throbber
Rapid Publication
`
`Insulinotropin: Glucagon-like Peptide I (7-37) Co-encoded in the Glucagon Gene
`Is a Potent Stimulator of Insulin Release in the Perfused Rat Pancreas
`Svetlana Mojsov,* Gordon C. Weir,* and Joel F. Haboner*
`*Laboratory ofMolecular Endocrinology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical
`School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; and tJoslin Diabetes Center and New England Deaconess Hospital, and Harvard Medical School,
`Boston, Massachusetts 02115
`
`Abstract
`
`Insulin secretion is controlled by a complex set of factors that
`include not only glucose but amino acids, catecholamines, and
`intestinal hormones. We report that a novel glucagon-like pep-
`tide, co-encoded with glucagon in the glucagon gene is a potent
`insulinotropic factor. The glucagon gene encodes a proglucagon
`that contains in its sequence glucagon and additional glucagon-
`like peptides (GLPs). These GLPs are liberated from proglu-
`cagon in both the pancreas and intestines. GLP-I exists in at
`least two forms: 37 amino acids GLP-I(1-37), and 31 amino
`acids, GLP-I(7-37). We studied the effects of synthetic GLP-Is
`on insulin secretion in the isolated perfused rat pancreas. In the
`presence of 6.6 mM glucose, GLP-I(7-37) is a potent stimulator
`of insulin secretion at concentrations as low as 5 X 10-11 M (3-
`to 10-fold increases over basal). GLP-I(1-37) had no effect on
`insulin secretion even at concentrations as high as 5 X 10-7 M.
`The earlier demonstration of specific liberation of GLP-I(7-37)
`in the intestine and pancreas, and the magnitude of the insuli-
`notropic effect at such low concentrations, suggest that GLP-
`I(7-37) participates in the physiological regulation of insulin se-
`cretion.
`
`Introduction
`
`Pancreatic glucagon and intestinal glicentin are synthesized in
`the form of a 180-residue protein, preproglucagon encoded in
`a single gene (1). The precursor contains in addition to glicentin
`and glucagon the sequences of two glucagon-like peptides
`(GLPs)', GLP-I and GLP-II, separated by an intervening peptide
`(IP-I) (2-5). The posttranslational processing of preproglucagon
`differs in pancreas and intestine (1, 6). In the pancreas the pre-
`cursor is processed to glucagon and GLP-I, and in both large
`and small intestines glicentin, GLP-I, GLP-II and IP-II-leucine-
`amide are found. Both pancreas and intestine contain GLP-I in
`at least two forms-31 and 37 residues long (1).
`The close similarity of the amino acid sequence of GLP-Is
`and GLP-II with glucagon and the other peptides related in
`structure to glucagon (secretin, vasoactive intestinal peptide,
`gastric inhibitory peptide, growth hormone-releasing hormone)
`
`Receivedfor publication 28 October 1986.
`
`1. Abbreviation used in this paper: GLP, glucagon-like peptide.
`
`J. Clin. Invest.
`© The American Society for Clinical Investigation, Inc.
`$1.00
`0021-9738/87/02/0616/04
`Volume 79, February 1987, 616-619
`
`616
`
`S. Mojsov, G. C. Weir, and J. F. Habener
`
`suggests that the GLPs might have a role in metabolic regulation.
`The specific liberation of GLP-I and GLP-II in the intestine
`indicates that these peptides may be components of the entero-
`insular axis (7), which comprises multiple intestinal factors in-
`fluencing the release of hormones produced in the pancreatic
`islets. Further, they may be incretins, endocrine transmitters
`produced in the gastrointestinal tract that are released by nu-
`trients and stimulate insulin secretion in the presence ofelevated
`glucose ifexogeneously infused in amounts not exceeding blood
`levels achieved after food ingestion (8). Detection ofboth GLP-
`I(1-37) and GLP-I(7-37) in pancreas and intestines raises the
`possibility that GLP-I( 1-37) is itselfa prohormone that undergoes
`a proteolytic cleavage at the single arginine residue at position
`6 to release the biologically active GLP-I(7-37). In these studies
`we used synthetic GLP-I(1-37) and GLP-I(7-37) to investigate
`their effects on insulin secretion in the perfused rat pancreas
`and find that GLP-I(7-37) has uniquely potent insulinotropic
`actions.
`
`Methods
`
`Synthesis of peptides. Glucagon and GLP-Is were synthesized by the
`stepwise solid-phase method (9). Because the assembly of the peptide
`chain proceeds in the carboxyl- to the amino-terminal direction, GLP-
`I( 1-37) and GLP-I(7-37) were prepared in the same synthesis by separating
`the peptide resin after incorporation of a protected histidyl residue at
`position 7 and continuing the assembly of amino acids on the other
`aliquot of the peptide resin to obtain protected GLP-I(1-37) peptide resin.
`Peptides were purified by preparative reverse-phase C- 18 chromatography.
`Purified peptides were shown to be homogeneous by amino acid analysis,
`preview-sequence analysis, and high performance liquid chromatography
`(HPLC) on reverse-phase C-18 and ion-exchange DEAE-52 columns.
`Radioimmunoassays. Development of the antisera and competitive
`binding radioimmunoassays for glucagon and GLP-I are described else-
`where (1). In brief, samples were incubated with the antisera in borate
`buffer (pH 8.1) for 24 h at 0°C, followed by addition of '25I-labeled
`peptide for an additional 24 h in a total volume of 0.5 ml. Separation
`of the antibody bound from the free peptide was accomplished with
`dextran-coated charcoal. Assay sensitivity with all three antisera was 10
`pg/ml. The antiserum against GLP-I was obtained by immunization
`with GLP-I(l-37) and is directed against both the amino-terminal (1-6)
`part of the molecule and to 7-37 determinants. Therefore, the amount
`ofGLP-I(7-37) may be over or underestimated with respect to GLP-I(1-
`37) in the assay. The assay for insulin (10) used charcoal separation and
`rat insulin standards (Novo Research Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark).
`Rat-perfused pancreas experiments. The preparation of the in situ
`isolated rat pancreas has been described previously (11, 12). The perfusate
`contained bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.4) and 120 mg/dl glucose, 4% dextran
`T-70, and 0.2% bovine serum albumin, and was equilibrated with 95%
`02 and 5% CO2. The first 20 min ofeach perfusion was an equilibration
`period and is not represented in the data graphs.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 1
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 1
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 1
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, INC.
`IPR2024-00009
`Ex. 1036, p. 1 of 4
`
`

`

`After the initial 20-min equilibration period, aliquots of perfusate
`were removed every 2-4 min for additional 20 min, thus allowing the
`system to equilibrate for a total of 40 min. The perfusion, with GLP-
`I(1-37) or GLP-I(7-37), was for 6 min and samples were collected at 1-
`min intervals. The peptide perfusions were followed by equilibration
`periods of 20 min, during which four samples 5 min apart were collected.
`A second 6-min perfusion followed with the same peptide as the first
`perfusion only at 100 times higher concentration ofpeptide. Again, sam-
`ples 1 min apart were collected. The entire perfusion time was between
`70 and 85 min.
`In each aliquot of perfusate obtained, insulin was determined by
`radioimmunoassay. In addition the efficiency of delivery of the GLP-Is
`was confirmed by radioimmunoassay of corresponding aliquots of per-
`fusate in which insulin was measured (1).
`
`Results
`
`To optimally study the effects of GLP-I(7-37) and GLP-I( 1-37)
`on insulin secretion we used separate perfusions with each pep-
`tide, perfusing twice at two different concentrations of peptides
`and allowing 20-min time intervals between the two perfusions.
`In perfusions of two separate pancreases using this protocol,
`GLP-I(7-37) was a potent stimulator of insulin secretion, giving
`about a 20-fold stimulation at 5 X 10-9 M and a sixfold stim-
`ulation at 5 X 10" M (Fig. 1). In comparson, GLP-I(1-37),
`also studied in two pancreases, showed no effect on insulin se-
`cretion at either 5 X 10-9 or 5 X l-7 M (Fig. 2). At the latter
`concentration no effect was observed even during a 15-min per-
`fusion period (Fig. 2 B).
`Using a slightly different perfusion protocol than that de-
`scribed above (Figs. 1 and 2) we gave alternate 5-min infusions
`of the peptides at concentrations ranging from 5 X lo-7 to 5
`X 10-12 M to five additional individual pancreases. We repro-
`ducibly observed insulin release in response to GLP-I(7-37) at
`concentrations as low as 5 X 10-" M, and little if any insulin
`responses to GLP-I(1-37) at concentrations as high as 5 X l0-7
`M. Thus, the potent insulinotropic actions ofGLP-I(7-37) have
`been observed in studies of seven separate pancreases.
`Effects of glucagon on insulin secretion in the perfused pan-
`creas have been established previously (13). We also compared
`the effects of glucagon to that of the GLP-Is. We used synthetic
`
`glucagon in the concentration range of I0- -10-7 M and found
`it to be less potent than GLP-I(7-37).
`
`Discussion
`
`The results ofthese studies clearly indicate that GLP-I(7-37) has
`potent insulinotropin activity. The liberation ofthis peptide from
`proglucagon in the intestine, and to a lesser extent in the pancreas
`(1), raises the possibility that GLP-I(7-37) has a role in endocrine
`regulation in the entero-insular axis (7). Our data, taken together
`with earlier observations that glucagon-like immunoreactivity
`in crude gut extracts released insulin after ingestion of glucose
`and fat, (8) suggest that GLP-I(7-37) could potentially be an
`incretin. Of all the known intestinal hormones tested for their
`insulin-releasing potency in the past, gastric inhibitory peptide
`has been considered as a possible incretin (14, 15). However,
`the concentrations ofgastric inhibitory peptide required to stim-
`ulate insulin secretion exceed the physiologic levels ofthe peptide
`achieved after a meal. In the rat-perfused pancreas in the presence
`of 8.9 mM glucose, gastric inhibitory peptide (I0-' M) increased
`insulin secretion sixfold (16). We find a comparable increase in
`insulin secretion with GLP-I(7-37) at concentrations 100-fold
`lower than those required for an insulinotropic response to gastric
`inhibitory peptide.. By radioimmunoassay we have measured
`both GLP-I(1-37) and GLP-I(7-37) levels of - 150 pg/ml (50
`pM) in rat portal blood and 50 pg/ml (15 pM) in peripheral
`blood (S. Mojsov, unpublished results). Therefore, the insuli-
`notropic effect that we have observed at concentrations ofGLP-
`I(7-37) ofbetween 5 and 50 pM are well within the physiological
`levels of GLP-I(7-37) found in the circulation.
`There has been considerable interest in the potential intra-
`islet relationships which might occur between A, B, and D cells,
`such that the secretory product of one cell type might influence
`the function of a neighboring cell (17). Interaction could take
`place via a paracrine mechanism or through a local intra-islet
`portal system. Glucagon can stimulate both insulin and soma-
`tostatin secretion (13, 18), but because there appears to be a
`functional compartmentalization between islet cells, it is unclear
`whether glucagon can actually reach B and D cells (19). Taking
`into account the vascular arrangement of the rat islet, the glu-
`
`C-93Figure 1. The effects of sepa-
`rate perfusions in two represen-
`tative pancreas GLP-I(7-37) at
`two concentrations, 5 X 10-"
`and 5 x 10-9 M. Solid lines,
`insulin values determined by
`radioimmunoassay. Dashed
`lines, amount of peptide per-
`fused as determined in a com-
`petitive binding radioimmu-
`noassay with antisera against
`GLP-I(1-37). The amount of
`GLP-I(7-37) at 5 X 10" M is
`beyond the detection sensitivity
`of the radioimmunoassay. Each
`graph represents a perfusion of
`a separate pancreas with a
`given peptide.
`
`i-8 I
`tn
`Iii
`3
`-.4-L
`+-2
`
`60
`
`Insulinotropin
`
`617
`
`Bn
`
`16
`
`-17
`
`2
`
`K
`
`o
`
`A
`
`2 2 2
`
`?4
`
`E1
`
`16
`,I
`ol
`'S
`C:
`12,-
`-I
`CD
`C:
`
`Time (min)
`
`20
`
`40
`Time (min)
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 2
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 2
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 2
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, INC.
`IPR2024-00009
`Ex. 1036, p. 2 of 4
`
`

`

`B
`
`5 x 10-9
`
`- 7
`
`-i250
`
`-2IC
`
`- 7C
`
`-13C r
`
`-90
`
`-5C 3
`TI C
`
`1
`1%
`Ii
`
`I0
`
`1
`
`11
`
`I
`
`6C
`
`A
`
`5
`
`I---9
`
`~~ 1
`1
`~
`x
`E ~ I.
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`Time (min)
`
`I90
`
`- 150;
`
`270
`j30
`lI 5
`t;10
`5
`60
`
`Figure 2. The effects of separate
`perfusions in two representative
`pancreas with GLP-I(1-37) at
`two concentrations, 5 X 10-9 and
`5 X 10-7 M. Details of the exper-
`iment and explanation of sym-
`bols are described in legend to
`Fig. 1.
`
`1JC1
`
`Time (min)
`
`and radioimmunoassay, respectively. We thank Esther Hoomis for typing
`the manuscript.
`The studies were supported in part by Public Health Service grants
`AM 30834 and AM 20349.
`
`Note added in proof In studies ofisolated perfused pig ileum and pancreas,
`Orskov et al. (25) recently reported finding secretion of a GLP-l peptide
`from ileum, but the pancreas secreted a large peptide with both GLP-I
`and GLP-2 immunoreactivity.
`
`References
`
`1. Mojsov, S., G. Heinrich, I. B. Wilson, M. Ravazzola, L. Orci, and
`J. F. Habener. 1986. Preproglucagon gene expression in pancreas and
`intestine diversifies at the level ofpost-transcriptional processing. J. Biol.
`Chem. 261:11880-11889.
`2. Heinrich, G., P. Gros, and J. F. Habener. 1984. Glucagon gene
`sequence: four of six exons encode separate functional domains of rat
`preproglucagon. J. Biol. Chem. 259:14082-14084.
`3. Bell, G. I., R. F. Santerre, and G. T. Mullenbach. 1983. Hamster
`preproglucagon contains the sequence of glucagon and two related pep-
`tides. Nature (Lond.). 302:716-718.
`4. Bell, G. I., R. Sanchez-Pescador, P. J. Laybourn, and R. C. Najarian.
`1983. Exon duplication and divergence in the human preproglucagon
`gene. Nature (Lond.). 304:368-371.
`5. Lopez, L. C., M. L. Frazier, C. J. Su, A. Humar, and G. F. Sanders.
`1983. Mammalian pancreatic preproglucagon contains three glucagon-
`related peptides. Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA. 80:5485-5489.
`6. George, S. K., L. D. Uttenthal, M. Ghiglione, and S. R. Bloom.
`1985. Molecular forms of glucagon-like peptides in man. FEBS (Fed.
`Eur. Biochem. Soc.) Lett. 192:275-278.
`7. Unger, R. H., and A. M. Eisentraut. 1969. Entero-insular axis.
`Arch. Intern. Med. 123:261-266.
`8. Creutzfelt, W. 1979. The incretin concept today. Diabetologia.
`16:75-85.
`9. Merrifield, R. B. 1963. Solid phase peptide synthesis. J. Am. Chem.
`Soc. 95:2149-2154.
`10. Albano, J. D. M., R. P. Ekins, G. Maritz, and R. C. Turner.
`1972. A sensitive, precise radioimmunoassay of serum insulin, relying
`on charcoal separation of bound and free hormone moities. Acta En-
`docrinol. 70:487-509.
`11. Weir, G. C., S. D. Knowlton, and D. B. Martin. 1974. Glucagon
`secretion from the perfused rat pancreas. Studies with glucose and cat-
`echolamines. J. Clin. Invest. 54:1403-1412.
`
`cagon-containing A cells ofthe mantle appear to be downstream
`from the B cells of the core, and therefore glucagon may not
`reach the B cells in high enough concentration to exert a sig-
`nificant influence (20). The mantle ofA and D cells are, however,
`adjacent and this makes the possibility of paracrine interaction
`more feasible, although experimental support for such an inter-
`action is not available. The finding that GLP-I(7-37) is a more
`potent insulin secretagogue than glucagon raises important
`questions about its potential intra-islet role.
`Amino and carboxyl-termini of glucagon, GLP-I(7-37) and
`GLP-II are closely related to each other in their amino acid
`sequences and to vasointestinal peptide that possibly exerts a
`neuronal stimulation of insulin secretion (21). A most striking
`similarity among them is the conservation of a histidine residue
`at position 1. It is noteworthy that gastric inhibitory peptide,
`also closely related in its structure to the GLPs, has a tyrosine
`residue at position 1 instead of histidine (22). Inasmuch as a
`histidine residue at this position is essential for adenylate cyclase
`stimulation in various systems, the greater insulinotropic potency
`of GLP-1(7-37) compared with GIP may in part be accounted
`for by the histidine substitution for tyrosine (23).
`Additional evidence in support ofthe concept that GLP-I(7-
`37) is a potent insulinotropic peptide is provided by our recent
`observation that GLP-I(7-37), and not GLP-I(1-37) or GLP-II,
`is a potent activator of adenylate cyclase at concentrations as
`low as 5 X 10-11 M and also stimulates cellular levels of insulin
`mRNA and insulin release in a rat insulinoma cell line (RIN-
`38) (Drucker, D. J., J. Philippe, S. Mojsov, W. L. Chick, and
`J. F. Habener, manuscript in preparation). Further, studies by
`Schmidt and co-workers showed that in isolated precultured is-
`lets, 10-' to 10-8 M concentrations of the peptide GLP-I( 1-36
`des Gly-Arg amide) were required to release insulin (24).
`Determining whether GLP-I(7-37) is the hormone whose
`primary function is to stimulate insulin secretion in response to
`feeding, or is one of a complex group of hormones involved in
`maintaining glucose homeostasis, will require further investi-
`gation.
`
`Acknowledaments
`
`We thank Henrietta Cooper, Deanna Deery, and Adacie Allen for their
`expert experimental assistance in carrying out the pancreatic perfusions
`
`618
`
`S. Mojsov, G. C. Weir, and J. F. Habener
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 3
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 3
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 3
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, INC.
`IPR2024-00009
`Ex. 1036, p. 3 of 4
`
`

`

`12. Penkos, J. C., C.-H. Wu, J. C. Basabe, N. Lopez, and F. W. Wolf.
`1969. A rat pancreas-small gut preparation for the study of intestinal
`factor(s) and insulin release. Diabetes. 18:733-738.
`13. Samols, E., G. Marri, and V. Marks. 1966. Interrelationship of
`glucagon, insulin, and glucose: the insulinogenic effect of glucagon. Di-
`abetes. 15:855-865.
`14. Dupre, J., S. A. Ross, D. Watson, and J. C. Brown. 1973. Stim-
`ulation of insulin secretion by gastric inhibitory polypeptide in man. J.
`Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 37:826-828.
`15. Andersen, D. K., D. Elahi, J. C. Brown, J. D. Tobin, and R.
`Andres. 1978. Oral glucose augmentation ofinsulin secretion. Interactions
`ofgastric inhibitory polypeptide with ambient glucose and insulin levels.
`J. Clin. Invest. 62:152-161.
`16. Brown, J. C., and R. A. Federson. 1976. The insulinotropic action
`of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in the perfused isolated rat pancreas.
`Endocrinology. 99:780-785.
`17. Samols, E., G. C. Weir, and S. Bonner-Weir. 1983. Intraislet
`insulin-glucagon-somatostatin relationships. In P. J. Lefebvre, editor.
`Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. Vol. 66. Springer-Verlag,
`Berlin. 133-173.
`18. Unger, R. H., and L. Orci. 1977. Hypothesis: the possible role
`of the pancreatic D-cell in the normal and diabetic states. Diabetes. 26:
`241-244.
`
`19. Kawai, K., E. Ipp, L. Orci, A. Pezzelet, and R. H. Unger. 1982.
`Circulating somatostatin acts on the islets of Langerhans by way of so-
`matostatin-poor compartment. Science (Wash. DC). 218:477-478.
`20. Bonner-Weir, S., and L. Orci. 1982. New perspectives on the
`microvasculature of the islets of Langerhans in the rat. Diabetes. 31:
`883-889.
`21. Schebalin, M., S. I. Said, and G. M. Makhlouf. 1977. Stimulation
`of insulin and glucagon secretion by vasoactive intestinal peptide. Am.
`J. Physiol. 232:E197-E200.
`22. Moody, A. J., L. Thim, and I. Valverde. 1984. The isolation and
`sequence of human gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP). FEBS (Fed. Eur.
`Biochem. Soc.) Lett. 172:142-148.
`23. Pandol, S. J., H. Seifert, M. W. Thomas, J. Rivier, and W. Vale.
`1984. Growth hormone-releasing factor stimulates pancreatic enzyme
`secretion. Science (Wash. DC). 225:326-328.
`24. Schmidt, W. E., E. G. Siegel, and W. Creutzfeld. 1985. Glucagon-
`like peptide- I but not glucagon-like peptide-2 stimulates insulin release
`from isolated rat pancreatic islets. Diabetologia. 28:704-707.
`25. Orskov, C., J. J. Holst, S. Knuhtsen, F. G. A. Baldissera, S. S.
`Poulsen, and 0. V. Nielsen. 1986. Glucagon-like peptides GLP-1 and
`GLP-2, predicted products of the glucagon gene, are secreted separately
`from pig small intestine but not pancreas. Endocrinology. 119:1467-
`1475.
`
`Insulinotropin
`
`619
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 4
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 4
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1036 PAGE 4
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, INC.
`IPR2024-00009
`Ex. 1036, p. 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket