-50 to
`4-64).
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`12, 15, 18, 19, 21-23,
`25, 27, 29-35, 37.
`
`Exhibit 11 (Ex. B-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 1, 2,
`5-7, 9-12, 14, 16-19, 21,
`22, 24, 26-29, 31-33.
`
`Exhibit 12 (Ex. B-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 1-3,
`5, 6, 8, 9, 12-15, 18, 20-
`23, 25, 28, 30-33.
`
`Exhibit 13 (Ex. C-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 1, 5-
`7, 9, 11-17.
`
`Exhibit 14 (Ex. C-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 1, 3,
`5, 6, 8-17.
`
`Exhibit 15 (Ex. C-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`
`- 8 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 10 of 15
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`“action control
`command”
`
`No construction
`necessary. This term
`should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is
`“command for
`controlling playing
`of content.”
`
`’528 patent,
`claims 1, 9,
`10, 11, 14, 16,
`24, 27-30
`
`’289 patent,
`claims 1, 4, 5,
`6, 10, 14, 15,
`16
`
`
`
`Contentions) at pp. 1, 4-
`8, 10-14.
`
`Exhibit 8 (Ex. A-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 6,
`15, 22, 23, 25, 27, 30,
`31, 35-37.
`
`Exhibit 9 (Ex. A-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 11,
`15, 18, 19, 28, 32, 48,
`50, 52, 55, 56, 68, 71,
`73.
`
`Exhibit 11 (Ex. B-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 2, 5,
`9, 10, 14, 16, 17, 22, 24,
`26, 29, 31, 33.
`
`Exhibit 12 (Ex. B-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 3, 5,
`7-9, 13, 18, 20, 21, 24,
`
`“a device- and
`media-player-
`independent
`command”
`
`Pages 5, 7, 11, 12, 15,
`16, 18, 20, and 22-24 of
`Exhibit B to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-27, 4-29, 4-33,
`4-37, 4-38, 4-40, 4-42,
`and 4-44 to 4-46).
`
`Pages 4-6, 8-10, and 12-
`17 of Exhibit C to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-50 to 4-52, 4-54
`to 4-56, and 4-58 to 4-
`63).
`
`- 9 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 11 of 15
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`25, 28, 31, 32.
`
`Exhibit 14 (Ex. C-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 3, 5,
`8-10, 12, 14-17.
`
`Exhibit 15 (Ex. C-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 4-8,
`10-13.
`
`Exhibit 9 (Ex. A-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 40,
`62.
`
`Exhibit 12 (Ex. B-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 16,
`26.
`
`Exhibit 15 (Ex. C-3 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 9,
`12.
`
`’289 patent,
`claims 10, 16
`
`“an
`identification
`code assigned by
`the server system
`to the content
`presentation
`device and
`received by the
`server system in
`a message
`generated by the
`personal
`
`The server system
`associates
`identification
`information of a
`content presentation
`device based on
`information
`provided to the
`server system from
`a personal
`computing device.
`
`Pages 11, 12, 15, and 16
`of Exhibit C to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-57, 4-58, 4-61,
`and 4-62).
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is
`“a unique identifier
`assigned by the
`server system to
`the content
`presentation device
`and received by the
`server system in a
`message generated
`by the personal
`computing device”
`
`- 10 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 12 of 15
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`’251 patent,
`claim 1
`
`Associating
`identification
`information of a
`display device
`based on
`information that is
`received by the
`server from a
`personal computing
`device that allows
`communication
`among the server
`system and the
`different devices.
`
`computing
`device”
`
`“assigning, by a
`server system, a
`synchronization
`code to the
`display device;
`receiving, in the
`server system, a
`message from a
`personal
`computing
`device that is
`separate from the
`server system
`and separate
`from the display
`device, wherein
`the message
`includes the
`synchronization
`code”
`
`Pages 1-3 of Exhibit A
`to Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-1 to 4-3).
`
`Exhibit 7 (Ex. A-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 6-7.
`
`Exhibit 10 (Ex. B-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 2-3.
`
`Exhibit 13 (Ex. C-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at p. 2.
`
`“assigning, by a
`server system, a
`unique identifier to
`the display device;
`receiving, in the
`server system, a
`message from a
`personal computing
`device that is
`separate from the
`server system and
`separate from the
`display device,
`wherein the
`message includes
`the unique
`identifier”
`
`- 11 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 13 of 15
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`Pages 10 and 11 of
`Exhibit A to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-10 and 4-11).
`
`’251 patent,
`claim 11
`
`“a
`synchronization
`code assigned by
`the server system
`to the display
`device and
`received by the
`server system in
`a message from
`the personal
`computing
`device”
`
`The server system
`associates
`identification
`information of a
`content presentation
`device based on
`information
`provided to the
`server system from
`a personal
`computing device.
`
`“a unique identifier
`associated with the
`display device that
`is the assigned by
`the server system
`to the display
`device and received
`by the server
`system in a
`message from the
`personal computing
`device”
`
`’251 patent,
`claim 22
`
`Pages 16 and 17 of
`Exhibit A to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at pp. 4-16 and 4-17).
`
`“a
`synchronization
`code that was
`assigned to the
`display device
`by a server
`system, the
`server system
`subsequently
`storing, based on
`a message from
`a personal
`computing
`
`The server system
`associates
`identification
`information of a
`content presentation
`device based on
`information
`provided to the
`server system from
`a personal
`computing device
`that allows
`communication
`
`“a unique identifier
`associated with the
`display device that
`was assigned to the
`display device by a
`server system, the
`server system
`subsequently
`retaining
`persistently to
`enable subsequent
`retrieval, based on
`a message from a
`
`- 12 -
`
`Exhibit 7 (Ex. A-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at p. 27.
`
`Exhibit 10 (Ex. B-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at p. 13.
`
`Exhibit 13 (Ex. C-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at p. 10.
`
`Exhibit 7 (Ex. A-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at p. 34.
`
`Exhibit 10 (Ex. B-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at pp. 25-
`26.
`
`Exhibit 13 (Ex. C-1 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at p. 14.
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 14 of 15
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`among the server
`system and the
`different devices.
`
`device that is
`separate from the
`server system
`and the display
`device, an
`association
`between the
`display device
`and the personal
`computing
`device, the
`message from
`the personal
`computing
`device including
`the
`synchronization
`code”
`
`personal computing
`device that is
`separate from the
`server system and
`the display device,
`an association
`between the display
`device and the
`personal computing
`device, the
`message from the
`personal computing
`device including
`the unique
`identifier.”
`
`’528 patent,
`claim 16
`
`“a
`synchronization
`code assigned by
`the server system
`to the content
`presentation
`device and
`
`The server system
`associates
`identification
`information of a
`content presentation
`device based on
`information
`
`Page 13 of Exhibit B to
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions (Exhibit 4
`at p. 4-35).
`
`“a unique identifier
`associated with the
`content
`presentation device
`that was assigned
`by the server
`system to the
`
`Exhibit 8 (Ex. A-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at p. 27.
`
`Exhibit 11 (Ex. B-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`
`- 13 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-06247-PGG-KNF Document 59-1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 15 of 15
`
`Exhibit 1 to Joint Disputed Claim Terms Charts for
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,356,251 (“the ’251 patent”), 8,782,528 (“the ’528 patent”) and 8,904,289 (“the ’289 patent”)
`Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc. Case No. 1:17-cv-06247-PGG
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Touchstream’s
`Infringement
`Contentions
`
`Vizbee’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Cross-reference to
`Related Paragraphs of
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions
`
`Patent(s),
`Claim(s)
`
`Term/Phrase
`
`Touchstream’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`provided to the
`server system from
`a personal
`computing device.
`
`received by the
`server system in
`a message
`generated by the
`personal
`computing
`device”
`
`content
`presentation device
`and received by the
`server system in a
`message generated
`by the personal
`computing device”
`
`Contentions) at p. 13.
`
`Exhibit 14 (Ex. C-2 to
`Vizbee’s Invalidity
`Contentions) at p. 11.
`
`
`
`- 14 -
`
`