throbber

`
` icine
`ER
`
`Mi
`
`Fi
`ELSEVI
`
`Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
`
`science()oinecr:
`
`Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 59 (2005) 205-211
`
`
`
`FEET
`

`
`APPLIED
`CATALYSIS
`
`B ENVIRONMENTAL
`
`www.elsevier.com/locate/apcatb
`
`Nature of nitrogen specie in coke andtheir role in NO,
`formation during FCC catalyst regeneration
`
`I.V. Babich, K. Seshan “, L. Lefferts
`
`University of Twente, Catalytic Processes and Materials, Faculty of Science and Technology,
`IMPACT, P.O. Box 217, 7500AE Enschede, The Netherlands
`
`Received 15 September 2004; received in revised form 7 February 2005; accepted 9 February 2005
`Available online 9 March 2005
`
`Abstract
`
`NO, emission during the regeneration of coked fluid catalytic cracking (FCC)catalysts is an environmental problem. In order to follow the
`route to NO, formation and try to find ways to suppress it, a coked industrial FCC catalyst has been prepared using model N-containing
`compounds, e.g., pyridine, pyrrole, aniline and hexadecane—pyridine mixture. Nitrogen present in the FCC feed is incorporated as
`polyaromatic compounds in the coke deposited on the catalyst during cracking. Its functionality has been characterized using XPS.
`Nitrogen specie of different types, namely, pyridine, pyrrolic or quaternary-nitrogen (Q-N) have been discriminated. Decomposition of the
`coke during the catalyst regeneration (temperature programmed oxidation (TPO) and isothermal oxidation) has been monitored by GC and
`MS measurements of the gaseous products formed. The pyrrolic- and pyridinic-type N specie, present more in the outer coke layers, are
`oxidized under conditions when still large amount of C or CO is available from coke to reduced NO, formed to N>. ““Q-N” type species are
`present in the inner layer, strongly adsorbed on the acidsites on the catalyst. They are combusted last during regeneration. As most of the coke
`is already combusted at this point, lack of reductants (C, CO, etc.) results in the presence of NO, in the tail gas.
`© 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: NO,; FCC; Regenerator, XPS
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Nitrogen oxides (NO,) are harmful atmospheric pollu-
`tants [1]. Legislations to limit NO, emissions are continually
`being introduced; 70-77% cut in NO, emissions is targeted
`by the EU before 2009 [2]. NO, emissions from a typical
`refinery are about 2000 tons/year, the fluid catalytic cracking
`(FCC) section contributes about 50% of this [3,4], and is
`thus an area of environmental concern.
`
`Hydrocarbon feedstock for FCC units usually contains a
`variety of aromatic, N-heterocyclic compounds. During
`cracking, part of this N present is included in the cokethatis
`deposited on the catalyst [3]. During regeneration of the
`catalyst, nitrogen in cokeis released to the atmosphere as N
`and NO,. Typical levels of NO, in the flue gas from fluid
`catalytic cracking regeneration units vary between 50 and
`
`* Corresponding author. Tel.: +31 53 4893554; fax: +31 53 4894683.
`E-mail address: k.seshan@utwente.nl (K. Seshan).
`
`0926-3373/$ — see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
`doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.02.008
`
`500 ppm, depending upon feed nitrogen content and rege-
`nerator conditions [5,6]. The major component (>95%) of
`NO, is NO. Formation of N20 and NOz is negligible under
`FCC regenerator conditions [3,6]. Reduction ofNO,levels in
`the exhaust gases is an essential part of the technology for
`a “green”refinery.
`Real-life data from refineries show that correlations exist
`
`between nitrogen contents, basicity of nitrogen precursors
`present in the feed and NO, emissions during regeneration
`[3,5]. Typically, N is present as (substituted poly-) aromatic
`compounds
`such as pyrroles (—C—NH-C-), pyridines
`(-C=N-C=) or anilines (~C—NH;). Of these, pyridine is
`a strong base, aniline and pyrrole are weaker bases because
`of the delocalization of the electron pair on N to the aromatic
`ring. Higher the basicity of the molecule, stronger is its
`adsorption on the acidic FCC catalyst and larger is the chance
`to be deposited in the coke during cracking.
`The nature of N in coke and the mechanism ofits
`conversion to NO, or N> in the FCC regeneratorare not very
`
`WRG-1012
`
`1
`
`WRG-1012
`
`

`

`206
`
`LV. Babich et al./Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 59 (2005) 205-211
`
`well understood.It is generally suggested, in analogy with
`coal combustion [7,8], that NO, is formed via two routes:
`directly from nitrogen in coke (fuel NO,) and through
`volatile nitrogen intermediates such as HCN and NH;
`(prompt NO,) [5,6]. The mechanism of nitrogen transfor-
`mation during coke or coal/char combustion is complex, and
`attempts to correlate nature of nitrogen functionality (its
`chemical environment) with the amount of NO, released
`[9,10], have not been very successful. In the case of FCC
`catalysts such relationships are even less available.
`Due to the very low nitrogen contents in coked FCC
`catalysts, the discrimination of nitrogen specie in coke is
`complicated. Presence of polar or non-polar type nitrogen
`has been reported, but no attempts have been madetorelate
`this to NO, formation during coke combustion in the FCC
`regenerator [11].
`Aim of this work is to understand (i) if and how, the
`variations in the coking conditions and different types of N
`compounds present in FCC feed influence the nature of
`nitrogen in the coke and (ii) the transformation of the N
`specie in coke to Nz and NO, during oxidative regeneration.
`In order to establish this, reactions occurring in a FCC unit
`(cracking and regeneration) were carried out on lab scale
`using a commercial FCC catalyst and model N-heterocyclic
`aromatic compounds. The knowledge generated should be
`helpful in the developmentof catalyst systems to minimize
`NO,, emission from FCC regenerators.
`
`2. Experimental
`
`2.1, Materials
`
`FCC catalysts were obtained from Grace Chemicals,
`Germany. Reagent grade (>99%) pyridine, aniline, pyrrole
`and hexadecane
`(Aldrich Chemicals) were used as
`precursors for coking experiments.
`
`coking experiments, catalysts were either cooled to RT or
`allowed to age at 550 °C in He for varying durations. Catalyst
`regeneration experiments were carried out in a fixed-bed
`reactor (~0.2 ¢ samples) in a temperature programmed
`oxidation (TPO) mode. TPO was carried out between 30 and
`850 °C,using a heating rate of 10 °C/min and a gas mixture
`containing 2-4 vol.% Oz; 0-1 vol.% CO and balance He.
`Total flow rates were between 50 and 100 ml/min.
`
`2.3. Analytical techniques
`
`Elemental analyses (C, N and H) of coked catalysts were
`carried out on a Elemental Analyzer Carlo Erba EA1108.
`Thermo-gravimetric measurements were performed using a
`TGA/DSC (Mettler-Toledo)set-up. Typically, 50 mg sample
`and 30 ml/min flow ofeither 5% O./Heor pure He wasused.
`During TPO, gas composition at the outlet was constantly
`monitored. Nx, O2, CO, CO2 and N2»O were analyzed by
`Varian 3300 GC, using a Valco 16 position ST valve, two
`columns (Heysep Q and MS 5A) and a TCD detector. The
`amounts of NO and NO, were determined by a NO, analyzer
`(Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc. 42C). In addition,
`a Quadruple MS(Pfeiffer Vacuum) was used for continuous
`monitoring of the gas composition.
`Coke formed on the catalyst was characterized (N1s,
`Cls) by XPS (® Quantera Scanning ESCA Microprobe
`spectrometer). Cls binding energy (BE) of 284.8 eV was
`used to calibrate the spectra. In order to differentiate the
`types of N specie present in coke, the non-symmetric N1s
`experimental envelopes were subjected to a de-convolution
`procedure using a minimal number of peaks, varying
`FWHM,position andintensities of the peaks to result in the
`best NLLS fit (x? = 0.98). A mix of Gaussian (80%) and
`Lorenzian (20%) functions, typical for XPS [12], was used.
`
`3. Results
`
`2.2. Coking and regeneration experiments
`
`3.1. Coke formation and characterization
`
`Coking experiments were carried out at 550°C. 0.4g
`catalyst was placed between two quartz pugs in a quartz
`tubular reactor (d = 4 mm). The catalyst was preheated first in
`He (50 ml/min) at 550°C for 30 min. Subsequently, coke
`precursors were introduced into the gas stream using a syringe
`pump. Flow of the liquid precursor was varied between 0.2
`and 180 ml/h, coking time was varied from 10 s to 4 h. After
`
`Table 1 gives the details of the ““N”’ containing precursors
`used for coking experiments (see Section 2). pKpase values of
`the precursors listed in the table show that acidity decreases
`in the order pyridine < aniline < pyrrole,i.e., pyridineis the
`most basic of the three components used. The table also
`gives the amount/composition of coke deposited on the
`catalysts after 4 h time on stream. No relation was observed
`
`Table 1
`
`Details of the coke precursors and coke formed on the catalysts*
`
`Coke precursor™
`
`N/C atomicratio for
`precursor
`
`Pyridine
`Aniline
`Pyrrole
`
`0.20
`0.16
`0.25
`
`PRobase
`
`8.64
`9.38
`14.00
`
`Coke composition related to FCC catalyst (wt.%)
`
`C (wt.%)
`49+ 0.1
`73404
`6440.1
`
`N (wt.%)
`0.90 + 0.05
`0.85 + 0.05
`0.85 + 0.05
`
`N/C atomicratio
`0.15
`0.10
`0.11
`
`* Total feed flow 100 ml/min containing 10 vol.% of coke precursor and He balance; coking time 4 h.
`
`2
`
`2
`
`

`

`LV. Babichet al./Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 59 (2005) 205-211
`
`207
`
`0.2
`
`
`240
`
`015 2

`2
`§&
`
`bot
`
`aQ
`
`s
`_
`=
`z
`(
`
`—>
`
`{
`—_+—__
`
`Lo.05 2
`
`ernege meets
`
`-
`
`S
`
`T
`
`0
`
`Coking time (min)
`
`Fig. 1. Amount and composition of coke over the FCC catalyst as a function
`of time. Pyridine was used as the coke precursor; total feed/catalyst ratio is
`2 ml/g; T= 550 °C. Left X-axis: (@) carbon content; (@) nitrogen content
`in the coke formed; right axis: (x) N/C atomic ratio.
`
`in coke varied with coking time, XPS spectra in the region of
`Nils BE were recorded for catalyst samples coked with
`varying times on stream. Typical N1s experimental spectra
`are shownin Fig.2.
`It can be seen from the figure that position and shape of
`the N1s peaks changed with coking time. Thus, increase of
`coking time from 10s to 4h caused a shift in the spectra
`position from 400.8 to 400.0 eV as well as broadening of the
`peak. In order to probe the changesin the spectra in terms of
`different types of “N”’’ specie, experimental Nls spectra
`were de-convoluted with multiple peaks as described in the
`experimental section. The details of the fit results, viz.
`positions of the individual peak maxima andtheir relative
`intensities are summarized in Table 2. The bestfit for the
`
`experimental N1s spectra, in all cases, was obtained with
`two individual components (Fig. 2a—d). BE of these two
`peaks did not depend on way coke was formed (coking time,
`precursor). Furthermore, FWHM of each peak varied only
`within the accuracy of the binding energy determination.
`Theresults indicate, probably, two types of nitrogen specie
`to be present in the coke and characterized by BE at 399.9
`and 402eV. Relative amounts of a nitrogen species
`corresponding to these were estimated from the integral
`intensity of the peaks and are presented in Table 2.
`In the case of coking experiments with pyridine, the
`contribution of the peak corresponding to the “N” specie
`characterized by the higher BE (402 eV) decreased from 58
`to 20% with increasing the coking time from 10 to 600s.
`Further, independent of the precursor used, longer coking
`(4h)or further ageing times(6 h) resulted in low intensities
`of this peak, i.e., between 10 and 17% of total integral
`intensity of Nls experimental peak (Table 2).
`
`betweenthe relative amount of N (indicated by N/C) in the
`coke precursor andin the coke deposited on the catalyst. As
`expected, the more basic compound,pyridine, causes higher
`percentage of N in the coke and detailed studies were
`undertaken with pyridine.
`Fig. 1 showsthe extent of coking with pyridine at 550 °C
`as a function of time. It can be seen from the figure that
`majority of the carbon and nitrogen is deposited on the
`catalyst at short
`times on stream.
`In the 4h coking
`experiment shown, 70% of the total coke was deposited
`during the first 60s. No significant deviation in the coke
`composition (N/C ratio) was observed during this coking
`period. Further heating at the coking temperature (550 °C) in
`an inert atmosphere (He) up to 6h did not cause any
`additional changes. In order to checkifthe nature of the “N”
`
`
`
`Intensity(a.u.)
`
`
`
`406 404 402 400 398 396
`
`406 404 402 400 398 396
`
`Fig. 2. Ns experimental XPS spectra of coked FCC catalyst. Experimental curves are fitted with two individual peaks. Shown spectra are after catalyst coked
`for 10s (a), 60s (b), 600s (c) and 4h (d).
`
`Ep(eV)
`
`Ep(eV)
`
`3
`
`

`

`208
`
`Table 2
`
`LV. Babich et al. /Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 59 (2005) 205-211
`
`Details of coking procedures, Nls BE of “N” specie and composition of gaseous products formed during oxidative regeneration
`
`Coke precursor
`
`Coking time/ageing
`time in He
`
`Nls BE (eV)*
`
`Peak area
`ratio (%)
`
`Distribution of C and N in gaseous products
`during regeneration of the cokedcatalyst (vol.%)
`
`Carbon
`As CO,
`
`As CO
`
`Nitrogen
`As N>
`
`As NO
`
`Pyridine
`Pyridine
`Pyridine
`Pyridine
`Pyridine
`Pyridine
`Pyrrole
`Aniline
`Hexadecane:pyridine (3.6:1 v/v)
`
`10 s/0s
`60 s/0s
`600 s/0 s
`4W0h
`4Wlh
`4h/6h
`4W0h
`4W0h
`4h/0h
`
`58:42
`399.9
`401.9
`32:68
`400.0
`402.1
`20:80
`400.1
`402.2
`16:84
`399.9
`402.0
`19:81
`400.0
`402.3
`12:88
`400.0
`402.0
`10:90
`399.9
`401.9
`14:86
`400.0
`401.9
`Low intensity peaks, not quantified
`
`85.4
`69.7
`60.3
`65.4
`79.4
`75.1
`62.2
`53.7
`50.0
`
`14.6
`30.3
`39.7
`34.6
`20.6
`24.9
`37.8
`46.3
`50.0
`
`61.7
`de
`85.6
`78.0
`76.6
`80
`87.0
`89.1
`81.6
`
`38.3
`24.8
`14.4
`22.0
`23.4
`20
`13.0
`10.9
`18.4
`
`* Reproducibility in the individual N1s peak position is +0.2 eV.
`
`3.2. Catalyst regeneration
`
`Coke combustion was followed by TGA(catalyst coked
`with pyridine at 550 °C for 4 h) in 5% O./He(data are not
`shown). Complete coke removal
`(by oxidation) was
`observed within the temperature interval 450-750 °C for
`different samples. The observed weightloss corresponded to
`the amount of coke determined by chemical analysis.
`Evolution of gaseous products during oxidative regen-
`eration (TPO)of catalyst coked with pyridine at 550 °C for
`4h is shown in Fig. 3. The trendis typical for other samples
`also; the main gaseous products observed during the TPO
`were CO;, CO, N; and NO. Only very small amounts NO,,
`NH:;, HCN or N2O were observed.
`Tt can be seen form Fig. 3 that the order of appearance of
`the gases with respect to temperature is CO2 = CO < N2
`< NO. This trend was the same for all samples studied.
`Further, in all cases, coke combustion started between 450
`and 500 °C and was accompanied by oxygen consumption
`and CO, and CO formation. Between 550 and 600°C in
`addition to CO/CO, formation of molecular N> was also
`observed. Maximum in N> release was observed around
`
`
`
`(ppm)
`
`N.,NO,
`
`
`
`CO2,CO(ppm)
`
`675 °C. Formation of NO occurred at higher temperatures
`(650-750 °C) coinciding with the decrease in CO and CO3.
`Quantitative data on the carbon (CO and CO>)and nitrogen
`(N2 and NO)containing gaseous products formed during coke
`combustion (TPO)are presented in Table 2.It is interesting to
`note that the relative amount of NO formed decreases from 38
`to 22% if coking time is increased from 10 s to 4 h. This is in
`line with the changes in N1s peak areas in XPS spectra of the
`coked catalysts and will be discussed in the next section.
`It can be seen from Table 2 that the relative amounts of
`CO vary inversely with those of NO. In order to check the
`influence of CO on the formation of NO/N, during
`combustion, TPO experiments were carried out with CO
`in the feed. Results of these experiments are shown in
`Table 3. It is observed that in the presence of 1 vol.% CO the
`amountof NOis about two times lowerthan if only O2 were
`present in the regeneration feed.
`In order to simulate conditions in an FCC regeneratorin the
`laboratory, isothermal coke combustion experiments were
`performed. Results of these experiments are shownin Fig. 4.
`Contacting the catalyst with 2% O2/He at 600 °C resulted in a
`rapid evolution of CO and was complete by 90-100 min. At
`this time removalofcoke from the catalyst was also complete.
`The NO peak followed the CO, peak with a time delay.
`
`4, Discussions
`
`The aim of the current study is to follow (i) the nature of
`“N”specie present in coke, (ii) the factors that influence
`
`Table 3
`
`Effect of CO on the formation of Nz and NO during combustion coked
`catalyst followed by TPO
`
`Regeneration conditions
`
`Temperature (°C)
`
`Fig. 3. Evolution of gases during temperature programmed oxidative
`regeneration of the FCC catalyst coked with pyridine (4h). Heating rate
`10 °C/min, amountof catalyst 100 mg. (@) CO; (0K) CO; (@) N2 and (+)
`NO concentration.
`
`2 vol.% O» + He (balance)
`2 vol.% O, + 1 vol.% CO + He(balance)
`
`The catalyst was coked with pyridine during 60 s.
`
`Total N products
`released (%)
`
`NO
`
`24.8
`13.9
`
`N>
`
`75.2
`86.1
`
`4
`
`

`

`209
`LV. Babichet al./Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 59 (2005) 205-211
`
`
`100
`
`Ee
`&
`Oo
`=
`
` 20
`
`o
`

`2
`=
`“a
`oO
`4 6
`
`0
`
`Time (min)
`
`Ne
`
`”
`
`=
`eae
`
`= 80
`uao
`E 60
`
`22S
`
`s
`uo
`
`2>
`
`40
`
`2
`
`0
`
`« &
`. *
`NO
`
`T
`T
`T
`T
`T
`T
`T
`0.1
`0.2
`03
`0.4
`0.5
`0.6
`O7
`Ratio "Q" N / total N
`
`0
`
`Fig. 6. Correlation between the type of nitrogen specie and the selectivity
`towards NO, formation under oxidative regeneration of the FCC coked
`catalyst.
`
`is represented by nitrogen which substitutes for carbon in the
`“graphene” type structure. For FCC catalysts, coked under
`industrial conditions, such discrimination has been difficult
`dueto the low nitrogen contentin the coke. In ourexperiments,
`the N contents in coke are high because we use model
`compounds. For the sake of argument, we assume thatthis
`(large amountofhydrocarbon coke) does notaffect the nature
`of “N”specie in coke. Extensive characterization ofcatalysts
`prepared in this study, have been carried ourby Barth etal. [4].
`Using IR, MAS NMR and MALDOTOPF
`they show that N in
`coke is present as polyaromatic species such as carbazole,
`imidazole or porphyrine derivatives, adsorbed on acid sites.
`This is in agreementwith what has been suggested in literature
`[13,16], that the nature of chars and FCC coke are similar. We
`will thus use the modelused for ““N”’ specie in model chars to
`characterize catalysts coked in this study.
`In accordance with the BE observed in our case and those
`
`Fig. 4. Isothermal oxidative regeneration of the coked catalyst at 600 °C.
`Catalyst coked with pyridine at 550 °C for 4 h;gas flow 5% O2/He, switched
`at t= 0.
`
`their formation and(iii) if any correlations exist between the
`nature of the ““N” in coke and formation of N2/NO, during
`regenerative combustion of coke. This information will help
`in the modification of FCC catalyst and in optimization of
`the regeneration procedure in order to minimize NO,
`emissions during catalyst regeneration.
`Firstofall, in agreementwith whatis reported, coke formed
`from the more basic compounds such as pyridine, retains a
`higherrelative amountofnitrogen. This is significant, asall the
`NO, formed during regeneration originates from the N in coke
`(no thermal NO,is formed during regeneration). Analysis of
`cokedcatalysts by XPS allowed us todiscriminate two types of
`nitrogen specie based onthe different N1s BE (Fig. 2, Table 2)
`observed. The XPS technique has been used before to
`discriminate differenttypes ofnitrogen functionalities in coals
`and model chars. Kapteijn et al.
`[13] reported nitrogen-
`containing species in char-type materials schematically to be
`as in Fig. 5. Based on N1s BEs,different authors [10,11,13—
`16] have suggested the following ““N”specie to be present in
`chars,
`ie., pyridinic (“Py-N”)
`(Ege = 398.7 + 0.2 eV);
`pyrrolic (“Pr-N”) (Ege = 400.3 + 0.2 eV); quaternary-nitro-
`gen (Q-N,Ege = 401.4 + 0.2 eV). As shown in Fig. 5, “Q-N”
`
`
`
`reported, we ascribe the ““N”species with BE around 399.9/
`400.1 as similar to pyridinic/pyrrolic types located at the
`edges of the carbon structure shown in Fig. 5 [13]. During
`catalytic cracking,
`feed molecules or
`their cracked
`fragments are adsorbed at the catalyst surface, especially
`via the strong interaction of nitrogen with the surface acid
`(Lewis and Bronsted) sites [17]. The shift in electron density
`awayfromNto the acidsite will result in an increase in N1s
`BE.Further, based on BE, these specie are similar to the “Q-
`N”nitrogen species shown in Fig. 5. We, therefore, propose
`that the acid sites on the catalyst are responsible for the
`
`+HO7I co
`|e (1)
`OY
`
`Cc
`
`co,
`
`+HO7 NO
`[+0 (2)
`OY
`
`N
`
`NO
`
`NO+CO>%N,+CO,
`
`NO+ C>%N,+CO
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
`Fig. 5. Schematic representation of nitrogen functionalities in char [13].
`
`Scheme 1. Simplified reaction pathways during coke combustion.
`
`5
`
`

`

`210
`
`LV, Babich et al./Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 59 (2005) 205-211
`
`
`
`FCC catalyst
`
`initial, low T
`
`(a)
`
`final, high T
`
`(b)
`
`Scheme 2. Schematic representation of coke combustion over coked FCCcatalyst at initial (low temperature) (a) and final (high temperature) (b) stages. Main
`products are shown in black; products, which are formed to a less extent, are shown in grey.
`
`the acid sites and limited to the inner layers of coke, their
`formation of the “Q-N” type species. With increase of
`combustion at the earlier stages of the catalyst regeneration
`coking time, nitrogen-containing groups, with N1s BE close
`is limited most probably due to lack of oxygen availability.
`to pyridinic/pyrrolic structures and located at the edge of
`Atlater stages of the coke oxidation,i.e., in the deeper
`coke particle are continually formed. However, at the same
`layers, the availability of possible reductants, C and CO
`time,
`the acid sites on the catalyst surface sites are
`progressively consumed and are unavailable after a while.
`becomelimited and feasibility of the reactions (3) and (4) is
`Thus, the “Q-N” type N specie showsarelative decrease
`diminished. Further, we notice that oxidation of C in coke is
`with time in the XPS spectra. This would explain our
`more facile than N (Fig. 3, CO,, N2 and NO patterns). This
`experimental observation that, with increase in coking time
`is in agreement with data of chemical analysis of partially
`the relative intensity of this “Q-N” type specie (Nls
`regenerated industrially coked FCC catalyst [3,6], ie.,
`Eg = 401.9) actually decreases (Table 2).
`partial coke removal results in the increase nitrogen content
`In Fig.6, we see that there is a strong correlation between
`in the coke remaining. Thus, nitrogen specie, which is
`the amount of “Q-N”’
`type species and the selectivity
`combusted last during regeneration are those strongly
`towards NO,. This implies that the presence of large amount
`bound to the catalyst surface, i.e., “Q-N” type. As most of
`of “Q-N” type specie can be related to higher NO,
`the coke is already combusted at
`this point,
`lack of
`formation during regenerative combustion. Despite a large
`reductants such as CO,results in the appearance of NO, in
`number of publications regarding regeneration of coked
`the gas phase as this is not completely reduced to No
`FCC catalysts, the actual reaction mechanism is not clear
`(Scheme2b). Since coking or ageing time doesnotstrongly
`yet, but it is generally accepted that in a simplified way the
`influence the extent of formation of ““Q-N”type specie, the
`coke combustion reactions can be represented by Scheme 1
`only way to reduce NO, formed during combustionis its
`[7]. A similar mechanism was also proposed for combustion
`sequential reduction.
`of coal and model chars [8,10]. We have not included in the
`scheme, the formation of volatile nitrogen compounds like
`NH;and HCN (asdefinite intermediates), these are believed
`to be intermediates for N» and NO, formation [8,10]. We
`only observed traces of NH; and HCN in our experiments.
`In order to explain the formation ofNO, andits relation to
`“N”specie nature,it is essential to understand what happens
`during coke combustion.
`It is generally agreed that, during combustion of coal,
`chars and diesel particulates [8,13], oxidation begins from
`the outside of a coke particle. Oxidation of nitrogen-
`containing specie in the coke particle starts at the outer
`surface, which is easily accessible for oxygen (see Scheme
`2a). The pyrrolic- and pyridinic-type N specie present more
`in the outer layers are oxidized under conditions when still
`large amountof C or COis available from coke. As shown
`earlier (Scheme 1) sequential reduction of NO to N2
`(reactions (3) and (4)) by CO is feasible under these
`conditions. As a result, N, is seen in the earlier stages of
`combustion (Fig. 3, N2 pattern). As the “Q-N”type specie
`are those which are directly interacting with the catalyst via
`
`Using model compounds, it is possible to follow the
`reaction pathwaysof N present in FCC feed, as heterocyclic
`compounds, to its incorporation in coke as polyaromatic
`specie. Coke formed from the more basic compounds,e.g.,
`pyridne,
`retains a higher relative amount of nitrogen.
`Analysis of coked catalysts by XPS allows characterization
`of the N specie present in coke, namely pyridinic, pyrrolic or
`quaternary-nitrogen. The pyrrolic- and pyridinic-type N
`specie, present more in the outer layers, are oxidized under
`conditions whenstill large amount of C or CO is available
`from coke and N>is the main product. “Q-N”’ type species
`are those strongly adsorbed on the acid sites on the catalyst
`and limited to the inner layer of deposited coke. Thus, “Q-
`N” type specie is combusted last during regeneration. As
`most of the coke is already combusted at this point, lack of
`reductants, such as CO,results in the appearance of NO, in
`the gas phase. In this way, larger amount of “Q-N”’ type
`
`5. Conclusions
`
`6
`
`

`

`LV. Babichet al./Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 59 (2005) 205-211
`
`211
`
`specie present on the coked FCCcatalystis related to higher
`NO, formed during regenerative combustion of the coke.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`The authors wish to thank Dr. Robert Ukropec for
`carrying out coking experiments. Financial support form the
`EU in the framework of “Competitive and Sustainable
`Growth Program” under contract GIRD-CT97-0065 is
`gratefully acknowledged.
`
`References
`
`[1] H. Bosch, F. Janssen, Catal. Today 2 (1988) 369.
`[2] R.H. Harding, A.W.Peters, I.R.D. Nee, Appl. Catal. A 221 (2001) 389.
`[3] X. Zhao, A.W. Peters, G.W. Weatherbee, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36
`(1997) 4535.
`[4] J.-O. Barth, A. Jentys, J.A. Lercher, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43 (2004)
`3097.
`
`[5] E.F. Iliopoulou, E.A. Efthimiadis, LA. Vasalos, J.-O. Barth, J.A.
`Lercher, Appl. Catal. B 47 (2004) 165.
`[6] K.L. Dishman, P.K. Doolin, L.D. Tullock, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 37
`(1998) 4631.
`[7] E.A. Efthimiadis, E.F. Iliopoulou, A.A. Lappas, D.K.Iatridis, LA.
`Vasalos, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41 (2002) 5401.
`[8] K.M. Thomas, Fuel 76 (1997) 457.
`[9] S. Kambara, T. Takarada, M. Toyoshima, K. Kato, Fuel 74 (1995)
`1247.
`
`[10] M.A. Wojtowicz, J.R. Pels, J.A. Moulijn, Fuel 74 (1995) 507.
`[11] K. Qian, D.C. Tomezak, E.F. Rakiewicz, R.H. Harding, G. Yaluris,
`W.C. Cheng, X. Zhao, A.W. Peters, Energy Fuels 11 (1997) 596.
`[12] P.M.A. Sherwood, in: D. Briggs, M.P. Seah (Eds.), Practical Surface
`Analysis: Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, vol. 1, John
`Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1990, p. 555.
`[13] F. Kapteijn, J.A. Moulijn, 8. Matzner, H.P. Boehm, Carbon 37 (1999)
`1143.
`
`[14] D. Cagniant, R. Gruber, J.P. Boudou, C. Bilem, J. Bimer, P.D. Salbut,
`Energy Fuels 12 (1998) 672.
`[15] B. Gong, A.N. Buckley, R.N. Lamb, P.F. Nelson, Surf. Interface Anal.
`28 (1999) 126.
`[16] LR.Pels, F. Kapteijn, J.A. Moulijn, Q. Zhu, K.M. Thomas, Carbon 33
`(1995) 1641.
`[17] A.A. Khaleel, K.J. Klabunde, Chem. Eur. J. 8 (2002) 3991.
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket