throbber
Case 6:22-cv-00122-ADA Document 37 Filed 09/23/22 Page 1 of 5
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`ZENTIAN LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. 6:22-cv-00122-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`The parties’ deemed Case Management Conference occurred on September 8, 2022.
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the Court orders that the following schedule will
`
`govern deadlines up to and including the trials of this matter:1
`
`Deadline
`
`Item
`
`September 1, 2022
`
`Plaintiff served preliminary2 infringement contentions in the form of
`a chart setting forth where in the accused product(s) each element of
`the asserted claim(s) are found. Plaintiff also identified the earliest
`priority date (i.e. the earliest date of invention) for each asserted
`claim and produced: (1) all documents evidencing conception and
`reduction to practice for each claimed invention, and (2) a copy of
`the file history for each patent in suit.
`
`1 Plaintiff requests that this case be coordinated and/or consolidated with CRSR related case
`Zentian v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 6:22-cv-00123-ADA (W.D. Tex.), for pre-trial purposes
`and with coordinated Markman briefing and a single Markman hearing. See OGP 4.2 at 2, 7.
`2 The parties may amend preliminary infringement contentions and preliminary invalidity
`contentions without leave of court so long as counsel certifies that it undertook reasonable efforts
`to prepare its preliminary contentions and the amendment is based on material identified after those
`preliminary contentions were served, and should do so seasonably upon identifying any such
`material. Any amendment to add patent claims requires leave of court so that the Court can address
`any scheduling issues.
`
`Amazon / Zentian Limited
`Exhibit 1032
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00122-ADA Document 37 Filed 09/23/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`Deadline
`
`Item
`
`October 27, 2022
`
`Defendant serves preliminary invalidity contentions in the form of
`(1) a chart setting forth where in the prior art references each
`element of the asserted claim(s) are found, (2) an identification of
`any limitations the Defendant contends are indefinite or lack written
`description under section 112, and (3) an identification of any claims
`the Defendant contends are directed to ineligible subject matter
`under section 101. Defendant shall also produce (1) all prior art
`referenced in the invalidity contentions, and (2) technical
`documents, including software where applicable, sufficient to show
`the operation of the accused product(s).
`
`November 10, 2022
`
`Parties exchange claim terms for construction.
`
`December 1, 2022
`
`Parties exchange proposed claim constructions.
`
`December 8, 2022
`
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The parties shall disclose any
`extrinsic evidence, including the identity of any expert witness they
`may rely upon with respect to claim construction or indefiniteness.
`With respect to any expert identified, the parties shall identify the
`scope of the topics for the witness’s expected testimony.3 With
`respect to items of extrinsic evidence, the parties shall identify each
`such item by production number or produce a copy of any such item
`if not previously produced.
`
`December 15, 2022
`
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms in dispute and
`exchange revised list of terms/constructions.
`
`January 19, 2023
`
`Defendant files Opening claim construction brief, including any
`arguments that any claim terms are indefinite.
`
`January 26, 2023
`
`Deadline to file Motion to Transfer.4
`
`February 9, 2023
`
`Plaintiff files Responsive claim construction brief.
`
`3 Any party may utilize a rebuttal expert in response to a brief where expert testimony is relied
`upon by the other party.
`4 Assumes Markman hearing on March 23, 2023. See OGP 4.2 at 5 (“This section applies to all
`cases filed on or after March 7, 2022. Otherwise, the Second Amended Standing Order Regarding
`Motions for Inter-District Transfer controls earlier-filed cases.”); Second Amended Standing
`Order Regarding Motions For Inter-District Transfer (“A motion for interdistrict transfer may be
`filed within eight weeks of the scheduled date for the Markman hearing only with a showing of
`good cause for any delay and leave of court.”).
`
`2
`
`Amazon / Zentian Limited
`Exhibit 1032
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00122-ADA Document 37 Filed 09/23/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`Deadline
`
`Item
`
`February 23, 2023
`
`Defendant files Reply claim construction brief.
`
`February 23, 2023
`
`February 23, 2023
`
`Parties to jointly email the law clerks
`(txwdml_lawclerks_wa_judgealbright@txwd.uscourts.gov) to
`confirm their Markman date.
`
`For pending inter-district venue transfer motions, the moving party
`to provide the Court with a status report with respect to whether the
`motion(s) has been fully briefed and ready for resolution.
`Parties to jointly email the Court’s law clerks
`(txwdml_lawclerks_wa_judgealbright@txwd.uscourts.gov) if any
`venue or jurisdictional motions remain unripe for resolution.
`
`March 9, 2023
`
`Plaintiff files a Sur-Reply claim construction brief
`
`March 14, 2023
`
`March 16, 2023
`
`March 16, 2023
`
`March 23, 2023
`
`March 24, 2023
`
`May 4, 2023
`
`May 18, 2023
`
`Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement and email the
`law clerks
`(txwdml_lawclerks_wa_judgealbright@txwd.uscourts.gov) an
`editable copy.
`
`Parties submit optional technical tutorials to the Court and technical
`adviser (if appointed).
`
`If the Court has not ruled on any pending inter-district motion to
`transfer, the moving party is directed to email the Court’s law clerks
`(txwdml_lawclerks_wa_judgealbright@txwd.uscourts.gov) and the
`technical advisor (when appointed), and indicate that the motion to
`transfer is pending.
`
`Markman Hearing at 9:00 a.m. This date is a placeholder and the
`Court may adjust this date as the Markman hearing approaches.
`
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve Initial Disclosures per Rule
`26(a).
`
`Deadline to add parties.
`
`Deadline to serve Final Infringement and Invalidity Contentions.
`After this date, leave of Court is required for any amendment to
`Infringement or Invalidity contentions. This deadline does not
`relieve the Parties of their obligation to seasonably amend if new
`information is identified after initial contentions.
`
`3
`
`Amazon / Zentian Limited
`Exhibit 1032
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00122-ADA Document 37 Filed 09/23/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`Deadline
`
`July 13, 2023
`
`September 21, 2023
`
`Item
`
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required unless the
`amendment adds patents or patent claims. (Note: This includes
`amendments in response to a 12(c) motion.)
`
`Deadline for the first of two meet and confers to discuss
`significantly narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior art
`references at issue. Unless the parties agree to the narrowing, they
`are ordered to contact the Court’s law clerks
`(txwdml_lawclerks_wa_judgealbright@txwd.uscourts.gov) to
`arrange a teleconference with the Court to resolve the disputed
`issues.
`
`October 19, 2023
`
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`
`October 26, 2023
`
`Opening Expert Reports.
`
`November 30, 2023
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`
`December 21, 2023
`
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`
`December 21, 2023
`
`Deadline for the second of two meet and confer to discuss narrowing
`the number of claims asserted and prior art references at issue to
`triable limits. If it helps the parties determine these limits, the parties
`are encouraged to contact the Court’s law clerks
`(txwdml_lawclerks_wa_judgealbright@txwd.uscourts.gov) for an
`estimate of the amount of trial time anticipated per side. The parties
`shall file a Joint Report within 5 business days regarding the results
`of the meet and confer.
`
`January 11, 2024
`
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`
`January 25, 2024
`
`February 1, 2024
`
`February 15, 2024
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists, witness
`lists, discovery and deposition designations).
`
`Deadline to respond to dispositive motions and Daubert motions.
`Deadline to file reply briefs in support of dispositive motions and
`Daubert motions.
`
`February 22, 2024
`
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`
`February 22, 2024
`
`Parties to jointly email the Court’s law clerks
`(txwdml_lawclerks_wa_judgealbright@txwd.uscourts.gov) to
`confirm their pretrial conference and trial dates.
`
`4
`
`Amazon / Zentian Limited
`Exhibit 1032
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00122-ADA Document 37 Filed 09/23/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`Deadline
`
`Item
`
`February 29, 2024
`
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures; file Motions in limine
`
`March 7, 2024
`
`March 14, 2024
`
`3 business days before
`Final Pretrial
`Conference
`
`TBD at the Court’s
`convenience
`[March 28, 2024, or as
`soon as practicable]
`
`TBD at the Court’s
`convenience
`[April 22, 2024, or as
`soon as practicable]
`
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury instructions,
`exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and deposition designations);
`file oppositions to Motions in limine.
`
`File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting.
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is
`requested for trial, the party or parties making said request shall file
`a notice with the Court and e-mail the Court Reporter, Kristie Davis
`at kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections and
`disputes on Motions in limine.
`
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial
`disclosures and disputes on motions in limine.
`
`Final Pretrial Conference. Held in person unless otherwise
`requested. The Court expects to set this date at the conclusion of the
`Markman Hearing.
`
`Jury Selection/Trial. The Court expects to set this date at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`SIGNED this 23rd day of September, 2022.
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`5
`
`Amazon / Zentian Limited
`Exhibit 1032
`Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket