throbber
Chapter 6 Optical Backplanes, Board
`and Chip Interconnects
`
`Rainer Michalzik
`University of Ulm, Optoelectronics Dept., Ulm, Germany
`
`6.1.
`
`Introduction
`
`The present chapter is intended to give some insight into the rapidly ad-
`vancing field of research into optical interconnects within data processing
`systems. This topic is dealt with in a huge number of publications at con-
`ferences, in scientific journals and their special issues, as well as book
`chapters, good access to which is obtained through [1-14]. Given the ex-
`tremely dynamic environment, it becomes clear that we cannot attempt to
`provide a complete overview but rather have to restrict ourselves to sev-
`eral examples from current research, which the readers hopefully will find
`representative. We start off by looking into recent developments in the
`10 Gbit/s data rate regime at the intersystem level. These are high-speed
`850-nm vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers, parallel optical links, and
`new-generation silica as well as plastic optical multimode fibers. Within a
`single box environment we follow down the usual hierarchy from optical
`backplanes to intraboard to inter- and perhaps even intrachip levels. For all
`these categories we attempt to list available technology options and give
`practical examples from ongoing project work.
`The overwhelming majority of digital data inside and between even peak
`performance computer systems is nowadays carried by electrical signals
`traveling on metallic lines. Besides the fact that high-speed electronic rather
`than photonic data transmission has historically been the first available
`
`216
`
`FIBER OPTIC DATA COMMUNICATION:
`TECHNOLOGICAL TRENDS AND ADVANCES
`$35.00
`
`Copyright (cid:14)9 2002 by Academic Press.
`All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
`ISBN: 0-12-207892-6
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 1 of 54
`
`

`

`6. Optical Backplanes, Board and Chip Interconnects
`
`217
`
`technique, clearly there are a number of advantages that speak in its favor.
`In the computer environment the most important ones are ease of imple-
`mentation and handling, low cost, and high reliability. However, with the
`exponentially increasing performance of electronic processing systems,
`more and more drawbacks of the conventional approach become apparent.
`The pronounced waveguide dispersion characteristics of electrical lines
`correspond to a relatively small bandwidth-distance product so that at
`higher clock rates it is an increasingly difficult task to bridge the required
`distances even within a single box. Electromagnetic cross-talk is forcing
`circuit designers to increase the width of data buses rather than the bus
`frequency. Susceptibility to electromagnetic interference requires proper
`shielding and grounding, which can turn thin wires into bulky copper
`strands, thus limiting the overall interconnect density. Finally signaling
`rates in the hundreds of megahertz regime make impedance matching a ne-
`cessity, which is not easy to achieve in practice and only works over a very
`limited frequency range. Apart from the clock rate's driving force, novel
`distributed or parallel computing approaches fuel the need for high band-
`width linking of individual data processing subsystems. Bearing these chal-
`lenges in mind it is widely recognized that the consequences of an apparent
`electrical signaling bottleneck are experienced at shorter and shorter link
`lengths and that optical interconnects hybridly integrated with electronics
`have attractive solutions at hand or are at least potentially able to offer them.
`It has become customary to classify optical interconnects into distinct,
`albeit overlapping, categories. Some of those are illustrated in Fig. 6.1,
`ranging from the longest to the shortest transmission distance:
`
`~ Rack-to-rack, also called frame-to-frame;
`(cid:12)9 Board-to-board;
`~ Multi-chip module (MCM)-to-MCM or intraboard;
`(cid:12)9 Chip-to-chip on a single MCM;
`(cid:12)9 Intra- or on-chip.
`
`On the frame-to-frame level, it is a relatively easy task to replace space-
`consuming and performance-limited copper cables with lightweight fibers.
`Single-channel or space-parallel optical transceiver modules are already
`commercially available at reasonable cost. Board-to-board interconnection
`within a rack can be accomplished via edge connections to optical wave-
`guides placed on a hybrid electrical/optical backplane or via free-space trans-
`mission. Within a printed circuit board, routed fiber circuits or integrated
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 2 of 54
`
`

`

`218
`
`Rainer Michalzik
`
`Transmitter / Receiver
`
`Fiber-parallel optical interconnect
`
`3card Leve
`
`Electric~ / optical
`Intraboard
`backplane
`optical\ ~ 1
`c h a n n e ~ , ~ * ~ ~
`
`Optical
`waveguides
`
`Free-space connections
`MCM and Chip Levels
`Optical
`interconnectio
`board -------~/'/,~:~~~~'~~ Optical
`connections
`
`T r a n s m i t t ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~
`Receiversrs ~~;~=~',~~'~~" Electrical
`Logic IC ~ , / ~ ~ ~ / v
`~
`circuit board
`
`Fig. 6.1 Major optical interconnect categories.
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 3 of 54
`
`

`

`6. Optical Backplanes, Board and Chip Interconnects
`
`219
`
`channel waveguides can be applied for inter-MCM communication. Data
`transfer between or even within chips finally might be achieved by optical
`fiber bundles or an optical overlay providing guided-wave or free-space
`data transport. In most of these scenarios the demand for high-throughput
`interconnection can be satisfied only by one- or two-dimensional high-
`density arrays of optoelectronic components, the surface-normal operation
`of which usually proves to be extremely beneficial.
`
`6.2. F r a m e - t o - F r a m e
`
`I n t e r c o n n e c t i o n s
`
`Owing to the benefits addressed before, it is an increasingly common prac-
`tice to take advantage of optical fibers to implement the data links between
`a high-performance computer box and its outside world, which might con-
`sist of other processing units, a storage farm, or a network server. In this
`section we thus review some recent achievements in graded-index fiber-
`based optical interconnects approaching the 10 Gbit/s data rate regime,
`which in the future are likely to be employed at the frame-to-frame level,
`replacing 1 Gbit/s or lower speed modules. In particular these advances
`rely on progress in the fabrication of high-speed vertical-cavity surface-
`emitting laser arrays and new-generation silica as well as polymer optical
`multimode fibers.
`
`6.2.1. ONE-DIMENSIONAL VCSEL A R R A Y
`D E V E L O P M E N T FOR NEXT-GENERATION
`PARALLEL OPTICAL DATA LINKS
`
`The vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) [15-15b] is a fine spec-
`imen of a novel compound semiconductor device that has been success-
`fully commercialized in the last few years. Operation principles and laser
`technology are treated in some detail in Vol. 1 Chapters 2 and 16 of this
`handbook. Among the various VCSEL applications, optical datacom is
`the primary driving field. Especially Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) and related
`transceivers for graded-index (GI) multimode fiber (MMF) data trans-
`mission have become inexpensive mass products by relying on 850 nm
`short-wavelength VCSEL technology. Generally speaking, the most at-
`tractive features of datacom VCSELs include on-wafer testing capabil-
`ity, mounting technology familiar from the low-cost light-emitting diode
`market, circularly symmetric beam profiles for ease of light focusing and
`fiber coupling, high-speed modulation with low bias currents, driving volt-
`ages well compatible to silicon VLSI electronics, temperature insensitive
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 4 of 54
`
`

`

`220
`
`Rainer Michalzik
`
`operation characteristics, and obvious forming of one- or two-dimensional
`arrays. Transceiver modules are employed for a variety of tasks such as in-
`building backbone links, interconnection of computer clusters or of telecom
`gear in central offices. The aggregate data throughput of single-channel
`modules can easily be increased by using the space-division multiplexing
`technique described, e.g., in Vol. 1 Chapter 11, where optical signals are
`transmitted in parallel through a MMF ribbon cable. A useful overview
`with many references on early fiber ribbon data links has been compiled
`in [ 16]. Although significant cost breakthroughs have been achieved with
`high yield one-dimensional laser [ 17] and photodetector arrays as well as
`alignment tolerant packaging approaches [ 18], a GI MMF ribbon cable is
`still a relatively expensive component, especially if interchannel skew is to
`be minimized. Therefore parallel links are currently competitive only for
`several tens of meter transmission length. State-of-the-art modules operate
`at 2.5 Gbit/s channel data rate and thus achieve 30 Gbit/s throughput for
`a 12-channel system [19-21]. Obviously, intensive work toward modules
`with 10 Gbit/s individual channel data rate has commenced.
`Figure 6.2 shows a photograph, bit error rate (BER) characteristics,
`and an eye diagram of a 1 (cid:12)9 10 elements VCSEL array that is being de-
`veloped for these next-generation parallel optical transceivers. The oxide-
`confined VCSELs are arranged on a 250-#m pitch that is compatible to MT
`(Mechanical Transfer) -type multifiber connectors [22] and each unit cell
`of the array contains p- and n-contacts separated by 125 #m. The etched
`VCSEL mesas are planarized by polyimide to obtain a low parasitic capaci-
`tance, coplanar contact layout. With this design, modulation corner frequen-
`cies in excess of 12 GHz are achieved [23] which are well-suited for data
`transmission in the 10 Gbit/s regime. In the given experiment, about 3 # m
`active diameter lasers with an average threshold current Ith - - 340 #A, emit-
`ting in a single transverse and longitudinal mode at 850-nm wavelength,
`have been driven at identical 1.65 mA bias current and 0.65 Vpp modulation
`voltage [24], yielding a dynamic on-off ratio of 6 dB. Figure 6.2 reveals that
`the BER curves thus obtained for back-to-back operation almost coincide
`and that error rates of 1 0 - 9
`a r e reached with less than - 1 5 dBm opti-
`cal power incident onto a pin photodiode and transimpedance-amplifier-
`based fiber pigtailed receiver. Although 10 Gbit/s-compatible prototype
`VCSEL arrays are available today, the manufacturing of complete inter-
`connect modules still requires some challenges to be addressed. Among
`those are the realization of high-sensitivity MMF-compatible photore-
`ceiver arrays and the dense hybrid integration of optoelectronic chips with
`high-speed, probably silicon germanium (SiGe) based electronics [24a].
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 5 of 54
`
`

`

`6. Optical Backplanes, Board and Chip Interconnects
`
`221
`
`VCSEI
`
`p-bondpa,
`
`~tact
`
`mide
`
`l.dpad
`
`.......... (cid:12)9 ...................... I::: ........
`...... ! ............ (cid:12)9 ............... I ...............
`B-T-B operation
`of all 10 channels
`at 10 Gbit/s data rate
`
`i ................ (cid:12)9 ............... ! .................. (cid:12)9 ................ ! ...........
`[th = 340 l.tA,
`~i"
`* ~ Z - 850 nm
`.....
`
`-2
`10
`
`-3
`10
`
`10 "4
`
`O
`0 - 5
`e 1
`m
`
`10 -v
`-9
`10
`-11
`10
`
`I
`
`(cid:12)9
`
`I
`
`(cid:12)9
`
`|
`
`(cid:12)9
`
`I
`
`,
`
`I
`
`-16
`-20
`-24
`-28
`-32
`Received Optical Power (dBm)
`
`I
`
`-12
`
`F i g . 6.2 C l e a v e d u n i t cell o f a l i n e a r 1 (cid:12)9 10, 2 5 0 - # m s p a c i n g V C S E L a r r a y w i t h c o p l a n a r ,
`1 2 5 - # m p i t c h c o n t a c t a r r a n g e m e n t (top) a n d bit e r r o r rate c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s for b a c k - t o - b a c k
`( B - T - B ) o p e r a t i o n o f all 10 c h a n n e l s at 10 G b i t / s m o d u l a t i o n w i t h a r e p r e s e n t a t i v e e y e
`d i a g r a m (on a 2 0 0 ps h o r i z o n t a l a n d 9 0 0 m V v e r t i c a l s c a l e ) in the i n s e t ( b o t t o m ) .
`
`Figure 6.3 shows a typical example of a complete parallel optical link
`module. Generally, effective heat sinking is required to remove the ex-
`cess power generated by the driver and receiver electronics as well as the
`multiplexing and demultiplexing circuits.
`
`6.2.2. L O N G - D I S T A N C E 10 GBIT/S M M F
`DATA T R A N S M I S S I O N
`
`Even before the GbE standard had been finalized it had already become
`evident that backbones operating at 1 Gbit/s speed would only for a short
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 6 of 54
`
`

`

`222
`
`Rainer Michalzik
`
`Infineon Technologies' parallel optical link (PAROLI) module with and without
`Fig. 6.3
`an attached 12-fiber ribbon cable [19] (left, (cid:14)9 2000 IEEE) and bottom view of an open
`module [19a] (right).
`
`time be able to satisfy the ever-increasing bandwidth demand in local area
`network environments. Thus, in March 1999 the Institute of Electrical and
`Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) established a Higher Speed Study Group
`to explore available technology options, and the current 10-Gigabit Ethernet
`proposal is expected to be adopted as a standard termed IEEE 802.3ae [25]
`during 2002. With regard to a multimode fiber medium that is attractive
`for low apparatus cost in-building cabling, several options exist to reach
`the target data rate on the order of 10 Gbit/s. Coarse wavelength-division
`multiplexing (CWDM, sometimes also called wide-WDM), usually with
`more than 10 nm channel spacing, is an attractive option for increasing the
`data throughput while utilizing the often low-bandwidth installed MMF
`base. CWDM modules based on 780 to 860 nm wavelength VCSELs for
`4 (cid:12)9 2.5 Gbit/s data transmission over 100 m of 62.5/zm core diameter MMF
`[26] or for 8 (cid:12)9 155 Mbit/s operation [27] have been demonstrated. For the
`1300 nm long-wavelength regime, the use of edge-emitting DFB lasers
`has been proposed for 4 . 2 . 5 Gbit/s transmission over either multimode
`or single-mode fiber [28]. However, several demonstrations of 10 Gbit/s
`VCSEL transmitters and MMF receivers together with the progress of
`CMOS and SiGe electronics clearly show the feasibility of a straight for-
`ward serial high-speed solution without the added complexity of optical
`multi- and demultiplexing. Indeed, the short-wavelength CWDM approach
`is presently not considered for the IEEE 802.3ae physical layer [28a].
`Subcarrier multiplexing and multilevel coding [29] or adaptive electronic
`equalization [30] as alternative upgrading methods have not yet been suf-
`ficiently evaluated for practical use but might become competitive in the
`future. On the other hand, an adoption of the 850 nm serial solution into the
`10-GbE standard required the availability of a MMF with improved modal
`bandwidth.
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 7 of 54
`
`

`

`6. Optical Backplanes, Board and Chip Interconnects
`
`223
`
`The maximum transmission distances achievable with a MMF are lim-
`ited by intermodal dispersion resulting in pulse broadening and thus inter-
`symbol interference. As an example, for the 850-nm short-wavelength
`regime the GbE standard defines an operating range of 275 m for a 62.5-#m
`core diameter GI MMF with a bandwidth-distance product of 200 MHz (cid:12)9
`km. Due to lower numerical aperture and smaller core area and thus better
`manufacturing control over the refractive index profile, a 50-/~m diameter
`fiber featuring 500 MHz (cid:12)9 km normalized bandwidth will suffice up to
`distances of 550 m [31, 32]. Although transmission over longer lengths has
`been demonstrated by taking advantage of restricted fiber launch from a
`laser source [33], average quality MMFs are not able to support 10 Gbit/s
`signals over sufficiently long distances.
`Minimum cabling length requirements can be extracted from the results
`of a survey of 107 U.S. companies of diverse size, location, and industry
`conducted by the IEEE in July 1996 during the development of GbE [34].
`According to Fig. 6.4, more than 90% of the in-building fiber backbones
`are less than 300 m in length, which is thus defined as a target value. In early
`2000, Lucent Technologies was the first company to introduce a 50-#m core
`diameter MMF with an increased bandwidth-distance product of 2.2 GHz (cid:12)9
`km at 850-nm wavelength [34]. Besides the adoption of GbE and related
`standards, commercialization of VCSEL technology, and the realization
`of low-cost connector and other hardware for fiber local area networks
`(LANs), this development is regarded as a key opportunity for further
`
`8000
`
`7000
`
`6000
`
`5000
`o 4000
`
`E 3000
`=
`Z 2000
`
`1000
`
`_
`
`//
`1
`
`lfli
`lll l
`100- 200- 300- 400- >500
`0-
`-199
`-299
`-399
`-499
`-99
`Backbone link length interval (m)
`
`100
`
`80 ~
`0
`
`o , , , ~
`
`60 x~
`
`(cid:12)9 , . . . i
`
`40 ~
`
`. , , , o
`
`20 ~
`
`0
`
`Fig. 6.4 In-building fiber backbone distance distribution from a 7/1996 IEEE survey [34].
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 8 of 54
`
`

`

`224
`
`Rainer Michalzik
`
`penetration of optoelectronics into data networks [35]. Fiber optimization
`consists of a reproducible and improved realization of a close to parabolic
`refractive index grading that minimizes the group delay differences between
`the multiple guided modes over a certain target wavelength regime. Of
`special importance is the suppression of the center dip in the index profile,
`which is easily established during fiber preform preparation [36], leading
`to propagation delay particularly for the fundamental mode. Despite being
`designed for the short-wavelength region, the bandwidth requirements of
`1.3 #m wavelength signals as defined in the IEEE 802.3z GbE standard
`1000BASE-SX physical layer are still satisfied by the new fiber.
`Figure 6.5 displays the results of time-domain differential mode delay
`(DMD) measurements carried out on a conventional as well as a new gen-
`eration MMF [37]. In this technique, an optical pulse is launched from a
`single-mode fiber into the MMF under test at different radial offset posi-
`tions and the resulting pulse shapes at the MMF end are recorded. Due to the
`excitation of different mode groups with different group velocities, the con-
`ventional fiber shows significant pulse splitting and wandering of the peak
`
`'
`'
`Current generation MI~F
`/ ~ ~ 2 0 ~tm radial offset
`
`15 ~tm
`
`O11li
`
`I
`I
`I
`New generation MMF
`
`~
`I
`
`I
`
`0 lam
`I
`
`reference
`pulse
`
`l
`
`20 lam
`
`10 lum
`
`0 ~tm
`
`0
`
`0.1
`
`0.2
`
`0.4
`0.3
`Time (ns)
`
`0.5
`
`0.6
`
`0.7
`
`Fig. 6.5 850-nm wavelength differential mode delay characteristics of 500-m spools of a
`typical deployed MMF (top) and of a new-generation optimized MMF (bottom), both with
`50-/zm core diameter [37].
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 9 of 54
`
`

`

`6. Optical Backplanes, Board and Chip Interconnects
`
`225
`
`10-2
`
`,l,,,,a
`
`~D
`r
`
`o
`
`, ~ . , ~
`
`0-4
`1
`
`10-6
`
`10-8
`
`10-10
`
`LazrSPEED TM MMF,
`to 5 spools in series;
`830 nm SM VCSEL,
`10 Gb/s data rate
`
`(cid:12)9 B-T-B
`o 900 m MMF
`(cid:12)9 1.6 km MMF
`
`10-12
`. . .
`-25
`
`- 1 5 " " i 0 ....
`-20
`....
`-;
`Received Optical Power (dBm)
`
`Fig. 6.6 Bit error rate characteristics for 10 Gbit/s data transmission with an 830-nm
`wavelength transverse single-mode (SM) V C S E L over up to 1.6 km of a high-performance
`multimode fiber as well as for back-to-back (B-T-B) operation [38] ((cid:14)9 1999 IEEE).
`
`position with varying launch offset. In contrast, the bandwidth-optimized
`fiber features nearly ideal pulse propagation behavior over almost the en-
`tire core area with only slight broadening versus the directly detected ref-
`erence pulse. Thus, alignment-tolerant data transmission properties can be
`expected, which retains the cost benefits of a MMF-based system.
`Figure 6.6 shows bit error rate measurements for 10 Gbit/s data trans-
`mission with an 830-nm VCSEL source over this fiber medium [38]. Error-
`free operation over up to 1.6 km distance is achieved with only 3 dB power
`penalty. Five connectorized fiber spools of 500, 400, 300, 300, and 100 m
`length are used in the experiment. Further including a 2-km-long fiber
`piece, transmission over even 2.8 km was shown to be possible [39]. Al-
`though in these two demonstrations single-mode emission turned out to be
`an essential feature due to chromatic dispersion limitations, highly multi-
`moded VCSELs can be employed as well for transmission over distances
`that will be required for 10-GbE [40].
`With a further increase of bandwidth demand beyond the direct cur-
`rent modulation capabilities of laser transmitters, CWDM approaches as
`mentioned before will certainly gain importance for premises backbone
`links. With a channel spacing of several nm, the requirements for wave-
`length stabilization of optical sources as well as on the demultiplexing
`process can be considerably relaxed compared
`to dense W D M
`in
`telecommunications. For a first laboratory realization of a 40 Gbit/s M M F
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 10 of 54
`
`

`

`226
`
`Rainer Michalzik
`
`10-2
`
`1
`0-4
`
`10-6
`
`10-8
`
`~D
`,4,-,a
`
`0
`
`1 0 ' ~ t
`10-12 _
`-20
`
`VCSEL W D M over 310 m M M F cable,
`4 • 10 Gbit/s simultaneously
`\
`
`n 815 nm, B-T-B
`A 815 nm, M M F
`<> 822 nm, B-T-B
`(cid:12)9 822 nm, M M F
`o 828 nm, B-T-B
`(cid:12)9 828 nm, M M F
`o 835 nm, B-T-B
`(cid:12)9 835 nm. M M F
`
`-4
`-8
`-
`-12
`-16
`Received Optical Power (dBm)
`
`0
`
`Fig. 6.7 Bit error rates in a 4-channel C W D M experiment showing 4 (cid:12)9 10 Gbit/s data
`transmission over 310 m of a 5 0 - # m core diameter M M F cable [41 ].
`
`system [41 ], oxide-confined high-speed transverse single-mode VCSELs
`in the 3 to 4 # m active diameter range with emission wavelengths of 815,
`822, 828, and 835 nm have been selected. VCSEL beams are combined
`through polarizing beam splitters and a MMF 3-dB coupler and a grating
`is used for free-space demultiplexing. The transmission experiment is per-
`formed by driving all VCSELs simultaneously with decorrelated 10 Gbit/s
`pseudo-random bit sequences from a pattern generator, whereas only one
`of the channels is detected. Figure 6.7 shows the measured BERs before
`and after the insertion of a 310-m-long high-bandwidth MMF cable, where
`error-free operation is achieved for all channels. Power penalties between
`1 and 3 dB are mainly caused by polarization noise generated during beam
`multiplexing and a below 15 dB adjacent wavelength suppression in the
`present demultiplexing setup. Integration of devices as demonstrated at
`lower speeds in [27] or [28] is likely to yield very compact affordable mod-
`ules for 40 Gbit/s or higher data rates in the future.
`
`6.2.3. DATA T R A N S M I S S I O N OVER P L A S T I C
`OPTICAL F I B E R S
`
`Traditionally plastic (sometimes also denoted polymer) optical fibers
`(POFs) are mainly applied in lighting, display, image transmission, or
`simple optical interconnection of consumer electronics equipment [42].
`For several years, however, POFs have produced much interest for use in
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 11 of 54
`
`

`

`6. Optical Backpla/nes, Board and Chip Interconnects
`
`227
`
`high-speed data communications. POFs can be fabricated with larger core
`diameter than any silica glass fiber while being much more flexible and
`resistant to breaking. As a consequence, large alignment tolerances allow
`the use of injection-molded parts in connectors and transceivers, which re-
`duces the apparatus cost to a minimum. At the same time, higher bandwidth,
`lighter weight, and inherent immunity to electromagnetic interference can
`give plastic fibers an edge over conventional copper cable technology.
`Progress in POF fabrication, system applications, and corresponding pas-
`sive and active components is well documented in the Proceedings of the
`International Plastic Optical Fiber Conferences [43-45a]. Fiber manufac-
`turing is concentrated mainly in Japan with Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.,
`Asahi Kasei Co. (previously Asahi Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.), Toray
`Industries, Inc., and Asahi Glass Company as the main players.
`One of the most important benchmarks for an optical fiber is its spectral
`attenuation characteristics. Figure 6.8 shows such spectra for the well-
`known silica glass fiber and the very low-cost PMMA step-index (SI)
`POF [46]. For data communication wavelengths of around 900 nm, these
`fiber types have hugely different attenuation coefficients of about 1 dB/km
`and 104 dB/km, respectively. The various attenuation peaks in the PMMA
`
`100000
`
`10000
`
`~ ,
`
`~
`
`~
`
`=
`.o
`
`q"~
`
`1000
`
`E
`
`100
`
`l O -
`
`~
`
`]
`
`-
`
`A SI-POF
`
`PF GI-POF
`
`~.
`
`~
`
`I ~
`
`I
`
`i
`
`I
`
`t
`
`I
`
`I
`I
`- .... ~
`
`|
`
`s
`
`.
`
`Glass Optical Fiber
`
`0.1
`
`t
`t
`t
`t
`i
`t
`300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500
`Wavelength (nm)
`
`Fig. 6.8 Currently achieved as well as potential attenuation characteristics of a perflu-
`orinated polymer (CYTOP) fiber compared with standard silica glass and polymethyl
`methacrylate (PMMA) material [46].
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 12 of 54
`
`

`

`228
`
`Rainer Michalzik
`
`spectrum are mainly caused by resonances of carbon-hydrogen bonds. In
`the more recent perfluorinated (PF) POF, basically hydrogen is replaced by
`heavier fluorine atoms, thus effectively suppressing most of the resonances
`and allowing achievement of intermediate (on a logarithmic dB-scale) at-
`tenuation coefficients of about 100 dB/km. The potential of the promis-
`ing perfluorinated material is exploited in graded-index fibers containing
`a parabolic-like refractive index profile in the core region. The so-called
`Lucina TM fiber with 120-/zm core diameter, fabricated from a glass-state
`PF polymer by Asahi Glass, offers an over-filled launch bandwidth in the
`200 MHz (cid:12)9 km range (see [47] for a discussion of maximum theoretical bit
`rates) and losses below 50 dB/km throughout the entire data communica-
`tions window from 700 to 1300 nm. Minimum losses down to 10 dB/km
`seem to be within reach [46].
`Table 6.1 provides an overview of recent system experiments performed
`with various kinds of POF and either Fabry-P6rot-type, DFB, or V C S E L
`sources in different wavelength regimes. Due to high attenuation of 1 to
`3 dB/m in the usual 780- to 860-nm short-wavelength datacom operation
`window (and even considerably higher losses for longer wavelengths),
`data transmission over PMMA-based fibers is feasible only for meter-long
`links within a cabinet [57] or on the circuit board level, as mentioned in
`
`Table 6.1 POF-Based Data Transmission Experiments
`Fiber Types are PMMA SI-POF (PMSI), PMMA GI-POF (PMGI),
`or Perfluorinated GI-POF (PFGI)
`
`Fiber
`type
`
`PMSI
`PMSI
`PMSI
`PMGI
`PFGI
`PFGI
`PFGI
`PFGI
`PFGI
`PFGI
`
`Core
`diameter
`
`1 mm
`1 mm
`120 #m
`500 #m
`170 #m
`130/zm
`130 #m
`130 #m
`155 #m
`130 #m
`
`Bit rate
`
`Distance
`
`Laser
`
`Wavelength Ref.
`
`0.5 Gbit/s
`1 Gbit/s
`2.5 Gbit/s
`2.5 Gbit/s
`2.5 Gbit/s
`2.5 Gbit/s
`2.5 Gbit/s
`9 Gbit/s
`7 Gbit/s
`11 Gbit/s
`
`100 m
`15 m
`2.5 m
`200 m
`300 m
`550 m
`550 m
`100 m
`80 m
`100 m
`
`FP
`VCSEL
`VCSEL
`FP
`FP
`VCSEL
`DFB
`VCSEL
`VCSEL
`FP
`
`650 nm
`780 nm
`835 nm
`645 nm
`645 nm
`840 nm
`1310 nm
`830 nm
`935 nm
`1300 nm
`
`[481
`[491
`[501
`[51]
`[52]
`[531
`[531
`[54]
`[551
`[56]
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 13 of 54
`
`

`

`6. Optical Backplanes, Board and Chip Interconnects
`
`229
`
`Sect. 6.5. Losses of about 0.2 dB/m allow for somewhat longer distances
`at around 650 nm, however, here the fabrication of array type laser sources
`with sufficient temperature stability imposes great difficulties. Although
`remarkable progress has been reported on red-emitting VCSELs in the
`last few years [58-60], high-speed operation at elevated temperatures still
`needs to be demonstrated. In addition, the PMMA attenuation spectrum in
`Fig. 6.8 exhibits a rather narrow dip at around 650 nm and unfortunately,
`laser performance degrades with almost every nanometer below 670 nm
`wavelength [61 ].
`Due to comparatively low attenuation over a several 100-nm-wide spec-
`tral range, the PF GI-POF appears to be a candidate for data transmission
`even up to 10 Gbit/s over 100 m distance. Graded-index POFs indeed gen-
`erally show higher bandwidth-distance products than would be expected
`from their refractive index profile. Both strong mode coupling between low
`order mode groups [62] and differential mode attenuation [63] are discussed
`as underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, the bandwidth can be enhanced
`through under-filled launch from a small numerical aperture source such
`as a VCSEL. Apart from the special modal dispersion properties it is also
`interesting to note that the material dispersion of perfluorinated material is
`lower than that of silica glass or PMMA [64]. However, as can be concluded
`from Table 6.1 there is no standardized fiber diameter as yet and long-term
`stability is still a much-debated issue. These factors all contribute to limited
`commercial fiber availability to date.
`With the aforementioned fiber properties, the application fields included
`in Fig. 6.9 are envisioned for POFs [64]. Step-index POFs with conventional
`or lower (0.2 to 0.3 rather than 0.4 to 0.5) numerical aperture (NA) could
`compete with twisted pair and coax electrical cables and be employed in
`much discussed [43-45a] digital home area networks (HANs) based on the
`IEEE 1394 (FireWire) standard. Also, data buses for entertainment, control,
`or communication in mobile systems such as cars, trains, and airplanes
`have moderate bandwidth and length requirements but do benefit from
`electromagnetic interference immunity and small size and weight of POFs
`[65, 66]. PMMA GI-POFs could be used for data rates exceeding 400 Mbit/s
`but required 650-nm transceiver components. Fiber cables for horizontal as
`well as vertical connections with below 300 m length in premises networks
`are potential applications of PF POFs. With further expected increases in
`bandwidth and reductions in loss, these fibers might even be used in campus
`LANs or penetrate into access networks for HANs, business districts, or
`residential areas. Currently however, the performance of PF POFs is by far
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 14 of 54
`
`

`

`230
`
`Rainer Michalzik
`
`I
`
`:: ~
`
`I
`
`'i""'"1['I'"""1' I':: I
`
`I
`
`I I
`
`lo G iiiiiiiiiii ~PMMA base~i]':i~::~i,::,:~ i ~: ]
`.~
`
`
`L~,~:lii',i5OdB!:kii~,i;iiii'~ii !i !! ~ili!i!iiiii!i! i (Pwrer~ g e~C~ p u~
`iii!!i!i i,i!iii iii
`
`~ IOOM
`IOM 10
`
`100
`Link length(m)
`Fig. 6.9 Bit rate vs length limits and future application areas of POFs [64].
`
`1000
`
`inferior to that of silica fibers, especially when considering the progress
`in high-bandwidth MMFs capable of 10 Gbit/s transport over more than
`300 m, as reported in the previous section. Also it has been shown [67]
`that non-standard, extended core diameter (148 or 185 #m) and thus more
`alignment tolerant GI silica MMFs allow data transmission over much
`larger distances (2.5 Gbit/s over 4 km at 1300 nm wavelength) than PF
`POFs owing to significantly lower losses.
`In any case, whereas it is relatively easy to launch the light from a laser
`source into a POE the receiving end remains the most demanding part of
`a high-speed Gbit/s plastic-based data link. First of all, the diameter of the
`photodiode has to be chosen large enough in order not to waste signal power
`and to minimize modal noise penalties, which incurs bandwidth limitations
`through the increased diode capacitance. Mostly, additional optics have to
`be used. On the other hand, the higher fiber loss compared to silica decreases
`the available link power margin so that high-sensitivity receivers have to
`be employed, especially if the links are intended to be operated within the
`eye safety margin of the infrared short-wavelength regime.
`
`6.3. Optical Backplanes
`
`The first penetration step of optical data links into single-box, high-
`performance data processing systems most likely will be the introduc-
`tion of optical backplanes to interconnect the usual multitude of printed
`
`Ex. 1023
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. / Page 15 of 54
`
`

`

`6. Optical Backplanes, Board and Chip Interconnects
`
`231
`
`circuit boards (PCBs). For clock frequencies exceeding values of roughly
`100 MHz, parallel electrical lines already suffer from well-known draw-
`backs such as RC time constant limitations, ohmic losses, cross-talk, re-
`flections due to impedance mismatch, or ground bounce. The usual design
`strategy consists of increasing the data bus width rather than the data rate.
`Operating a bus at higher frequencies is usually not possible, requiring a
`complete redesign. Apart from pure intra-backplane transmission, the inter-
`f

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket