`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 28
`Date: July 9, 2024
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`GEOSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2023-01209 (Patent 7,561,104 B2)
`IPR2023-01210 (Patent 8,400,358 B2)
`IPR2023-01211 (Patent 8,786,494 B2)
`IPR2023-01212 (Patent 8,406,753 B2)
`IPR2023-01213 (Patent 9,097,784 B2)1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before PATRICK R. SCANLON, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`BRIAN D. RANGE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`PER CURIAM
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion to
`Withdraw Counsel
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in all above-captioned
`proceedings. We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in
`each proceeding. The parties are not authorized to use this style heading in
`subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-01209 (Patent 7,561,104 B2)
`IPR2023-01210 (Patent 8,400,358 B2)
`IPR2023-01211 (Patent 8,786,494 B2)
`IPR2023-01212 (Patent 8,406,753 B2)
`IPR2023-01213 (Patent 9,097,784 B2)
`On June 20, 2024, with our prior authorization, Geoscope
`Technologies Pte. Ltd. (“Patent Owner”) filed “Patent Owner’s Motion to
`Withdraw Counsel.” Paper 28 (“Motion”).2 Patent Owner requests that the
`Board authorize the withdrawal of its initially designated back-up counsel,
`Mr. Ryan J. Singer. Id. at 1. Patent Owner indicates that Mr. Singer “is no
`longer an attorney at Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP.” Id. Patent Owner asserts
`that “granting this Motion will not hinder the economy, the integrity of the
`patent system, the efficient administration of the Office, or the ability of the
`Office to timely complete this proceeding.” Id. Patent Owner indicates that
`Petitioner, Google LLC, does not oppose the Motion. Id.
`Patent Owner filed updated Mandatory Notices, which list a
`complement of back-up counsel in addition to Mr. Singer. Paper 26, 3–4.
`Because alternative counsel has been designated to replace the departing
`counsel, we authorize the withdrawal of Mr. Singer.
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion is granted, and Mr. Singer is
`withdrawn as counsel from the above-identified proceedings.
`
`
`2 For expediency, this Order cites only to papers filed in IPR2023-01209.
`Similar or identical papers were also filed in IPR2023-01210, IPR2023-
`01211, IPR2023-01212, and IPR2023-01213.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2023-01209 (Patent 7,561,104 B2)
`IPR2023-01210 (Patent 8,400,358 B2)
`IPR2023-01211 (Patent 8,786,494 B2)
`IPR2023-01212 (Patent 8,406,753 B2)
`IPR2023-01213 (Patent 9,097,784 B2)
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Patrick Keane
`Roger Lee
`Matthew Fedowitz
`Andrew Cheslock
`Mythili Markowski
`Samuel Harrod
`Ralph Fischer
`Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
`patrick.keane@bipc.com
`roger.lee@bipc.com
`matthew.fedowitz@bipc.com
`andrew.cheslock@bipc.com
`mythili.markowski@bipc.com
`samuel.harrod@bipc.com
`ralph.fischer@bipc.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`James T. Carmichael
`Stephen McBride
`Minghui Yang
`Carmichael IP, PLLC
`jim@carmichalip.com
`stevemcbride@carmichaelip.com
`mitch@carmichaelip.com
`
`Ryan J. Singer
`Christopher M. Gerson
`Saunak K. Desai
`Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
`ryan.singer@srz.com
`chris.gerson@srz.com
`saunak.desai@srz.com
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
