throbber
Case 2:23-cv-00113-JRG Document 44 Filed 09/07/23 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 564
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`IN RE: TAASERA LICENSING LLC,
`
`PATENT LITIGATION
`
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL
`
`
`CASES
`
`Case No. 2:22-MD-03042-JRG
`
`EIGHTH AMENDED DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`
`
`It is hereby ORDERED that the following schedule of deadlines is in effect until further
`
`
`
`
`
`order of this Comt:
`
`Deadline Amended Deadline
`
`Event
`
`April 1, 2024 April 15, 20241
`
`
`
`*Jmy Selection-9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas
`
`7 days before Jmy
`
`Selection
`
`*Defendant to disclose final invalidity theories,
`
`
`
`final prior rut references/combinations, and final
`
`
`
`equitable defenses with notice of the same filed
`with the Comt.2
`
`10 days before
`Jmy Selection
`
`*Plaintiff to disclose final election of Asserted
`
`
`
`
`Claims with notice of the same filed with the
`Comt.3
`
`March 12, 2024 March 26, 2024 *Pretrial Conference - 9:00 a.m. in Marshall,
`
`
`
`Texas before Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`1 This trial date applies only to cases originally filed in the Eastern District of Texas, with the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`order of trials to be determined by the Court at a later date.
`
`2 The proposed DCO shall include this specific deadline. The deadline shall read, "7 days before
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jmy Selection," and shall not include a specific date.
`
`3 Given the Comt's past experiences with litigants dropping claims and defenses during or on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`eve of trial, the Comt is of the opinion that these additional deadlines are necessaiy. The
`
`
`
`
`proposed DCO shall include this specific deadline. The deadline shall read, "10 days before Jmy
`
`
`
`Selection," and shall not include a specific date.
`
`IPR2024-00027
`CrowdStrike Exhibit 1012 Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00113-JRG Document 44 Filed 09/07/23 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 565
`
`Deadline Amended Deadline
`
`Event
`
`
`
`26, 2024 *If a juror questionnaire is to be used, an editable
`
`Febmaiy 19, 2024 February
`
`
`
`(in Microsoft Word fonnat) questionnaire shall be
`
`jointly submitted to the Deputy Clerk in Charge by
`this date.4
`
`Febmaiy 19, 2024 March 21, 2024 *Notify Comi of Agreements Reached During
`
`
`Meet and Confer
`
`The paiiies are ordered to meet and confer on any
`
`
`
`
`outstanding objections or motions
`The
`in limine.
`
`
`paiiies shall advise the Comi of any agreements
`
`reached no later than 1 :00 p.m. three (3) business
`
`days before the pretrial conference.
`
`
`
`Febmaiy 19, 2024 February
`
`26, 2024 *File Joint Preti·ial Order, Joint Proposed Jmy
`
`
`
`
`Instructions, Joint Proposed Verdict Fo1m,
`
`Responses to Motions
`
`Updated Exhibit
`in Limine,
`Lists, Updated Witness Lists, and Updated
`
`Deposition Design ations
`
`
`
`Febmaiy 19, 2024
`
`*File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or
`
`
`
`Real Time Reporting.
`
`If a daily ti·anscript or real time repo1iing of comi
`
`
`
`
`
`proceedings is requested for ti·ial, the paiiy or
`
`
`
`paiiies making said request shall file a notice with
`
`
`the Court and e-mail the Comi Reporter, Shawn
`
`McRobe1is, at
`shawn mcrobelis@txed.uscomts.gov.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Febmaiy 5, 2024 February 12, 2024 File Motions
`in Limine
`
`
`
`The paiiies shall limit their motions to
`in limine
`
`
`
`
`issues that if improperly inti·oduced at ti·ial would
`
`be so prejudicial that the Court could not alleviate
`
`
`
`
`the prejudice by giving appropriate instructions to
`the iurv.
`
`
`
`Febmaiy 5, 2024 February 26, 2024 Serve Objections to Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Januaiy 29, 2024
`19, 2024 Serve Objections to Pretrial Disclosures; and Serve
`
`
`
`February
`
`
`Rebuttal Preti·ial Disclosures
`
`
`
`
`
`4 The Pa1iies are refened to the Comi's Standing Order Regai·ding Use of Juror Questionnaires in
`
`
`
`
`
`Advance of Voir Dire.
`
`2
`
`IPR2024-00027
`CrowdStrike Exhibit 1012 Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00113-JRG Document 44 Filed 09/07/23 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 566
`
`Deadline Amended Deadline
`
`Event
`
`
`(Witness List, Disclosures Janmuy 15, 2024 February 12, 2024 Serve Preti·ial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Deposition Designations, and Exhibit List) by the
`Party with the Burden of Proof
`
`Janmuy 1, 2024
`
`to Dispositive February 8, 2024 *Response
`
`
`Motions (including
`
`
`Daubert Motions). Responses to dispositive
`
`motions that were filed prior to the dispositive
`
`
`
`
`motion deadline, including Daubert Motions, shall
`
`be due in accordance with Local Rule CV-7( e ), not
`
`to exceed the deadline as set fo1ih in this Docket
`
`
`
`Conti·ol Order. 5 Motions for Summaiy Judgment
`shall comply with Local Rule CV-56.
`
`
`
`25, 2024 *File Motions to Sti·ike
`December 18, 2023 January
`Expe1i Testimony
`
`
`(including Daubert Motions)
`
`No motion to sti·ike expe1i testimony (including a
`
`
`
`Daubert motion) may be filed after this date
`
`without leave of the Comi.
`
`
`
`December 18, 2023 January 25, 2024 *File Dispositive Motions
`
`
`
`
`
`No dispositive motion may be filed after this date
`
`
`without leave of the Comi.
`
`Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56 and
`
`
`Local Rule CV-7. Motions to extend page limits
`
`
`will onlJ'.: be gi·anted in exceptional circumstances.
`regmre more than
`circumstances
`Exceptional
`
`
`agreement ainong the oa1iies.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`December 11, 2023 January
`
`11, 2024 Deadline to Complete Expert Discove1y
`
`
`
`November 27, 2023 December 11, 2023 Serve Disclosures for Rebuttal Expe1i Witnesses
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`November 6, 2023 November 13, 2023 Serve Disclosures for Expe1i Witnesses by the
`
`
`
`
`Paiiy with the Burden of Proof
`
`5 The pa1iies ai·e directed to Local Rule CV-7(d), which provides in pali that "[a] paiiy's failure to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`oppose a motion in the manner prescribed herein creates a presumption that the paiiy does not
`
`
`
`conh'ove1i the facts set out by movant and has no evidence to offer in opposition to the motion."
`
`
`
`
`If the deadline under Local Rule CV 7(e) exceeds the deadline for Response to Dispositive
`
`
`
`
`
`Motions, the deadline for Response to Dispositive Motions conti·ols.
`
`3
`
`IPR2024-00027
`CrowdStrike Exhibit 1012 Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00113-JRG Document 44 Filed 09/07/23 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 567
`
`Deadline Amended Deadline
`
`Event
`
`
`
`
`October 30, 2023 November 6, 2023 Deadline to Complete Fact Discove1y and File
`
`
`
`
`Motions to Compel Discove1y
`
`
`
`October 25, 2023
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-7 (Opinion of Counsel
`
`
`Defenses)
`
`
`
`
`
`October 4, 2023 October 11, 2023 *Claim Constmction Hearing - 9:00 a.Ill.
`
`
`
`Texas before Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`Marshall,
`
`lil
`
`
`
`September 1, 2023
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(d) (Joint Claim
`
`
`
`
`
`Construction Chart)
`
`(*) indicates a deadline that cannot be changed without an acceptable showing of good
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cause. Good cause is not shown merely by indicating that the parties agree that the
`
`deadline should be changed.
`
`ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
`
`While certain cases may benefit from mediation, such may not be appropriate
`
`
`Mediation:
`
`
`
`
`for eve1y case. The Court finds that the Paiiies are best suited to evaluate whether mediation will
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`benefit the case after the issuance of the Court's claim consti11ction order. Accordingly, the Court
`
`
`
`ORDERS the Pa1iies to file a Joint Notice indicating whether the case should be refened for
`mediation
`order. As a
`
`
`
`within fourteen days of the issuance of the Court's claim construction
`
`
`
`
`
`paii of such Joint Notice, the Paiiies should indicate whether they have a mutually agreeable
`
`
`
`
`
`mediator for the Comito consider. If the Paiiies disagree about whether mediation is appropriate,
`
`
`
`
`
`the Parties should set forth a brief statement of their competing positions in the Joint Notice.
`
`Summary Judgment Motions, Motions to Strike Exl!ert Testimony, and Daubert
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For each motion, the moving paiiy shall provide the Comi with two (2) hai·d copies of
`Motions:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the completed briefing ( opening motion, response, reply, and if applicable, sur-reply), excluding
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`exhibits, in D-three-ring binders, appropriately tabbed. All documents shall be single-sided and
`
`
`
`
`
`must include the CM/ECF header. These copies shall be delivered to the Comi within three (3)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`business days after briefmg has completed. For expe1i-related motions, complete digital copies of
`
`
`
`
`
`the relevant expert repo1i(s) and accompanying exhibits shall be submitted on a single flash drive
`
`
`
`
`to the Court. Complete digital copies of the expe1ireport(s) shall be delivered to the Comi no later
`
`than the dispositive motion deadline.
`
`In lieu of eai·ly motions for summaiy judgment, the pa1iies ai·e directed to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Indefiniteness:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`subject to include any ai·guments related to the issue of indefiniteness in their Markman briefing,
`the local mles' nonnal page limits.
`
`4
`
`IPR2024-00027
`CrowdStrike Exhibit 1012 Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00113-JRG Document 44 Filed 09/07/23 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 568
`
`Lead Counsel: The Parties are directed to Local Rule CV-11(a)(1), which provides that
`“[o]n the first appearance through counsel, each party shall designate a lead attorney on the
`pleadings or otherwise.” Additionally, once designated, a party’s lead attorney may only be
`changed by the filing of a Motion to Change Lead Counsel and thereafter obtaining from the Court
`an Order granting leave to designate different lead counsel. The true lead counsel should be
`designated early and should not expect to parachute in as lead once the case has been largely
`developed.
`
`Motions for Continuance: The following will not warrant a continuance nor justify a
`failure to comply with the discovery deadline:
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss pending;
`
`The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court on the same day,
`unless the other setting was made prior to the date of this order or was made as a special
`provision for the parties in the other case;
`
`The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can demonstrate that it
`was impossible to complete discovery despite their good faith effort to do so.
`
`Amendments to the Docket Control Order (“DCO”): Any motion to alter any date on
`the DCO shall take the form of a motion to amend the DCO. The motion to amend the DCO shall
`include a proposed order that lists all of the remaining dates in one column (as above) and the
`proposed changes to each date in an additional adjacent column (if there is no change for a date
`the proposed date column should remain blank or indicate that it is unchanged). In other words,
`the DCO in the proposed order should be complete such that one can clearly see all the remaining
`deadlines and the changes, if any, to those deadlines, rather than needing to also refer to an earlier
`version of the DCO.
`
`Proposed DCO: The Parties’ Proposed DCO should also follow the format described
`above under “Amendments to the Docket Control Order (‘DCO’).”
`
`Joint Pretrial Order: In the contentions of the Parties included in the Joint Pretrial Order,
`the Plaintiff shall specify all allegedly infringed claims that will be asserted at trial. The Plaintiff
`shall also specify the nature of each theory of infringement, including under which subsections of
`35 U.S.C. § 271 it alleges infringement, and whether the Plaintiff alleges divided infringement or
`infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. Each Defendant shall indicate the nature of each
`theory of invalidity, including invalidity for anticipation, obviousness, subject-matter eligibility,
`written description, enablement, or any other basis for invalidity. The Defendant shall also specify
`each prior art reference or combination of references upon which the Defendant shall rely at trial,
`with respect to each theory of invalidity. Other than as set forth in the above deadlines, the
`contentions of the Parties may not be amended, supplemented, or dropped without leave of the
`Court based upon a showing of good cause. The Parties in a case which has been consolidated for
`pre-trial purposes and which is moving towards a separate trial on the merits (subsequent to pre-
`trial) shall file, as an exhibit to the parties’ Joint Pretrial Order, a list identifying all docket entries
`from the lead case that relate to the applicable member case.
`
`5
`
`IPR2024-00027
`CrowdStrike Exhibit 1012 Page 5
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00113-JRG Document 44 Filed 09/07/23 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 569
`
`Trial: All parties must appear in person at trial. All non-individual (including but not
`limited to corporate) parties must appear at trial through the presence in person of a designated
`representative. Once they have appeared, any representative of a non-individual party shall not be
`replaced or substituted without express leave of Court.
`
`DM2\18397822 3
`
`6
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of September, 2023.
`
`IPR2024-00027
`CrowdStrike Exhibit 1012 Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket