throbber

`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 1 of 72
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 1 of 72
`
`

`

`Second Edition
`
`Copyright @ 1985, 1992 by Butterworth-Heinemann.
`An Imprint ofElsevier
`P.mBllois m5y b. 6o!€nt di.cny f.om Els6,i.& Sci6rl.! and L.h.olog! Rrghrs t.p.rh.d in
`Odord, UK. Phon.: {44) 1866 843630, Fix: (a4) 1845 853333, 6{d[ p..mi$iomO6ta6d6im.uk.
`\bu n.y Jso c6dsL you. r.qusd on-lir. vi. th6 Elsai. hofi.paga; htp//ri**..ts.tbrcom by
`!.lrcrinq 'Cuaron.. SLrpport' lnd Ih.n robtaini@ Parnierions'.
`
`Originally published by Culf Professional Publishing,
`Houston, TX.
`
`For information, pleas€ contact:
`Manager of Special Sales
`Butterworth-Heinemann
`225 Wildwood Avenue
`Wobum, MA 01801-2041
`Tel: 781-904-2500
`Fax 781-904-2620
`For information on all Bufterwonh-Lleinemann publications
`available, contact our World Wide Web home page at:
`http:l'www,bh.com
`Printed on Acid-Free Paper (e)
`
`Transfe ed to Digital Printing,2010
`
`Printed and bound in the United Kingdom
`
`Ubrary of Cor4rtss Catologir4-iFhbtcrtim lhtt
`Lobanoff, Val S., 1910-
`Cenrifugal pumps: design & application/Val S.
`Lobanoff, Robert R. Ross.-2nd ed.
`p. cm.
`Includes index.
`ISBN-l3 : 978-0-87201-2N- 4 ISBN-lo: 0-87201-200-X
`1. Centrifugal pumps. I. Ross, Robert R.,
`1934- . tr. Tide.
`Tt9t9.L52 t9y2
`621.6'1-dcm
`
`9l-41458
`CIP
`
`ISBN-l3 : 978-0-87201-200-4
`ISBN-IO: G87201-200-X
`
`iv
`
`PralaGo
`
`Fant Bl Ei0iemnontr
`
`B ,r*u*on.....
`
`System Analysis for puml
`Head Capacity Curve. Pur
`ily. Conslruction. Pump S
`
`2 r**spoodnd
`
`Definition of Pump Spociti(
`ciric Speed Charts. Corec
`sion.
`
`$ mpomo*en..
`
`lmpeller Laloul. Developn
`ler End Viow. tmpelter lnt
`tions. Notation.
`
`rtl
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 2 of 72
`
`

`

`18
`
`=E:|<j=e<
`
`\
`
`by Frsd R. &erasl'
`Engineering Dynamics lncorporated
`
`V0brat[@m amd
`No0sc [m
`Fumops
`
`lntroduction
`Although a certain amount of noise is to be expected from cenhifugal
`pumps and their drivers, unusually high noise levels (in excess of 100
`dB) or particularly high frequencies (whine or squeal) can be an early'
`indicator of potential mechanical failures or vibration problems in cen-
`trifugal pumps. The purpose of this chapter is to concentrate on the
`mechanisms that may produce noise as a by-product; however, reduction
`of the noise, per se, is not the main concern. The main point of interest of
`this chapter is to study the mechanisms and their effect on the reliabilirr
`of the pump system. Methods will be presented to reduce the vibration
`(and noise) or eliminate the basic causes by modi$ing the pump or pip
`ing system.
`The occurrence of significant noise levels indicates that sufficient en-
`ergy exists to be a potential cause of vibrations and possible damage rc
`the pump or piping. Defining the source and cause of noise is the fim
`step in determining whether noise is normal or whether problems mar
`exist. Noise in pumping systems can be generated by the mechanical mc-
`tion of pump components and by the liquid motion in the pump and pip-
`ing systems. Noise from internal mechanical and liquid sources can k
`transmitted to the environment.
`Effective diagnosis and treatment of noise sources to control pur--
`noise require a knowledge of the liquid and mechanical noise-generanc--
`
`' Thg author wish6a lo acknolyledgp the contrlbutions by th€ engingerlng 6taff ol Englneoring Dyna..r i=
`lnc., who pedormed many ot the analFoi and fi€ld lesl8.
`
`422
`
`mechanisms and comrnon noisr
`transmitted. If noise itself is th
`acoustic enclosures or other tre
`
`Sourcel
`
`Mechanlcal Noi8e Sources
`
`Common mechanical sources
`pump components or surfaces b
`generated in the liquid or air. Im
`bearings, vibrating pipe walls,
`mechanical sources.
`In centrifugal machines, im
`causes mechanical noise at twi(
`speed is near or passes throueh
`generated by high vibrations rIs
`of bearings, seals, or imoellers.
`ized by a high-pitched squeal. V
`tor fans, shaft keys, andcouplir
`rngs produce high-frequency no
`and speed.
`
`Liquld Notse Sources
`
`These are pressure fluctuatior
`Liquid noise can be produced by
`(turbulence). pulsations, cavitatir
`ration, and impeller interaction
`pressure pulsations and flow mo
`or broad-band frequency compon
`any part of the structure includin
`cal vibration, then noise may b
`rypes of pulsation rou."e. ociu.
`o Discrete-frequency componentt
`as vane passing frequency and
`. Flow-induced pulsatlon ciused
`tlons and side branches in the ;
`r Broad-band turbulent energy r€
`. Intermittent bursts of broa"d'-bar
`ing, and water hammer.
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 3 of 72
`
`

`

`Vibration and Noise in Pumps 423
`
`mechanisms and cotnmon noise conduction paths by which noise can be
`transmitted. If noise itself is the major concern, it can be controlled by
`acoustic enclosurcs or other treatment [1, 2].
`
`Sources ol Pump Nolse
`
`Mechanlcal Noise Sources
`
`Common mechanical sources that may produce noise include vibrating
`pump components or surfaces because of the pressure variations that are
`generated in the liquid or air. Impeller or seal rubs, defective or damaged
`bearings, vibrating pipe walls, and unbalanced rotors are examples of
`mechanical sources.
`In centrifugal machines, improper installation of couplings often
`causes mechanical noise at twice pump speed (misalignment). If pump
`speed is near or passes through the lateral critical speed, noise can be
`generated by high vibrations resulting ftom imbalance or by the rubbing
`of bearings, seals, or impcllers. If rubbing occurs, it may be character-
`ized by a high-pitched squeal. Windage noises may be generated by mo-
`tor fans, shaft keys, and coupling bolts. Damaged rolling element bear-
`ings produce high-frequency noise [3] related to the bearing geometry
`and s@.
`
`Liquld Nols6 Sources
`
`These are pressure fluctuations produced directly by liquid motion.
`Liquid noise can be produced by vortex fomation in high-velocity flow
`(turbulence), pulsations, cavitation, flashing, water hammer, flow sepa-
`ration, and impeller interaction with the pump cutwater. The resulting
`pressure pulsations and flow modulations may produce either a discrete
`or broad-band frequency component. If the generated frequencies excite
`any part of fte sEucture including the piping or the pump into mechad-
`cal vibration, then noise may be radiated imo the environnent. Four
`types of pulsation sources occur commonly in centrifugal pumps [2]:
`. Discrete-frequency components generated by dre pump impeller such
`as vane passing
`and multiples,
`o Flow-induced pulsation caused by turbulence such as flow past restric-
`tions and side branches in the piping system.
`. Broad-band turbulent energl resulting from high flow velocities.
`. Intermittent bursts of broad-band energy caused by cavitation, flash-
`ing, and watu hanrmer.
`
`l l
`
`l
`
`lf,hnatflom amdl
`!o[se [m
`rumops
`
`)tion
`is to be expected from centrifueal
`igh noise levels (in excess of l]m
`3rhine o1 squeal) can be an early
`res or vibration problems in cen-
`chapter is to concentrate on the
`a by-product; however, reduction
`cern. The main point ofinterest of
`s and their effect on the reliabiliry
`presented to reduce the vibration
`es by modiffing the pump or pip
`
`levels indicates that sufficient en-
`'ibrations and possible damage to
`ce and cause of noise is the first
`rormal or whether problems may
`generated by the mechanical mo-
`pid motion in the pump and pip
`nnical and liquid sourcas can be
`f noise sources to control DumD
`and mechanical noise-geneiation
`
`th6 sngln.lrlng steff ol Englneering Dynlmlcs
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 4 of 72
`
`

`

`incorect application, hydrauli
`sign and manufacturing flaws
`vibrations and failures are [5]
`lnstelhtlon/ilalntenance
`
`Unbalance
`Shaft +o-shaft misalignment
`Seal rubs
`Case distortion caused bv oi
`Piping dynamic r".ponr" ('r.
`Support structural response
`Anchor bolts/grout
`Improper assembly
`
`Appllcarion
`
`Operating off of design point
`Improper speed/flow
`Inadequate NPSH
`Entrained air
`
`Hydraullc
`
`Interaction of pump (head-flc
`Hydraulic instabilities
`Acoustic resonances (Dressun
`rtr/ater hammer
`Flow distribution problems
`Recirculation
`Cavitation
`Flow induced excitation (turb
`High flow velocity
`
`O€Cgn/[anutacturlng
`
`L:teral critical speeds
`lbrsional critical speeds
`Improper bearings or seals
`Rotor insrability
`Shaft misalignment in iournah
`Impeller resonances
`Bearing housing/pedestal reso
`
`424 Centrifugal Pumps: Design and Application
`
`A variety of secondary flow patterns [4] that produce pressure fluctua-
`tiors are possible in centritrgal pumps, as shown in Figure l8-1, particu-
`-operation
`at off-design flow. The numbers shown in the flow
`larly for
`stream are the locations of the following flow mechanisms:
`l. Stall
`2. Recirculation (secondarY flow)
`3. Circulation
`4. Leakage
`5. Unsteady flow fluctuations
`6. \lhke (vortices)
`7. Thrbulence
`8. Cavitation
`
`Caulcs of Vlbrrtlon3
`
`Causes of vibrations are of major concern because of the damage to the
`pump and piping that generally results from excessive vibrations. Vibra-
`iioni in pumps may be a result of imProper installation or maintenance,
`
`?,
`
`8
`
`t
`
`IIIIEI GUI DT
`
`\-s-l
`
`I
`
`1o
`
`ROTATIOT{AL ATIS
`
`l.
`v.
`Flgurc l&1. Secondary llow around pump imPoller ofl-deBign flow EPRI Re
`search Projoct 120er8, Roport CS'1445 [41.
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 5 of 72
`
`

`

`Application
`
`4l that produce pressure fluctua-
`s shown in Figure l8-1, particu-
`lbe numbers shown in the flow
`g flow mechanisms:
`
`Vibration and Noise in Pumps 425
`
`incorrect application, hydraulic interaction with the piping system, or de-
`sigo and manufacturing flaws, Some of the common causes of excessive
`vibrations and failures are [5]:
`
`lnstallation/Malntenance
`
`Unbalance
`Shaft-to-shaft misalignment
`Seal rubs
`Case distortion caused by piping loads
`Piping dynamic response (supports and restraints)
`Support structural response (foundation)
`Anchor bolts/grout
`Improper assembly
`
`Appllcation
`
`Operating off of design p<iint
`Improper speed/flow
`Inadequate NPSH
`Entrained air
`
`Hydraullc
`
`Interaction of pump (head-flow curve) with piping resonanoes
`Hydraulic instabilities
`Acoustic resonances (pressure pulsations)
`rirhter hammer
`Flow distribution problems
`Recirculation
`Cavitation
`Flow induced excitation (turbulence)
`High flow velocity
`
`Ileslgn/ilanulscturlng
`
`Lateral critical speeds
`Torsional critical speeds
`Improper bearings or seals
`Rotor instability
`Shaft misalignment in journals
`Impeller resonances
`Bearing housing/pedestal resonancas
`
`ratlons
`
`ern because of the damage to the
`om exccssive vibrations. Vibra-
`,per installation or maintenance,
`
`7,
`
`I
`
`t
`
`4
`
`-+-
`
`impeller off-do8ign flow EPHI Rs-
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 6 of 72
`
`

`

`produce torsional or lateral vi
`coupling are similar to those j
`small angular misalignment or
`not constant. If one shaft spee
`has a faster rotational rate [6] f
`tional rate for part of the revol
`sults in a second harmonic (tu
`
`iE=
`=F:[=
`
`(.)
`
`,lTN
`n@,
`
`t N,
`
`,.)',r.rnd
`{
`(b) Gl
`
`(c) Pol.r
`Flgurc l&.2. E tecls o, ang
`
`426 Contrifugal Pumps: Design and Application
`
`Many of these causes are a result of an interaction of the pump (or its
`driver) with the fluid or the structure (including piping). This interactive
`relationship requires that the complete system be evaluated rather than
`investigating individual components when problems occur. Although
`prototype pumps or a new design may run the gambit of these problems,
`standard design or "off-the-shelf" pumps are not immune, particularly to
`system problems.
`
`lnstallatlonruaintenanca Ef lects
`
`UnbaLnc!. Unbalance of a rotating shaft can cause large transverse vi-
`brations at certain speeds, known as critical speeds, that coincide with
`the lateral natural frequencies ofthe shaft, l,ateral vibration due to unbal-
`ance is probably the most cornmon cause of downtime and failures in
`centrifugal pumps. Damage due to unbalance response may range from
`seal or bearing wipes to catastrophic failures of the rotor. Excessive un-
`balance can result from rotor bow, unbalanced couplings, thermal distor-
`tion, or loose parts. All too often, field balancing is required elen after
`careful shop balancing has been performed.
`Although a pump rotor may be adequately balanced at startup, after a
`period of operation the pump rotor may become unbalanced by erosion,
`corrosion, or wear. Unbalance could also be caused by non-uniform plat-
`ing of the pumped product onto the impeller. In this instance, cleaning the
`impeller could restore the balance. Erosion of the impeller by cavitation
`or chemical reaction with the product may cause permanent unbalance
`requiring replacement of the impeller. rlbar of the impeller or shaft
`caused by rubs will require the repair or replacement of dre dern ged
`component. Another cause of unbalarrce can occur if lubricated couplings
`have an uneven build-up of grease or sludge.
`Assembly or manufacturing procedures may cause a new pump rotor
`to be unbalanced because of slight manufacturing imperfections or toler-
`ance build-up resulting in the center of mass of the rotor not being exactly
`at the center of rotation. Forging or casting procedues cao produce local
`variations in the density of the meal due to inclusions or voids. On large
`cast impellers, the bore for the shaft may not be exactly centered with the
`casting geometry. Stacking a rotor can result in thermal disortions of the
`shaft or impellers that can result in a cocked impeller. Nonsymmetries of
`just a few mils caused by these manufacturing or assembly methods can
`result in significant forces generated by a high speed roor. Mo6t ofthese
`nonsymmetries can be compensated for by balancing the rotor,
`
`Mlsalignment. Angular misalignment between two shafts connected
`with a flexible coupling introduces an additional &iving force that can
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 7 of 72
`
`

`

`)n
`
`on of the pump (ot its
`ping). This interactive
`evaluated ralher than
`.ems occur. Although
`rbit of these problems,
`nmune, particularly to
`
`lse large transverse vi-
`ds, that coincide with
`vibration duo to unbal-
`rntime and failures in
`Ponse may r4nge from
`te rotor. Excessive un-
`rplings, thermal distor-
`I is required ovetr after
`
`nc€d at startuP, after a
`nbalanced by erosion,
`d by non-uniform plat-
`s instanc€, cleaning tlrc
`impeller by cavitation
`I pennanent unbalance
`the impeller or shaft
`:ment of the damaged
`if lubricated couplings
`
`use a new pump fotor
`imperfections or toler-
`rotor not being exactly
`ures can produce local
`ons or voids. On large
`actly centered with the
`rmal distortions of the
`ler. Nonsymmetries of
`assembly methods can
`,d rotor. Most of these
`ring the rotor.
`
`two shafts connected
`driving forc€
`that can
`
`vibration and Noise in PumF 427
`
`produce torsional or latoral vibrations. The forces in a typical industrial
`coupling are similar to 0rose in a universal joint (Figure l8-2). When a
`small angular misalignment occurs, the velocity ratio across the joint is
`not constant. If one shaft speed is assumed constant, then the other shaft
`has a faster rotational rate [6] for part ofthe revolution and a slower rota-
`tional rate for part of the revolution. This variation of rotating speed re-
`sults in a second harmonic (twice shaft speed) vibrational component.
`
`B
`
`{!) Univ.rs.l Joint
`
`0
`
`(b) Ge.red coupllnq {ith
`An-oular [lisa] i gnmert
`
`(() Pol.r Angul.r Velocity Di.grrn
`Flgure '18-2. Ettects o, anguler misalignmsnl in shatt couplingE.
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 8 of 72
`
`

`

`428 Centrifugal Pumps: Dssign and Application
`
`Piplng and Structure. The pump should be relatively isolated from the
`piping. The weight and thermal loading on the suction and discharge con-
`nections should be minimized. The American Petroleum Institute (API)
`Standard 610 [7] specifies allowable external nozzle forces and mo-
`ments. Most pump manufacturers specify allowable weight and thermal
`loads transferred from the pipe to the pump case. Static forces ftom the
`piping may misalign the pump from its driver, or for excessive loading,
`the pump case may become distorted and cause rubs or seal and bearing
`damage. Thermal flexibility analyses of the piping should be performed
`to evaluate piping loads and to design the necessary supports and re-
`straints to minimize the transfer of piprng loads to the operating equip-
`ment.
`Vibrations of the piping or the support structure can be mechanically
`transferred to the pump. The piping and lhe structure should not have
`their resonant frequencies coincident with any of the pump excitations
`such as vane passing frequency or multiples. The vibrations transferred
`from the pipe to the structure can be minimized by using a visco-elastic
`material (i.e., belting material) between the prpe and the pipe clamp.
`
`Applicalion
`
`The initial stage of pump system design should include the task of de-
`fining the range of operating conditions for pressure, flow, temperatures.
`and the fluid properties. The vendors can provide the correct pump ge-
`ometry for these design conditions. Expected variations in operating con-
`ditions and fluid composition, if a significant percentage, may influence
`the design.
`Improper application or changing conditions can result in a variety of
`problems. Operation at high-flow, low-head conditions can cause vibra-
`tions of the rotor and case. Inadequate NPSH can result in cavitation tha!
`will cause noise and vibration of varying degrees.
`
`Bearings. General purpose, small horsepower pumps in process plars
`generally have rolling element beatings. Noise and vibrations are com-
`monly a result of bearing wear. As the rolling elements or races wear, tht
`worn surfaces or defects initially produce a noise and as wear increa-.e-.
`vibrations may become noticeable. Several vibrational ftequencies m.a..
`occur that depend on the geometry of the bearing components and the::
`relative rotational speeds [3]. The frequencies are generally above o5:-
`ating speed.
`Many ball bearing failures [8] are due to contaminants in the lubn*:r
`that have found their way into the bearing after the machine has be=
`placed in operation. Common contaminants include moisture, dirt. ar
`
`I
`
`other miscellaneous particles
`may cause wear or permanent
`tremendous stresses generated
`purpose pumps and I
`-.,speclal
`fllm (hydrodynam ic) bearings.
`rotllng element bearings forii;
`orodynamic bearing suppors t
`geometry of the hyarodynamic
`portant role in controlling the I
`vtbrational characteristici of ti
`
`Seals. The fluid dynamics of I
`ll- d9r.9ynryu", t9l. Hydrodr
`me stabilization of rotatinq ma
`targe axial flow in the turbilent
`ro produce Iarge stiffness and d,
`robr vibrations and shbiliry. Wr
`and-cause greater leakage and p
`renstrcs of the seal resu-iting in
`
`Hydraullc Eftectg
`
`.Hydraulic effects and pulsatior
`vroratron of the pump oipiping :
`pas$ng frequency arO it" t armo
`c-an, be. caused by acoustical reso:
`Hil:HX.:"fiix",1i#*Ti1
`an_ uneyen pressure d'istributiln r
`rotor.
`
`Ii:::r:T". srarring and stoppins
`r{l,#iilil::l:r#3ffH;
`suoden rmpact.force to thJ pump
`warcr hammer has caused cracks ir
`was anchored.
`closure of con yendonal v:
`" --Rapid
`-€vere water haruner. Increasing tl
`[rE[1[:;l"*d';n*.X
`oon tor various closure rates [ib].
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 9 of 72
`
`

`

`Application
`
`I be relatively isolated from te
`n the suction and discharge e-r--
`rican Fetroleum Institute (AlT
`rternal nozzle forces and m;-
`y allowable weight and therm:-
`mp case. Static forces ftom Se
`lriver, or for excessive loadrnr
`I cause rubs or seal and bearir.:
`the piping should be performc
`lhe necessary supports and re-
`g loads to the operating equip
`
`: structure can be mechanically
`Ithe structure should not have
`th any of the pump excitations
`e.s. The vibrations transferred
`rimized by using a visco-elastic
`the pipe and the pipe clamp.
`
`r should include the task of de-
`r pressure, flow, temperatures,
`r provide the correct pump ge-
`ted variations in operating con-
`)ant petcentage, may influence
`
`itions can result in a variety of
`ad conditions can cause vibra-
`SH can result in cavitation that
`degrees.
`
`Dwer pumps in process plants
`Noise and vibrations are ornn-
`ing elements or races wear, the
`a noise and as wear increases
`rl vibrational frequeacies may
`bearing components and their
`cies are generally above oper-
`
`) contaminants ifl the lubricant
`rg after the machine has been
`ts include moisture, dirt, and
`
`vibration and Noiso in Pumps 425
`
`cher miscellaneous particles which, when tr-?ppeq insid: lle.-bearing'
`;;;;;;;;
`p,i..r*otrv ina"nt rhe balli irnd racewavs under the
`;;;;;" Gt;es'generated bv tte operating load'
`m'*rxtm+:mgm*x*e*:**;+
`;"'itiil;ffiil;#il.." fr" 'it'i " a fttm ot o:iias lt rotates' rhe
`Il]j"iI"rir'. rt"[.o.iin"*i" be;in! and the oil properties ptay a1 ry-
`:ffi;ii#;:ffiiii; d;i"t"a "?ti"a
`speedi and consequentlv the
`iitrational draracteristics of the pump'
`Secls. The fluid dynamics of flow tlrough sealslrave a dramatic effect
`;;;;"il;-;;;r-i91 Hvdrodvnamic fories involved mav contribute to
`;;;'$^bilil"ti* oi iotuting .h.t'i""ty or make it unstable' s€als with
`i"t" *i"r nt"' in ttre turtitem r"ngei such as in feed water Pumps' tend
`fi ;;"fr; ilil;l+;;;; "d
`e*''pt'i coefficients. that are-be^nefi cial to
`;;fi;il;il;"t-# stabititv. wearbr 6e seals will increase theclearance
`ffi;;;;Hleakage and possibly change tre rotordynamic charac-
`teristics of-the seal resulting in incroased vibrations'
`
`Hydraullc Effects
`Hvdraulic effects and pulsations can result in almost any frequeircy of
`p"rp-o.'pipirg from once per r.wo.lu$on up tothe vane
`oassinq frequencv and its trarmonics. frequencias below running sqed
`"iirLrrii"r,iiJ
`Hfff;tHil""outti""ii*n"nce s' Generally' these effects are due
`;,#illl*;;;;;thJit"ilse
`diftuser.or some other discontinuitv
`in the case. Any nonsynrmetry of ihe internals of the pump may produce
`p;rrt" disttiuuti'on that can result in foices applied to the
`;;;;;
`rotor.
`
`Ttamlents. Starting and stopping pumps with the attendant opening and
`closing of valves is a major cause of severe transients in piping systems'
`the rJsulting pressue surge, referred to as water hammer' can apply a
`r"Ja", ir"pi"f f"rce to rhJ pump, its internals, and the piping' Severe
`fr".it"t tt.. caused oracks in concrete structures to which the pipe
`t
`"t"i
`was anchored.
`n""iJ"t*rr" of conventional valves used in fecdwater lines can cause
`.";;[;iln
`,nii. tncreasing the ctosure time of the valve can reduce
`thc severitv of the surge pr"st,it". Analytical rnethods arc available to
`*."irity oi *'utt hammer in a porticular piping configura-
`"i,"ilJui,,
`tion for various closure rates [10].
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 10 of 72
`
`

`

`430 Centritugal Pumps: Design and Application
`Cavltatlon and Fla3hlng. For many liquid pump piping systems, it is
`common to have some degree of flashing and caviation associated with
`the pump or with thc prcssure control valves in the piping system. High
`flow rates produce more severe cavitation because ofgreater flow losses
`through restrictions.
`Cavitation produces high local pressures that may be traosmitted di-
`rectly to the Frmp or piping and may also be transmitted through the
`fluid to otlrcr areas of the prping. Caviation is one of the most commonly
`occurring and damaging problems in liquid pump systems. The term
`cavitation refers !o the formation and subsequent collapse of vapor bub-
`bles (or cavities) in a ligid caused by dynamic pressure variations near
`the vapor pressure. Cavitation can produce noise, vibration, loss of head
`and capecity as well as severc erosion of the impeller and casing sur-
`faces,
`Before the pressure of the liquid flowing through a centrifugal pump is
`increased, the liquid may experience a pressure &op inside the pump
`case. Ihis is due in part to acceleration of the liquid into the eye of the
`impeller and flow separation from the impeller inlet vanes. If flow is in
`excess of design or the incident vane angle is incorrect, high-velocity,
`low-pressure eddies may form. If the liquid pressure is reduced to the
`vaporization prcssure, the ligid will flash. Later in the flow path the
`pressure will increase. The implosion which follows causes what is usu-
`ally referred to as cavitation noise. The collapse of the vapor pockets,
`usually on the nonpressure side ofthe impeller vanes, causes severe dam-
`age (vane erosion) in addition to noise.
`When a centrifugal pump is operated at flows away from the point of
`bast efficiency, noise is often heard amund the pump casing. The magni-
`tude and freguency of this noise may vary from pump to pump and are
`dependent on the magdtude of the pump head being generated, the ratio
`of NPSH required to NPSH available, and the amount by which actual
`flow deviates from ideal flow. Noise is often generated when the vane
`angles of the inla gurdes, imFller, and diffuser are incorrect for the ac-
`tual flow rate.
`Cavitation can best be recognized by observing the complex wave or
`dynamic pressure variation using an oscilloscope and a pressure tratrs-
`ducer. Ihe pressure waveform will be non-sinusoi&l with sharp maxi-
`mum peaks (Cpike$ and rounded minimum peaks occurring at vapo'
`plessure as shown in Figurc 18-3. As the pressure drops, it canncr
`produce a vacuum less than the vapor pressure.
`Cavitation-like noise can also be heard at flows less than design, evea
`when available inlet NPSH is in excess of purp required NPSH, and this
`has been a puzzling problem. Ar explanation offered by Fraser I I, 12]
`suggests that noise ofa very low, random ftequency but very high inten-
`
`'o]
`
`_.1
`
`lr
`
`(.) c.!i
`
`{tz
`!sa
`.9 36
`618
`
`0
`
`(b) ConDt.x !r
`Shoiing ar
`Flgwo t8\r. Cavh
`
`sity results from backflow r
`charge, or both. Every centri
`tain conditions of flow reduc
`can be d"maging to the pressr
`Ier vanes (and also to casinp ,
`ctease in loudness of a barisi
`suction and/or discharse orlr
`Sound levels mea"rrfo 'rt
`rt
`slction piping during cavitati<
`tron prcduced a wide_band si
`ever, in this case, the vane pa
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 11 of 72
`
`

`

`lltl
`
`ication
`
`Pump ptptng systems, it is
`I cavitation associated with
`in the piping system. High
`nuse of greater flow losses
`
`hat may be transmitted di-
`be trartsmited through the
`i one of the most commonly
`pump systems. The term
`rent collapse of vapor bub-
`tic pressure variations near
`rise, vibration, loss of head
`e impeller and casing sur-
`
`rough a centrifugal pump is
`surc drop inside the pump
`e liquid ino ttre eye if thi
`cr inlet vanes. If flow is in
`is incorrect, high-velocity,
`pressure is rcduced to the
`Later in the flow path the
`bllows causes what is usu-
`rpse of the vapor pockets,
`vanes, causes severe dam-
`
`ws away from tho point of
`r pump casing. The magni-
`)m pump to pump and are
`being generated, the ratio
`e anrount by which actual
`generated when fte vane
`lr are incorrect for the ac-
`
`ring the complex wave or
`ope and a pressure trans-
`tusoidal with sharp maxi-
`peaks occurring at vapor
`rressure drops, it camot
`
`rws less than deqign, even
`r rcquircd NPSH, and this
`rffered by Fraser [l l, 12]
`ency but very high inten-
`
`Vibration and Noise in Pumps 431
`
`lr
`
`tt
`
`lt
`
`rr
`
`rt
`
`,=0
`
`(.) C.vtr.tion Theor),
`lf Pd, P3 - Plp than cavitltion rill occur
`P5 = St.tic Prarru..
`Pd' 0ra.riC P!lratio.s, te.o.0..l
`Pvp= !rpo.0resturc
`
`ll
`
`t
`ilI
`IilTfl
`
`?
`
`08
`
`90
`
`72
`
`54
`
`36
`
`lg
`
`0
`
`5c i!/div
`{b) Conplet I.veforn or P.esrvre
`snori.g Iff€.t. or C.vit.aiot
`Flguro 1&3. Cavitalion etfects on lhe dynamic praosur€
`
`sity results from bacKlow at the impeller eye or at the impeller dis-
`charge, or both. Every centdfugal pump has this recirculation under cer-
`tain conditions of flow reduction. Operation in a recirculating condition
`can be damaging to the pr€ssure side of the inlet and/or discharge impel-
`ler vanes (and also to casing vanes). Recirculation is evidenced by an in-
`crease in loudness of a banging type, random noise, and an increase in
`suction and/or discharge pressure pulsations as flow is decreased.
`Sound levels measured at the casing of an 8000 hp pump and near the
`suction piping during cavitation [2] are shown in Figure 18.4. The cavita-
`tion ptoduced a wide-band shock that excited many frequencies; how-
`ever, in this case, the vane passing frequency (number of impeller vanes
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 12 of 72
`
`

`

`432 Centrifugal Pumps: Design and Application
`
`5 ll(lat tior lwllon
`----- 6 llrclltt ,tot qnl .lst
`-
`
`i6
`
`t^xt trt'tc
`Itt0u[,r(r
`
`^il)
`
`Flgure lH. Noiso spsctra of cavitation in cenlrifugal pump.
`
`times revolutions per second) and multiples of it predominated. Cavita-
`tion noise of this type usually produces very high ftequency noise, best
`described as " crackling."
`Flashing is particularly common in hot water systems (fe€dwater pump
`systems) when the hot, pressurized water experiences a decrease in pres-
`sure through a restriction (i.e., flow control valve). This reduction of
`pressure allows the liquid to suddenly vapotae, or flash, which results in
`a noise similar to cavitation. lb avoid flashing after a resricdon, suffi-
`cient back pressure should be provided. Alternately, the restriction could
`be located at the end of the line so that the flashing energy can dissipate
`into a larger volume.
`
`Flow TUrbulence, Pump generated dynamic pressure sources include
`turbulence (vortices or wakes) produced in the clearance space between
`impeller vane tips and the stationary diffrrser or volute lips, Dynamic
`pressure fluctuations or pulsations produced in this manner can cause im-
`peller vibrations or can result in shaft vibrations as the pressure pulses
`impinge on the impeller.
`Flow past an obstruction or restriction in the piping may produce tur-
`bulence or flow-induced pulsations [2]. These pulsations may produce
`both noise and vibration over a wide-frequency band. The frequencies
`are related to the flow velocity and geometry of the obstruction. These
`pulsations may cause a resonant interaction with other parts of the acous-
`tic piping system.
`Most of these unstable flow patterns are produced by shearing at tle
`boundary b€tween a high-velocity and low-velocity region in a fluic
`
`field. Typical examples of rl
`obstructions or past deadwatr
`bidirectional flow. The shear
`are converted to pressure Defl
`localized vibration excitaton
`acoustic natural response mor
`the turbulence has ; strong in
`ttls voriex shedding. Experir
`tex flow is more severe when
`the generation frequency of th
`turbulent energy centeied ar,
`with a dimensionless Strouha.
`f:$y
`D
`where f: vortex frequency,
`S" = Strouhal numbei.
`V = flow velocitv in t
`D:acharacteriiticdi
`For flow past tubes, D is the
`past a branch pipe, D is the ins
`Strouhal equation is firrrher de
`an example, flow at 100 ft/se
`produce broad-band turbulencr
`slub were acoustically resonani
`tlon amplitudes could result.
`Pressure regulators or flow r
`ated with both turbulence and f
`ating with a severe pressure dro
`ate significant turbulence. Althr
`broad-band, it is characteristic
`sponding to a Strouhal number
`Pu.lsatlons. pumping systems
`pulsatlons through normal ounr
`tions occur from mechanisms w
`rn a centrifugal pump are generi
`-betwe
`lp9_n the clearance space
`drttuser or volute lips, the instal
`symmeffy of the pump rotor an(
`Tculatgly known, predicting th
`loenucal pumps often have diffr
`
`Exhibit 1130
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 13 of 72
`
`

`

`ld Application
`
`6 lxfltt tiot Sucnoli flnic
`6 |lrortt rlm! PUi' cisa
`
`rz
`
`alion in contrifugal pump,
`
`of_it predominated. Cavita-
`'Ies
`/ery tugl frequency noise. besr
`water systems (feedwater DumD
`exDenences a decrease in'Drc"._
`rrot valve). This reductitin of
`rrze, or flash, which results in
`:mng atter a restric(on. suffi_
`rr:rn_atglx the restriction could
`, rusnrng energy can dissipate
`
`uic pressure sourcts include
`r lne cleaEDce space between
`user
`_or volute lips. Dynamic
`r ln 0lis manner can cause im_
`?uons as the pressurc pulses
`the piping may produce tur-
`tese pulsations may produce
`'ency- qand. The freqlencies
`rl.ot the obsEuction. These
`vrm other parts of the acous_
`prc{uc<d by shearing at the
`'-veroclty region itr a fluid
`
`Vibration and Noiso ln Pumps 433
`
`field. Typical examples of this type of turbulence include flow around
`obstructions or past deadwater regions (i.e., a closed bypass line) or by
`bi{irectional flow. The shearing action produces vorlices, or eddies that
`are converted to pressure perturbations at the pipe wall that may result in
`localized vibration excitation of the piping or pump components. The
`acoustic natural response modes of the piping system and the location of
`the turbulence has a strong influence on the frequency and amPlitude of
`this vortex shedding. Experimental measurements have shown that vor-
`tex flow is more severe when a system acoustic resonance coincides with
`the generati

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket