throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORP., DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., and DELL INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`OZMO LICENSING LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTITUTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3898161.v1
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b), Patent Owner Ozmo Licensing LLC (“Patent
`
`Owner” or “Ozmo”) respectfully asserts the following objections to the evidence
`
`proffered with the Petition for inter partes review (the “Petition”) filed by Microsoft
`
`Corporation, Dell Technologies Inc., and Dell Inc. (collectively, “Petitioners”)
`
`regarding the claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814 (the “’814 Patent”). The Federal
`
`Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) apply to these proceedings according to the provisions of
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.62(a), and these rules, along with relevant case law and PTAB Rules,
`
`form the basis of objections contained herein. Patent Owner’s objections apply
`
`equally to Petitioners’ reliance on or citation to any objected evidence in its papers,
`
`including expert declarations. These objections are being served and filed within 10
`
`business days from the institution of trial on January 16, 2024.
`
`
`
`3898161.v1
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`
`Evidence
`
`Ex. 1002, Ding
`Declaration
`
`¶¶ 13-21
`¶¶ 24-26
`
`Ex. 1006, Bluetooth
`Specification
`
`Ex. 1011, Trial
`Times
`
`Ex. 1015, Markman
`Order
`
`Objection(s)
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1002 is the Declaration of Dr. Zhi Ding.
`
`Patent Owner objects to ¶¶13-21 under 37 CFR § 42.65(a) as
`testimony on United States patent law, patent examination
`practice, or legal standards is not admissible.
`
`Patent Owner objects to ¶¶24-26 under FRE 403 as
`cumulative, prejudicial, and/or a waste of time.
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1006 is Specification of the Bluetooth
`System, Version 1.1, February 22, 2001.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay
`under FRE 802, e.g., the purported publication dates printed
`on the pages, because it is offered for the truth of the matter
`asserted.
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1011 is WDTX District Court Trial
`Times.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay
`under FRE 802, e.g., the purported dates printed on the
`pages, because it is offered for the truth of the matter
`asserted. Further, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as not
`authenticated under FRE 901. In addition, Patent Owner
`objects to this exhibit as irrelevant under FRE 402, and
`prejudicial, misleading, confusing, and/or a waste of time
`under FRE 403.
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1015 is Markman Order (Dkt. 36), Ozmo
`Licensing LLC v. Acer Inc., 6:21-cv-1225-ADA (W.D. Tex.
`Sept. 20, 2022).
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant under FRE
`402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing, and/or a waste
`of time under FRE 403. Further, Patent Owner objects to this
`exhibit under 37 CFR §§ 42.6(a)(3) and 42.24(a)(1)(i)
`because it is not referenced or explained in the Petition. See
`37 CFR §§ 42.22(a)(2) and 42.104(b)(5).
`
`3898161.v1
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`
`Evidence
`
`Ex. 1017, 802.11-
`1999
`
`Ex. 1018, 802.11b-
`1999
`
`Ex. 1019, 802.11g-
`2003
`
`Ex. 1020, DMI 2.0s
`Specification
`
`Ex. 1021, 802.15.1-
`2002
`
`Objection(s)
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1017 is 802.11-1999.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit under FRE 802 as
`containing hearsay, including as to all dates (e.g., copyright
`dates) and material that appears to be added (e.g., stamps).
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1018 is 802.11b-1999.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit under FRE 802 as
`containing hearsay, including as to all dates (e.g., copyright
`dates) and material that appears to be added (e.g., stamps).
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1019 is 802.11g-2003.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit under FRE 802 as
`containing hearsay, including as to all dates (e.g., copyright
`dates) and material that appears to be added (e.g., stamps).
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1020 is DMI 2.0s Specification.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay
`under FRE 802, e.g., the purported publication dates printed
`on the pages, because it is offered for the truth of the matter
`asserted. Further, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as not
`authenticated under FRE 901. In addition, Patent Owner
`objects to this exhibit as irrelevant under FRE 402, and
`prejudicial, misleading, confusing, and/or a waste of time
`under FRE 403.
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1021 is 802.15.1-2002.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay
`under FRE 802, e.g., the purported publication dates printed
`on the pages, because it is offered for the truth of the matter
`asserted. Further, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as not
`authenticated under FRE 901. In addition, Patent Owner
`objects to this exhibit as irrelevant under FRE 402, and
`prejudicial, misleading, confusing, and/or a waste of time
`under FRE 403.
`
`3898161.v1
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`
`Evidence
`
`Ex. 1023, U.S.
`7,340,015
`
`Ex. 1024, Markman
`Transcript
`
`Objection(s)
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1023 is U.S. Patent No. 7,340,015.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant under FRE
`402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing, and/or a waste
`of time under FRE 403. Further, Patent Owner objects to this
`exhibit under 37 CFR §§ 42.6(a)(3) and 42.24(a)(1)(i)
`because it is not referenced or explained in the Petition. See
`37 CFR §§ 42.22(a)(2) and 42.104(b)(5).
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1024 is 2023.06.28 Markman Hearing
`Transcript, Ozmo Licensing v. Dell Technologies Inc., 6:22-
`cv-642-ADA.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant under FRE
`402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing, and/or a waste
`of time under FRE 403. Further, Patent Owner objects to this
`exhibit under 37 CFR §§ 42.6(a)(3) and 42.24(a)(1)(i)
`because it is not referenced or explained in the Petition. See
`37 CFR §§ 42.22(a)(2) and 42.104(b)(5).
`
`3898161.v1
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`
`Evidence
`
`Ex. 1026, 4/1/2002
`WaybackMachine
`
`Objection(s)
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1026 is April 1, 2002 WaybackMachine
`Archive of www.Bluetooth.com.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay
`under FRE 802, e.g., the purported publication dates printed
`on the pages, because it is offered for the truth of the matter
`asserted. Further, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as not
`authenticated under FRE 901.1 2 In addition, Patent Owner
`objects to this exhibit as irrelevant under FRE 402, and
`prejudicial, misleading, confusing, a waste of time, and/or
`needlessly presenting cumulative evidence under FRE 403.
`Patent Owner also objects to this exhibit under 37 CFR §§
`42.6(a)(3) and 42.24(a)(1)(i) because it is not referenced or
`explained in the Petition. See 37 CFR §§ 42.22(a)(2) and
`42.104(b)(5).
`
`
`
`1 E.g., when offering a printout of a webpage into evidence to prove the website’s
`contents, the proponent of the evidence must authenticate the information from the
`website itself, not merely the printout. See VictaulicCo. v. Tieman, 499 F.3d 227, 236
`(3d Cir. 2007).
`2 “[T]o authenticate printouts from a website, the party proffering the evidence must
`produce some statement or affidavit from someone with knowledge of the website ...
`for example a web master or someone else with personal knowledge would be
`sufficient.” EMC Corp. v. Personalweb Techs., LLC, Case No. IPR2013-00084, slip
`op. at 45 (PTAB May 15, 2014) (Paper 64) (quoting St. Luke's Cataract & Laser
`Inst., P.A. v. Sanderson, 2006 WL 1320242, at *2 (M.D. Fla. May 12, 2006)).
`6
`
`3898161.v1
`
`

`

`Evidence
`
`Ex. 1027, 4/7/2002
`WaybackMachine
`
`Ex. 1028, Xplore
`802.11-1999
`
`Ex. 1029, Xplore
`802.11b-1999
`
`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`
`Objection(s)
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1027 is April 7, 2002 WaybackMachine
`Archive of http://Bluetooth.com/dev/specifications.asp.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay
`under FRE 802, e.g., the purported publication dates printed
`on the pages, because it is offered for the truth of the matter
`asserted. Further, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as not
`authenticated under FRE 901. (see supra, FNs 1 & 2) In
`addition, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant
`under FRE 402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing,
`and/or a waste of time under FRE 403. Patent Owner also
`objects to this exhibit under 37 CFR §§ 42.6(a)(3) and
`42.24(a)(1)(i) because it is not referenced or explained in the
`Petition. See 37 CFR §§ 42.22(a)(2) and 42.104(b)(5).
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1028 is IEEE Xplore, 802.11-1999
`Specification.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay
`under FRE 802, e.g., the purported publication dates printed
`on the pages, because it is offered for the truth of the matter
`asserted. Further, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as not
`authenticated under FRE 901. (see supra, FNs 1 & 2) In
`addition, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant
`under FRE 402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing,
`and/or a waste of time under FRE 403.
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1029 is IEEE Xplore, 802.11b-1999
`Specification.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay
`under FRE 802, e.g., the purported publication dates printed
`on the pages, because it is offered for the truth of the matter
`asserted. Further, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as not
`authenticated under FRE 901. (see supra, FNs 1 & 2) In
`addition, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant
`under FRE 402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing,
`and/or a waste of time under FRE 403.
`
`3898161.v1
`
`7
`
`

`

`Evidence
`
`Ex. 1030, Xplore
`802.11g-2003
`
`Ex. 1031, 2/12/2004
`WaybackMachine
`
`Ex. 1033, U.S.
`7,990,904
`
`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`
`Objection(s)
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1030 is IEEE Xplore, 802.11g-2003
`Specification.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay
`under FRE 802, e.g., the purported publication dates printed
`on the pages, because it is offered for the truth of the matter
`asserted. Further, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as not
`authenticated under FRE 901. (see supra, FNs 1 & 2) In
`addition, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant
`under FRE 402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing,
`and/or a waste of time under FRE 403.
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1031 is Feb. 12, 2004 WaybackMachine
`Archive of http://standards.ieee.org/getiee802/802.11.html.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay
`under FRE 802, e.g., the purported publication dates printed
`on the pages, because it is offered for the truth of the matter
`asserted. Further, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as not
`authenticated under FRE 901. (see supra, FNs 1 & 2) In
`addition, Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant
`under FRE 402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing,
`and/or a waste of time under FRE 403.
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1033 is U.S. Patent No. 7,990,904.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant under FRE
`402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing, and/or a waste
`of time under FRE 403. Further, Patent Owner objects to this
`exhibit under 37 CFR §§ 42.6(a)(3) and 42.24(a)(1)(i)
`because it is not referenced or explained in the Petition. See
`37 CFR §§ 42.22(a)(2) and 42.104(b)(5).
`
`3898161.v1
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`
`Evidence
`
`Ex. 1034, Sur-
`Reply Claim
`Construction Brief
`
`Ex. 1036, Claim
`Construction Order
`
`
`
`Objection(s)
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1034 is Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply Claim
`Construction Brief (Dkt. 38), Ozmo Licensing v. Dell
`Technologies Inc., 6:22-cv-642-ADA.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant under FRE
`402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing, and/or a waste
`of time under FRE 403. Further, Patent Owner objects to this
`exhibit under 37 CFR §§ 42.6(a)(3) and 42.24(a)(1)(i)
`because it is not referenced or explained in the Petition. See
`37 CFR §§ 42.22(a)(2) and 42.104(b)(5).
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1036 is Claim Construction Order (Dkt.
`60), Ozmo Licensing v. Dell Technologies Inc., 6:22-cv-642-
`ADA.
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit as irrelevant under FRE
`402, and prejudicial, misleading, confusing, and/or a waste
`of time under FRE 403. Further, Patent Owner objects to this
`exhibit under 37 CFR §§ 42.6(a)(3) and 42.24(a)(1)(i)
`because it is not referenced or explained in the Petition. See
`37 CFR §§ 42.22(a)(2) and 42.104(b)(5).
`
`
`3898161.v1
`
`9
`
`

`

`Respectfully submitted this 30th day of January, 2024.
`
`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`
`
`/Lawrence P. Cogswell III, Ph.D. 71,441/
`Lawrence P. Cogswell III, Ph.D.
`Reg. No. 71,441
`Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, P.C.
`155 Seaport Boulevard
`Boston, Massachusetts 02210
`Phone: (617) 607-5900
`Fax: (978) 341-0136
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner,
`Ozmo Licensing LLC
`
`
`
`3898161.v1
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2023-01060
`U.S. Patent No. 8,599,814
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I hereby certify that on January 30, 2024, the
`foregoing Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence Submitted Prior to Institution is
`being served electronically by agreement of the parties at the following email
`addresses:
`
`brian.erickson@dlapiper.com
`chris.katsantonis@us.dlapiper.com
`Ozmo-IPR@us.dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Lawrence P. Cogswell III, Ph.D. 71,441/
`Lawrence P. Cogswell III, Ph.D.
`Reg. No. 71,441
`Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, P.C.
`155 Seaport Boulevard
`Boston, Massachusetts 02210
`Phone: (617) 607-5900
`Fax: (978) 341-0136
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner,
`Ozmo Licensing LLC
`
`3898161.v1
`
`11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket