throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`SOVEREIGN PEAK VENTURES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2023-01261
`U.S. Patent No. 8,045,531
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Description
`
`Confidential Settlement and License Agreement (Parties
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`
`2001
`and Board Only)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ii
`
`

`

`I.
`
`PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), Petitioner HEWLETT PACKARD
`
`ENTERPRISE COMPANY and Patent Owner SOVEREIGN PEAK VENTURES,
`
`LLC jointly request that this inter partes review proceeding involving U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,045,531 (“the ’531 patent”) be terminated based on a settlement between
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner (“the Parties”) with respect to the ’531 patent.
`
`II. REASONS FOR GRANTING THE MOTION
`
`Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing
`
`of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). The Board authorized filing of the instant motion
`
`on October 11, 2023. Guidance as to the content of a motion to terminate is provided
`
`in IPR2013-00428, Paper No. 56. There, the Board indicated that a joint motion,
`
`such as this one, should (a) include a brief explanation as to why termination is
`
`appropriate; (b) identify all parties in any related litigation involving the patent at
`
`issue; (c) identify any related proceedings currently before the Office; and (d)
`
`discuss specifically the current status of each such related litigation or proceeding
`
`with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding. Id. at 2. This motion
`
`satisfies each of the above requirements and is accompanied by the Parties’
`
`settlement agreement, as required by 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 35 C.F.R. § 42.74 (b).
`
`a. Brief Explanation of Why Termination is Appropriate
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Termination is appropriate because no patent owner preliminary response or
`
`patent owner response has yet been filed, no trial has been instituted, the Board has
`
`not decided the merits of the proceeding, and no final written decision has been
`
`issued. Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), this proceeding “shall be terminated with respect
`
`to [] [P]etitioner” because the parties are jointly requesting termination and the
`
`Office has not yet “decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for
`
`termination is filed.” The Parties have resolved their disputes with respect to the ’531
`
`patent. Patent Owner has filed a notice of dismissal of its infringement claim under
`
`the ’531 patent in the related proceedings (Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC v. Hewlett
`
`Packard Enterprise Company), and Patent Owner and Petitioner have executed an
`
`agreement to request termination of this proceeding and providing a covenant not to
`
`sue under the ’531 patent.
`
`b. All Parties in Any Pending Related Litigation Involving the Patent at
`Issue
`
`The following litigations are related to the ’531 patent:
`
`Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company,
`
`Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00009-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.).
`
`c. Related Proceedings Currently Before the Office
`
`The following proceedings are related to the PTAB IPR2023-01261:
`
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company v. Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC,
`
`PTAB-IPR2023-01260.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company v. Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC,
`
`PTAB-IPR2023-01262.
`
`Joint motions to terminate each of the above proceedings are being filed
`
`concurrently with this instant motion.
`
`d. Current Status of Each Such Related Litigation of Proceeding With
`Respect to Each Party in the Litigation or Proceeding
`
`Sections II.b and II.c above indicate the status of each related litigation or
`
`proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding.
`
`III. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the Parties’
`
`agreement is in writing, and a true and correct copy is being filed concurrently
`
`herewith as Exhibit 2001.1 There are no other agreements, oral or written, between
`
`the parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of these
`
`proceedings. The parties are also filing concurrently herewith a joint request under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) to treat the settlement agreement as
`
`business confidential information and keep it separate from the files of the ’531
`
`patent.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`
`1 The settlement agreement is being filed via the PTAB E2E with access to the
`
`“Parties and Board only.”
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`For all these reasons, the Parties respectfully request termination of this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 12, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
` / Patrick D. McPherson/ /Tarek N. Fahmi/
`Patrick D. McPherson
` Tarek N. Fahmi
`Reg. No. 46,255
`Reg. No. 41,402
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`901 New York Ave., NW
`Ste. 700 East
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`Tel: 202.776.5214
`Email:
`PDMcPherson@duanemorris.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`2150 N. First Street, Suite 420
`San Jose, CA 95131
`
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Email: tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDINGS
`was served on October 12, 2023, by filing this document though the PTAB P-
`TACTS System as well as by delivering a copy via email directed to the attorneys
`of record for the Petitioner at the following addresses:
`Patrick D. McPherson
`Patrick C. Muldoon
`Matthew S. Yungwirth
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW, Ste. 700 East
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`Email:
`PDMcPherson@duanemorris.com
`PCMuldoon@duanemorris.com
`MSYungwirth@duanemorris.com
`
`
`The parties have agreed to electronic service in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Dated: October 12, 2023
`
`/Tarek N. Fahmi/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`
`Reg. No. 41,402
`2150 N First St., Suite 420
`San Jose, CA 95131
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Email: patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket