throbber
a2) United States Patent
`US 11,494,862 B2
`do) Patent No.:
`Redmonet al.
`*Nov.8, 2022
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US011494862B2
`
`(54) MOBILE LEGAL COUNSEL SYSTEM AND
`METHOD
`
`(71) Applicant: Redmon Jeang LLC, Parker, TX (US)
`
`(72)
`
`Inventors: Clayton K. Redmon, Grand Prairie,
`TX (US); Wei Wei Jeang, Parker, TX
`(US)
`
`(73)
`
`Assignee: Redmon Jeang LLC, Parker, TX (US)
`
`(*)
`
`Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the termofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 17/507,884
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Oct. 22, 2021
`
`(65)
`
`(63)
`
`(51)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2022/0044339 Al
`
`Feb. 10, 2022
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`Continuation of application No. 15/688,764, filed on
`Aug. 28, 2017, which is a continuation-in-part of
`(Continued)
`
`Int. Cl.
`G06Q 50/18
`HOAN 7/15
`HOAW 4/02
`HO4L 67306
`HOAN 7/14
`
`(2012.01)
`(2006.01)
`(2018.01)
`(2022.01)
`(2006.01)
`(Continued)
`
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`CPC ....... G06Q 50/182 (2013.01); HO4L 65/1069
`(2013.01); HO4L 67/306 (2013.01); HO4L
`67/52 (2022.05); HO4L 67/535 (2022.05);
`
`HOAN7/147 (2013.01), HO4N 7/15 (2013.01);
`HOAN 7/155 (2013.01); HO4W 4/025
`(2013.01)
`
`(58) Field of Classification Search
`CPC combination set(s) only.
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2002/0002469 Al*
`
`2011/0119197 A1*
`
`1/2002 Hillstrom ............... G06Q 10/10
`707/999.107
`5/2011 Turchin G06Q 10/10
`T1S/781
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner — Phung-Hoang J Nguyen
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Wei Wei Jeang; Grable
`Martin Fulton PLLC
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`667)
`A Mobile Lawyer system includes a 360 degree HD video
`camera configured for mounting on a vehicle; a display
`screen configured for mounting inside the passenger com-
`partment of a vehicle; and a Mobile Lawyer App down-
`loaded and installed on a mobile telephone in communica-
`tion with the video camera and display screen, configured,
`upon command from a user, to notify an attorney located
`remotely via a cellular and/or computer network, and to
`display a video image of the remote attorney on the display
`screen (or the screen of the mobile telephone), and to
`live-stream a 360 degree video captured by the video camera
`to the Internet for viewing by the remote attorney and for
`cloud storage. The introduction of a lawyer on-demandinto
`a police encounter can help to defuse and de-escalate the
`situation. The lawyer can serve as a live observer, witness,
`and intermediary who can provide live legal guidance to the
`user.
`
`20 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets
`
`a 42
`‘SEND ALERT
`TO LAWYER(S}
`
`
`l
`RECEIVE REPLY
`FROM LAWYER(S}
`
`
`’
`
`46
`
` *
`
`SELECT ONE LAWYER
`
` ¥
`
` ¥ E
`
`NABLE LAWYER,
`AULIO
`
`
`
` x
`
`————_
`CONTINUE VIDEO
`LIVE-STREAM
`
`RECEIVE USER
`RFQUPST TO
`END SESSION
`
`54
`
`56
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 1 of 10
`
`
`2
`LIVE-STREAM
`VIDEO DATA
`TO LAWYER
`STOREVIDEO DATA
`
`DISPLAY LAWYER
`50
`IMAGE & NAME
`—s—
`ON MONITOR
`38
`DETERMINEUSER|~'
`JJR SDICTION
`
`
` ys
`
`
`30
`
`34
`
`36
`
`—_———_,
`RECEIV: USER
`REQUEST
`
` ¥ E
`
`XECUTE
`MOBILE LAWYERAPP
`

`STANT VIDEO.
`LIVE-STREAM
`
` ¥
`
`40
`
` ¥ I
`
`DENTIFY SUITABLE
`LAWYER(S)
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 1 of 10
`
`

`

`US 11,494,862 B2
`
`Page 2
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`application No. 15/644,524, filed on Jul. 7, 2017, now
`Pat. No. 11,443,395.
`
`(60) Provisional application No. 62/364,300, filed on Jul.
`19, 2016.
`
`(51)
`
`(56)
`
`Int. CL
`HO4L 65/1069
`HOAL 67/52
`HOAL 67/50
`
`(2022.01)
`(2022.01)
`(2022.01)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2OLS/OL72561 AL*
`
`2016/0061625 Al*
`
`6/2015 Tee we HO04M 1/03
`348/584
`2015/0371456 Al* 12/2015 Moore, Jr oe GO1S 19/13
`701/1
`3/2016 Wang oc GO1C 21/3697
`701/454
`6/2016 Gabel oo. cee G06Q 10/10
`2016/0182707 Al*
`455/404.2
`2016/0295197 Al* 10/2016 Hudman .............. HOAN 13/254
`2/2017 Cuban oo... G06V 20/53
`2017/0053169 Al*
`
`2/2017 Wells occ HO4L 65/65
`2017/0054770 AL*
`2018/0367820 Al* 12/2018 Abulikemu.......... HOAN 21/218
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 2 of 10
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 2 of 10
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov.8, 2022
`
`Sheet 1 of 3
`
`US 11,494,862 B2
`
`
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 3 of 10
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 3 of 10
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov.8, 2022
`
`Sheet 2 of 3
`
`RECEIVE USER
`
`REQUEST
`
`EXECUTE
`
`MOBILE LAWYER APP
`
`START VIDEO
`
`LIVE-STREAM
`
`STORE VIDEO DATA
`
`DETERMINE USER
`JURISDICTION
`
`IDENTIFY SUITABLE
`LAWYER(S)
`
`FIG. 2
`
`US 11,494,862 B2 42
`END SESSION
`
`DISPLAY LAWYER
`IMAGE & NAME
`ON MONITOR
`
`SEND ALERT
`TO LAWYER(S)
`
`RECEIVE REPLY
`
`FROM LAWYER(S)
`
`SELECT ONE LAWYER
`
`LIVE-STREAM
`VIDEO DATA
`
`TO LAWYER
`
`ENABLE LAWYER
`
`AUDIO
`
`CONTINUE VIDEO
`
`LIVE-STREAM
`
`RECEIVE USER
`
`REQUEST TO
`
`44
`
`46
`
`48
`
`30
`
`52
`
`54
`
`36
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 4 of 10
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 4 of 10
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov.8, 2022
`
`Sheet 3 of 3
`
`US 11,494,862 B2
`
`RECEIVE REMOTE
`
`LAWYER REQUEST
`
`ACCESS DATABASE
`
`FOR USER DATA AND
`
`INCIDENT DATA
`
`OBTAIN POLICE
`
`COMPLAINT FORM
`
`REMOTE LAWYER
`
`PRE-FILL COMPLAINT
`FORM WITH
`
`USER & INCIDENT DATA
`
`TRANSMIT COMPLAINT
`
`FORM TO
`
`FIG. 3
`
`TurnSignI - Exhibit 1005
`Page 5 of 10
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 5 of 10
`
`

`

`1
`MOBILE LEGAL COUNSEL SYSTEM AND
`METHOD
`
`2
`the police and members of the general public if the loss of
`innocent lives can be avoided or reduced.
`
`US 11,494,862 B2
`
`RELATED APPLICATION
`
`
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`This is a Continuation ofU.S. application Ser. No. 15/688,
`764 filed Aug. 28, 2017, which is a Continuation-in-Part
`application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/644,524 filed Jul.
`7, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent
`Application No. 62/364,300 filed on Jul. 19, 2016, all of
`which are hereby incorporated by referencein their entirety.
`
`FIELD
`
`This disclosure relates to mobile software applications,
`and moreparticularly to a mabile legal counsel system and
`method, so that an attorney can be summoned quickly and
`virtually whenever a need arises to serve as a third-party
`observer, help defuse the situation, run interference, and
`provide legal advice.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`20
`
`25
`
`40
`
`45
`
`Some argue that police shooting is racially-based, but
`there are evidence that show these police officers who
`commit these atrocities may be motivated by unconscious or
`implicit bias. There are research studies that support the
`notion that police professionals use more force, or be
`quicker to use force, against blacks due to a black-crime
`implicit bias producing greater perceptions of threat. Studies
`also support that
`implicit bias, once recognized, can be
`counteracted with repeated and intentional
`training and
`learning. However, implicit or explicit, the result is still the
`same—loss of innocent lives.
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Whether white or black, implicit or explicit bias, there is
`a desire to defuse and de-escalate tense situations between
`
`For many African Americans living in the United States,
`the threat of police brutality and shooting is an everyday
`reality. Black parents have “The Talk” with their children not
`of the birds and the bees, but how they must be obedient and
`compliant whenever they encounter the police.
`Police brutality and killing is a deeply-rooted problem
`According to a U.S. Department of Justice Special
`that cannot be easily and quickly addressed without multi-
`Report, in 2011, over 62.9 million U.S. residents had one or
`pronged persistent efforts. The concept described herein is
`more contacts with police. Of these contacts, over 31 million
`an effort to introduce technology as one immediate solution
`were involuntary, and 13 million are in the context of traffic
`stops. Relatively more black drivers (13%) than white (10%)
`to this problem. This concept uses technology to introduce
`
`and Hispanic (10%) drivers were pulled overinatratlic stop. the presence ofa third party, a licensed attorney, into a police
`In thesetraffic stop incidents, about 1.2 million people felt
`encounter. The licensed attorney can serve asa live observer,
`that the police officer involved did not behave properly.
`witness, and intermediary who canhelp to de-escalate and
`defuse the situation.
`However, only a small fraction, or 4.4% of these people filed
`a police complaint, and more than 1.1 million people did not.
`FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram of an exemplary embodi-
`About 19% of persons involvedin street stops were searched
`ment of a system and method for mobile legal counsel 10
`or frisked by police. The majority of these people did not
`according to the teachings of the present disclosure. The
`believe the police had a legitimate reason for the search.
`system 10 includes a 360-degree video camera 12 that can
`According to data compiled by The Washington Post,
`live-stream 360 degrees of video data with accompanying
`audio data over the Internet and/or cellular network 14. The
`white people make up roughly 62 percent of the U.S.
`population but only about 49 percent of those whoare killed
`bypolice officers. African Americans, however, account for
`24 percent of those fatally shot and killed by the police
`despite being just 13 percent of the U.S. population. These
`numbers mean black Americans are 2.5 times as likely as
`white Americansto be shot andkilled by police officers. U.S.
`police officers have shot and killed the exact same number
`of unarmed white people as they have unarmed black
`people: 50 each. But because the white population is
`approximately five times larger than the black population,
`unarmed black Americans were five times as likely as
`unarmed white Americans to be shot and killed by a police
`officer. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/
`wp/2016/07/1 1/arent-more--white-people-than-black-
`people-killed-by-police-yes-but-no/?utm
`term=.7 la68e6da5fe
`
`FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram of an exemplary embodi-
`ment of a system and method for mobile legal counsel
`according to the teachings of the present disclosure;
`FIG. 2 is a simplified flowchart of a system and method
`for mobile legal counsel according to the teachings of the
`present disclosure; and
`FIG. 3 is another simplified flowchart of a system and
`method for mobile legal counsel according to the teachings
`of the present disclosure.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`
`
`360-degree camera 12 is preferably high definition and
`designed for mounting on the dash of a vehicle so that it can
`capture unobstructed video images of a user seated in the
`driver’s seat as well as the front passenger seat of the
`vehicle. An example of such a camera is a 1080p sports
`action camera, Chinavasion product code CVLM-DV141.
`Alternatively, the 360-degree camera may be mountable to
`the user’s mobile device itself, and utilize its cellular and
`Internet connectivity to live stream video data. In another
`alternate embodiment, a mobile device that has a built-in
`360-degree camera can be employed.
`In an alternate
`embodiment, the 360-degree camera 12 is joined by addi-
`tional video cameras mounted at different points of the
`user’s car, inside and/or outside the passenger compartment,
`to capture video footage from various vantage points to
`avoid obstacles that may block the view, such as someparts
`ofthe car or passengers in the car. The mobile lawyer app
`may incorporate images captured by OEM cameras on the
`vehicle. In yet another embodiment, a drone-based video
`camera 28 can be used to augmentthe live-streamed video
`data from an overhead vantage point. It is contemplated that
`the drone can be remotely controlled by either the user, a
`remote administrator, or the remote lawyer. Additionally, the
`remote administrator and/or lawyer may also be able to
`remotely control one or more other video cameras mounted
`inside and/or outside the passenger compartment. One or
`more of these cameras mayadditionally have intrared capa-
`bility to capture clear images in low ambient light condi-
`tions.
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 6 of 10
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 6 of 10
`
`

`

`US 11,494,862 B2
`
`3
`the mobile lawyer app may
`In certain applications,
`employ video images captured by cameras native on a
`mobile device, such as the front and back-facing cameras on
`a mobile telephone. For example, if the mobile lawyer app
`is initiated and it detects that an externally-mounted 360-
`degree camera is not available, then it may automatically
`initiate operation of the built-in cameras.
`All of the captured live-stream video data (including
`audio) are transmitted (using cellular/Internet connectivity
`of the mobile device, the camera,or the vehicle) via a global
`computer network (Internet) and/or cellular mobile tele-
`phone network 14 to a remote server 16 and stored in a
`database 18, preferably encrypted to ensure privacy. The
`database 18 further stores the identities, credentials, states
`where licensed, contact information (e.g., address, email
`address, and mobile telephone number), and other informa-
`tion of lawyers licensed in various jurisdictions who have
`been vetted and contracted to be on call during certain days,
`time periods, and other work parameters to provide mobile
`lawyer services. The system 10 further includes a dash-
`mounted display monitor 20 such as the seven-inch LCD
`display, Chinavasion product code CVABR-LT298. A user
`may download andinstall the Mobile Lawyer App 22 onto
`his mobile phone 24 or another mobile device, such as a
`wearable device, for example. The video camera 12 and
`display screen 20 may directly communicate wireless to the
`server 16 and database 18 via the Internet/cellular network
`or via the mobile device 24. It is contemplated that the drone
`may be controlled by administrators or other employees of
`the mobile lawyer service and/or the remote lawyer.
`In operation, the user may initialize the Mobile Lawyer
`App 22 by setting up a profile with the name, address, phone
`number, age, sex, race, emergency contact, medical infor-
`mation, and other basic information. ‘he user may become
`a subscriber by agreeing to make monthly subscription
`payments to retain the services provided via the Mobile
`Lawyer App 22. There may be mulli-iered services avail-
`able tied to different subscription payment amounts. For
`example, the user may enter into an agreementto pay $9.99
`per month for the basic service level and $29.99 per month
`for a premium service level. The service levels may differ in
`the amount of coverage in terms of, e.g., hours and juris-
`diction. Once becoming a subscriber, the user is issued one
`or more stickers or decals that can be displayed on the
`vehicle (on the bumper, in the rear window,in the driver side
`window,etc.) to clearly mark and identify the user/driver as
`one that is protected by the Mobile Lawyer App 22.
`The user may initiate a Mobile Lawyer Consultation
`Session and live-stream video capture by the camera(s) by
`sending a request via the Mobile Lawyer App 22 on his/her
`mobile device 24. Once the request to live-stream video is
`received at the server 16, analert notification is sent to one
`or more lawyers licensed in the same jurisdiction as the
`current location of the user. The alert notification may be in
`the form ofa call, text message, email. and another form of
`message transmitted to and presented on a computing device
`26, such as a mobile phone, tablet computer, and laptop
`computer that is equipped with a video camera. Thefirst
`lawyer who responds first to handle the consultation session
`can immediately view the live-streamed video information
`on a computing device. One or more different criteria may
`also be used to select the responding lawyer. In a preferred
`embodiment, the lawyerinterfaces with the system 10 via a
`web browser-based interface. As soon as
`a
`lawyer is
`assigned to handle the consultation session, his/her image as
`captured by his/her computing device 26 (transmitted via the
`cloud 14) along with his/her name is displayed on the
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`5
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`dash-mounted monitor 20 in the user’s vehicle. Alterna-
`tively, if the user does not have a dash-mounted display
`monitor,
`the lawyer’s image is displayed by the user’s
`mobile device 24. In another alternate embodiment, a still
`imageofthe selected lawyer stored in the database may be
`displayed on the display monitor or mobile device if the
`lawyer is not able to participate via video.
`‘The Mobile Lawyer App 22 has GPS and mapping
`capabilities, or alternatively has access to these functions of
`the mobile phone, so that it may be able to pinpoint the
`location of the user and relay this information to the server
`16 so that this information maybe usedin selecting lawyers
`who mayrespondto the alert notification. When GPSis not
`available, location may be determined by triangulation of
`cellular towers that are in communication with the user’s
`mobile device.
`Referring to FIG. 2, a simplified flowchart of the mobile
`lawyer system and method is shown.In blocks 30 and 32, a
`request from the user is received by the mobile device to
`execute the Mobile Lawyer App. The user may click a
`button, use a verbal command, or turn on the 360-degree
`camera to initiate the consultation session. The video camera
`begins to capture video images inside and outside the
`vehicle and transmits the captured imagesin real-time to the
`remote server and database for storage, as shown in blocks
`34 and 36. A determination is madeas to the location of the
`user/vehicle, such as the city and state, as shownin block 38.
`In responseto the location of the user(i.e., jurisdiction), and
`possibly other criteria (e.g., ranking or rating of lawyers),
`one or more lawyers are selected andalerts are transmitted
`to their respective computing devices, as shownin blocks 40
`and 42. One or more responses are received from the
`lawyers, and oneis selected, as shown in blocks 44 and 46.
`‘The captured video data is immediately transmitted to the
`lawyer’s associated computing device, as shownin block 48.
`The lawyer’s computing device also captures video images
`of the lawyer and transmils it to the remote server, which in
`turn streams it to the display monitor located inside the
`user’s vehicle, as shown in block 50. Audio data captured of
`the lawyer are also transmitted to the user via either the
`display monitor or the user’s mobile device, as shownin
`block 52. In this manner, the lawyer has becomea third-
`party observer in a police encounter.
`The following is an exemplary scenario in which the
`Mobile Lawyer App 22 can be used. The user, driving his
`car, sees that a police squadcar is behind himwithits lights
`flashing. The user pulls the car to the side of the road, and
`upon stopping the car completely, immediately clicks on the
`Mobile Lawyer App icon displayed on the screen of his
`mobile phone 24 to execute the app. Alternatively,
`the
`Mobile Lawyer App 22 can be initiated by a verbal com-
`mand or by turning on the 360-degree camera. The user also
`connects the phone to the 360-degree camera and optionally
`to the displayscreen (via wireless or hard connections). The
`execution of the Mobile Lawyer App 22 turns on the
`360-degree camera 12 and beginslive-streaming video data
`either directly via the Internet/cellular network or via the
`mobile device 24. The server 16 also receives the request
`from the user and selects one or more licensed lawyers to
`send analert notification. ‘Vhe notification may be done via
`the attorney’s own mobile phone or computer, in the form of
`text message, a phonecall, or another formofalert. The first
`lawyer who responds immediately has access to the live-
`streaming video data. Additionally, the lawyer’s image is
`also immediately displayed on the dash-mounted monitor
`20. Alternatively, the same can be displayed on the screen of
`the mobile phone. Because the 360-degree camera 12 is
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 7 of 10
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 7 of 10
`
`

`

`US 11,494,862 B2
`
`5
`mounted and positioned to optimally capture the actions of
`the user/driver as well as the police officer that steps up to
`the car and standing by the driver’s side door, the remotely-
`located lawyer can clearly see what is happening. Because
`of the 360-degree nature of the video camera, the actions of
`any passenger in the car andactivities that occur around the
`vehicle can be clearly captured. The lawyer’s speech can be
`relayed by a display screen that has audio speaker capability
`or through the speakers on the user’s mobile phone. The
`lawyer’s image is identified by name and other information
`that clearly identifies him/her as a licensed attorney for the
`jurisdiction in which the user is located. The licensed
`attorney can have a 360-degree view of the scene by
`accessing, the live streamed video from the video camera.
`Video data from additional camera angles from above and
`other vehicle-mounted and/or drone-mounted cameras are
`also live-streamed to the lawyer’s computing device. The
`live streamed videois, at the same time, stored in the cloud
`data storage 18.
`By the time the police officer steps up to the driver’s side
`window,the display screen 20 showsthe attorney’s face and
`identification, and the video camera is capturing and live
`streaming video data. When the police officer first comes
`into view, the lawyer may chooseto introduce him/herselfto
`ensure that the police officer is aware of his/her presence.
`During the interaction between the police officer and the
`user, the attorney may remain silent and only act as an
`observerto allow the police officer to do his/her job without
`obstruction. However, the lawyer may interject if and when
`the situation demands it, such as whenthe police officer’s
`demandoraction is illegal under the laws of that jurisdic-
`tion. The lawyer may also provide guidance to the user to
`cooperate with the police officer and serve as a calming
`influence in a scenario that may be tense for all parties
`involved.
`From the vantage point of the police officer, the presence
`of the lawyer as a third-party observer mayalso serve to
`alleviate concerns he/she may have about the user/driver and
`remove some of the tension. The police officer may be
`assured that the presence of the Mobile Lawyer meansthat
`the user will likely be compliant and notresist his reasonable
`demands. Further assuranceis that fact that there will be a
`
`20
`
`25
`
`40
`
`45
`
`comprehensive video recording of the incident that can be
`used to verify either party’s testimony.
`The Mobile Lawyer mayuse the attorney functionalities
`provided by the app such as taking down extemporaneous
`notes regarding his/her observation of the activities. The
`attorney function also includes capturing and storing of the
`video of the attorney in cloud storage. Additionally, when 5
`the action of the police officer is improper and exceeds the
`limits of legality. the Mobile Lawyer may access a police
`complaint form that may auto-fill certain data fields such as
`the date, time, and location of the stop, etc. Referring to FIG.
`3, the mobile lawyer may request to access a police com-
`plaint function, as shown in block 70. The server accesses
`the database to obtain data associated with the user, as well
`as data related to the incident, as shown in block 72. The
`server also obtains a template police complaint and pre-fills
`certain data fields with user data and incident data, as shown
`in blocks 74 and 76. For example, data fields such as user
`name, driver’s license identifier, home address, age, sex,
`incident date, incident time, and incident location can be
`pre-filled on the complaint form. The complaint form is then
`transmitted to the remote mobile lawyer, as shownin block
`78, so that it may be completed and submitted to the proper
`authorities to lodge a complaint.
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`the Mobile Lawyer technology
`the hope that
`is
`Tt
`described herein can provide a desperately needed calming
`and tempering presence that can be called upon whenever a
`police encounter occurs. Not unlike having a legal adviser
`along, at all times, the Mobile Lawyer can be summoned to
`serve, observe, and provide legal guidance to the user in
`tense situations.
`The lawyer selection criteria is primarily jurisdictional
`due to the licensing requirements for lawyers. Secondarily,
`users may rate lawyers and those lawyers with poor rating
`may receiver fewer or no opportunities to respond to con-
`sultation requests.
`It should be noted that 360-degree camera described
`herein can be any camera that provides a wide field of view
`or a substantially panoramic field of view, and can include
`a single lens or multiple lenses. Multi-lens cameras capture
`multiple video streams that are stitched together by soft-
`ware. The term 360-degree camera should notbe interpreted
`herein to strictly include cameras that capture exactly 360-
`degrees field of view. The “360-degree camera” can be
`stand-alone or built-into the mobile device and/or the
`vehicle, and can be in one housing or multiple housings. The
`output 360-degree video can be the result of multiple video
`streams stitched. together to form the 360-degree view.
`It should be noted that it is contemplated herein that the
`functionalities of the video camera and display monitor can
`be combined and integrated into one housing. so that one
`integrated device is dash-mounted with video camera and
`display capabilities, as well as communicating with the
`remote server, either directly via the Internet/cellular net-
`work or through the user’s mobile device.
`It should be understoodthat user’s profile data, subscrip-
`tion information, and video data are protected by password
`and other security measures. Further, the lawyers’ profile
`and credential information are also protected by password
`and other security measures. To access these data, the users
`and lawyers must supply the correct login information. It
`should be noted that the word “video” used herein is used to
`denote video and/or audio.
`The features of the present invention which are believed
`to be novel are set forth below with particularity in the
`appended claims. However, modifications, variations, and
`changesto the exemplary embodiments described above will
`be apparent to those skilled in the art, and the system and
`method for Mobile Lawyer described herein thus encom-
`passes such modifications, variations, and changes and are
`not limited to the specific embodiments described hercin.
`
`Whatis claimedis:
`1. A mobile lawyer system, the system comprising:
`a remote server and a remote database:
`at least one video camera;
`at least one display screen,
`a mobile device executing a mobile application in com-
`munication with the at least one video camera and the
`at least one display screen, and configured, upon a
`one-click command from a user of the mobile device,
`to automatically and immediately communicate a cur-
`rent location of the mobile device to the remote server,
`the remote server being configured to:
`automatically search a plurality of information records
`associated with a plurality of lawyers stored in the
`remote database;
`automaticallyidentify at least one lawyer licensed in a
`jurisdiction that correspondto the current location of
`the mobile device;
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 8 of 10
`
`TurnSignl - Exhibit 1005
`Page 8 of 10
`
`

`

`US 11,494,862 B2
`
`ra 0
`
`5
`
`25
`
`35
`
`7
`automatically transmit at least one notification to at
`least one computing, device associated. with the iden-
`tified at least one lawyer;
`receive an acceptance of engagement from a selected
`one of the at least one computing device associated
`with a selected one of the identified at least one
`lawyer; and
`automatically and immediately set up a bi-directional
`video communication session between the selected
`one of the at least one computing device associated
`with the selected one ofthe at least one lawyer and
`the mobile device, so that live video data of the user
`is automatically transmitted to the selected comput-
`ing device associated with the selected lawyer and
`live video data of the selected lawyer is automati-
`cally transmitted to the at least one display screen;
`automatically and immediately enable the at least one
`display screen to stream live video data of the selected
`lawyer, and the at least one video camera capture and
`stream live video of the user and surroundings to the
`computing device for viewing by the selected lawyer;
`and
`automatically and immediately enable live video data
`from the mobile device and the selected computing
`device to be transmitted to the remote server and
`database for secure storage.
`2. The mobile lawyer system of claim 1, wherein the at
`least one video camera is selected from the group consisting
`of: at least one video camera mounted on a drone, at least
`one camera native to the mobile device, front and back-
`facing cameras native to the mobile device, at least one
`camera integrated and mounted on a vehicle, at least one
`camera mounted at various points of a vehicle, at least one
`camera with infrared capabilities, and at
`least one 360-
`degree video camera.
`3. The mobile lawyer system of claim 1, wherein the
`mobile application is configured to:
`automatically determine incident data comprising, at least
`one of the user name, driver’s license identifier, home
`address, age, sex,
`incident date,
`incident
`time, and
`incident location of captured video;
`automatically transmit the incident data to the selected
`computing device associated with the selected lawyer
`having the live video communication session with the
`user; and
`automatically transmit the incident data to the remote
`server and database for secure storage.
`4. The mobile lawyer system of claim 3, further compris-
`ing, a lawyer app for execution on the computing, device and
`configured to provide access by the at least one lawyer to 5
`user data and the incident data.
`5. The mobile lawyer system of claim 4, wherein the
`lawyer app is further configured to include a police com-
`plaint function that automatically pre-fills certain data fields
`of a police complaint with the incident data.
`6. A mobile lawyer method comprising:
`receiving a live consultation request from a user’s mobile
`device;
`automatically and immediately initiating capture of
`images ofthe user and surroundings, and live-stream-
`ing the captured images to a remote server
`for
`encrypted storage via a computer network in response
`to receiving the consultation request;
`automatically and immediately determining a current
`location of the mobile device;
`automatically and immediately transmitting the current
`location of the mobile device to the remote server;
`
`40
`
`45
`
`60
`
`65
`
`8
`automatically searching, at the remote server, a plurality
`of information records associated with a plurality of
`lawyers stored in the remote database;
`aulomatically identifying, at the remote server, at least
`one lawyerlicensed in a jurisdiction that correspond to
`the current location of the mobile device;
`automatically transmitting, by the remote server, at least
`one notification to at least one computing device asso-
`ciated with the identified at least one lawyer;
`automatically receiving live-streaming video data of an
`identified remote lawyer licensed to practice law in a
`jurisdiction associated with the current location of the
`mobile device;
`automaticallylive-streaming captured video images of the
`user to the at least one remote lawyer via the remote
`server;
`automatically displaying the live-streaming video data of
`the identified at least one remote lawyer on a display
`monitor viewable by the user; and
`automatically storing the captured video data of the user
`and the at least one remote lawyer in a data storage
`device accessible by the remote server.
`7. The mobile lawyer method of claim 6, wherein initi-
`ating capture of images of the user and surroundings com-
`prises initiating a capture of video images by at least one
`video camera selected from the group consisting of: at least
`one video camera mounted on a drone, at least one camera
`native to the mobile device, front and back-facing cameras
`native to the mobile device, at least one camera integrated
`and mounted on a vehicle, at least one camera mounted at
`various points of a vehicle, at least one camera with infrared
`capabilities, and at least one 360-degree video camera.
`8. The mobile lawyer method of claim 7, further com-
`prising receiving remote control input of a flight path and
`position of the drone from the remote lawyer.
`9. The mobile lawyer method of claim 6, further com-
`prising receiving remote control
`input of viewing angle
`direction for the at least one video camera from the remote
`
`lawyer.
`10. The mobile lawyer method of claim 6, wherein
`automatically determining, a location of the user comprises
`accessing a GPSlocation of the user and determininga street
`address location from the GPS location.
`
`11. The mobile lawyer method of claim 6, further com-
`prising automatically searching, by the remote server, a
`database storing data associated with a plurality of lawyers,
`and automatically identifying at least one remote lawyer
`licensed in a jurisdiction that matches the current location of
`the user.
`12. The mobile lawyer method of claim

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket