`
`Triais@Quspto. gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper10
`Entered: May 18, 2023
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SONY GROUP CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`GREENTHREAD LLC
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2023-00324 (Patent No. 11,121,222 B2)
`IPR2023-00325 (Patent No. 11,316,014 B2)
`IPR2023-00375 (Patent No. 10,734,481 B2)
`IPR2023-00376 (Patent No. 10,510,842 B2)!
`
`Before GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, CHRISTOPHERL.
`CRUMBLEY, and CHRISTOPHER M.KAISER, Administrative Patent
`Judges.
`
`Per Curiam.
`
`DECISION
`Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial
`37 CER. § 42.74
`
`' This Order addressesissues that are the same in the above-captioned
`proceedings. The parties are not authorized to use a multi-case caption.
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 1 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 1 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00324 (Patent No. 11,121,222 B2)
`IPR2023-00325 (Patent No. 11,316,014 B2)
`IPR2023-00375 (Patent No. 10,734,481 B2)
`IPR2023-00376 (Patent No. 10,510,842 B2)
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`On May3, 2023, after email authorization by the Board, Petitioner
`
`and Patent Owner(collectively “the Parties”) filed a Joint Motion to
`
`Terminate /nter Partes Review in the above-identified proceeding. Paper 8
`
`(“Joint Motion’’).* In support of the Joint Motion,the Partiesfiled copies of
`
`Confidential Settlement-Related Agreements (Exs. 2001, 2002 (“Settlement
`
`Agreements”’)), as well as a Jomt Request that Agreements be Treated as
`
`Business Confidential Information and be Kept Separate Pursuantto 35
`
`U.S.C. §317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74 (Paper 9 (“Joint Request’’)).
`
`I. DISCUSSION
`
`In the Joint Motion,“[t]he Parties jointly request that the Board
`
`terminate this interpartes review in its entirety.” Paper 8,2. The Parties
`
`represent that the filed Settlement Agreementsare true copies and “together
`
`form the complete agreementresolving the disputes in the interpartes
`
`review betweenthe Parties” and that “[t]here are no othercollateral
`
`agreements between the Parties made tn connection with, or in
`
`contemplation of, the termination sought.” /d. at 1. The Parties further
`
`represent that the District Court proceedings betweenthe Parties involving
`
`the above-identified patent at issue was dismissed on April 27, 2023. Id. at
`
`2.
`
`The Parties also filed a Joint Request that the Settlement Agreements
`
`be treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the
`
`For purposes of expediency, wecite to papers and exhibits filed in
`IPR2023-00324, unless otherwise noted. The Partiesfiled similar papers
`and exhibits in each of the above-identified proceedings.
`
`2
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 2 of 199
`
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 2 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00324 (Patent No. 11,121,222 B2)
`IPR2023-00325 (Patent No. 11,316,014 B2)
`IPR2023-00375 (Patent No. 10,734,481 B2)
`IPR2023-00376 (Patent No. 10,510,842 B2)
`
`file of the patent involvedin this interpartes proceeding. Paper9, 1. As the
`
`filing party for confidential Exhibit 2001, Patent Ownerrepresents thatit “is
`
`not permitted to share certain portions .
`
`.
`
`. with any party other than the
`
`Board andits staff.” Paper 8, 1. Patent Ownerfurther represents that
`
`“Exhibit 2001, to which Sonyis not a party,is to be filed suchthatit is
`
`available to the Board and Patent Owneronly”andthat“the Parties are in
`
`agreementwith this procedure.” /d.
`
`This proceedingis in its preliminary phase. Petitionerfiled its
`
`Petition on December 12, 2022, and Patent Ownerhasnotfiled a
`
`Preliminary Response, which was due May 12, 2023. Paper 5, 1; Ex. 3002,
`
`1. Accordingly, we have not yet entered a decision on institution. In view
`
`of the early stage of the proceeding andthe settlement betweenthe Parties,
`
`we determine that good cause exists to terminate the proceeding with respect
`
`to the Parties.
`
`After reviewing each of the Settlement Agreements, wefind that the
`
`Settlement Agreements contain confidential business information regarding
`
`the termsof settlement. We determinethat good cause exists to treat the
`
`Settlement Agreements as business confidential information pursuantto 35
`
`U.S.C. §317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) and kept separate from thefiles of
`
`the challenged patent.
`
`The Parties further request that “the Board inform them if anyone
`
`seeks production of the agreements and afford them an opportunity to
`
`address whether such request is supported by good cause.” Paper9, 1. We
`
`have no such procedureto serve upon the Parties a request for accessto the
`
`Settlement Agreements, and, further, our regulations do not require us to do
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 3 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 3 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00324 (Patent No. 11,121,222 B2)
`IPR2023-00325 (Patent No. 11,316,014 B2)
`IPR2023-00375 (Patent No. 10,734,481 B2)
`IPR2023-00376 (Patent No. 10,510,842 B2)
`
`so. Therefore, we decline to issue an order regarding any request for access
`
`to the Settlement Agreements.
`
`This Order doesnot constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. §318(a).
`
`Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above,it is:
`
`I. ORDER
`
`ORDEREDthatthe Jomt Motion to Terminate is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthatthe Jomt Request that Agreements be
`
`Treated as Business Confidential Information and be Kept Separate Pursuant
`
`to 35 U.S.C. §317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74 is granted,
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat Exhibits 2001 and 2002 shall remain
`
`business confidential information, and
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthatthe Petition is dismissed.
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 4 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 4 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00324 (Patent No. 11,121,222 B2)
`IPR2023-00325 (Patent No. 11,316,014 B2)
`IPR2023-00375 (Patent No. 10,734,481 B2)
`IPR2023-00376 (Patent No. 10,510,842 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Matthew A. Smith
`Andrew S. Baluch
`SMITH BALUCH LLP
`smith@smithbaluch.com
`baluch@smithbaluch.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Alan Whitehurst
`Nicholas T. Matich
`Arvind Jairam
`Stuart McCommas
`Archis “Neil” Ozarka
`MCKOOLSMITH,P.C.
`awhitehurst@mckoolsmith.com
`nmatich@mckoolsmith.com
`ajairam@mckoolsmith.com
`smccommas@mckoolsmith.com
`nozarkar@mckoolsmith.com
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 5 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 5 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

` Trials@pu
`Tel: 57].272-782
`
`Paper11
`Date: May 17, 2023
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND DELL INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`GREENTHREAD LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2023-00506 (Patent No. 10,510,842 B2)
`IPR2023-00507 (Patent No. 10,734,481 B2)
`IPR2023-00509 (Patent No. 11,121,222 B2)
`IPR2023-00510 (Patent No. 11,316,014 B2)!
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER,
`and KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`Per Curiam.
`
`DECISION
`Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial
`37 CFR. $ 42.74
`
`' This Order addressesissues that are the samein the above-captioned
`proceedings. The parties are not authorized to use a multi-case caption.
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 6 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 6 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00506 (Patent No. 10,510,842 B2)
`IPR2023-00507 (Patent No. 10,734,481 B2)
`IPR2023-00509 (Patent No. 11,121,222 B2)
`IPR2023-00510 (Patent No. 11,316,014 B2)
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`On May 2, 2023, after email authorization by the Board, Petitioner
`
`and Patent Owner(collectively “the Parties”) filed a Joint Motion to
`
`Terminate /nter Partes Review in the above-identified proceeding. Paper 9
`
`(“Joint Motion’’).? In support of the Joint Motion,the Parties filed copies of
`
`Confidential Settlement-Related Agreements (Exs. 2001, 2002 (“Settlement
`
`Agreements”)), as well as a Joint Request to Keep Separate Pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (Paper 10 (“Joint Request’’)).
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`
`In the Joint Motion, “[t]he Parties jointly request that the Board
`
`terminate this inter partes review of the Patent-in-Suit, Case No. IPR2023-
`
`00506, in its entirety.” Paper 9,2. The Parties represent that the filed
`
`Settlement Agreements are true copies and “together form the complete
`
`agreement resolving the disputes in the inter partes review between the
`
`Parties” and that “[t]here are no other collateral agreements between the
`
`Parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination
`
`sought.” /d. at 1. The Parties further represent that a “joint motion to
`
`dismiss the lawsuit between”the Parties “involving the Patent-in-Suit was
`
`filed on April 24, 2023.” /d. at 2.
`
`The Parties also filed a Joint Request that the Settlement Agreements
`
`be treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the
`
`file of the patent involved in this inter partes proceeding andthefiles of this
`
`? For purposes of expediency, wecite to papers and exhibits filed in
`IPR2023-00506, unless otherwise noted. The Parties filed similar papers
`and exhibits in each of the above-identified proceedings.
`
`2
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 7 of 199
`
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 7 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00506 (Patent No. 10,510,842 B2)
`IPR2023-00507 (Patent No. 10,734,481 B2)
`IPR2023-00509 (Patent No. 11,121,222 B2)
`IPR2023-00510 (Patent No. 11,316,014 B2)
`
`proceeding. Paper 10,1. As the filing party for confidential Exhibit 2001,
`
`Patent Ownerrepresentsthat it “is not permitted to share certain portions. .
`
`.
`
`with any party other than the Board andits staff.” Paper 9, 1. Patent Owner
`
`further represents that “Exhibit 2001, to which Dell is not a party, is to be
`
`filed such that it is available to the Board and Patent Owner only” and that
`
`“the Parties are in agreement with this procedure.” /d.
`
`This proceedingis in its preliminary phase. Petitionerfiled its
`
`Petition on January 27, 2022, and Patent Ownerhasnotfiled a Preliminary
`
`Response. Paper 9, 2. Accordingly, we have not yet entered a decision on
`
`institution. In view ofthe early stage of the proceeding andthe settlement
`
`between the Parties, we determine that good cause exists to terminate the
`
`proceeding with respect to the Parties.
`
`After reviewing each of the Settlement Agreements, wefind that the
`
`Settlement Agreements contain confidential business information regarding
`
`the terms of settlement. We determine that good cause exists to treat the
`
`Settlement Agreements as business confidential information pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) and kept separate from thefiles of
`
`the challenged patent. On the other hand,as to the Parties’ request that the
`
`Board keep the Settlement Agreements “separate from thefiles of this
`
`proceeding,” Paper 10, 1, our regulations do not require us to do so.
`
`Therefore, we decline to issue an order to keep the Settlement Agreements
`
`separate from thefile of this inter partes proceeding.
`
`The Parties further request that “the Board inform them if anyone
`
`seeks production of the agreements and afford them an opportunity to
`
`address whether such request is supported by good cause.” Paper 10,1. We
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 8 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 8 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00506 (Patent No. 10,510,842 B2)
`IPR2023-00507 (Patent No. 10,734,481 B2)
`IPR2023-00509 (Patent No. 11,121,222 B2)
`IPR2023-00510 (Patent No. 11,316,014 B2)
`
`have no such procedure to serve upon the Parties a request for access to the
`
`Settlement Agreements, and, further, our regulations do not require us to do
`
`so. Therefore, we decline to issue an order regarding any request for access
`
`to the Settlement Agreements.
`
`This Order doesnot constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above,it is:
`
`I. ORDER
`
`ORDEREDthat the Joint Motion to Terminate is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat the Joint Request to Keep Separate
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) is granted-in-part
`
`and denied-in-part,
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat Exhibits 2001 and 2002 shall remain
`
`business confidential information, and
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthatthe Petition is dismissed.
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 9 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 9 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00506 (Patent No. 10,510,842 B2)
`IPR2023-00507 (Patent No. 10,734,481 B2)
`IPR2023-00509 (Patent No. 11,121,222 B2)
`IPR2023-00510 (Patent No. 11,316,014 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Christopher TL Douglas
`Lauren N. Griffin
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`christopher.douglas@alston.com
`lauren.griffin@alston.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Alan Whitehurst
`Arvind Jairam
`Archis Ozarkar
`Nicholas Matich
`Stuart McCommas
`MCKOOLSMITH,P.C.
`awhitehurst@mckoolsmith.com
`ajairam(@mckoolsmith.com
`nozarkar@mckoolsmith.com
`nmatich@mckoolsmith.com
`smccommas@mckoolsmith.com
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 10 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 10 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Bocument38 Filed O5/O2e/22 Page lati
`
`AO 126 (Rev. 08/10}
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop8
`
`Birector of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`|
`
`|
`
`REPORTON THE
`
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 vou are hereby advised that a court action has been
`Wastern District of Texas, Waco Division on the folowing
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`PF] Trademarks or
`ff Patents.
`[[] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.3:
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`§:22-cv-00105
`PLAINTIFF
`GREENTHREAD, LLC
`
`DATE FILED
`Vi27/2082
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`DEMARK
`DATER
`OR
`ER
`SIA.
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEM
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—cniitied case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s)
`INCLUDED BY
`
`have been included:
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`ivf Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`[i Answer
`
`[i Cross Bill
`
`[| Other Pleading
`
`US. DISTRICT COURT
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division
`ip EPENDANT
`INTEL CORPORATION, DELL INC. AND DELL
`TECHNOLOGIES INC.
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERE.
`
`in the above---entitied case, the following decision las been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECTSIONSUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1-—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy te Director Copy 3--Upon termination of action, mail this capy te Birector
`Copy 2-—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy te Director Copy 4-—-Case fle capy Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 11 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 11 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-O0105-ADA Documents Filed O1/ 27/22Bo
`
`oC opci th eek 3cons
`
`fed
`
`AO 126 (Rev. 08/10}
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop8
`
`Birector of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`|
`
`|
`
`REPORTON THE
`
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 vou are hereby advised that a court action has been
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division on the folowing
`
`Sled in the U.S. District Court
`PF] Trademarks or
`ff Patents.
`[[] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.3:
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`§:22-Cv-001 05
`PLAINTIFF
`
`GREENTHREAD, LLC
`
`DATE FILED
`Vi272022
`
`US. DISTRICT COURT
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division
`ip EPENDANT
`
`INTEL CORPORATION, DELL INC., AND DELL
`[| TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`DEMARK
`DATER
`OR
`ER
`SIA.
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEM
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—cniitied case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARKNO.
`
`Lt Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[i Answer
`
`[i Cross Bill
`
`[| Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER
`
`OF
`
`PATEN’
`
`RADEMARK
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEM
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERE.
`
`in the above---entitied case, the following decision las been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECTSIONSUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1-—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy te Director Copy 3--Upon termination of action, mail this capy te Birector
`Copy 2-—Upon filing document adding patent(s)}, mail this copy te Director Copy 4-—-Case fe capy Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 12 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 12 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFIGE
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`Q. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`15/590,282
`
`05/09/2017
`
`G.R. MOHAN RAO
`
`GRTD.01.01.DV5
`CONFIRMATION NO. 1032
`
`40672
`LAW OFFICE OF BILL NAIFEH
`
`PO BOX 803423
`
`DALLAS, TX 75380
`
`POWER OF ATTORNEYNOTICE
`
`0000.0040.09000
`
`Date Mailed: 10/15/2021
`
`NOTICE REGARDING CHANGE OF POWEROF ATTORNEY
`
`This is in response to the Power of Attorneyfiled 10/07/2021.
`
`¢ The Power of Attorney to youin this application has been revoked by the applicant. Future correspondence
`will be mailed to the new address of record(37 CFR 1.33).
`
`Questions about the contents of this notice and the
`requirements it sets forth should be directed to the Office
`of Data Management, Application Assistance Unit,at
`(571) 272-4000 or (571) 272-4200 or 1-888-786-0101.
`
`/ytdemisse/
`
`
`
`page 1 of 1
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 13 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 13 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFIGE
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`Q. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`15/590,282
`
`05/09/2017
`
`G.R. MOHAN RAO
`
`GRTD60-33439
`CONFIRMATION NO. 1032
`
`25883
`MUNCK WILSON MANDALAL.L.P
`
`P.O, Drawer 800869
`
`DALLAS, TX 75380
`
`POA ACCEPTANCE LETTER
`
`000.0040090000
`
`Date Mailed: 10/15/2021
`
`NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF POWEROF ATTORNEY
`
`This is in response to the Power of Attorneyfiled 10/07/2021.
`
`The Power of Attorney in this application is accepted. Correspondencein this application will be mailed to the
`above address as provided by 37 CFR 1.33.
`
`Questions about the contents of this notice and the
`requirements it sets forth should be directed to the Office
`of Data Management, Application Assistance Unit,at
`(571) 272-4000 or (571) 272-4200 or 1-888-786-0101.
`
`/ytdemisse/
`
`
`
`page 1 of 1
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 14 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 14 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`PROSAIA/&14 (02-153
`Approved for use through 03/31/2021, GMB O651-035
`1S. Patent and Trademark Office; US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`
`Under the Paerwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required ta respond to a collection: of information uplessit displays a valid OMB control number
`
`
`
`PATENT - POWER OF ATTORNEY
`Patent Number
`[10,510,842
`
`Issue Date
`42-17-2019
`OR
`aySirst Named Inventor
`
`
`REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY eS GR. MohanRAO.
`
`
`
`Tithe
`heer
`i SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
`WITH A NEW POWER OF ATTORNEY
`|
`AWITH GRADED DOPANT
`
`
`
`AND
`REGIONS
`
`
`
`CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS=“aiisrnay Docket No. lorntoses3439.0~*~*«é“‘éa’
`
`
`
`l hereby revoke alt previous powers of attorney givenin the above-identitied patent.
`A Powerof Attorneyis susmitted herewith.
`
`R f hereby appoint Practitioner{s} associated with the Customer Numberidentified in the box at right as my/our
`(@) attorney(s) or agent{s} with respect te the patent identified above, and to transact aff business in the United
`States Patent and Trademark Office connected therewith:
`OR
`
`
`
`poy
`
`| hereby appoint Practitioner(s} named below as my/our attorney{s} or agent{s} with respect te the patent identified above, and to transact
`all business in the United States Patent and Trademark Office connected therewith:
`
`
`Registration Number
`
`
` ienenavneenonceeeeee
`
`|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please recognize or change the correspondence address for the above-identified patent to:
`CF The address associated with the above-identified Customer Numbar,
`OR
`The address associated with the Customer Number identified in the box at right:
`
`(25883
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Country
`Telephone
`iam the:
`Applicant.
`
`OR
`Ba] Patent awner,
`Statement under 37 CFR 3.73(c) (Farm PTOSAIA/96} submitted herewith orflledan
`_SIGNATUREof Applicant oy Patent Owner
`
`
` | Telephone
`Greeninread, LU
`VASES
`
`«t
`NOTE: Signatures of al i
`he applicants ar patent ownersof the entire interest or their representative(s} are required. If mare than one signature
`{
`ig required, submit mult
`nie farms, check the boy below, and identify the total number of forms submitted in the blank below.
`
`forms are submitted,
`j Atotslof
`This caliectian ofinformationis required by 37 CFR 4,34, 1.32, and 4.33. The informationis required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public, whichis to update
`iand by the USPTO ta pracess) the file of s patent.or reexamination proceeding. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122: and 37: CER 4.24. This collection is
`estimated to take 3 minutes In camplete, including gathering, preparing, and subrnitting the completed application farmta the USPTO. Thne will vary depending
`
`upon the individual case. Any comments an the amaunt of tire you require to cocnplate this
`forme and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, shauld be sent to
`the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department. of Cammerce, ©.G, Bay 1450, Alexandria, VA 22333-1486, DO. NOT SEND FEES OR
`COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SENB TO: Commissioner for Satents, P.O, Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22923-1450.
`iF you need ossistance in comnteting the form, calf 1-€00-° 70-9298 and select aption Z.
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 15 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 15 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`
`
`aa
`
`Electronic AcknowledgementReceipt
`
`Application Number:
`
`15590282
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Confirmation Number:
`
`1032
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH GRADED DOPANT REGIONS
`
`Paymentinformation:
`
`File Listing:
`
`Warnings:
`
`Pages
`Multi
`File Size(Bytes)/
`DocumentDescription
`Document
`
`
`
`Number Message Digest|Part/.zip|P (if appl.)
`120467
`
`Assignee showing of ownership per 37
`CER 3.73
`
`GRT33439373STMT.pdf
`
`29fdf96e90cb1 0f99a7dc8741b81 3fcc187d
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 16 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Information:
`
`Information:
`
`Powerof Attorney
`
`GRT33439POACHANGEADDRE
`SEXE.pdf
`
`1018436
`
`02f36f373996b50d97938688fbb562bfa9
`03d6
`
`
`
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`If a new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary componentsfora filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)-(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shownonthis
`AcknowledgementReceiptwill establish the filing date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`If a timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/EO/903indicating acceptanceof the application as a
`national stage submission under35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`If a new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 1810), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and of the International Filing Date (Form PCT/RO/105)will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shownon this AcknowledgementReceiptwill establish the international filing date of
`the application.
`
`This AcknowledgementReceipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO ofthe indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable.It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 17 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 17 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`PTO/AIA/96 (08-12)
`Approvedfor use through 01/31/2013. OMB 0651-0031
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`STATEMENT UNDER 37 CER 3.73(c)
`Applicant/Patent Owner: Greenthread, LLC
`
`
`Application No./Patent No.: 10,510,842
`Filed/Issue Date:
`_12-17-2019
`
`Titled.
`SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH GRADED DOPANT REGIONS
`Greenthread, LLC
`_a Limited Liability Company
`
`(Nameof Assignee)
`(Type of Assignee, e.g., corporation, partnership, university, government agency,etc.)
`
`states that, for the patent application/patent identified above, it is (choose oneof options 1, 2, 3 or 4 below):
`1.
`[x] The assignee ofthe entire right, title, and interest.
`
`2. [| An assignee of less than the entireright,title, and interest (check applicable box):
`|_| The extent (by percentage)of its ownershipinterestis
`%. Additional Statement(s) by the owners
`holding the balance of the interest must be submitted to account for 100% of the ownership interest.
`L] There are unspecified percentages of ownership. Theotherparties, including inventors, who together ownthe entire
`right, title and interest are:
`
`Additional Statement(s) by the owner(s) holding the balance of the interest must be submitted to account for the entire
`right, title, and interest.
`3. L] The assignee of an undividedinterestin the entirety (a complete assignment from oneofthe joint inventors was made).
`The other parties, including inventors, who together own the entire right, title, and interest are:
`
`
`
`Additional Statement(s) by the owner(s) holding the balance of the interest must be submitted to account for the entire
`right, title, and interest.
`4. C The recipient, via a court proceeding orthe like (e.g., bankruptcy, probate), of an undividedinterestin the entirety (a
`complete transfer of ownership interest was made). The certified document(s) showing the transfer is attached.
`
`The interest identified in option 1, 2 or 3 above (not option 4) is evidenced by either (choose one of options A or B below):
`
`A.
`
`An assignment from the inventor(s) of the patent application/patent identified above. The assignment wasrecordedin
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office at Reel 043783
`, Frame 9629
`, or for which a copy
`thereof is attached.
`
`B. L] A chain oftitle from the inventor(s), of the patent application/patentidentified above, to the current assigneeas follows:
`
`1. From:
`
`2. From:
`
`To:
`
`The document was recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`, or for which a copythereofis attached.
`To:
`
`The document was recordedin the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`, or for which a copythereofis attached.
`
`[Page 1 of 2]
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 3.73(b). The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public whichis tofile (and by the USPTO to
`process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11 and 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 12 minutes to complete, including
`gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Timewill vary depending uponthe individual case. Any comments on the amount
`of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark
`Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMSTO THIS ADDRESS. SEND
`TO: Commissionerfor Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`
`Ifyou need assistance in completing theform, call 1-S00-PTO-9199 and song ARUON2sductor v. Greenthread
`reenthread Ex. 2075, p. 18 of 199
`on 2.
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 18 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`PTO/AIA/96 (08-12)
`Approved for use through 01/31/2013. OMB 0651-0031
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`STATEMENT UNDER 37 CFR 3.73(c)
`
`
`To:
`
`The document was recorded in the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`, or for which a copythereofis attached.
`, Frame
`Reel
`
`To:
`
`The document was recorded in the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`, or for which a copythereofis attached.
`, Frame
`Reel
`
`To:
`
`The document was recorded in the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`, or for which a copythereofis attached.
`, Frame
`Reel
`
`To:
`
`The document was recorded in the United States Patent and Trademark Office at
`
`Reel
`
`, Frame
`
`, or for which a copythereofis attached.
`
`[|
`
`Additional documents in the chain oftitle are listed on a supplemental sheet(s).
`
`
`
`As required by 37 CFR 3.73(c)(1)(i), the documentary evidenceof the chain oftitle from the original owner to the
`assignee was, or concurrently is being, submitted for recordation pursuant to 37 CFR 3.11.
`
`[NOTE: A separate copy(i.e., a true copy of the original assignment document(s)) must be submitted to Assignment
`Division in accordance with 37 CFR Part 3, to record the assignment in the records of the USPTO. See MPEP 302.08]
`
`The undersigned (whose title is supplied below) is authorized to act on behalf of the assignee.
`/Gregory M. Howison, Reg. #30646/
`October 5, 2021
`
`Signature
`Date
`Gregory M. Howison
`30,646
`
`Printed or Typed Name
`
`Title or Registration Number
`
`[Page 2 of 2]
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 19 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`Greenthread Ex. 2075, p. 19 of 199
`Semiconductor v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Privacy Act Statement
`
`The Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579) requires that you be given certain information in connection with your
`submission of the attached form related to a patent application or patent. Accordingly, pursuant to the
`requirements of the Act, please be advised that: (1) the general authority for the collection of this information is 35
`U.S.C. 2(b)(2); (2) furnishing of the information solicited is voluntary; and (3) the principal purpose for which the
`information is used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is to process and/or examine your submission related
`to a patent application or patent.
`If you do not furnish the requested information, the U.S. Patent and Trademark
`Office may not be able to process and/or examine your submission, which mayresult in termination of proceedings
`or abandonmentof the application or expiration of the patent.
`
`The information provided by you in this form will be subject to the following routine uses:
`
`1. The information on this form will be treated confidentially to the extent allowed under the Freedom of
`Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C 552a). Records from this system of records
`may be disclosed to the Department of Justice to determine whether disclosure of these recordsis
`required by the Freedom of Information Act.
`A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in the course of presenting
`evidence to a court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, including disclosures to opposing counselin the
`course of settlement negotiations.
`A record in this system of records maybedisclosed, as a routine use, to a Member of Congress
`submitting a request involving an individual, to whom the record pertains, when the individual has
`requested assistance from the Member with respect to the subject matter of the record.
`A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a contractor of the Agency
`having need for the information in order to perform a contract. Recipients of information shall be required
`to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(m).
`A record related to an International Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in this system of
`records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property
`Organization, pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
`A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to another federal agencyfor
`purposesof National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act
`(42 U.S.C. 218(c)).
`A record from this system of records may bedisclosed, as a routine use, to the Administrator, General
`Services, or his/her designee, during an inspection of records conducted by