throbber
C:::,-(7\
`U1
`0\
`
`-~-
`----o
`---
`C:
`-
`.
`"°
`·---·
`rn
`'ti
`========= ~
`0
`
`[I..>
`,__
`
`Please type a plus sign(+) inside this box ➔ e:J
`
`,
`
`PTO/SS/16 (3-97)
`Approved tor use through 1/31/98. 0MB 0651-0037
`Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`.
`Under the Paperwork Reduc:t1on Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information untess it displays a
`valid 0MB control number.
`PROVISIONAL APPL/CATION FOR PA TENT COVER SHEET
`This is a request for filing a PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT under 37 CFR 1.53 (b)(2).
`
`INVENTOR(S)
`
`!\ I PROV
`
`Given Name (first and middle [if any])
`Nancy
`Charles
`Peter
`
`Family Name or Surname
`Benovich Gilby
`Evett
`Fearey
`
`e Additional inventors are being named on the J:__ separately numbered sheets attached hereto (back)
`
`Residence
`(City and either State or Foreign Country)
`
`TITLE OF THE INVENTION (280 characters max)
`
`CUSTOMER LEAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
`
`Direct all correspondence to:
`
`CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
`
`I ►
`
`PlaCIJ Customer Number
`Bar Code Label here
`
`OR
`
`Type Customer Number here
`
`D Customer Number I
`o Firm or
`
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`225 Franklin Street
`
`lndMdual Name
`
`Address
`Address
`City
`
`Country
`
`Boston
`
`TIC::A
`
`02110
`MA
`ZIP
`State
`'>17-542-5070 Fax 617-542-8906
`Telephone
`ENCLOSED APPLICATION PARTS(check all that apply}
`
`0 Specification Number of Pages I 14
`I □ Small Entity Statement
`0 Orawing(s) Number of Sheets I 5
`I ~ Other (specify) I Appendix A (190 pg1
`D A check or money order is enclosed to cover the filing fees
`
`METHOD OF PAYMENT OF FILING FEES FOR THIS PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENTcfleckone)
`FILING FEE
`AMOUNT/$)
`
`□ The Commissioner is hereby authorized to charge filing
`fees or credit any overpayment to Deposit Account Numbe{
`
`I $75.00
`
`The invention was made by an agency of the United States Government or under a contract with an agency of thE
`United States Government.
`IXl No.
`0 Yes, ttle name of the U.S. Government agency and the Government contract number ar"·
`
`Respectfully sub~ / ) I
`SIGNATURE ~ /4.J '-><'n. /Zll<-~
`TYPED or PRINTED NAM,._e __ J_. _&_o_b_1_· n_&_o_h_l_i_c_e_k_
`TELEPHONE _____ 6_1_7_-_54_2_-_s_o_10 _ _ _
`
`Date
`
`5121 99
`
`REGISTRATION No. I
`
`43,349
`(if appropnate)I := ========:
`. 10844/002001
`Docket Number:
`USE ONLY FOR FILING A PROVISIONAL APPL/CATION FOR PA TENT
`Burden Hour Statement This lofll\ is estimated to take 0.2 hours to complete. Time will vary depending upon the needs of the individual case.
`Any comments on the amount of time you are required to complete this form should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, Patent and
`Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231. 00 NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Box ProviStonal
`Application, Assistant Commissioner tor Patents, Washington, DC 20231.
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.1
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`PROVISIONAL APPL/CATION COVER SHEET
`Additional Page
`
`valid 0MB control number.
`
`PTO/SB/16 (3-97)
`Approved for use through 1/31/98. 0MB 0651-0037
`Undet" the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are r~:!m,g7g ~:~~~ ~'reht~o~·o~~t~~NJn~ 'fRt'l"~=Cf
`I Dock N
`be 110844/00200~:Yl;>e a ~•us sign(+) I
`inside this box ➔ +
`
`et um
`
`r
`
`Given Name (first and middle [if any))
`
`Family or Surname
`
`Residence
`(Citv and either State or Foreign Country)
`
`INVENTOR(S),'APPLICANT(S)
`
`Gregory
`
`David
`
`John
`
`Erma.n
`
`Tiu
`Mandel
`
`Number
`
`1
`
`of
`
`1
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.2
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`PROVISIONAL APPLICATION
`
`UNDER 37 CFR 1.53(b)(2)
`
`TITLE:
`
`CUSTOMER LEAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
`
`APPLICANTS:
`
`NANCY BENOVICH GILBY, CHARLES EVETT,
`PETER FEAREY, GREGORY ERMAN, DAVID TIU
`and JOHN MANDEL
`
`"EXPRESS MAIL" Mailing Label Number EL266438027US
`
`Date of Deposit =M=ay'-'2=1._. 1=99:;..:;9 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
`I hereby certify under 37 CFR 1.10 that this correspondence is being
`deposited with the United States Postal Service as "Express Mail
`Post Office To Addressee" with sufficient postage on the date
`
`~~~;T~
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.3
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`PATENT
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. 10844/002001
`
`CUSTOMER LEAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
`
`Background
`
`5
`
`This invention relates to a system for processing
`customer leads.
`Today, lead management is largely a paper-based manual
`process in which customer leads are received as a result of
`marketing activities, and distributed to particular sales
`10 organizations. For example, names and other information
`about customer leads may be obtained at a trade show. A
`subset of these leads may then be selected and passed to
`sales groups based on the geographic region of the lead,
`the product or service involved, or other lead-related
`15 criteria.
`In general, there is little or no automated
`feedback regarding the outcome of the lead, such as whether
`a sale actually occurred or if the lead was not properly
`routed.
`
`Summary
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`In a general aspect, the invention provides an
`automated system for accepting, prioritizing and routing
`customer leads. The system provides feedback regarding the
`routing and ultimate outcome of a lead, thereby allowing
`lead tracking and performance measurement. The invention
`can feature a hierarchical delegation approach in which
`users specify rules according to which leads routed to them
`are processed, for example, by routing the lead to other
`users. The invention can also feature a distributed
`architecture in which several servers are coupled, for
`example, over the Internet. Leads are provided from one
`
`1
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.4
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`server to another, and feedback regarding the disposition
`of the lead is provided in return.
`In one aspect, in general, the invention is a method
`for processing customer leads. The method includes
`accepting a lead that includes a number of data fields,
`such as the lead name, the lead's address, or a marketing
`campaign associated with the lead. The method also
`includes inputting, or otherwise accepting, a number of
`rule specification for each of a number of users. The lead
`is routed to a first of the users, and one or more of the
`rules that were inputted for that user are applied to the
`lead. Based on application of those rules, the lead is
`routed to a second of the users. The second user is
`notified of the routed lead. Then an acceptance of the
`lead is received from the second user.
`The invention has the advantage of providing feedback
`regarding the processing of a lead, thereby allowing
`tracking and, if necessary, re-routing of a lead that is
`not being handled effectively.
`The hierarchical delegation of rule specification
`allows users to more precisely tailor the rule for their
`particular circumstances, rather than relying only on a
`centralized administration approach.
`Coupling of multiple servers allows different servers
`to be administered by different organization, such as a
`vendor and multiple resellers. When leads are passed from
`one server to another, the configurable amount of feedback
`provides desirable security and privacy to the
`organizations which maintaining efficient processing of the
`leads. By maintaining the leads on multiple servers
`administered by different organizations, each organization
`can make use of its own leads database, while maintaining a
`degree of sharing of information between the organizations.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`2
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.5
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`Other features and advantages are apparent from the
`following description and from the claims.
`
`Description of Drawings
`
`FIG. 1 is block diagram of load management system;
`FIG. 2 shows the interconnection of computers used to
`implement the lead management system over the Internet;
`FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing logical modules of a
`lead management server;
`FIG. 4 shows a set of lead boxes coupled to user
`interfaces and to a rules engine; and
`FIG. 5 illustrates exemplary handling of leads through
`the system.
`
`Description
`
`Referring to FIG. 1, a lead management system includes
`a lead management server 100 that accepts leads 162 from
`one or more lead sources 160, and routes those leads to
`particular users through user interfaces 110. Lead sources
`160 can include email, Web forms, telephone call centers,
`business card or badge scanners at trade shows, or
`purchased mailing lists.
`In the description that follows,
`leads 162 refer to customer lead that relate to potential
`purchases of products or services offered by a commercial
`organization, and the users are typically sales
`representatives, or managers of organizations that include
`sales representatives. The organization makes use of the
`lead management system to direct the leads to appropriate
`users, such as sales representatives, who interact with the
`potential customers for the purpose of actually selling the
`products or services. Although the description that
`follows refers to such customer leads, in alternative
`embodiments, rather than leads, other types of records or
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`3
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.6
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`requests are routed to appropriate individuals using such a
`system.
`Lead management server 100 routes a lead 162 to a
`particular user based on an internal configuration, which
`includes, for instance, rules for handling leads with
`different attributes and preferences for particular users.
`In this embodiment, the lead management server is
`configured in a decentralized manner. That is, an
`administrator of the server may set global configurations
`using administration interface 105, while individual users
`set individual configurations using user interfaces 110.
`The global configuration typically handles a first level of
`routing of leads to particular users. When a lead is
`routed to a particular user, the configuration provided by
`that user generally determines how the lead is further
`handled. For instance, in the case that the user is a
`sales representative, the user may have specified a
`preferred method of being notified of a new lead, for
`example notification by email or by pager. Some users may
`also have configured the lead management system to
`automatically route some or all leads sent to them to other
`users. For example, a sales manager may configure his lead
`box to automatically route leads to particular sales
`representations based on the geographic region of the lead.
`When a lead is sent to a user, the user must in
`generally provide feedback to the lead management system
`indicating that the lead is accepted, that it is rejected,
`or that it should be forwarded to another user. Various
`approaches are used to encourage a user to provide this
`feedback. For example, some information related to the
`lead may be withheld until the user provides feedback that
`indicates that the user is accepting the lead. The status
`of each lead is tracked by lead management server 100 and
`this status can be accessed by the users of the system.
`
`4
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.7
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`In addition to routing leads when they arrive, lead
`management server 100 has the capability of re-routing
`leads after they have been routed to a particular user.
`For example, the server can periodically re-route leads
`that have been sent to particular users but have not yet
`been accepted or rejected. Also, the lead management
`server can adaptively modify its routing of leads based,
`for example, one the number of outstanding leads assigned
`to a particular user, or based on a statistical criterion,
`such as the responsiveness of a particular user, of their
`success in obtaining actual sales from leads that have been
`assigned to them.
`In one mode of routing leads, lead management server
`100 assigns a lead to a class of users, and then chooses a
`15 particular user in that class in a round robin manner such
`that successive leads assigned to the class are routed to
`different users.
`In another mode, leads are routed to
`multiple users, or multiple secondary servers (e.g.,
`corresponding to multiple resellers), in an "up for grabs"
`" 20 mode.
`In this mode, although multiple users are initially
`assigned a lead, only the first to accept the lead keeps
`it. The others then receive notifications that the lead is
`no longer available.
`Lead management server maintains a history of activity
`related to a lead, and in particular maintains a history of
`the rules applied to a lead, the sequence of users to whom
`the lead has been routed, and changes of state of a lead.
`This history is used to "progressively close the loop" by
`associating the progress of a lead, for example its
`generation of an actual sale, with its history. For
`example, this allows sales to be associated with particular
`marketing activities.
`In addition, the history is used to
`optimize the rules by determining the effectiveness of
`routing leads with particular attributes to particular
`
`25
`
`30
`
`5
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.8
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`10
`
`15
`
`users. Also, in alternative embodiments, the history is
`used to determine statistics that are used to affect
`further lead routing.
`A user that has accepted a lead may update the status
`5 of the lead as he or she interacts with the lead.
`In some
`instances, a lead does not result in a sale, but the user
`indicates that the lead should be reactivated after an
`"incubation" period. After the lead is later reactivated,
`it is re-routed in the same manner as a new lead entering
`the system.
`Referring still to FIG. 1, lead management server 100
`is also optionally coupled to one or more secondary lead
`management servers 150. These servers are similar to lead
`management server 100, and optionally may be restricted to
`received leads only from the lead management server, and
`not directly from other lead sources. After the lead is
`routed to the secondary server, it is essentially
`replicated in the lead storage of both servers, although
`the fields of the two stored leads may not be identical,
`since some details regarding the lead may be withheld by
`the secondary server. The lead management server updates
`the lead based on feedback from the secondary server when
`it updates its copy of the lead, for example when the lead
`is assigned to a user. An exemplary application of the
`lead management system has a vendor operating lead
`management server 100 and resellers operating secondary
`lead management servers 150. The vendor has users 100,
`such as direct sales representatives, who receive leads
`directly from lead management server 100. Some leads are
`sent to a reseller by transferring lead information to the
`secondary server. The secondary server may provide some
`feedback information regarding the status of the lead to
`the lead management server 100. However, for example for
`competitive business reasons, some information such as the
`
`M 20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`6
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.9
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`" 20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`identity of a particular user assigned a lead by secondary
`lead management server 150 or contact information related
`to the lead may be kept private to the secondary system.
`Leads may also be routed to users by lead management
`server 100 through other information systems 130. For
`example, lead management server 100 can route leads to a
`opportunity management tool provided by Siebel Systems Inc.
`Lead management system 100 is also coupled to a
`secondary information source 120. This information source
`is used to augment the information associated with a lead
`162 that it receives from lead source 160. For example,
`Dunn and Bradstreet information, product literature, or
`sales tools may be associated with a lead and routed to a
`user along with the lead.
`Referring still to FIG. 1, a user interacts with lead
`management server 100 though a user interface 110, which
`may include a computer, a pager, or a telephone.
`In
`general, a user provides configuration 112 to the server,
`for example specifying rules for routing leads provided to
`that user, and configuring the method for notifying that
`user when leads are available. The user receives
`notifications and leads 114 from the server, and in return
`provides explicit acceptances 116 for the leads back to the
`server.
`Referring to FIG. 2, the lead management system is
`implemented using a number of computers coupled to one
`another through Internet 210.
`In alternative embodiments,
`other communication interconnections are also feasible, for
`example, relying on dedicated or "dial-up" connections
`between computers. Lead management server 100 is
`implemented on a lead management server computer 200 that
`is coupled to Internet 210. Lead management server
`In
`computer 200 executes a number of software processes.
`particular, server computer 200 executes a Web client 211
`
`7
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.10
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`20
`
`for accessing other computers over Internet 210 using the
`http (hyper-text transport protocol) application protocol,
`a Web server 202 for providing other computer access to it
`over Internet 210 using the http protocol, and a mail
`interface 203 for accessing users at other computers using
`electronic mail that is transferred over the Internet.
`In
`addition, lead management server computer 200 is coupled to
`batch input/output devices 204, for example magnetic tape
`drives, that are used to import or export data from the
`server computer. The lead management server computer is
`optionally coupled to other systems over other
`communication links 205, for example over dedicate data
`connections.
`Each user typically interacts with the system using a
`15 user computer 210. For instance, user computer 210
`executes a mail interface 212 that accepts messages from
`mail interface 203 at lead management server computer 200
`and that is used to send messages back to the lead
`management server computer. User computer 210 also
`includes a Web browser 211 for accessing Web server 202 at
`lead management server computer 200.
`In some embodiments,
`user computer 210 may include only a mail interface or a
`Web browser, rather than both.
`In other embodiments,
`client computer 210 is coupled to lead management server
`computer 200 in any of a number of well-known techniques,
`for example using a dedicated client application which
`executes on the client computer and which communicates with
`a server application at the lead management server
`computer.
`In this embodiment, users can also be notified using a
`wireless paging system.
`In this case, lead management
`server computer 200 sends a electronic mail message through
`its mail interface 203 to a pager server 218 over the
`
`25
`
`30
`
`8
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.11
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`5
`
`Internet, and the pager server sends a wireless message to
`the user's pager 215.
`Lead management server computer 200 can also
`communicate with other lead management systems 230 over the
`Internet, for example to route leads to those systems, or
`to accept leads from those systems. Lead management server
`computer 200 can also communicate with secondary lead
`management server computers 250 over the Internet, for
`instance using the http protocol, for the purpose of
`10 passing leads to the secondary servers and for receiving
`feedback regarding the status of leads that it previously
`passed.
`Referring to FIG. 3, lead management server 100
`logically has several modules which are implemented using
`15 physical storage devices, or as processes executing on a
`computer processor according to a program stored on program
`storage 310. Leads 162 are accepted by a lead import
`module 310. Lead import module 310 performs initial
`processing functions to input the lead into the system.
`20 Leads are passed to a data cleansing and enhancement module
`320, which corrects errors in the imported lead, for
`instance based on secondary information sources 120, and
`augments the lead, for example by attaching company
`information from a secondary information source.
`The lead is then passed to rules engine 330 and the
`lead is stored in lead storage 340. Lead storage 340 is
`logically implemented as an object database, which is then
`actually implemented using relational database techniques.
`Rules engine 330 is also coupled to a rules and profile
`storage 350 that hold rules specified by an administrator
`to the system as a whole, or by users for leads that are
`delivered to them. Rules engine 330 makes use of the rules
`in rules and profile storage 350 to modify the leads in
`lead storage 340, thereby logically routing the lead to
`
`25
`
`30
`
`9
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.12
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`20
`
`particular users. Lead management system 100 includes a
`notification, delivery, and tracking module 370 that
`notifies users of leads, provides lead information to the
`users, and accepts responses, such as acceptances,
`rejections, and rerouting of the leads provided to the
`user. When rules engine 330 routes a lead to a secondary
`lead management system, the lead is passed to a server(cid:173)
`server lead module 380 which provides the lead information
`to the secondary server, and accept notifications regarding
`routing and changes of state of the lead from the secondary
`system.
`Referring to FIG. 4, logically, the leads stored in
`lead storage 340 (FIG. 3) logically flow through a
`succession of lead boxes, which are somewhat analogous to
`15 mail boxes.
`Initially, a lead is placed in a system lead
`box 410, and as it is routed to the final user, the lead
`may pass through a succession of user lead boxes 420. Each
`lead box is associated with configuration data, which
`includes rules to apply to leads that are routed to that
`lead box. Each lead has a number of attributes, such as
`the name of the lead, the lead's organization, the
`organization's address, the product involved, the marketing
`campaign involved, and the likelihood of a sale. Rules are
`defined in terms of the attributes. There are several
`types of rules that are applied to a lead.
`A prioritization rule assigns a numeric or categorical
`priority to a lead based on other attributes of the lead.
`Note that this prioritization may be different in different
`lead boxes. An assignment rule determines which next lead
`box the lead should be routed to, again based on the
`attributes associated with the lead. An attachment rule,
`which is also based on the particular attributes of a lead,
`determines what additional information should be attached
`to the lead prior to routing it further. For example,
`
`25
`
`30
`
`10
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.13
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`5
`
`15
`
`product specifications can be attached and delivered to a
`user with the lead. Note that the information attached to
`the lead may be provided to enable a user to better service
`a lead, rather than simply provide more information about
`the lead itself. An example of such information is
`documentation of a promotional program that could be used
`to encourage a customer to buy a product or service. Other
`examples include training presentations (e.g., video
`presentations) to better prepare the user for selling a
`10 particular product, order forms, or rebate information.
`These attachments may be provides as references to
`documents (e.g., URLs) that the user then accesses over the
`Internet, rather than being provided in their entirety.
`A user specifies a particular rule to apply to leads
`in his or her lead box 420 through user interface 110.
`This specification is typically based on a selection from a
`small number of types of rules, and selection from a
`constrained set of parameters for the rule. The system
`includes a "wizard" mode that specifies a rule by
`20 presenting a sequence of selections to be made or questions
`to be answered by the user, for example having the user
`select which attribute to use in determining where to route
`leads. The system holds definitions for these types (or
`classes) of rules, and specifications of the wizard modes
`for rule selection. A user with appropriate access
`privileges can specify the types of rules that another user
`may choose from, and the wizard mode that the other user
`can use to select a particular rule. The wizard is
`specified using XML (extensible Markup Language) and
`essentially forms a template for the particular rules that
`the users that make use of the wizard can choose.
`In some
`embodiments, the users are arranged in a hierarchy or tree
`and a user has the privilege to specify a wizard for the
`users branching from that user's node in the tree (i.e.,
`
`25
`
`30
`
`11
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.14
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`10
`
`below that user's node if the root of the tree is at the
`top). For example, a user who supervises a set of other
`users may configure their lead boxes with a wizard that
`allows those users to specify particular rules from a class
`5 of rules specified by that supervisor.
`Referring to FIG. 5, logically, based on an exemplary
`application of rules by rules engine 330 (FIGS. 3, 4) a
`lead passes through a branching tree of lead boxes.
`Initially at system lead box 410, leads are routed based on
`system-wide routing rules to a user lead box 420, for
`instance by routing the lead to a lead box associated with
`a geographic region, such as the eastern US. Based on the
`rules at that lead box, the lead may be routed again to
`another lead box 410, for instance one associated with a
`smaller geographic region, such as a particular state in
`the US, and finally to a user interface 110, for instance
`associated with a sales representative for that state.
`Alternatively, in another exemplary application of the
`rules, a lead may be passed to a system lead box 410 at a
`secondary lead management system, where it is passed
`through user lead boxes 420 an finally to a user interface
`110.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Each lead is tracked by lead management system 100 as
`it is routed from lead box to lead box, and as it is
`provided and then later accepted or rejected by a user.
`Therefore, users can determine the status of leads.
`Referring back to FIG. 1, lead management server 100 is
`coupled to a reporting interface 140. Based on the
`information regarding routing and status of lead in the
`lead management system, detailed reports regarding aspects
`of sets of leads can be directly determined. For example,
`statistics regarding completion of sales from a particular
`marketing campaign, or in a particular geographic region
`can be prepared. These reports provide feedback from sales
`
`12
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.15
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`activities, for example, to determine the effectiveness of
`particular marketing campaigns or the effectiveness of
`particular rules in the system.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`The following additional documents are attached as an
`appendix to this description:
`1. Press release, dated May 24, 1999 (4 sheets)
`2. "Marketsoft Corporation Architectural Overview,"
`viewgraphs dated May 18, 1999 (24 sheets)
`3. "Navigating Through Marketsoft, 11 a user manual,
`including images of a graphical user interface (36
`sheets)
`4. "Rule Explanation," a document describing types of
`rules with examples (13 sheets)
`5. "Marketsoft Architectural Blueprint," (7 sheets)
`6. "Launch Product Plan 5/6/99" (2 sheets)
`7. "Feature Profiles M2.1 Pilot," (8 sheets)
`8. "Feature Profiles M2.2," (22 sheets)
`9. "Feature Profiles M3: Vl.O / FCS," (24 sheets)
`10. Database schema,
`(50 sheets)
`
`It is to be understood that the foregoing description
`is intended to illustrate and not to limit the scope of the
`invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended
`claims. Other embodiments are within the scope of the
`following claims.
`
`What is claimed is:
`
`13
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.16
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`A method for processing customer leads
`1.
`comprising:
`accepting a lead that includes a plurality of
`data fields;
`for each of a plurality of users, accepting a
`plurality of rule specification for that users;
`routing the lead to a first of the users;
`applying one or more of the rules that were
`accepted for that user to the lead;
`routing the lead to a second of the users based
`on the application of the rules;
`notifying the second of the users of the routed
`
`lead; and
`
`receiving from the second user an acceptance of
`the routed lead.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`14
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.17
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`/or
`
`/10
`
`/tD
`
`Joo
`
`/2o
`
`Lt:'Ac
`t1A~G~~
`sBz-ve:.R..
`
`,,.,, ___ ,
`
`SEG:J,-J~ftY
`INf=o (2..t:\A-l~IIJ
`S~J~
`
`130
`
`t'-/o
`
`orYl'l:::-.7"--
`I t--> ~ Pm u)...)
`SY sTt:'.:."'M S.
`
`\
`'2EfOJ<-TI ~ (,
`lt..l1'=(lP~ce.
`
`To ontl.:;"""R
`Le A-D H Au A-4€1'\ el\
`S°'t'S n2HS /00
`
`-
`
`ISL
`
`S€Cot.JC/JcP(
`U::AD
`YIAN M..l,.J!'ll:>'•1
`s;-~
`
`S~C-O,.iOA-i'r'
`~
`n4',JAfit;;1'1
`s~
`
`I
`
`F\ G, i
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.18
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`219
`
`p~~~R
`5 t9t V ~ \\.
`1--\AIL
`IN'lt:.'1t~AC.
`
`\
`
`21s
`)
`
`\
`
`200
`
`2£0
`
`S' e:. c_o ..s~ILY
`I . .~
`r1 Pr.J A-4 <:)1dJr
`} '~~
`~,::iv1\:::.)(..
`
`OT\-t~K
`L€fx0
`t/l "" 'T.
`s '-l (1"El"lS
`)
`~30
`
`r IC. 2.
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.19
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`3Sb
`_ )
`l
`Rut.Es
`f-
`~.~t 1.£
`s-;--oMG.f;
`......
`
`:~
`
`(),/&~
`PN Tl:::.'"'P-A.Ct:::5:.
`:1f:110
`
`/
`
`'
`,,,
`'
`
`_I'
`
`1'
`
`,~
`' Rtl'LE.S.
`' Co'-1~lc.;.
`n<> 011W:2:
`J67
`
`jR.(-te K1 N ~
`f1 ..IOUL~
`
`'3~
`
`'
`
`--
`
`3/1.)
`~
`' .,.
`
`P~oc.l\AK
`STO<R.A4,1:.
`
`1.,..lc;P\I.RT
`11-"\Po
`j--\.,) O..iL1::
`
`I
`(..l:m;o M C.T
`,
`~
`...
`(
`
`'3LO
`
`_,,.I
`
`,l,--
`
`32,-0
`Oi:\T'A
`1
`.
`C Ll:E'"A-t-J s I i.J "
`A i-.1 o €').I
`lt'Ar.Jcch ~
`
`\
`
`Jz,:;
`S e. Cc:. ~ 0 A (.tJ(
`11 ... r·pa ie-tv1 /,\-li w
`s~u !LC. e..
`
`J
`
`I
`
`r
`
`'
`
`-~
`Ru1...~
`E.~G'\Ni:;
`~
`
`~3 (.:)
`
`3 '-I.:,
`
`d
`
`~ LfA.D
`Sn,(<Ac;c
`
`·, _J '-.
`l ~ Pe:wvE~~ +
`/ lr~on ~1~..1.
`'t
`I
`
`s~va.-
`S~vc:::"'IL
`~"'fir◊ oeuu
`l"li>OuG-
`
`180
`
`~ r e-w ~ .i\fc-Y
`l,,t."A O rt k,J ~ E"Hel.J'i
`J\fs.1"'e.>1
`ISo
`
`Fl G, '3
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.20
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`330
`
`IDS
`
`AoM1tJ.
`
`110
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.21
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

`

`410
`
`%Co N n AA'{ (..,~ D
`rl1'1", S't r ~ .
`
`American Airlines, Ex. 1010, p.22
`American Airlines v. Advanced Transactions
`IPR2023-01366
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket