throbber
Dion M. Bregman
`Partner
`+1.650.843.7519
` d ion.bregman@morganlewis.com
`
`December 14, 2023
`
`VIA EMAIL
`
`Alexander Gasser
`agasser@skiermontderby.com
`Skiermont Derby LLP
`
`John Lord
`jlord@skiermontderby.com
`Skiermont Derby LLP
`
`Paul Skiermont
`pskiermont@skiermontderby.com
`Skiermont Derby LLP
`
`Jaime Olin
`jolin@skiermontderby.com
`Skiermont Derby LLP
`
`Ryan Hargrave
`rhargrave@skiermontderby.com
`Skiermont Derby LLP
`
`Re:
`Entangled Media, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc., Case No. 5:23-cv-03264-PCP (N.D. Cal.)
`Dear Counsel:
`I write regarding the above-captioned litigation (the “District Court Case”), and the
`related petition for inter partes review (IPR) in IPR2024-00285 that was filed today
`against certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,484,260.
`Petitioner Dropbox, Inc. (“Dropbox”) hereby stipulates that if the Patent Trial and
`Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes an IPR based on the grounds identified below, then it will
`(i) not pursue the grounds identified below in the District Court Case, and (ii) not pursue
`any other ground that reasonably could have been raised during the IPR (should it be
`instituted) in the District Court Case.
`The grounds presented in the IPR petition are reproduced below for convenience:
`Ground
`Prior Art
`Statutory Basis Claims Challenged from U.S.
`Patent No. 8,296,338
`1 and 4-8
`2 and 3
`1-8
`
`§ 103
`§ 103
`§ 103
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`Havewala, Adams
`Havewala, Adams, Saridakis
`Havewala, Adams, Saridakis,
`Rothman
`
`Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
`
`1400 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA
`United States
`
`+1.650.843.4000
`+1.650.843.4001
`
`Dropbox Exhibit 1009 - Page 1
`Dropbox, Inc. v. Entangled Media, LLC
`IPR2024-00285 - U.S. Patent No. 8,484,260
`
`

`

`December 14, 2023
`Page 2
`
`In so stipulating, Dropbox seeks to avoid multiple proceedings challenging the
`same claims on the same grounds. Consistent with Congressional intent, through this
`stipulation, Dropbox expresses its intentions to have only the PTAB address the
`patentability of the challenged claims identified above on the grounds identified above.
`However, if the PTAB declines institution as to any grounds, then Dropbox reserves the
`right to pursue any non-instituted grounds in the District Court Case.
`
`This stipulation is not intended, and should not be construed, to limit Dropbox’s
`abilities to assert invalidity or unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 8,484,260 in the District
`Court Case on any other ground not covered by this stipulation (e.g., indefiniteness,
`written-description issues, enablement, unenforceability issues, invalidity on grounds that
`reasonably could not have been raised during the IPR if instituted).
`
`Sincerely,
`
` / Dion M. Bregman /
` Dion M. Bregman
`
`Dropbox Exhibit 1009 - Page 2
`Dropbox, Inc. v. Entangled Media, LLC
`IPR2024-00285 - U.S. Patent No. 8,484,260
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket