throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`QUANTUM IMAGING LLC
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SONY INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT INC.; SONY
`INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT
`LLC; AND BLUEPOINT GAMES, INC.,
` Defendants.
`










`
`NO. 1:23-CV-1212-ADA-DTG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
`
`Before the Court is Defendants’ Opening Claim Construction Brief filed July 7, 2023,
`
`pertaining to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,458,028; 10,255,724; 10,846,941; and 10,991,165. ECF No. 124.
`
`Plaintiff responded to the claim constructions in a brief filed on August 1, 2023. ECF No. 127.
`
`Defendants replied in support of their claim constructions on August 15, 2023. ECF No. 128.
`
`Plaintiff filed a sur-reply brief on August 29, 2023. ECF 129. The Markman hearing was held on
`
`October 10, 2023. ECF No. 142. The Court considered the patent as well as the arguments and
`
`authorities raised by the parties. The Court issues this Order to memorialize the Court’s final claim
`
`construction rulings for the parties, and to inform the parties that the Court will issue a more-
`
`detailed Order explaining its analysis in due course. The deadline to file any objections to the
`
`undersigned’s claim construction rulings (pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59 and 72)
`
`does not begin to run until the more-detailed Order is entered on the docket.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`SIGNED this 20th day of October, 2023.
`
`____________________________________
`DEREK T. GILLILAND
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`1
`
`

`

`I.
`
`AGREED TERMS
`
`Term
`No.
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Patent Nos.
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`“virtual thematic
`environment”
`“graphics user
`interface (GUI)
`module”
`“external
`sources”
`
`(’724, ’941 and
`’165 Patents)
`(’724, ’941 and
`’165 Patents)
`
`(’724 Patent)
`
`“a theme-based virtual computer interface”
`
`“software that provides a graphical display and
`processes user inputs to allow a user to interact with the
`graphical display”
`“sources outside of the clients and servers of the
`claimed computer system”
`
`Court’s Final
`Construction
`As agreed by the parties.
`
`As agreed by the parties.
`
`As agreed by the parties.
`
`II.
`
`DISPUTED TERMS
`
`Term
`No.
`4
`
`Claim Terms:
`
`
`“automatically”
`
`’028 Pat., (cls. 1, 7);
`’724 Pat., (cl. 1)
`
`5
`
`“real-time information”
`
`’941 Pat., (cls. 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
`23, 25, 26);
`’165 Pat., (cls. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 10,
`11, 18)
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`Plain and Ordinary
`meaning; no construction
`required.
`
`But if the Court requires
`construction, “in a self-
`acting manner, when
`initially actuated by a
`user”
`Plain and Ordinary
`meaning; no construction
`required.
`
`But if the Court requires
`construction, the
`construction for “real
`time” is: “data
`
`2
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`This term precludes action
`initiated by a user, i.e.,
`“not effected by physical
`operation of the user.”
`
`Court’s Final
`Construction
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning. “The plain and
`ordinary meaning of the
`term is that real-time
`information is live
`information; there is no
`real-time information that
`is not live.” (This is the
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning, which includes
`but is not limited to live
`information.
`
`
`

`

`6
`
`7
`
`“world wide web”
`
`’165 Pat., (cls. 1, 8, 18)
`
`“virtual thematic environment
`rules”
`
`
`’724 (cl. 1);
`’941 (cls. 1, 23)
`
`Court’s actual
`construction in Barbaro
`Techs., LLC v. Niantic,
`Inc., N.D.Cal. 3:18-cv-
`02955-RS.)
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is: “The
`set of interlinked
`documents or web pages,
`written in HTML
`(Hypertext Markup
`Language), residing on
`servers all around the
`world and identified by
`URLs (Uniform Resource
`Locators), and transmitted
`from server to end user
`under HTTP (Hypertext
`Transfer Protocol).”
`Indefinite
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Construed as “rules for the
`virtual thematic
`environment.”
`
`
`communicated without
`any discernible delay”
`
`“an aspect of the internet
`using web-based protocols
`such as HTTP and
`HTTPS.” (The Court’s
`construction in Barbaro
`Technologies, LLC v.
`Niantic, Inc. N.D.Cal.
`3:18-cv-02955-RS.)
`
`Plain and Ordinary
`meaning; no construction
`required, not indefinite.
`
`But if the Court requires
`construction, see previous
`construction for “virtual
`thematic environment”.
`The construction for
`“rules” is: “principles or
`regulations governing
`conditions within an
`environment”
`
`3
`
`

`

`8
`
`9
`
`“thematic/publishing logic
`module”
`
`’724 (cl. 1);
`’941 (cls. 1, 23);
`’165 (cls. 1, 18)
`
`“quantum imaging environment
`(QIE) module”
`
`’724 (cl. 1);
`’941 (cls. 1, 23);
`’165 (cls. 1, 18)
`
`Plain and Ordinary
`meaning; no construction
`required; not subject to 35
`USC 112(6); not
`indefinite.
`However, if the Court
`requires construction,
`“software layer which
`directs other components
`and contains virtual
`thematic environment
`rules”
`“a software layer which
`receives and interprets
`content such that the
`content is manipulated so
`as to be accessible on
`different types of devices
`for use within the virtual
`thematic environment”
`(The Court’s construction
`in Barbaro Technologies,
`LLC v. Niantic, Inc.
`N.D.Cal. 3:18-cv-02955-
`RS)
`
`Not subject to
`interpretation under 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶6. Plain
`and ordinary meaning.
`
`Not subject to
`interpretation under 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶6. “A
`software layer which
`receives and interprets
`content such that the
`content is manipulated so
`as to be accessible on
`different types of devices
`for use within the virtual
`thematic environment”
`(The Court’s construction
`in Barbaro Technologies,
`LLC v. Niantic, Inc., 3:18-
`cv-02955-RS (N.D. Cal.)).
`
`This term is subject to
`interpretation under 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶6. The
`function is, e.g., thematic/
`publishing logic. The
`specification fails to
`describe adequate
`corresponding structure to
`perform this function, and
`thus the term is indefinite.
`
`This term is subject to
`interpretation under 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶6. The
`function is e.g., quantum
`imaging environment. The
`corresponding structure
`from the specification is a
`software virtual platform
`that is both part of client
`and server. On the client-
`side, the structure is part
`of a GUI component. On
`the server-side, the
`structure is a 6-tier
`modular / layer system
`fully distributed across the
`internet, the six layers
`including 1) a graphical
`user interface, 2) a
`Thematic/ Publishing
`Logic and a Digital
`
`4
`
`

`

`Content Library, 3) a
`Business Logic, 4) a
`thematic or zone
`application builder and
`interpreter (i.e., a
`Quantum Imaging
`Engine), 5)
`Communications, and 6) a
`Data Storage.
`This term is subject to
`interpretation under 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶6. The
`function is providing a
`digital content library. The
`specification fails to
`describe adequate
`corresponding structure to
`perform this function, and
`thus the term is indefinite.
`
`Plain and Ordinary
`meaning; no construction
`required; not subject to 35
`USC 112(6); not
`indefinite. However, if the
`Court requires
`construction, “software
`layer which is a content
`management application
`or database”
`
`Not subject to
`interpretation under 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶6. Plain
`and ordinary meaning.
`
`10
`
`“digital content library module”
`
`’724 (cl. 1);
`’941 (cls. 1, 23)
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket