Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 1 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 8
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.1 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 2 of 25
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`GREENTHREAD, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`INTEL CORPORATION, DELL INC., AND
`DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:22-cv-00105-ADA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GREENTHREAD’S AMENDED PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order Governing Proceedings (OGP) 4.1—Patent Cases,
`
`Plaintiff Greenthread, LLC (“Greenthread”), concurrent with the filing of its First Amended
`
`Complaint, hereby provides its amended preliminary infringement contentions, including
`
`identification of asserted claims, the priority date for each asserted claim, accused products, and
`
`accompanying document production. Claim charts are attached as Exhibits A-1 through A-6, B-1
`
`through B-6, C-1 through C-6, D-1, D-2, D-3, and D-6.
`
`Greenthread’s disclosures are based on publicly available materials regarding the accused
`
`infringing products of Intel Corporation (“Intel”), Dell Inc., and Dell Technologies Inc. (Dell Inc.
`
`and Dell Technologies Inc. are collectively “the Dell Defendants” or “Dell,” and Intel Corporation
`
`and the Dell Defendants are collectively “Defendants”). Greenthread does not yet have access to
`
`any of Defendants’ discovery materials that may be relevant to its infringement claims and thus
`
`relies on publicly available materials. In light of the absence of discovery and reliance on publicly
`
`available materials, Greenthread has procured limited physical testing to the extent practicable, of
`
`1
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.2 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 3 of 25
`
`certain products believed to be representative of, and similar to, the accused infringing products in
`
`pertinent respects. Greenthread explicitly reserves the right to supplement or alter its disclosures
`
`herein, as a matter of right, as permitted by the Court, based on the Court’s claim constructions,
`
`based on additional information obtained through formal discovery or other means, and/or based
`
`on other circumstances.
`
`I.
`
`ASSERTED CLAIMS AND PRIORITY DATE
`
`Based on the information presently available to it, Greenthread identifies the asserted
`
`claims of each asserted patent that Greenthread alleges is infringed by Defendants, and the priority
`
`date of those claims, as set forth in the table below. Based on the information presently available
`
`to it, Greenthread alleges that all asserted claims of each particular asserted patent are entitled to
`
`the same priority date.
`
`Patent
`
`Asserted Claims
`
`Priority Date of Asserted Claims
`
`10,510,842 (“the
`’842 patent”)
`
`10,734,481 (“the
`’481 patent”)
`
`1, 2, 4-10, 12-18
`
`September 3, 2004
`
`1-9, 13, 15-20, 22-27, 31-36
`
`September 3, 2004
`
`11,121,222 (“the
`’222 patent”)
`
`1-9, 13, 15- 21, 23-28, 32-42,
`44
`
`September 3, 2004
`
`September 3, 2004
`
`September 3, 2004
`
`8,421,195 (“the ’195
`patent”)
`
`9,190,502 (“the ’502
`patent”)
`
`11,316,014 (the
`“’014 Patent”)
`
`1-3, 5-6
`
`7-9, 11
`
`1-9, 13, 15-21, 23-28
`
`September 3, 2004
`
`Greenthread notes that the claims identified in the table reflect the asserted claims in this
`
`case, and the absence of a claim from the list does not imply that the claim is not infringed.
`
`Greenthread explicitly reserves the right to supplement or alter its identification of asserted claims
`
`and priority dates, as a matter of right, as permitted by the Court, based on any further claim
`
`2
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.3 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 4 of 25
`
`constructions, additional information obtained through formal discovery or other means, and/or
`
`based on other circumstances.
`
`II.
`
`ACCUSED PRODUCTS
`
`Based upon information presently available to it, Greenthread asserts infringement by the
`
`accused products set forth below in this section. For each accused product identified below,
`
`Greenthread’s contentions apply to the accused product and any other similar past, present, or
`
`future products, as well as systems incorporating the accused products or other products with the
`
`same or substantially similar features.
`
`
`
`Intel Accused Products
`
`As described further in Exhibits A-1 through A-6 and Exhibits B-1 through B-6 below,
`
`Intel’s CPU products and Intel’s flash memory products infringe one or more asserted claims of
`
`each of the asserted patents.
`
`Intel Accused CPUs include all CPUs designed or manufactured (in whole or in part) by
`
`Intel, that have the same or similar structures, features, or functionalities as the exemplary Intel
`
`Core i7 11800H CPU shown in Exhibits A-1 through A-6. As shown in Exhibits A-1 through A-
`
`6, Intel Accused CPUs each infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,421,195 (claims 1-
`
`3, 5-6), 9,190,502 (claims 7-9), 10,510,842 (claims 1-2, 4-10, 12-18), 10,734,481 (claims 1-9, 13,
`
`15, 17-18, 20, 22-27, 31-32, 34-35), 11,121,222 (claims 1-9, 13, 15, 17-18, 20-21, 23-28, 32-33,
`
`35-36, 38-42, 44), 11,316,014 (claims 1-9, 13, 15, 17-18, 20-21, 23-28). Intel Accused CPUs
`
`include the 12th generation semiconductor products labeled as “Alder Lake,” the 11th generation
`
`semiconductor products labeled as “Tiger Lake,” and the 10th generation semiconductor products
`
`labeled as “Comet Lake.” The following listing of Intel 10th, 11th, and 12th generation
`
`3
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.4 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 5 of 25
`
`semiconductor products is derived from publicly available information at Intel’s website, as noted
`
`in Exhibit G to Greenthread’s Complaint (Dkt. 1-7).
`
`Greenthread reserves the right to supplement the list of Intel Accused Products as
`
`discovery proceeds.
`
`12th Generation “Alder Lake” Intel
`
`Products
`
`1. Intel Core i5-12400
`2. Intel Core i5-12400F
`3. Intel Core i5-12400T
`4. Intel Core i5-12450H
`5. Intel Core i5-12500
`6. Intel Core i5-12500E
`7. Intel Core i5-12500H
`8. Intel Core i5-12500T
`9. Intel Core i5-12500TE
`10. Intel Core i5-12600
`11. Intel Core i5-12600KF
`12. Intel Core i5-12600H
`13. Intel Core i5-12600HE
`14. Intel Core i5-12600T
`15. Intel Core i5-12600K
`16. Intel Core i5-12600KF
`17. Intel Core i7-12650H
`18. Intel Core i7-12700
`19. Intel Core i7-12700E
`20. Intel Core i7-12700F
`21. Intel Core i7-12700H
`22. Intel Core i7-12700T
`23. Intel Core i7-12700TE
`24. Intel Core i7-12800H
`25. Intel Core i7-12800HE
`26. Intel Core i7-12700K
`27. Intel Core i7-12700KF
`28. Intel Core i9-12900
`29. Intel Core i9-12900E
`30. Intel Core i9-12900F
`31. Intel Core i9-12900H
`32. Intel Core i9-12900HK
`33. Intel Core i9-12900T
`34. Intel Core i9-12900TE
`
`35. Intel Core i9-12900K
`36. Intel Core i9-12900KF
`37. Intel Core i9-12900KF
`
`
`11th Generation “Tiger Lake” Intel
`
`Products
`
`1. Intel Core i3 11100HE
`2. Intel Core i3 1115G4E
`3. Intel Core i3 1115GRE
`4. Intel Core i3 1120G4
`5. Intel Core i3 1125G4
`6. Intel Core i3 1110G4
`7. Intel Core i3 1115G4
`8. Intel Core i5 11500HE
`9. Intel Core i5 11320H
`10. Intel Core i5 1155G7
`11. Intel Core i5 11260H
`12. Intel Core i5 11400H
`13. Intel Core i5 11500H
`14. Intel Core i5 11600
`15. Intel Core i5 11600
`16. Intel Core i5 11600T
`17. Intel Core i5 11500
`18. Intel Core i5 11600KF
`19. Intel Core i5 11600K
`20. Intel Core i5 11400T
`21. Intel Core i5 11500T
`22. Intel Core i5 11400F
`23. Intel Core i5 11400
`24. Intel Core i5 11300H
`25. Intel Core i5 1140G7
`26. Intel Core i5 1145G7
`27. Intel Core i5 1145GZE
`28. Intel Core i5 1145GRE
`29. Intel Core i5 1135G7
`30. Intel Core i5 1130G7
`
`4
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.5 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 6 of 25
`
`31. Intel Core i7 11850HE
`32. Intel Core i7 11600H
`33. Intel Core i7 11390H
`34. Intel Core i7 1195G7
`35. Intel Core i7 11800H
`36. Intel Core i7 11850H
`37. Intel Core i7 11700KF
`38. Intel Core i7 11700F
`39. Intel Core i7 11700
`40. Intel Core i7 11700T
`41. Intel Core i7 11700K
`42. Intel Core i7 11370H
`43. Intel Core i7 1180G7
`44. Intel Core i7 11375H
`45. Intel Core i7 1185GRE
`46. Intel Core i7 1185G7E
`47. Intel Core i7 1167G7
`48. Intel Core i7 1185G7
`49. Intel Core i7 1165G7
`50. Intel Core i7 1160G7
`51. Intel Core i9 11950H
`52. Intel Core i9 11980HK
`53. Intel Core i9 11900H
`54. Intel Core i9 11900
`55. Intel Core i9 11900F
`56. Intel Core i9 11900T
`57. Intel Core i9 11900KF
`58. Intel Core i9 11900K
`
`
`10th Generation “Comet Lake” Intel
`
`Products
`
`1. Intel Core i3 10105
`2. Intel Core i3 10105F
`3. Intel Core i3 10105T
`4. Intel Core i3 10305
`5. Intel Core i3 10305T
`6. Intel Core i3 10325
`7. Intel Core i3 10100Y
`8. Intel Core i3 10100F
`9. Intel Core i3 10100
`10. Intel Core i3 10100E
`11. Intel Core i3 10100T
`12. Intel Core i3 10100TE
`13. Intel Core i3 100300
`
`5
`
`14. Intel Core i3 100300T
`15. Intel Core i3 10320
`16. Intel Core i3 10110U
`17. Intel Core i3 10110Y
`18. Intel Core i3 1000G1
`19. Intel Core i3 1000G4
`20. Intel Core i3 1005G1
`21. Intel Core i5 10505
`22. Intel Core i5 10500H
`23. Intel Core i5 10200H
`24. Intel Core i5 10310U
`25. Intel Core i5 1038NG7
`26. Intel Core i5 10400
`27. Intel Core i5 10400F
`28. Intel Core i5 10400T
`29. Intel Core i5 10500
`30. Intel Core i5 10500E
`31. Intel Core i5 10500T
`32. Intel Core i5 10500TE
`33. Intel Core i5 10600
`34. Intel Core i5 10600K
`35. Intel Core i5 10600KF
`36. Intel Core i5 10600T
`37. Intel Core i5 10300H
`38. Intel Core i5 10400H
`39. Intel Core i5 10210U
`40. Intel Core i5 10210Y
`41. Intel Core i5 10310U
`42. Intel Core i5 1030G4
`43. Intel Core i5 1030G7
`44. Intel Core i5 1035G1
`45. Intel Core i5 1035G4
`46. Intel Core i5 1035G7
`47. Intel Core i7 10870H
`48. Intel Core i7 10610U
`49. Intel Core i7 10810U
`50. Intel Core i7 1068NG7
`51. Intel Core i7 10700
`52. Intel Core i7 10700E
`53. Intel Core i7 10700F
`54. Intel Core i7 10700K
`55. Intel Core i7 10700KF
`56. Intel Core i7 10700T
`57. Intel Core i7 10700TE
`58. Intel Core i7 10750H
`59. Intel Core i7 10850H
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.6 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 7 of 25
`
`60. Intel Core i7 10875H
`61. Intel Core i7 10510U
`62. Intel Core i7 10710U
`63. Intel Core i7 1060G7
`64. Intel Core i7 1065G7
`65. Intel Core i9 10850K
`66. Intel Core i9 10885H
`
`
`
`67. Intel Core i9 10900
`68. Intel Core i9 10900E
`69. Intel Core i9 10900F
`70. Intel Core i9 10900KF
`71. Intel Core i9 10900T
`72. Intel Core i9 10900TE
`73. Intel Core i9 10900HK
`
`“Intel Accused Flash Memory Products” include flash memory products designed or
`
`manufactured (in whole or in part) by Intel that have the same or similar structures, features, or
`
`functionalities as the exemplary Micron 16 nm node NAND flash memory analyzed in Exhibits
`
`B-1 through B-6 regardless of how they are branded. That exemplary product was manufactured
`
`by Intel and bears Intel die marks.
`
`On information and belief, Intel designs and/or fabricates flash memory products using similar
`
`designs according to a limited number of processes, many or all of which utilize substantially
`
`similar process steps, including process steps for creating regions with graded dopant
`
`
`
`6
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.7 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 8 of 25
`
`concentrations. Accordingly, statements in Exhibits B-1 through B-6 referring to Micron’s flash
`
`memory products are equally applicable to Intel Accused Flash Memory Products.
`
`As shown in Exhibits B-1 through B-6, Intel Accused Flash Memory Products each
`
`infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,421,195 (claims 1-3, 5-6), 9,190,502 (claims 7-
`
`8, 11), 10,510,842 (claims 1-2, 4-5, 7-10, 12-13, 15-18), 10,734,481 (claims 1-4, 6-9, 13, 15-16,
`
`20, 22-24, 26-27, 31-33), 11,121,222 (claims 1-4, 6-9, 13, 15-17, 20-21, 23-25, 27-28, 32-34, 38-
`
`42, 44), 11,316,014 (claims 1-4, 6-9, 13, 15-17, 20-21, 23-25, 27-28).
`
`Intel Accused CPU Products and Intel Accused Flash Memory Products are collectively
`
`the “Intel Accused Products.”
`
`
`
`Dell Accused Products
`
`Dell’s products infringe one or more asserted claims of the asserted patents (“Dell
`
`Accused Products”). Dell Accused Products include Dell Products (as defined in the First
`
`Amended Complaint) that incorporate or comprise Intel Accused Products (“Dell-Intel Accused
`
`Products”), Dell-Micron Accused Products (defined in the First Amended Complaint), Dell-WD
`
`Accused Products (defined in the First Amended Complaint), and Dell-Sony Accused Products
`
`(defined in the First Amended Complaint).
`
`1.
`
`Dell-Intel Accused Products
`
`Dell Products comprising or containing Intel Accused Products are Dell-Intel Accused
`
`Products and infringe the same claims of the Greenthread Patents as the Intel Accused Products
`
`for the same reasons. The following listing of Dell-Intel Accused Products is derived from
`
`publicly available information at Dell’s website, as noted in Exhibit G to Greenthread’s
`
`Complaint (Dkt. 1-7). Greenthread reserves the right to supplement the list of Dell Accused
`
`Products, e.g., as discovery proceeds.
`
`7
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.8 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 9 of 25
`
`1. New XPS Desktop
`2. Alienware Aurora R13 Gaming
`Desktop
`3. New XPS Desktop
`4. Alienware x17 Gaming Laptop
`5. Alienware x15 Gaming Laptop
`6. XPS 17 Touch Laptop
`7. Alienware m15 R6 Gaming Laptop
`8. XPS 15 Laptop
`9. XPS 15 Touch Laptop
`10. XPS 13 Touch Laptop
`11. G15 Special Edition Gaming Laptop
`12. XPS 13 Laptop
`13. XPS 13 2-in-1 Laptop
`14. Inspiron 15 2-in-1 Laptop
`15. XPS 13 Touch Laptop
`16. New Inspiron 16 Plus Laptop
`
`17. G15 Gaming Laptop
`18. XPS 17 Laptop
`19. XPS 13 Laptop
`20. Inspiron 17 2-in-1 Laptop
`21. Inspiron 14 2-in-1 Laptop
`22. Inspiron 13 Laptop
`23. Inspiron 13 2-in-1 Plus Laptop
`24. Inspiron 15 Laptop
`25. Inspiron 14 Laptop
`26. Inspiron 15 3000 Laptop
`27. New Inspiron 15 1300 Laptop
`28. Alienware m15 R4 Gaming Laptop
`29. Inspiron Desktop
`30. XPS Desktop
`31. Other Dell products incorporating
`Intel Accused Products.
`
`This identification of Dell-Intel Accused Products is based upon Greenthread’s investigation to
`
`date, which has included limited physical testing to the extent practicable and has been undertaken
`
`at significant expense to Greenthread.
`
`2.
`
`Dell-Micron Accused Products
`
`Dell-Micron Accused Products include all Dell Products containing or comprising flash
`
`memory designed or manufactured (in whole or in part) by Micron Technology, Inc., Micron
`
`Semiconductor Products, Inc., Micron Technology Texas, LLC and/or their affiliates (“Micron”),
`
`that have the same or similar structures, features, or functionalities as the exemplary product shown
`
`in Exhibits B-1 through B-6, regardless of how such products are branded. Flash memory products
`
`include SSDs, microSD/SD cards, and thumb drives. As described in Exhibits B-1 through B-6,
`
`Dell-Micron Accused Products each infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,421,195
`
`(claims 1-3, 5-6), 9,190,502 (claims 7-8, 11), 10,510,842 (claims 1-2, 4-5, 7-10, 12-13, 15-18),
`
`10,734,481 (claims 1-4, 6-9, 13, 15-16, 20, 22-24, 26-27, 31-33), 11,121,222 (claims 1-4, 6-9, 13,
`
`15-17, 20-21, 23-25, 27-28, 32-34, 38-42, 44), 11,316,014 (claims 1-4, 6-9, 13, 15-17, 20-21, 23-
`
`25, 27-28). Dell-Micron Accused Products include Precision Fixed Workstations, Precision
`
`8
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.9 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 10 of 25
`
`Mobile Workstations, Latitude, Optiplex, XPS Desktops, XPS Notebooks, Vostro Desktops,
`
`Inspiron Desktops, Inspiron Netbooks, Alienware Desktops, and Alienware Notebooks.
`
`3.
`
`Dell-WD Accused Products
`
`“Dell-WD Accused Products” include all Dell Products containing or comprising flash
`
`memory designed or manufactured (in whole or in part) by Western Digital Corporation, Western
`
`Digital Technologies, Inc., HGST, Inc., SanDisk LLC, SanDisk Holdings LLC, SanDisk
`
`Technologies LLC and/or their affiliates (“Western Digital” or “WD”) that have the same or
`
`similar structures, features, or functionalities as the exemplary product shown in Exhibits C-1
`
`through C-6, regardless of how such products are branded, regardless of how such products are
`
`branded. As described in Exhibits C-1 through C-6, Dell-WD Accused Products each infringe
`
`one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,421,195 (claims 1-3, 5-6), 9,190,502 (claims 7-11),
`
`10,510,842 (claims 1-2, 4-5, 7-10, 12-13, 15-18), 10,734,481 (claims 1-4, 6-9, 13, 15-16, 20, 22-
`
`24, 26-27, 31-33), 11,121,222 (claims 1-4, 6-9, 13, 15-17, 20-21, 23-25, 27-28, 32-34, 38-42, 44),
`
`11,316,014 (claims 1-4, 6-9, 13, 15-17, 20-21, 23-25, 27-28). Flash memory products include
`
`SSDs, microSD/SD cards, and thumb drives. Exemplary Dell-WD Accused Products are listed
`
`below. All images were taken from dell.com.
`
`9
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.10 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 11 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.11 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 12 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.12 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 13 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.13 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 14 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.14 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 15 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.15 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 16 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.16 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 17 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.17 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 18 of 25
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Dell-Sony Accused Products
`
`
`
`Dell-Sony Accused Products include all Dell Products containing or comprising image
`
`sensors designed or manufactured (in whole or in part) by Sony Corporation, Sony Semiconductor
`
`Solutions, Sony Global Manufacturing & Operations, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Corporation of
`
`America or their affiliates (“Sony”), that have the same or similar structures, features, or
`
`functionalities as the exemplary product shown in Exhibits D-1, D-2, D-3 and D-6, regardless of
`
`17
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.18 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 19 of 25
`
`how such products are branded. As described in Exhibits D-1, D-2, D-3, and D-6, Dell-Sony
`
`Accused Products each infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,510,842 (claims 1-2,
`
`5, 7-10, 13, 15-18), 10,734,481 (claims 1-2, 4, 6-9, 13, 19-20, 22, 24, 26-27, 31, 36), 11,121,222
`
`(claims 1-2, 4, 6-9, 13, 19-21, 23, 25, 27-28, 32, 37-39, 41), 11,316,014 (claims 1-2, 4, 6-9, 13,
`
`19-21, 23, 25, 27-28). Exemplary Dell-Sony Accused Products are listed below. All images are
`
`taken from dell.com.
`
`
`
`18
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.19 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 20 of 25
`
`
`
`Upon information and belief, Dell also incorporates further Sony image sensors into other Dell
`
`Products, such as webcams that Dell integrates into Dell laptops, desktops, and other computing
`
`devices. Greenthread reserves the right to amend its list of Dell-Sony Accused Products, including
`
`based on information learned in discovery.
`
`5.
`
`Additional Dell Accused Products
`
`Upon information and belief, the following Dell products infringe one or more asserted
`
`claims of the asserted patents through their incorporation of dynamic random access memories
`
`(DRAMs), flash memory devices (e.g., in solid-state drives) and image sensors that meet the
`
`limitations of one or more asserted claims. The identities of such DRAMs, flash memory devices,
`
`19
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.20 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 21 of 25
`
`and image sensors, their specifications, and their manufacturers and/or suppliers (if other than
`
`Dell) are in the possession of the Dell Defendants and are expected to be learned over the course
`
`of this litigation, e.g., obtained through discovery. More complete information about the Accused
`
`Products is in the possession of Defendants and is expected to be obtained through discovery.
`
`Greenthread explicitly reserves the right to supplement or alter its preliminary identification of
`
`accused products, as a matter of right, as permitted by the Court, based on the Court’s claim
`
`constructions, based on additional information obtained through formal discovery or other means,
`
`and/or based on other circumstances.
`
`III. CLAIM CHARTS FOR LITERAL INFRINGEMENT
`
`Based upon information presently available to it, Greenthread’s preliminary infringement
`
`claim charts are provided as attached Exhibits A-1 through A-6, B-1 through B-6, C-1 through C-
`
`6, and D-1, D-2, D-3, and D-6. In each claim chart, the discussion for dependent claims should be
`
`read as incorporating by reference the discussion corresponding to the claims from which they
`
`depend. In addition, the discussion for each row in the chart should be read within the context of
`
`the discussion for the entire claim to which that row pertains. Where the charts incorporate
`
`excerpts of particular documents, the reference to those excerpts is exemplary and not to the
`
`exclusion of any other excerpt or version of the document or any versions of related documents.
`
`These infringement claim charts are based upon Greenthread’s investigation to date. More
`
`complete information about the Accused Products is in the possession of Defendants and is
`
`expected to be obtained through discovery. Greenthread explicitly reserves the right to supplement
`
`or alter its preliminary infringement claim charts, as a matter of right, as permitted by the Court,
`
`based on the Court’s claim constructions, based on additional information obtained through formal
`
`discovery or other means, and/or based on other circumstances.
`
`20
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.21 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 22 of 25
`
`IV. DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS
`
`Unless otherwise noted in the claim charts, Greenthread alleges that Defendants infringe
`
`literally all asserted claims. To the extent any differences are alleged to exist between the asserted
`
`claims and Defendants’ Accused Products, such differences are insubstantial and Defendants’
`
`Accused Products perform substantially the same function, in substantially the same way, to yield
`
`substantially the same result, and therefore Defendants infringe under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`Greenthread explicitly reserves the right to supplement or alter its disclosure concerning
`
`the doctrine of equivalents, as a matter of right, as permitted by the Court, based on the Court’s
`
`claim constructions, based on additional information obtained through formal discovery or other
`
`means, and/or based on other circumstances. In the event that a claim limitation is deemed to be
`
`missing under a literal infringement analysis, Greenthread also reserves the right to demonstrate
`
`the presence of a substantial equivalent of such limitation and to pursue infringement under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents.
`
`V.
`
`DOCUMENT PRODUCTION
`
`Accompanying these amended preliminary infringement contentions, Greenthread is
`
`producing documents pursuant to § II, page 2 of the Court’s Standing Order Governing
`
`Proceedings (OGP) 4.1—Patent Cases dated April 14, 2022 in the production range
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-000001-002065, including (1) documents evidencing conception and
`
`reduction to practice for each claimed invention at GREENTHREAD-WDTX-000349-000367,
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-000741-000759,
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-001061-001095,
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-001249-001283,
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-001378-001416,
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-001727-001857, GREENTHREAD-WDTX-002026-002051; and (2)
`
`a copy of the file history for each patent in suit at the following:
`
`21
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.22 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 23 of 25
`
`File History Production Range
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-001059-1246
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-001247-1375
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-001376-1649
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-000349-739
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-000740-905
`
`GREENTHREAD-WDTX-001866-2065
`
`Patent
`
`’842 patent
`
`’481 patent
`
`’222 patent
`
`’195 patent
`
`’502 patent
`
`’014 patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.23 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 24 of 25
`
`Dated: April 29, 2022.
`
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`
`
`
` /s/ Alan L. Whitehurst
`Alan L. Whitehurst
`D.C. Bar No. 484873
`awhitehurst@mckoolsmith.com
`Nicholas J. Matich
`D.C. Bar No. 1024907 (admission pending)
`nmatich@mckoolsmith.com
`Arvind Jairam
`D.C. Bar No. 1017133 (admission pending)
`ajairam@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`1999 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: 202-370-8300
`Telecopier: 202-370-8344
`
`John B. Campbell
`Texas Bar No. 24036314
`jcampbell@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`303 Colorado Street, Suite 2100
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Telephone: 512-692-8700
`Telecopier: 512-692-8744
`
`Kaitlyn M. Dawson
`Texas Bar No. 24101683 (admission
`pending)
`kdawson@mckoolsmith.com
`600 Travis Street, Suite 7000
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Telephone: 713-485-7300
`Telecopier: 713-485-7344
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Greenthread, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`23
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.24 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00105-ADA Document 38-8 Filed 04/29/22 Page 25 of 25
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served on the
`
`following counsel of record on April 29, 2022 via electronic mail using the following contact
`
`information.
`
`J. Stephen Ravel
`Texas State Bar No. 16584975
`KELLY HART &HALLMAN LLP
`Email: steve.ravel@kellyhart.com
`
`
`Gregory S. Arovas (Pro Hac Vice filed)
`Robert A. Appleby (Pro Hac Vice filed)
`Todd M. Friedman (Pro Hac Vice filed)
`Leslie M. Schmidt (Pro Hac Vice filed)
`Jon R. Carter (Pro Hac Vice filed)
`Christopher DeCoro (Pro Hac Vice filed)
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`Email: greg.arovas@kirkland.com
`Email: robert.appleby@kirkland.com
`Email: todd.friedman@kirkland.com
`Email: leslie.schmidt@kirkland.com
`Email: jon.carter@kirkland.com
`Email: christopher.decoro@kirkland.com
`
`Nyika O. Strickland (Pro Hac Vice filed)
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`300 North LaSalle Street
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Email: nyika.strickland@kirkland.com
`
`Abigail Lauer Litow (Pro Hac Vice filed)
`John R. Rhine (Pro Hac Vice filed)
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`Email: abigail.litow@kirkland.com
`Email: john.rhine@kirkland.com
`
`Bao Nguyen (Pro Hac Vice filed)
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`555 California Street 27th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Email: bao.nguyen@kirkland.com
`
` /s/ Alan L. Whitehurst
`Alan L. Whitehurst
`
`
`
`24
`
`Greenthread Ex 2005, p.25 of 25
`Cirrus Logic, et. al. v. Greenthread
`
`