`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`SOVEREIGN PEAK VENTURES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2023-01261
`U.S. Patent No. 8,045,531
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Description
`
`Confidential Settlement and License Agreement (Parties
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`
`2001
`and Board Only)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ii
`
`
`
`I.
`
`PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), Petitioner HEWLETT PACKARD
`
`ENTERPRISE COMPANY and Patent Owner SOVEREIGN PEAK VENTURES,
`
`LLC jointly request that this inter partes review proceeding involving U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,045,531 (“the ’531 patent”) be terminated based on a settlement between
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner (“the Parties”) with respect to the ’531 patent.
`
`II. REASONS FOR GRANTING THE MOTION
`
`Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing
`
`of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). The Board authorized filing of the instant motion
`
`on October 11, 2023. Guidance as to the content of a motion to terminate is provided
`
`in IPR2013-00428, Paper No. 56. There, the Board indicated that a joint motion,
`
`such as this one, should (a) include a brief explanation as to why termination is
`
`appropriate; (b) identify all parties in any related litigation involving the patent at
`
`issue; (c) identify any related proceedings currently before the Office; and (d)
`
`discuss specifically the current status of each such related litigation or proceeding
`
`with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding. Id. at 2. This motion
`
`satisfies each of the above requirements and is accompanied by the Parties’
`
`settlement agreement, as required by 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 35 C.F.R. § 42.74 (b).
`
`a. Brief Explanation of Why Termination is Appropriate
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Termination is appropriate because no patent owner preliminary response or
`
`patent owner response has yet been filed, no trial has been instituted, the Board has
`
`not decided the merits of the proceeding, and no final written decision has been
`
`issued. Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), this proceeding “shall be terminated with respect
`
`to [] [P]etitioner” because the parties are jointly requesting termination and the
`
`Office has not yet “decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for
`
`termination is filed.” The Parties have resolved their disputes with respect to the ’531
`
`patent. Patent Owner has filed a notice of dismissal of its infringement claim under
`
`the ’531 patent in the related proceedings (Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC v. Hewlett
`
`Packard Enterprise Company), and Patent Owner and Petitioner have executed an
`
`agreement to request termination of this proceeding and providing a covenant not to
`
`sue under the ’531 patent.
`
`b. All Parties in Any Pending Related Litigation Involving the Patent at
`Issue
`
`The following litigations are related to the ’531 patent:
`
`Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company,
`
`Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00009-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.).
`
`c. Related Proceedings Currently Before the Office
`
`The following proceedings are related to the PTAB IPR2023-01261:
`
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company v. Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC,
`
`PTAB-IPR2023-01260.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company v. Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC,
`
`PTAB-IPR2023-01262.
`
`Joint motions to terminate each of the above proceedings are being filed
`
`concurrently with this instant motion.
`
`d. Current Status of Each Such Related Litigation of Proceeding With
`Respect to Each Party in the Litigation or Proceeding
`
`Sections II.b and II.c above indicate the status of each related litigation or
`
`proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding.
`
`III. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the Parties’
`
`agreement is in writing, and a true and correct copy is being filed concurrently
`
`herewith as Exhibit 2001.1 There are no other agreements, oral or written, between
`
`the parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of these
`
`proceedings. The parties are also filing concurrently herewith a joint request under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) to treat the settlement agreement as
`
`business confidential information and keep it separate from the files of the ’531
`
`patent.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`
`1 The settlement agreement is being filed via the PTAB E2E with access to the
`
`“Parties and Board only.”
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`For all these reasons, the Parties respectfully request termination of this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 12, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
` / Patrick D. McPherson/ /Tarek N. Fahmi/
`Patrick D. McPherson
` Tarek N. Fahmi
`Reg. No. 46,255
`Reg. No. 41,402
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`901 New York Ave., NW
`Ste. 700 East
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`Tel: 202.776.5214
`Email:
`PDMcPherson@duanemorris.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`2150 N. First Street, Suite 420
`San Jose, CA 95131
`
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Email: tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDINGS
`was served on October 12, 2023, by filing this document though the PTAB P-
`TACTS System as well as by delivering a copy via email directed to the attorneys
`of record for the Petitioner at the following addresses:
`Patrick D. McPherson
`Patrick C. Muldoon
`Matthew S. Yungwirth
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW, Ste. 700 East
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`Email:
`PDMcPherson@duanemorris.com
`PCMuldoon@duanemorris.com
`MSYungwirth@duanemorris.com
`
`
`The parties have agreed to electronic service in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Dated: October 12, 2023
`
`/Tarek N. Fahmi/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`
`Reg. No. 41,402
`2150 N First St., Suite 420
`San Jose, CA 95131
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Email: patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`