throbber
Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No.
`
` 2:23-cv-00285
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Cobblestone Wireless, LLC (“Cobblestone”) files this complaint against Samsung
`
`Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” or “Sam-
`
`sung”) alleging infringement of U.S. Patents No. 7,924,802 (the “’802 Patent”), 8,554,196 (the
`
`“’196 Patent”), 8,891,347 (the “’347 Patent”), 9,094,888 (the “’888 Patent”), and 10,368,361 (the
`
`“’347 Patent”) (collectively the “Patents-in-Suit”).
`
`The Parties
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Cobblestone Wireless LLC is a limited liability company organized under the laws
`
`of the State of Texas, with an address at 101 E Park Blvd, Suite 600, Plano, Texas 75074.
`
`2.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) is a corpo-
`
`ration organized under the laws of South Korea, with its principal place of business at 129, Sam-
`
`sung-Ro, YeongTong-Gu, Suwon-Si, Gyonggi-Do, 443-742, South Korea.
`
`3.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”) is a
`
`United States corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York, with its principal
`
`place of business at 85 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660 and with an office
`
`1
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 1 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 2
`
`located at 6625 Excellence Way, Plano, Texas 75023. SEA is a wholly owned subsidiary of SEC.
`
`SEA distributes certain Samsung consumer electronics products, including the Accused Products,
`
`in the United States.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`4.
`
`This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States
`
`Code. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`1338(a).
`
`5.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants in this action because Defendants
`
`have established minimum contacts with the United States as a whole, such that the exercise of
`
`jurisdiction would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Defendants
`
`have purposefully directed activities at the United States, in particular, directing Accused Products
`
`for sale to customers and distributors within the United States (including within this District) and
`
`engaging in sales and marketing efforts to generate and support such sales. Defendants have com-
`
`mitted and continue to commit acts of infringement in this District by, among other things, import-
`
`ing, offering to sell, and selling products that infringe the Asserted Patents. Defendants, directly
`
`and through subsidiaries, intermediaries, and third parties, have committed and continue to commit
`
`acts of infringement in this District by, among other things, making, using, offering to sell, selling,
`
`and importing products that infringe the Asserted Patents.
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b). Defendant SEC is a
`
`foreign corporation. Venue is proper as to a foreign defendant in any district. 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1391(c)(3). Defendant SEA has committed and continues to commit acts of infringement in this
`
`District and has regular and established places of business in this District, including as set forth
`
`above.
`
`2
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 2 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 3
`
`Count 1 – Claim for infringement of the ’802 Patent
`
`7.
`
`Cobblestone incorporates by reference each of the allegations in paragraphs 1–6 above and
`
`further alleges as follows:
`
`8.
`
`Cobblestone is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 7,924,802 entitled “Wireless Communication
`
`Systems and Methods,” which issued on April 12, 2011. A copy of the ’802 Patent is attached to
`
`this complaint as Exhibit 1.
`
`9.
`
`On information and belief, Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import certain
`
`products (“Accused Instrumentalities”), including base station and mobile products supporting
`
`LTE and/or 5G carrier aggregation functionalities, that directly infringe, literally and/or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’802 Patent.
`
`10.
`
`Defendants also knowingly and intentionally induce infringement of one or more claims of
`
`the ’802 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). Through at least the filing and service of this
`
`Complaint, Defendants have had knowledge of the ’802 Patent and the infringing nature of the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities. Despite this knowledge of the ’802 Patent, Defendants continue to ac-
`
`tively encourage and instruct their customers and end users (for example, through user manuals
`
`and online instruction materials on their website) to use the Accused Instrumentalities in ways that
`
`directly infringe the ’802 Patent. Furthermore, Defendants offer the Accused Instrumentalities in
`
`a form and configuration such that customers and end users will perform the claimed method au-
`
`tomatically by using the Accused Instrumentalities “out of the box” in their ordinary way. Defend-
`
`ants do so knowing and intending that their customers and end users will commit these infringing
`
`acts. Defendants also continue to make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Accused Instru-
`
`3
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 3 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 4 of 13 PageID #: 4
`
`mentalities, despite their knowledge of the ’802 Patent, thereby specifically intending for and in-
`
`ducing their customers to infringe the ’802 Patent through the customers’ normal and customary
`
`use of the Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`11.
`
`Defendants have also infringed, and continue to infringe, one or more claims of the ’802
`
`Patent by selling, offering for sale, or importing into the United States, the Accused Instrumental-
`
`ities, knowing that the Accused Instrumentalities constitute a material part of the inventions
`
`claimed in the ’802 Patent, are especially made or adapted to infringe the ’802 Patent, and are not
`
`staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for non-infringing use. Defendants have been,
`
`and currently are, contributorily infringing the ’802 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(c) and
`
`(f).
`
`12.
`
`The Accused Instrumentalities satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of
`
`the ’802 Patent. A claim chart comparing independent claim 1 of the ’802 Patent to representative
`
`Accused Instrumentalities is attached as Exhibit 2 and incorporated by reference herein.
`
`13.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities, Defendants have injured Plaintiff and are liable for infringement of
`
`the ’802 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`14.
`
`As a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ’802 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to monetary
`
`damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendants’ infringement, but in no event less
`
`than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendants, together with interest
`
`and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`Count 2 – Claim for infringement of the ’196 P atent
`
`15.
`
`Cobblestone incorporates by reference each of the allegations in paragraphs 1–6 above and
`
`further alleges as follows:
`
`4
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 4 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 5 of 13 PageID #: 5
`
`16.
`
`Cobblestone is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 8,554,196 entitled “Network Coverage by
`
`Cycling Through Beam Shape Coverage Configurations,” which issued October 8, 2013. A copy
`
`of the ’196 Patent is attached to this complaint as Exhibit 3.
`
`17.
`
`On information and belief, Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import certain
`
`products (“Accused Instrumentalities”), including cellular base stations that support providing net-
`
`work coverage using different types of beams and networks, e.g. 4G LTE and 5G NR wireless
`
`networks, that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more
`
`claims of the ’196 Patent.
`
`18.
`
`Defendants also knowingly and intentionally induce infringement of one or more claims of
`
`the ’196 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). Through at least the filing and service of this
`
`Complaint, Defendants have had knowledge of the ’196 Patent and the infringing nature of the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities. Despite this knowledge of the ’196 Patent, Defendants continue to ac-
`
`tively encourage and instruct their customers and end users (for example, through user manuals
`
`and online instruction materials on their website) to use the Accused Instrumentalities in ways that
`
`directly infringe the ’196 Patent. Furthermore, Defendants offer the Accused Instrumentalities in
`
`a form and configuration such that customers and end users will perform the claimed method au-
`
`tomatically by using the Accused Instrumentalities “out of the box” in their ordinary way. Defend-
`
`ants do so knowing and intending that their customers and end users will commit these infringing
`
`acts. Defendants also continue to make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Accused Instru-
`
`mentalities, despite their knowledge of the ’196 Patent, thereby specifically intending for and in-
`
`ducing their customers to infringe the ’196 Patent through the customers’ normal and customary
`
`use of the Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`5
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 5 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 6 of 13 PageID #: 6
`
`19.
`
`Defendants have also infringed, and continue to infringe, one or more claims of the ’196
`
`Patent by selling, offering for sale, or importing into the United States, the Accused Instrumental-
`
`ities, knowing that the Accused Instrumentalities constitute a material part of the inventions
`
`claimed in the ’196 Patent, are especially made or adapted to infringe the ’196 Patent, and are not
`
`staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for non-infringing use. Defendants have been,
`
`and currently are, contributorily infringing the ’196 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(c) and
`
`(f).
`
`20.
`
`The Accused Instrumentalities satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of
`
`the ’196 Patent. A claim chart comparing independent claim 1 of the ’196 Patent to representative
`
`Accused Instrumentalities is attached as Exhibit 4 and incorporated by reference herein.
`
`21.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities, Defendants have injured Plaintiff and are liable for infringement of
`
`the ’196 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`22.
`
`As a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ’196 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to monetary
`
`damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendants’ infringement, but in no event less
`
`than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendants, together with interest
`
`and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`Count 3 – Claim for infringement of the ’347 P atent
`
`23.
`
`Cobblestone incorporates by reference each of the allegations in paragraphs 1–6 above and
`
`further alleges as follows:
`
`24.
`
`Cobblestone is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 8,891,347 entitled “User-focusing technique
`
`for wireless communication systems,” which issued November 18, 214. A copy of the ’347 Patent
`
`is attached to this complaint as Exhibit 5.
`
`6
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 6 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 7 of 13 PageID #: 7
`
`25.
`
`On information and belief, Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import certain
`
`products (“Accused Instrumentalities”), including (1) cellular base stations that support 3GPP 5G
`
`NR beamforming; and (2) cellular user equipment (UE) that supports 3GPP 5G NR beamforming,
`
`that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of
`
`the ’347 Patent.
`
`26.
`
`Defendants also knowingly and intentionally induce infringement of one or more claims of
`
`the ’347 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). Through at least the filing and service of this
`
`Complaint, Defendants have had knowledge of the ’347 Patent and the infringing nature of the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities. Despite this knowledge of the ’347 Patent, Defendants continue to ac-
`
`tively encourage and instruct their customers and end users (for example, through user manuals
`
`and online instruction materials on their website) to use the Accused Instrumentalities in ways that
`
`directly infringe the ’347 Patent. Furthermore, Defendants offer the Accused Instrumentalities in
`
`a form and configuration such that customers and end users will perform the claimed method au-
`
`tomatically by using the Accused Instrumentalities “out of the box” in their ordinary way. Defend-
`
`ants do so knowing and intending that their customers and end users will commit these infringing
`
`acts. Defendants also continue to make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Accused Instru-
`
`mentalities, despite their knowledge of the ’347 Patent, thereby specifically intending for and in-
`
`ducing their customers to infringe the ’347 Patent through the customers’ normal and customary
`
`use of the Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`27.
`
`Defendants have also infringed, and continue to infringe, one or more claims of the ’347
`
`Patent by selling, offering for sale, or importing into the United States, the Accused Instrumental-
`
`ities, knowing that the Accused Instrumentalities constitute a material part of the inventions
`
`claimed in the ’347 Patent, are especially made or adapted to infringe the ’347 Patent, and are not
`
`7
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 7 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 8 of 13 PageID #: 8
`
`staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for non-infringing use. Defendants have been,
`
`and currently are, contributorily infringing the ’347 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(c) and
`
`(f).
`
`28.
`
`The Accused Instrumentalities satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of
`
`the ’347 Patent. A claim chart comparing independent claims 8, 15, and 19 of the ’347 Patent to
`
`representative Accused Instrumentalities is attached as Exhibit 6 and incorporated by reference
`
`herein.
`
`29.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities, Defendants have injured Plaintiff and are liable for infringement of
`
`the ’347 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`30.
`
`As a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ’347 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to monetary
`
`damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendants’ infringement, but in no event less
`
`than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendants, together with interest
`
`and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`Count 4 – Claim for infringement of the ’888 Patent
`
`31.
`
`Cobblestone incorporates by reference each of the allegations in paragraphs 1–6 above and
`
`further alleges as follows:
`
`32.
`
`Cobblestone is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 9,094,888 entitled “Wireless device handoff
`
`between wireless networks,” which issued July 28, 2015. A copy of the ’888 Patent is attached to
`
`this complaint as Exhibit 7.
`
`8
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 8 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 9 of 13 PageID #: 9
`
`33.
`
`On information and belief, Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import certain
`
`products (“Accused Instrumentalities”), including cellular base stations that support handover be-
`
`tween 4G LTE and 5G NR wireless networks, that directly infringe, literally and/or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’888 Patent.
`
`34.
`
`Defendants also knowingly and intentionally induce infringement of one or more claims of
`
`the ’888 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). Through at least the filing and service of this
`
`Complaint, Defendants have had knowledge of the ’888 Patent and the infringing nature of the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities. Despite this knowledge of the ’888 Patent, Defendants continue to ac-
`
`tively encourage and instruct their customers and end users (for example, through user manuals
`
`and online instruction materials on their website) to use the Accused Instrumentalities in ways that
`
`directly infringe the ’888 Patent. Furthermore, Defendants offer the Accused Instrumentalities in
`
`a form and configuration such that customers and end users will perform the claimed method au-
`
`tomatically by using the Accused Instrumentalities “out of the box” in their ordinary way. Defend-
`
`ants do so knowing and intending that their customers and end users will commit these infringing
`
`acts. Defendants also continue to make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Accused Instru-
`
`mentalities, despite their knowledge of the ’888 Patent, thereby specifically intending for and in-
`
`ducing their customers to infringe the ’888 Patent through the customers’ normal and customary
`
`use of the Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`35.
`
`Defendants have also infringed, and continue to infringe, one or more claims of the ’888
`
`Patent by selling, offering for sale, or importing into the United States, the Accused Instrumental-
`
`ities, knowing that the Accused Instrumentalities constitute a material part of the inventions
`
`claimed in the ’888 Patent, are especially made or adapted to infringe the ’888 Patent, and are not
`
`staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for non-infringing use. Defendants have been,
`
`9
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 9 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 10 of 13 PageID #: 10
`
`and currently are, contributorily infringing the ’888 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(c) and
`
`(f).
`
`36.
`
`The Accused Instrumentalities satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of
`
`the ’888 Patent. A claim chart comparing independent claim 20 of the ’888 Patent to representative
`
`Accused Instrumentalities is attached as Exhibit 8 and incorporated by reference herein.
`
`37.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities, Defendants have injured Plaintiff and are liable for infringement of
`
`the ’888 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`38.
`
`As a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ’888 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to monetary
`
`damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendants’ infringement, but in no event less
`
`than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendants, together with interest
`
`and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`Count 2 – Claim for infringement of the ’361 Patent
`
`39.
`
`Cobblestone incorporates by reference each of the allegations in paragraphs 1–6 above and
`
`further alleges as follows:
`
`40.
`
`Cobblestone is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 10,368,361 entitled “Adaptive communication
`
`resource allocation in a wireless network,” which issued July 30, 2019. A copy of the ’361 Patent
`
`is attached to this complaint as Exhibit 9.
`
`41.
`
`On information and belief, Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import certain
`
`products (“Accused Instrumentalities”), including cellular base stations that support 3GPP NG-
`
`RAN supporting directional Supplementary Uplink (SUL) and/or Bandwidth Adaptation function-
`
`ality, that directly infringe, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims
`
`of the ’361 Patent.
`
`10
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 10 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 11 of 13 PageID #: 11
`
`42.
`
`Defendants also knowingly and intentionally induce infringement of one or more claims of
`
`the ’361 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). Through at least the filing and service of this
`
`Complaint, Defendants have had knowledge of the ’361 Patent and the infringing nature of the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities. Despite this knowledge of the ’361 Patent, Defendants continue to ac-
`
`tively encourage and instruct their customers and end users (for example, through user manuals
`
`and online instruction materials on their website) to use the Accused Instrumentalities in ways that
`
`directly infringe the ’361 Patent. Furthermore, Defendants offer the Accused Instrumentalities in
`
`a form and configuration such that customers and end users will perform the claimed method au-
`
`tomatically by using the Accused Instrumentalities “out of the box” in their ordinary way. Defend-
`
`ants do so knowing and intending that their customers and end users will commit these infringing
`
`acts. Defendants also continue to make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import the Accused Instru-
`
`mentalities, despite their knowledge of the ’361 Patent, thereby specifically intending for and in-
`
`ducing their customers to infringe the ’361 Patent through the customers’ normal and customary
`
`use of the Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`43.
`
`Defendants have also infringed, and continue to infringe, one or more claims of the ’361
`
`Patent by selling, offering for sale, or importing into the United States, the Accused Instrumental-
`
`ities, knowing that the Accused Instrumentalities constitute a material part of the inventions
`
`claimed in the ’361 Patent, are especially made or adapted to infringe the ’361 Patent, and are not
`
`staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for non-infringing use. Defendants have been,
`
`and currently are, contributorily infringing the ’361 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(c) and
`
`(f).
`
`11
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 11 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 12
`
`44.
`
`The Accused Instrumentalities satisfy all claim limitations of one or more claims of
`
`the ’361 Patent. A claim chart comparing independent claim 10 of the ’361 Patent to representative
`
`Accused Instrumentalities is attached as Exhibit 10 and incorporated by reference herein.
`
`45.
`
`By making, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing into the United States the
`
`Accused Instrumentalities, Defendants have injured Plaintiff and are liable for infringement of
`
`the ’361 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`46.
`
`As a result of Defendants’ infringement of the ’361 Patent, Plaintiff is entitled to monetary
`
`damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Defendants’ infringement, but in no event less
`
`than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendants, together with interest
`
`and costs as fixed by the Court.
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`47.
`
`Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Cobblestone requests a trial
`
`by jury of any issues so triable by right.
`
`Prayer for Relief
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Cobblestone respectfully requests the following relief from this Court:
`
`A.
`
`A judgment in favor of Cobblestone that Defendants have infringed the ’802 Patent, the
`
`’196 Patent, the ’347 Patent, the ’888 Patent, and the ’361 Patent, and that the ’802 Patent, the
`
`’196 Patent, the ’347 Patent, the ’888 Patent, and the ’361 Patent are valid, enforceable, and patent-
`
`eligible;
`
`B.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Defendants to pay Cobblestone compensatory damages,
`
`costs, expenses, and pre- and post-judgment interest for its infringement of the asserted patents, as
`
`provided under 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`12
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 12 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00285 Document 1 Filed 06/16/23 Page 13 of 13 PageID #: 13
`
`C.
`
`Any and all injunctive and/or equitable relief to which Cobblestone may be entitled includ-
`
`ing, but not limited to, ongoing royalties with respect to Defendants’ infringement of the ’802
`
`Patent, the ’196 Patent, the ’347 Patent, the ’888 Patent, and the ’361 Patent;
`
`D.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Defendants to provide an accounting and to pay supple-
`
`mental damages to Cobblestone, including, without limitation, pre-judgment and post-judgment
`
`interest;
`
`E.
`
`A finding that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285, and an award of Cobble-
`
`stone’s reasonable attorney’s fees and costs; and
`
`F.
`
`Any and all other relief to which Cobblestone may be entitled.
`
`Dated: June 16, 2023
`
` /s/ Reza Mirzaie
`
`Reza Mirzaie
`CA State Bar No. 246953
`Marc A. Fenster
`CA State Bar No. 181067
`Neil A. Rubin
`CA State Bar No. 250761
`Christian W. Conkle
`CA State Bar No. 306374
`Jonathan Ma
`CA State Bar No. 312773
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Telephone: 310-826-7474
`Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`Email: mfenster@raklaw.com
`Email: nrubin@raklaw.com
`Email: cconkle@raklaw.com
`Email: jma@raklaw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,
`COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC
`
`13
`
`Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
`Ex. 2021, IPR2024-00315
`Page 13 of 13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket