`Arvind Jairam; Paul, Rajesh; Liddell, Andrew; Sharma, Anupam; Bluestone, David; Weidenfeller, Scott; Greene,
`Bert A.; GT-Cirrus-IPR; Greenthread-Cirrus-MS; Greenthread-Omnivision-MS; CirrusCov-GT; Texeira, Jennifer W.
`Trials
`RE: IPR2024-00001, -00016, -00017, -00018, -00019, -00020, -00021
`Wednesday, October 23, 2024 10:10:44 AM
`image001.png
`image003.png
`image004.png
`
`From:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Counsel,
`
`Patent Owner is not authorized to submit Dr. Campbell’s deposition testimony from other
`IPRs (IPR2024-00468, -00469, -00470) along with its Patent Owner Sur-reply in the present
`proceeding.
`
`Initially, we note that Dr. Campbell’s testimony in other IPRs (IPR2024-00468, -00469,
`-00470) is best characterized as concerning a disputed factual issue, not a legal one. Dr.
`Campbell was not retained as an expert by Petitioner and is not a witness in the present
`proceeding. Petitioner would have limited, if any, opportunity to cross-examine Dr. Campbell
`were we to admit his testimony from other proceedings.
`
`Briefing is nearing completion in IPR2024-00001, -16, -17, -18, -19, -20, and -21. In order to
`provide Petitioner with an opportunity to respond to Patent Owner’s new evidence,
`supplemental briefing would be required.
`
`In view of the above, and particularly in view of the advanced stage of this proceeding, we do
`not grant Patent Owner’s request. No call is necessary at this time.
`
`Regards,
`
`Tina
`
`From: Arvind Jairam <ajairam@McKoolSmith.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 2:58 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Paul, Rajesh <RPaul@cov.com>; Liddell, Andrew <WALiddell@duanemorris.com>; Sharma,
`Anupam <asharma@cov.com>; Bluestone, David <DBluestone@beneschlaw.com>; Weidenfeller,
`Scott <SWeidenfeller@cov.com>; Greene, Bert A. <BGreene@duanemorris.com>; GT-Cirrus-IPR
`<GT-Cirrus-IPR@cov.com>; Greenthread-Cirrus-MS <Greenthread-Cirrus-MS@mckoolsmith.com>;
`Greenthread-Omnivision-MS <Greenthread-Omnivision-MS@mckoolsmith.com>; CirrusCov-GT
`<CirrusCov-GT@cov.com>; Texeira, Jennifer W. <JWTexeira@duanemorris.com>
`Subject: IPR2024-00001, -00016, -00017, -00018, -00019, -00020, -00021
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`IPR2024-00001, -00016, -00017, -00018, -00019, -00020, -00021
`
`Dear Board,
`
`Ex. 3008
`IPR2024-00001
`IPR2024-00016
`IPR2024-00017
`IPR2024-00018
`IPR2024-00019
`IPR2024-00020
`IPR2024-00021
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Greenthread requests to submit newly available evidence regarding the core dispute
`in these proceedings.
`
`Greenthread recently deposed the expert witness of a petitioner in parallel IPRs (IPR2024-00468,
`-00469, -00470). The witness, Dr. Stephen Campbell, testified consistent with Greenthread’s
`position regarding the “aid carrier movement” claim term and contrary to the position of Petitioners
`here (and the petitioner in the parallel proceedings). Dr. Campbell testified about a number of
`forces besides a gradient that affect carrier motion. He testified that a minimum quantum of force
`from a gradient is required for carrier movement. He also testified that it is not possible to identify
`the doping gradient in the active region in Kawagoe, a reference at issue in both these IPRs and the
`parallel IPRs.
`
`Greenthread requests permission to submit in the present IPRs the Dr. Campbell deposition
`transcript from the parallel IPRs when Greenthread files its Patent Owner sur-reply in these IPRs, in
`the event that Petitioners do not submit the transcript along with their Patent Owner response.
`
`Prior to sending this email, Greenthread conferred with Petitioners, which indicated they oppose
`Greenthread’s requested relief. Petitioners provided the following statement: “Petitioners oppose
`on the basis that, among other things, the Campbell deposition transcript contains inadmissible
`hearsay, Patent Owner mischaracterizes the testimony, and the portions of the transcript referenced
`by Patent Owner are irrelevant and misleading to the issues in these IPRs.”
`
`The parties can make themselves available for a conference call October 25, 2024 or later if desired
`by the Board.
`
`Respectfully,
`Arvind Jairam
`Counsel for Patent Owner Greenthread, LLC
`
`NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT and
`ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGE and is CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are
`hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this
`e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee designated above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have
`received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be
`immediately destroyed.
`
`
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
![](/site_media/img/document_icon.png)
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
![](/site_media/img/error_icon.png)
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site