throbber
1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` ____________________________
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` _____________________________
`
` BAZOOKA-FARMSTAR, LLC,
`
` Petitioner,
`
` v.
`
` NUHN INDUSTRIES LTD.,
`
` Patent Owner.
`
` _______________________________________
`
` Case IPR2024-00098
`
` U.S. Patent No. 11,541,708
`
` _______________________________________
`
` VIDEO-RECORDED REMOTE ZOOM VIDEOCONFERENCE
`
` DEPOSITION OF DOUGLAS S. PRAIRIE
`
` Taken on Tuesday, October 29, 2024
`
` Scheduled for 8:00 a.m. CDT
`
`REPORTED BY: DANA S. ANDERSON-LINNELL
`
`Job No.: MW 6960929
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 1 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`VIDEO-RECORDED REMOTE ZOOM VIDEOCONFERENCE DEPOSITION
`
`OF DOUGLAS S. PRAIRIE taken on Tuesday, October
`
`29, 2024, commencing at 8:06 a.m. CDT, via a REMOTE
`
`COUNSEL ZOOM PROCEEDING, before Dana S.
`
`Anderson-Linnell, a Stenographic Shorthand Reporter
`
`and Notary Public of and for the State of Minnesota.
`
` ***************
`
` APPEARANCES
`
`On Behalf of Petitioner Bazooka-Farmstar, LLC:
`
`Taylor R. Stemler, Esquire
`
`MERCHANT & GOULD, P.C.
`
`150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2200
`
`Minneapolis MN 55402
`
`Email: tstemler@merchantgould.com
`
`(Appearances continued on next page.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 2 of 297
`
`

`

`APPEARANCES (continued):
`
`Page 3
`
`On Behalf of Patent Owner Nuhn Industries Ltd. and
`
`the Witness:
`
`James "Brad" Luchsinger, Esquire
`
`HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.
`
`5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200
`
`Troy, MI 48098
`
`Email: bluchsinger@harnessip.com
`
`ALSO PRESENT: Robert Buchman, videographer
`
`NOTE: The original transcript will be filed with the
`
`Merchant and Gould Law Firm, pursuant to the
`
`applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 3 of 297
`
`

`

`INDEX PAGE
`
`Page 4
`
`WITNESS: DOUGLAS S. PRAIRIE
`
`EXAMINATION BY:
`
`Mr. Stemler 8
`
`Mr. Luchsinger 227
`
`Mr. Stemler 230
`
`INSTRUCTIONS NOT TO ANSWER: (None.)
`
`PRODUCTION REQUESTS: (None.)
`
`CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS: (None.)
`
`INDEX OF MARKED EXHIBITS:
`
`Exhibit 1086 - US Patent 8,256,692 67
`
`Exhibit 1087 - Patent Application Publication
`
`US 2010/0144220 84
`
`Exhibit 1088 - Amendments to the Claims and
`
`Listing of Claims 111
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 4 of 297
`
`

`

`INDEX OF EXHIBITS (continued): PAGE
`
`Page 5
`
`Exhibit 1089 - Pending claims filed by Nuhn
`
`Industries in a continuation application
`
`to the '708 patent 115
`
`Exhibit 1090 - Merriam-Webster
`
`definition of the word "transverse" 124
`
`Exhibit 1091 - Preliminary Amendment 150
`
`Exhibit 1092 - Nuhn's Conditional Motion to
`
`Amend the '835 patent claims 171
`
`Exhibit 1093 - US Patent 10,118,138 209
`
`INDEX OF PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS:
`
`Exhibit 1001 - US Patent 11,541,708 22
`
`Exhibit 1012 - Senwatec vehicle 199
`
`Exhibit 2084 - Patent Application Publication
`
`US 2010/0144220 A 86
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 5 of 297
`
`

`

`INDEX OF EXHIBITS (continued): PAGE
`
`Page 6
`
`Exhibit 2099 - Declaration of Douglas S.
`
`Prairie in Support of Patent Owner’s Response 19
`
`(Original exhibits attached to original transcript;
`
`copies to counsel as requested. Previously marked
`
`exhibits referenced attached.)
`
`REPORTER'S NOTE: All quotations from exhibits are
`
`reflected in the manner in which they were read into
`
`the record and do not necessarily indicate an exact
`
`quote from the document.
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 6 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
` THE COURT REPORTER: Do all counsel
`
` stipulate that I can swear in the witness
`
` remotely over the Zoom videoconference?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Yes, counsel for
`
` patent owner stipulates to that.
`
` MR. STEMLER: Yes, counsel for the
`
` petitioner does as well.
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. We
`
` are going on the record at 8:06 a.m. on
`
` October 29th, 2024. This is Media Unit Number 1
`
` of the video-recorded deposition of Douglas S.
`
` Prairie being taken by counsel for the petitioner
`
` in the matter of Bazooka-Farmstar, LLC versus
`
` Nuhn Industries Ltd., filed in the U.S. Patent
`
` Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board,
`
` Case Number IPR2024-00098.
`
` My name is Robert Buchman from the
`
` firm Veritext Legal Solutions, and I'm the
`
` videographer. The court reporter is Dana
`
` Anderson-Linnell from the firm Veritext Legal
`
` Solutions.
`
` This deposition is being held remotely
`
` via Zoom.
`
` Will the attorneys please identify
`
` themselves and state whom they represent for the
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 7 of 297
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 8
`
` record.
`
` MR. STEMLER: Yes. This is Taylor
`
` Stemler, counsel for petitioner,
`
` Bazooka-Farmstar, LLC, from the law firm
`
` Merchant and Gould, P.C.
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: This is James
`
` Bradley Luchsinger. I'm an attorney with the
`
` Harness IP law firm. We represent the patent
`
` owner in this IPO, Nuhn Industries Limited.
`
` THE COURT REPORTER: Will the court
`
` reporter please swear in the witness.
`
` DOUGLAS S. PRAIRIE,
`
` called as a witness, being first duly sworn,
`
` was examined and testified as follows:
`
` EXAMINATION
`
` BY MR. STEMLER:
`
` Q. Good morning, Mr. Prairie. How are you
`
` doing today?
`
` A. Morning, Taylor.
`
` Q. How are you this morning?
`
` A. Doing good. Doing good.
`
` Q. Good. Well, thank you for joining us.
`
` To start out, I know my colleague, Tom Leach,
`
` has deposed you before in one of the related
`
` IPR matters. Have you ever been deposed before
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 8 of 297
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 9
`
` that?
`
` A. Yes, I have.
`
` Q. How many times?
`
` A. I don't remember the exact count. Maybe
`
` three or four.
`
` Q. Were they patent cases?
`
` A. I think all of them were, yes.
`
` Q. Okay. Do you understand that your
`
` testimony today is under oath?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And that that has the same force and
`
` effect as if you were in a courtroom in front
`
` of a judge or a jury?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Now, throughout the course of the day
`
` I'm going to attempt to make my questions as
`
` clear as possible. If you don't understand,
`
` please go ahead and ask me to repeat or
`
` rephrase the question, and I will do my best to
`
` do so.
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. Otherwise, if you answer the question,
`
` everyone will assume that you've understood the
`
` question, is that clear?
`
` A. That is clear.
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 9 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
` Q. Also, as I'm sure you've noticed, the
`
` testimony today is being recorded by a court
`
` reporter. Because of that, it's important for
`
` the record that you and I speak audibly and,
`
` you know, don't communicate via headshakes or
`
` uh-huhs or that kind of thing. Does that make
`
` sense?
`
` A. Yes, it does.
`
` Q. Okay. On that same topic, it's also
`
` important that you and I take turns and, you
`
` know, do our best not to speak over each other,
`
` is that clear?
`
` A. Yes, it is.
`
` Q. Now, Mr. Prairie, is there any reason
`
` that you can't give fair and accurate testimony
`
` today?
`
` A. No, there is not.
`
` Q. What did you do to prep for today's
`
` deposition?
`
` A. Brad and I -- I guess, how far back do
`
` you want to go, just, like, in the last week or
`
` so, or what do you mean? Like, how far --
`
` Q. I guess as far back as there were
`
` preparation efforts for it.
`
` A. I've worked with Brad, legal firm and
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 10 of 297
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 11
`
` Nuhn. Ian Nuhn had some conversations over the
`
` last year-plus in regards to Zoom calls,
`
` in-person meetings, reading patent documents,
`
` reading industry reference documents and
`
` ultimately submitting declarations. And then
`
` the last week of reviewing those declarations
`
` to prep for the discussions today.
`
` Q. You mentioned that you met with Brad.
`
` Did you meet with any other counsel in
`
` preparation for this deposition?
`
` A. Yes. There was Scott Yackey. I can't
`
` remember his last name. Scott at the time.
`
` But yeah, there's another attorney that works
`
` with Brad that I met with as well over Zoom.
`
` Q. Was Scott the only other attorney?
`
` A. No. I think there was a couple other
`
` support staff throughout the last year. I
`
` don't remember their names. They were -- Brad
`
` and Scott were the primary -- my primary
`
` contacts. There was a couple other staff that
`
` were focused on certain parts that came in
`
` conversations throughout at some point in the
`
` declarations, but I don't remember their names.
`
` Q. Did you travel to Michigan to meet with
`
` Brad?
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 11 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
` A. The only time I traveled to Michigan was
`
` during my last deposition. I traveled a day or
`
` two beforehand for some discussions and prep
`
` prior to the in-person -- I guess it was in
`
` person with Brad, but it was remote for
`
` everyone else.
`
` Q. Where are you located today?
`
` A. I am in my residence in Brookings, South
`
` Dakota.
`
` Q. How long would you say you met with
`
` Brad?
`
` A. Say that again, Mr. Stemler.
`
` Q. How long did you meet with Brad and
`
` Mr. Yackey to prepare for today's deposition?
`
` A. Like, over the course of the last year,
`
` or just in the last couple days?
`
` Q. I apologize. Just in the last couple
`
` days.
`
` A. Last week Brad and I had a couple Zoom
`
` calls, and then just some emails back and forth
`
` over a few questions.
`
` Q. How long were the Zoom calls?
`
` A. I don't know. They were in the two to
`
` three-hour range each.
`
` Q. And were there two or more than that?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 12 of 297
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 13
`
` A. We did one on Thursday of last week and
`
` one on Friday.
`
` Q. Did you review any documents while you
`
` were meeting with counsel?
`
` A. Yeah. We reviewed the key documents at
`
` hand, declaration, the '708 patent and then
`
` Mr. Winkel's declaration as well.
`
` THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry.
`
` Counsel, can we go off the record for
`
` 30 seconds?
`
` MR. STEMLER: We can.
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Yep.
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are going off
`
` the record.
`
` The time now is 8:14 a.m.
`
` (Off the record 8:14 to 8:17.)
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are going back
`
` on the record.
`
` The time now is 8:17 a.m.
`
` BY MR. STEMLER:
`
` Q. Welcome back, Mr. Prairie.
`
` A. Hello again.
`
` Q. Before we broke, you mentioned that you
`
` reviewed some of the key documents in
`
` preparation for today's deposition. Could you
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 13 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
` please reiterate what those key documents were?
`
` A. Specifically they are my declarations
`
` for the '708 patent. And that's the Nuhn
`
` '708 patent. Those specifically are
`
` Exhibits 2099, Exhibits 2004, and the patent
`
` itself is Exhibit 1001. There was a few others
`
` that I reviewed, but those are the key ones.
`
` Q. Do you remember what those few others
`
` that you reviewed were?
`
` A. They were references of those doc -- of
`
` those exhibits.
`
` Q. Documents cited in those exhibits?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Do you remember which documents that
`
` were cited in those exhibits you reviewed?
`
` A. I just want to make sure I -- I tried to
`
` look through a lot of them and -- I just looked
`
` through the listing. I don't remember
`
` specifically. But I just wanted to make sure I
`
` was -- kind of refresh myself on the exhibits
`
` that were referenced in my declarations that I
`
` was familiar with in case they were referenced
`
` in today's conversation.
`
` Q. You mentioned you reviewed the
`
` '708 patent. Have you read the '708 patent?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 14 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
` A. Yeah, I've read it multiple times.
`
` Q. How many times would you say?
`
` A. I cannot tell you, Taylor, how many
`
` times I've read it.
`
` Q. Do you have an estimate? I mean, is it
`
` more than two times?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form.
`
` THE WITNESS: I've read it multiple
`
` times over the last year. I cannot honestly
`
` tell you as to how many times I've read it.
`
` BY MR. STEMLER:
`
` Q. But it's more than once?
`
` A. As I've said, I've read it multiple
`
` times over the last year-plus. I cannot tell
`
` you how many times I've read it.
`
` Q. When was the last time you read it?
`
` A. I just looked at it again last night,
`
` read through it.
`
` Q. Do you have any materials in front of
`
` you there today?
`
` A. I do. I have the '708 patent printed
`
` out. I have Exhibit Number 2004, which was my
`
` early declaration of the 7008 [sic], and then
`
` Exhibit 2099, which is the most recent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 15 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
` declaration, the 7008.
`
` Q. Have you written --
`
` A. I'm sorry. '708 patent. Not 7000,
`
` '708.
`
` Q. Thank you. Have you written any notes
`
` on any of those documents?
`
` A. I have not. They are clean copies.
`
` Q. Do you have any notes there in front of
`
` you today?
`
` A. I do not.
`
` Q. Did you take any notes during your
`
` meetings with counsel over the past week?
`
` A. Yeah, I've taken some notes for -- just
`
` in conversations of areas of discussion that --
`
` to kind of read up on and study up on just to
`
` refresh myself.
`
` Q. What areas of discussion?
`
` A. I don't know --
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: I'm just gonna
`
` caution the witness not to discuss in great
`
` detail, you know, our conversations regarding
`
` preparing for the deposition because I would
`
` consider that work product. But I'm fine with,
`
` you know, testimony discussing just the
`
` high-level topics.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 16 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
` THE WITNESS: In prep for the
`
` deposition today, Brad, we had conversations.
`
` We, went through some -- Brad refreshed me on
`
` some of the legal standings of the case itself.
`
` So he kind of gave me an update on what has
`
` transpired since my last deposition, just kind
`
` of some notes there. And like I said, I don't
`
` remember all the details. It was just some
`
` highlights that I had that -- in preparation
`
` for today of areas to place some emphasis on
`
` reading through and just some legal
`
` interpretation, make sure I understood things
`
` correctly from a legal standpoint.
`
` BY MR. STEMLER:
`
` Q. What do you understand has transpired
`
` since the last deposition?
`
` A. I don't recall the details. Ultimately,
`
` the last deposition was on the '425 patent.
`
` And this is the '708. So we didn't really go
`
` into detail on the '425 side. It was more --
`
` kind of more presently where the '708 stands.
`
` Q. Have you read the institution decision
`
` on the '708 patent?
`
` A. I can't recall if I have read some
`
` institution. I believe I've read on this one,
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 17 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
` but honestly can't tell you with certainty if
`
` I've -- I don't believe I -- I haven't read it
`
` recently here.
`
` Q. Other than counsel for Nuhn, you know,
`
` Brad and Scott, who you mentioned, did you
`
` speak with anybody else about today's
`
` deposition?
`
` A. No. The -- Brad is my primary contact
`
` in regards to the case, and I have not spoken
`
` to anyone outside his legal firm in regards to
`
` this case.
`
` Q. Have you spoken with Ian Nuhn?
`
` A. Not recently. There was a conversation
`
` earlier this year with Ian at some point just
`
` to get background about the equipment and its
`
` history and the company itself, but not -- no
`
` conversations as of recently.
`
` Q. Have you spoken with Dennis Nuhn?
`
` A. I don't believe I've ever spoken with
`
` Dennis Nuhn.
`
` Q. I'm going to introduce an exhibit. It's
`
` Exhibit 2099.
`
` MR. STEMLER: I see that the host
`
` for -- apologies. Can we go off the record
`
` briefly?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 18 of 297
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 19
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Yes.
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are going off
`
` the record.
`
` The time now is 8:26 a.m.
`
` (Off the record 8:26 to 8:26.)
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are going back
`
` on the record.
`
` The time now is 8:26 a.m.
`
` BY MR. STEMLER:
`
` Q. Mr. Prairie, I've introduced what has
`
` been marked as Exhibit 2099 in this proceeding.
`
` All right. This document should also be
`
` available on Exhibit Share, but I'm sharing it
`
` on my screen here. Do you see this document?
`
` A. (Views document.) Yes, I see it in --
`
` on the screen and the Marked Exhibits.
`
` Q. Do you recognize this document?
`
` A. Yes. This is my declaration for the
`
` '708 patent.
`
` Q. Did you draft this declaration?
`
` A. Yes, I did.
`
` Q. How much time in total would you say you
`
` spent working on this declaration?
`
` A. I don't recall the total number of
`
` hours.
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 19 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 20
`
` Q. Do you have an estimate?
`
` A. No, I don't have an estimate for you at
`
` this time.
`
` Q. Would you say it was more than 50 hours?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form.
`
` THE WITNESS: As I've stated, I
`
` don't know -- I don't have a count on the
`
` number of hours that I've worked on this
`
` declaration.
`
` BY MR. STEMLER:
`
` Q. Do you know how much you've billed in
`
` this matter?
`
` A. I don't recall those hours at this point
`
` in time.
`
` Q. Do you have an estimate for the number
`
` of fees you've billed in this matter?
`
` A. No, I cannot provide you a number at
`
` this point in time.
`
` Q. Have you worked with anyone other than
`
` Nuhn's counsel on this report?
`
` A. No, I have not.
`
` Q. Do you have any staff that helped you
`
` prepare it?
`
` A. No. I'm an individual, and no staff
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 20 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
` that work for me in regards to this.
`
` Q. Who wrote the first draft of this
`
` report?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form.
`
` THE WITNESS: I wrote the first
`
` draft. I worked on the draft, edited the
`
` draft, approved the draft -- or approved the
`
` final version.
`
` BY MR. STEMLER:
`
` Q. Did you ever send it to Nuhn's counsel
`
` before you signed it?
`
` A. Nuhn's counsel was heavily involved.
`
` There's heavy legal stuff, content in this
`
` document. And they provided guidance on the
`
` legal terms, conditions. It's a legal case.
`
` So the legal firm -- Nuhn's legal case [sic]
`
` provided input and feedback in regards to the
`
` declaration.
`
` Q. Did Nuhn's counsel make any revisions to
`
` this document?
`
` A. Nuhn's legal firm made markups and edits
`
` that I reviewed and ultimately approved.
`
` Q. How many rounds of revisions were made
`
` during the course of drafting this document?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 21 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
` A. I don't recall. At times it was a live
`
` working document, so they weren't often. You
`
` know, it's -- it was a joint working document.
`
` So to say that there was certain revisions, it
`
` was a live document at times with live editing
`
` and collaboration.
`
` Q. When did you begin preparing this
`
` document?
`
` A. The '708 and '425, they're similar
`
` content. I started working on this case
`
` sometime last year, mid to late last year, I
`
` believe. I can -- I don't remember the exact
`
` timing.
`
` Q. But you didn't start preparing this
`
` document mid to late last year, did you?
`
` A. No. There was certain material that was
`
` started late last -- mid to late last year that
`
` ultimately made its way into here. There's
`
` similarities of the '708 and '425 patents. So
`
` there's some content from the '425 that was
`
` merged over into the '708 declaration.
`
` Q. All right. I'm going to introduce
`
` another previously marked document. This will
`
` be Exhibit 1001. Mr. Prairie, I'm sharing on
`
` my screen and I've introduced into Exhibit
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 22 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
` Share this document that has been marked as
`
` Exhibit 1001 in this proceeding.
`
` Do you see this document?
`
` A. (Views document.) Yes, I see
`
` Exhibit 1001, which is the '708 patent, on the
`
` screen, and I have it on my end in the document
`
` share as well.
`
` Q. Great. So you mentioned that you've
`
` read this document before?
`
` A. Yes, I have read through it multiple
`
` times.
`
` Q. I'm going to refer to this document as
`
` the '708 patent during our discussion today.
`
` Does that make sense?
`
` A. Yes, it does.
`
` Q. I'm scrolling to the end of the document
`
` specifically to the page that lists claim 17.
`
` Could you please read for me the third element
`
` of claim 17 that begins with, "A floatable
`
` vehicle body..."?
`
` A. So just to confirm, you're referring to
`
` claim 17 on column 9?
`
` Q. That's correct.
`
` A. Starting on line 50?
`
` Q. That's correct.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 23 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
` A. Okay. "A floatable vehicle body
`
` comprising a first buoyant element situated
`
` between the first front wheel and the first
`
` rear wheel and a second buoyant element between
`
` the second front wheel and the second rear
`
` wheel."
`
` Q. Thank you. Do you have an understanding
`
` of what the word "between" means as it's
`
` written in that element?
`
` A. Yes, I do.
`
` Q. What is it?
`
` A. It's the space between the first front
`
` wheel on the right-hand side of a vehicle as
`
` it's going forward and the -- so that space
`
` between there and the rear wheel on the very
`
` same side, the right side of the vehicle, so
`
` that space between the front wheel and the rear
`
` wheel on the same side of the vehicle.
`
` Q. Can you describe what specifically you
`
` understand the word "between" means without
`
` using the word "between" in your definition?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form.
`
` THE WITNESS: I guess it's the --
`
` I'm trying to think of another word for
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 24 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
` "between." It's the -- I mean, graphically it
`
` would ultimately be the -- it says "between."
`
` It's the -- it's a space. It's a gap. I can't
`
` think of another word alternate to "between" at
`
` this point in time that I would deem as
`
` accurate.
`
` BY MR. STEMLER:
`
` Q. I'm gonna scroll to claim 21. That's on
`
` column 10. Could you please read the second
`
` element of claim 21 beginning on line 28?
`
` A. So line start with, "With a
`
` ground-engaging..." is that the line you want
`
` me to begin with?
`
` Q. That's correct, yes.
`
` A. This is from column 10 of the
`
` '708 patent and starting about line 27, 28, "A
`
` ground-engaging propulsion structure comprising
`
` a first front wheel, a second front wheel, a
`
` first rear wheel, and a second rear wheel,
`
` wherein the first front wheel and the first
`
` rear wheel are on the first side of the vehicle
`
` body, and the second front wheel and the second
`
` rear wheel are on the second side of the
`
` vehicle body, and wherein the first buoyant
`
` element is between the first front wheel and
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 25 of 297
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
` the first rear wheel, and the second buoyant
`
` element is in between the second front wheel
`
` and the second rear wheel."
`
` Q. Thank you. Is your understanding of the
`
` meaning of the term "between" in claim 17 the
`
` same as your understanding of the meaning of
`
` the term "between" in claim 21 here?
`
` A. Yes. It's my understanding that they
`
` are referring to the same space.
`
` Q. So the term "between" means the same
`
` thing in claim 21 as it does in claim 17?
`
` A. It's talking about the same vehicle.
`
` It's talking about the same wheels, the same
`
` size of the vehicle, and hence the same space
`
` in between the front and the rear wheel.
`
` Q. Does the term "between" mean anything
`
` different in claim 21 than it does in claim 17?
`
` A. From my interpretation is that the --
`
` from my understanding is that it's referring to
`
` the same vehicle, the same wheels, the same
`
` side of the vehicle, and hence the same space
`
` in between the front and the rear wheel.
`
` Q. So it doesn't have a different meaning?
`
` A. From my understanding -- my
`
` interpretation is it's the same space in
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 26 of 297
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 27
`
` between the front first -- the first front
`
` wheel and the rear wheel.
`
` Q. I'm turning back to claim 23. And that
`
` is on column 10, line about 64 would be the
`
` first element. Begins with, "A floatable
`
` vehicle body..." and then it ends on the
`
` following page at column 11, line 2. Can you
`
` please read that element?
`
` A. So claim 23 of the '708 patent starting
`
` on column 10 reads, "An amphibious vehicle
`
` comprising," the first element being, "A
`
` floatable vehicle body comprising buoyant
`
` elements having foam-filled buoyant chambers,
`
` the buoyant elements comprising the first
`
` buoyant element situated between the first
`
` front wheel and the first rear wheel, and a
`
` second buoyant element between the second front
`
` wheel and the second rear wheel." Is that
`
` where you want me to stop?
`
` Q. Yes, please. Thank you. Is your
`
` understanding of the term "between" in claim 23
`
` the same as your understanding of the meaning
`
` of the term "between" in claim 17 and 21?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form.
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Exhibit 1094
`Bazooka v. Nuhn - IPR2024-00098
`Page 27 of 297
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 28
`
` THE WITNESS: Please restate your
`
` question, Mr. Stemler.
`
` BY MR. STEMLER:
`
` Q. Yeah. Do you understand "between" as
`
` it's written in claim 23 to mean the same thing
`
` as the term "between" as it's written in claim
`
` 17 and 21?
`
` MR. LUCHSINGER: Objection as to
`
` form.
`
` THE WITNESS: It's talking about a
`
` space situated -- claim 23 is talking about --
`
` more discussion about the buoyant chambers.
`
` And they're talking about the first buoyant
`
` element. And it is situated between the first
`
` front wheel and the first r

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket