`
`Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________________
`
`BAZOOKA-FARMSTAR, LLC,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NUHN INDUSTRIES LTD.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`_______________________________________
`
`Case IPR2023-01161
`
`U.S. Patent No. 11,358,425
`
`_______________________________________
`
`CONFIDENTIAL VIDEO-RECORDED REMOTE ZOOM
`
` VIDEOCONFERENCE DEPOSITION OF DOUGLAS PRAIRIE
`
`Taken on Tuesday, June 25, 2024
`
`Scheduled for 9:00 a.m. EDT
`
`REPORTED BY: DANA S. ANDERSON-LINNELL
`
`Job No.: MW 6753765
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 1 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 2
`
`CONFIDENTIAL VIDEO-RECORDED REMOTE ZOOM
`
`VIDEOCONFERENCE DEPOSITION OF DOUGLAS PRAIRIE taken
`
`on Tuesday, June 25, 2024, commencing at 9:02 a.m.
`
`EDT, via a REMOTE COUNSEL ZOOM PROCEEDING, before
`
`Dana S. Anderson-Linnell, a Stenographic Shorthand
`
`Reporter and Notary Public of and for the State of
`
`Minnesota.
`
` ***************
`
` APPEARANCES
`
`On Behalf of Petitioner Bazooka-Farmstar, LLC:
`
`Thomas J. Leach, Esquire
`
`MERCHANT & GOULD, P.C.
`
`150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2200
`
`Minneapolis MN 55402
`
`Email: TLeach@merchantgould.com
`
`(Appearances continued on next page.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 2 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 3
`
`APPEARANCES (continued):
`
`On Behalf of Patent Owner Nuhn Industries Ltd. and
`
`the Witness:
`
`James B. Luchsinger, Esquire
`
`HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.
`
`5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200
`
`Troy, MI 48098
`
`Email: bluchsinger@harnessip.com
`
`ALSO PRESENT: Kyle Peterson, videographer
`
`NOTE: The original transcript will be filed with the
`
`Merchant and Gould Law Firm, pursuant to the
`
`applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 3 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 4
`
`INDEX PAGE
`
`WITNESS: DOUGLAS PRAIRIE
`
`EXAMINATION BY:
`
`Mr. Leach 10
`
`INSTRUCTIONS NOT TO ANSWER: (None.)
`
`PRODUCTION REQUESTS: (None.)
`
`INDEX OF MARKED EXHIBITS:
`
`Exhibit 1130 - New Oxford American
`
`Dictionary 3rd Edition excerpt 119
`
`Exhibit 1132 - Wayback Machine Definition
`
`of Slurry 120
`
`INDEX OF PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS:
`
`Exhibit 1001 - United States Patent
`
`No. 11,358,425 (Nuhn) 22
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 4 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 5
`
`INDEX OF PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS PAGE
`
`(continued):
`
`Exhibit 1005 - United States Patent
`
`Application Publication No. US 2012/0185129 236
`
`Exhibit 1012 - Schröer Environment and Water
`
`Technology Light Amphibious Boat/Vehicle,
`
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2023-01161 255
`
`Exhibit 1014 - United States Patent
`
`Application Number U.S. 2014/0112093 89
`
`Exhibit 1019 - Western Producer article,
`
`Float your boat in a slurry moat, Bazooka v.
`
`Nuhn - IPR2023-01161 220
`
`Exhibit 1029 - United States Patent
`
`No. 8,944,758 (Nuhn) 148
`
`Exhibit 1040 - NRAES (1998) NRAES-89
`
`Liquid Manure Application Systems D 199
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 5 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 6
`
`INDEX OF PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS PAGE
`
`(continued):
`
`Exhibit 1040-2 - NRAES (1998) NRAES-89
`
`Liquid Manure Application Systems 199
`
`Exhibit 1066 - AWMFH - Chapter 12 (Waste
`
`Management Equipment) 187
`
`Exhibit 1074 - Lagoon Crawler Customer
`
`Article, NUHN15000007687 213
`
`Exhibit 1081 - Complete copy of the UD Umwelt
`
`Amphi-King marketing video 93
`
`Exhibit 1082 - Certified Translation of Video 113
`
`Exhibit 1088 - Manure-Manager
`
`January/February 2011 274
`
`Exhibit 2029 - Declaration of Douglas S.
`
`Prairie in Support of Patent Owner’s Response 15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 6 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 7
`
`INDEX OF PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS PAGE
`
`(continued):
`
`Exhibit 2030 - Natural crusting of
`
`slurry storage as an abatement measure 132
`
`Exhibit 2031 - Wolverine Agitation Boat -
`
`Bazooka Farmstar, Bazooka v. Nuhn -
`
`IPR2023-01161 251
`
`(Original exhibits attached to original transcript;
`
`copies to counsel as requested. Previously marked
`
`exhibits referenced attached.)
`
`REPORTER'S NOTE: All quotations from exhibits are
`
`reflected in the manner in which they were read into
`
`the record and do not necessarily indicate an exact
`
`quote from the document.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 7 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 8
`
` THE COURT REPORTER: Do all counsel
`
` stipulate that I can swear in the witness
`
` remotely over the Zoom videoconference?
`
` MR. LEACH: Yes.
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Yes, we do.
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. We
`
` are going on the record. The time is 9:02 a.m.
`
` Today's date is June 25th, 2024. Please note
`
` that this deposition is being conducted
`
` virtually. Quality of recording depends on the
`
` quality of camera and Internet connection of
`
` participants. What is seen from the witness
`
` and heard on screen is what will be recorded.
`
` Audio and video recording will continue to take
`
` place unless all parties agree to go off the
`
` record.
`
` This is Media Unit 1 of the
`
` video-recorded deposition of Douglas Prairie,
`
` taken by counsel for the petitioner in the
`
` matter of Bazooka-Farmstar, LLC versus Nuhn
`
` Industries Ltd., filed in the United States
`
` Patent and Trademark Office, Case Number
`
` IPR2023-01161. This deposition is being
`
` conducted remotely using virtual technology.
`
` My name is Kyle Peterson,
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 8 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 9
`
` representing Veritext Legal Solutions. I'm the
`
` videographer. The court reporter is
`
` Dana Anderson from the firm Veritext Legal
`
` Solutions. I am not authorized to administer
`
` an oath, I am not related to any party in this
`
` action, nor am I financially interested in the
`
` outcome.
`
` If there are any objections to
`
` proceeding, please state them at the time of
`
` your appearance.
`
` MR. LEACH: Tom Leach with Merchant
`
` and Gould for Petitioner Bazooka-Farmstar.
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: James Bradley
`
` Luchsinger. I'm an attorney with the Harness
`
` IP law firm, who represent Patent Owner Nuhn
`
` Industries Limited.
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: And would the
`
` reporter please swear in the witness.
`
` And, Counsel, you may proceed.
`
` DOUGLAS PRAIRIE,
`
` called as a witness, being first duly sworn,
`
` was examined and testified as follows:
`
` MR. LEACH: Great.
`
` EXAMINATION
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 9 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 10
`
` Q. Thank you, Mr. Prairie. Can you please
`
` state your name, address and work address for
`
` the record, please?
`
` A. My full name is Douglas Samuel Prairie.
`
` I live in Brookings, South Dakota. Residential
`
` street address is 532 Copper Mountain Circle,
`
` Brookings, South Dakota 57006. My primary
`
` employer is South Dakota State University. It
`
` resides in Brookings, South Dakota as well.
`
` Q. And are you represented by counsel here
`
` today?
`
` A. Yes. Brad is representing and work with
`
` relative to Harness IP.
`
` Q. And so they're your lawyers in this
`
` proceeding?
`
` A. I am consulting with them on this case,
`
` so they represent me. I guess they are the
`
` legal firm that I'm working through on this
`
` case.
`
` Q. Is there any reason you can't give fair
`
` and accurate testimony today?
`
` A. No, there's not.
`
` Q. So I want to go over just a few
`
` deposition rules. First, have you ever been
`
` deposed before? I think I read in your report
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 10 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 11
`
` or your CV that you have.
`
` A. Yes, I have.
`
` Q. How many times?
`
` A. It was one case. There was multiple
`
` depositions in that case. I don't remember the
`
` number of times. It was more than one.
`
` Q. Okay. Well, in this depo if I -- if you
`
` don't understand a question, please ask me to
`
` rephrase it or clarify, okay?
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. And if you answer a question, I'll
`
` assume you understood the question, is that
`
` fair?
`
` A. Fair.
`
` Q. And for the court reporter we need to
`
` give verbal responses. So an uh-huh or a shake
`
` of the head, that doesn't help. We need to
`
` have, like, yes, no or a verbal answer so the
`
` court reporter can get it down, okay?
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. And I won't talk over you, and I ask
`
` that you don't talk over me, and that way the
`
` court reporter can get down everything that's
`
` said, because it's hard for her to do that when
`
` we're talking over each other, okay?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 11 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 12
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. And you understand that your testimony
`
` here today is under oath, and it has the same
`
` force and effect as if you were in a courtroom
`
` in front of a judge or jury, correct?
`
` A. I do understand that.
`
` Q. And you understand that your counsel may
`
` object from time to time, but unless he
`
` instructs you not to answer, you have to answer
`
` the question asked, correct?
`
` A. I understand that.
`
` Q. I want to go through some vocabulary
`
` really quick just so we're straight here on the
`
` record. So the patent owner in this matter is
`
` Nuhn Industries Ltd., correct?
`
` A. Specifically which patent are you
`
` referring to?
`
` Q. The '425 patent.
`
` A. Yes. That's Nuhn's patent.
`
` Q. And that's the patent at issue in this
`
` IPR, correct?
`
` A. That is correct.
`
` Q. Okay. And so sometimes I'll refer to
`
` Nuhn Industries as Nuhn, patent owner or Nuhn
`
` Industries, and you'll understand that I'm
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 12 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 13
`
` referring to the patent owner in this matter,
`
` correct?
`
` A. Yes. I will associate Nuhn with the
`
` patent owner.
`
` Q. Okay. And the petitioner in this matter
`
` is Bazooka-Farmstar, LLC, and I will refer to
`
` them here sometimes as petitioner, Bazooka or
`
` possibly defendant, and you understand if I use
`
` those terms, that we're talking about the
`
` petitioner in this IPR, Bazooka-Farmstar, LLC,
`
` correct?
`
` A. That's correct. If I need to, I will
`
` clarify.
`
` Q. And the patent at issue in this IPR is
`
` U.S. Patent number 11,358,425, correct?
`
` A. That is correct.
`
` Q. And sometimes I'll refer to that patent
`
` as the '425 patent. Do you understand that?
`
` A. Yes. If you refer to the '425 patent,
`
` I'll correlate the two there.
`
` Q. And sometimes, as you saw in your report
`
` and in the papers, we talk about a person of
`
` ordinary skill in the art. And sometimes
`
` people refer to it as a POSITA, sometimes
`
` people refer to it as a POSA, or they generally
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 13 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 14
`
` just say person of ordinary skill. Do you
`
` understand when I say in this proceeding a
`
` POSITA, a POSA, a person of ordinary skill in
`
` the art or a person of ordinary skill, I'm
`
` talking about a person of ordinary skill in the
`
` art at the time of the invention?
`
` A. Yes. I understand those words are --
`
` mean the same thing --
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` A. -- refer to the same topic.
`
` THE COURT REPORTER: Gentlemen, can
`
` we go off the record for a moment, please?
`
` MR. LEACH: Yes.
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are going off
`
` the record.
`
` The time now is 9:10 a.m.
`
` (Off the record 9:10 to 9:13.)
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are back on
`
` the record.
`
` The time now is 9:13 a.m.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. Mr. Prairie, we had a little bit of a
`
` discussion off the record. And you have some
`
` documents in front of you. Can you explain or
`
` tell me what documents you have in front of
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 14 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 15
`
` you?
`
` A. Yes, I can do that. I've got one, the
`
` '425 Nuhn patent that we discussed. I have the
`
` first declaration of mine for this case
`
` dated -- this one is dated -- it's
`
` Exhibit 2004. I have the latest declaration in
`
` this case, Exhibit 2029. And I have
`
` Dr. Winkel's expert declaration, Exhibit 1004.
`
` Q. Thank you. If you can go on Exhibit
`
` Share, I've marked -- or introduced, I should
`
` say, Exhibit 2029. And that's your
`
` declaration. I think it was executed on
`
` April 2nd, 2024. Can you just briefly look
`
` through that and just confirm that that is, in
`
` fact, your declaration, and it's the same
`
` declaration, Exhibit 2029, that you have in
`
` front of you?
`
` A. (Views document.) Just doing a couple
`
` spot-checks. Mr. Leach, that document appears
`
` to be the same as the hard copy that I have
`
` here with me.
`
` Q. Okay. Mr. Prairie, from the perspective
`
` of a POSA around 2012, how was the structure of
`
` a fluid pump for pumping liquid manure
`
` different than a water pump?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 15 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 16
`
` A. Please state your question again.
`
` Q. Sure. From the perspective of a POSA
`
` around 2012, how was the structure of a fluid
`
` pump for pumping liquid manure different than a
`
` water pump?
`
` A. During that 2012 time period, a pump
`
` that would be able to pump liquid manure would
`
` have to have -- be able to handle a wide
`
` variety of solids, slurry, components that
`
` would be in existence in a -- from an animal
`
` waste facility in a liquid manure lagoon.
`
` During that time period, a water pump would be
`
` different in that, like, a water pump and a
`
` pump that is capable of handling liquid manure
`
` are not the same.
`
` Q. Okay. I understand what you just
`
` provided me was kind of what their capabilities
`
` are, but I'm asking you a little bit different
`
` question. From the perspective of a POSA
`
` around 2012, how was the structure of a fluid
`
` pump for pumping liquid manure different than a
`
` water pump? I want to focus on the difference
`
` in structure.
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form, vague, asked and answered.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 16 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 17
`
` THE WITNESS: Yeah, you changed up
`
` your wording there, I believe, from your first
`
` question.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. Well, I'll ask it again. From the
`
` perspective of a POSA around 2012, how was the
`
` structure of a fluid pump for pumping liquid
`
` manure different than a water pump?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Same objections.
`
` THE WITNESS: Yeah, specifically I'm
`
` not -- the structure, I was talking about the
`
` capabilities of the pump itself, and the
`
` capabilities would be different.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. Sure. But can you tell me what the
`
` differences are in terms of structure of a pump
`
` for pumping liquid manure compared to a pump
`
` for pumping water?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Same objections.
`
` THE WITNESS: It has to do with
`
` capabilities.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. I'm not asking about capabilities,
`
` though. I'm asking about what structural
`
` differences does a pump for pumping liquid
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 17 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 18
`
` manure have versus a pump for pumping water.
`
` Can you name any?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Same objections.
`
` THE WITNESS: Like I said, sir, it
`
` has to do with the capabilities. When pumping
`
` liquid manure, liquid manure is that from an
`
` animal waste facility, an animal -- from an
`
` animal livestock farm. It can contain a wide
`
` variety of materials. And it has to do with
`
` its ability to be tested in that environment
`
` and its capabilities in terms of pumping liquid
`
` manure.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. Okay. I understand that it's your
`
` opinion that they have different capabilities.
`
` What I'm asking you, though, is a little bit
`
` different question. I'm asking: What are the
`
` differences in structure of a pump that can
`
` pump liquid manure versus a pump that pumps
`
` water?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Same objections.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. What structural differences are there?
`
` A. I've gaven [sic] you an -- I've given
`
` you the answer. It has to do with be able to
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 18 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 19
`
` test its capabilities in that particular
`
` application.
`
` Q. Can you name one structural difference
`
` between a pump for pumping liquid manure and a
`
` water pump?
`
` A. Again, it has to do with its
`
` capabilities in that particular application.
`
` It needs to be tested in that particular
`
` environment.
`
` Q. Can you name a difference between a pump
`
` that pumps liquid manure and a pump that pumps
`
` water in terms of the pump's structure?
`
` A. The pump has to be capable of
`
` handling -- a liquid manure pump has to be
`
` capable of handling liquid, solids, a slurry
`
` mixture that comes from an animal livestock
`
` waste facility. That is what is from the
`
` capabilities of a liquid manure pump needs to
`
` be capable of doing.
`
` Q. I understand what you keep saying. I
`
` understand what you're answering. What I'm
`
` asking you: From a physical perspective, the
`
` physical structure of a pump, what are the
`
` differences in terms of physical structure
`
` between a pump for pumping liquid manure and a
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 19 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 20
`
` pump that pumps water? What physical
`
` differences, what structural differences are
`
` there between those two types of pumps?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection to the
`
` form, vague.
`
` THE WITNESS: I can keep giving you
`
` the answer, Mr. Leach, that I've been giving if
`
` you like.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. Well, you haven't given me any
`
` structural differences. Can you provide one
`
` structural difference between a pump that pumps
`
` liquid manure and a pump that can pump water?
`
` A. Mr. Leach, I've told you its
`
` capabilities. It's the capabilities of the
`
` pump.
`
` Q. How do you know if it has those
`
` capabilities without looking at the structure?
`
` A. It has to be designed for -- designed
`
` and tested for the application of liquid
`
` manure.
`
` Q. So is your opinion that a liquid manure
`
` pump -- to determine whether it's a -- in fact,
`
` a liquid manure pump, you have to find out what
`
` its intended design was for?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 20 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 21
`
` A. Yes. In any pump there are -- when it
`
` comes to pumps, there's a wide variety of
`
` pumps. And just saying pump is not a specific
`
` statement, specific enough detail. You need to
`
` know the application, the product that it's
`
` going to be pumping, and then you must design
`
` for that particular application, design and
`
` test for that.
`
` Q. So can you look at a pump and determine
`
` whether it's a liquid manure pump or a pump
`
` capable of pumping liquid manure or simply a
`
` water pump?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form, vague.
`
` THE WITNESS: Like I said, the pump,
`
` would have to be known that it was designed for
`
` liquid manure applications or a particular
`
` application that was being -- and it'd have to
`
` be then tested and verified.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. So the '425 patent, when it says a pump
`
` for pumping liquid manure, how is someone
`
` supposed to know whether they meet that
`
` limitation or not based on the pump?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 21 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 22
`
` form, vague.
`
` THE WITNESS: If we reference the
`
` '425 patent, so Exhibit 1001, column 1, page 10
`
` of 16, more specifically in the application of
`
` the technical field of the '425 patent, it
`
` talks about basically it's pumping liquid
`
` manure such as animal manure contained in a
`
` farm lagoon. And so particular to the '425
`
` patent, you would have to know that that pump
`
` is capable, as I said, designed and
`
` particularly tested for an application of
`
` pumping liquid manure from an animal waste
`
` facility, animal -- an animal farm.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. Okay. I want to go back, though. I'm
`
` trying to understand how someone skilled in the
`
` art would understand whether the pump they have
`
` is a pump for pumping liquid manure or a pump
`
` for pumping water. Tell me what you would look
`
` for to know the difference between those two
`
` pumps in terms of physical properties of the
`
` pump.
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form, asked and answered.
`
` THE WITNESS: Within industry there
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 22 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 23
`
` is a wide variety of pumps. The pumps are
`
` designed and marketed for -- design, marketed,
`
` tested for certain applications. And so if the
`
` pump is designed, tested and marketed as a
`
` manure -- a pump that is capable of handling
`
` liquid manure, then from -- based on that, you
`
` could know that it is indeed a pump that is
`
` capable of handling liquid manure.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. I keep hearing your answer, but I just
`
` want to confirm. You can't name one physical
`
` structural property that a pump for pumping
`
` liquid manure has compared to a pump that pumps
`
` water, is that correct?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form, argumentative.
`
` THE WITNESS: I'm stating that
`
` within industry there are a wide variety of
`
` pumps. How I know that they would work for an
`
` application is that the designer or the company
`
` would design, test, and then ultimately market
`
` that pump for a particular application.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. And when you say there's a wide variety
`
` of pumps, pumps aren't designed for any
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 23 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 24
`
` specific fluid, right, they're designed for
`
` ranges of fluids, correct?
`
` A. Well, there's hydraulic pumps, there's
`
` air pumps, there's water pumps, there's liquid
`
` manure pumps. There are a wide variety of --
`
` within industry, as I stated, there is a wide
`
` variety of pumps, and they are designed for the
`
` particular product, products plural
`
` potentially, that they are being sold --
`
` designed, marketed and sold into.
`
` Q. I guess what I'm asking is: To your
`
` point, companies provide a range of pumps, and
`
` those pumps can handle a variety of different
`
` liquids or slurries, right?
`
` A. Sometimes. Not always.
`
` Q. And so --
`
` A. There's a wide variety of liquids, gases
`
` that pumps pump.
`
` Q. So I just want to get back and just be
`
` confident here. You don't have any opinion on
`
` what structure is needed to pump -- sorry.
`
` Strike that.
`
` I just want to confirm. You don't have
`
` any opinion as to the structure of a fluid pump
`
` for pumping liquid manure and what's
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 24 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 25
`
` required -- strike that again.
`
` From the perspective of a POSA around
`
` 2012, you don't have any opinion as to what
`
` structure was required of a pump that can pump
`
` liquid manure?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form.
`
` THE WITNESS: I can give you a
`
` similar answer, Mr. Leach, again if you wish.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. I'm asking, though, about structure, and
`
` you haven't given me anything on structure.
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form, argumentative.
`
` THE WITNESS: I've given you
`
` information in regards to -- you've asked about
`
` a very specific application, and I've said is
`
` that for a pump that would pump liquid manure,
`
` I would seek out a component that was designed,
`
` tested and marketed for that particular
`
` application.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. Sir, are you an expert in pump design?
`
` A. I have worked with pumps in my career.
`
` Q. That's not my question. Are you -- do
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 25 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 26
`
` you consider yourself an expert in pump design?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form to the extent it calls for a legal
`
` conclusion.
`
` THE WITNESS: I have worked with
`
` pumps throughout my professional career, a wide
`
` variety of different style of pumps throughout
`
` my professional career.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. Do you consider yourself an expert in
`
` pump design?
`
` A. I have worked with a wide variety of
`
` pumps in various applications throughout my
`
` professional career.
`
` Q. That's not my question. I'm asking if
`
` you consider yourself to be an expert in pump
`
` design?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form, asked and answered.
`
` THE WITNESS: I have worked with a
`
` wide variety of pumps throughout my
`
` professional career and their applications.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. Are you refusing to answer my question?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection to form.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 26 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 27
`
` He provided an answer, so obviously he's not
`
` refusing.
`
` MR. LEACH: Hey, Brad?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Whether or not you
`
` think --
`
` MR. LEACH: I'm not going to go
`
` through this like we did with Mr. Nuhn.
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: I don't --
`
` MR. LEACH: You're going to have to
`
` keep your objections to proper objections or
`
` we're going to call the Board.
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: You're
`
` argumentative in your question. You're saying:
`
` This answer is not good enough for me, so I
`
` want you to change it. That's improper.
`
` BY MR. LEACH:
`
` Q. Okay. Mr. Prairie, yes or no, do you
`
` consider yourself to be an expert in pump
`
` design?
`
` A. I have worked with a wide variety of
`
` pumps in different applications. There is a
`
` wide variety of pumps, so your statement is
`
` very broad. And so there are a wide variety of
`
` pumps. There are different people that design
`
` different style of pumps.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1095
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 27 of 364
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 28
`
` Q. Again, from a structural standpoint, can
`
` you name any difference between a pump that can
`
` pump liquid manure from a pump that pumps
`
` water? Can you name one structural difference?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form, asked and answered.
`
` THE WITNESS: A water pump is
`
` designed, tested to pump -- and validated to
`
` pump water. A liquid manure pump is designed,
`
` tested and marketed in the application of
`
` liquid manure pumps. A hydraulic pump would be
`
` designed