throbber
Trials
`Chandran Iyer; Paul Hart; Trials
`Richard Juang; Ron Daignault; kevin.rongish@eriseip.com; Adam Seitz; PTAB@eriseip.com; Konah Duche; Vivek
`Ramachandran; Christina Canino; Jason Charkow
`RE: IPR2023-00937, -00938, and -00939: Petitioner"s Request for a Preliminary Reply
`Wednesday, October 18, 2023 1:19:17 PM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Counsel,
`
`From the Board –
`
`With respect to the parties’ emails of October 16, 2023, we authorize Petitioner in each of IPR2023-
`00937, IPR2023-00938, and IPR2023-00939 to file a three-page preliminary reply limited to
`addressing whether the Slivka application incorporates the appendices in each proceeding, which
`and should be filed within five business days of the Order to follow.
`
`We authorize Patent Owner in each of IPR2023-00937, IPR2023-00938, and IPR2023-00939 to file a
`responsive preliminary sur-reply of three pages in each proceeding, which should be filed within five
`business days of the filing of a preliminary reply in each proceeding.
`
`This email and those of the parties will be entered in the record as Exhibit 3001.
`
`An Order providing further details will follow shortly.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Monday, October 16, 2023 12:12 PM
`To: Paul Hart <paul.hart@eriseip.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Richard Juang <rjuang@daignaultiyer.com>; Ron Daignault <rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com>;
`kevin.rongish@eriseip.com; Adam Seitz <adam.seitz@eriseip.com>; PTAB@eriseip.com; Konah
`Duche <kduche@daignaultiyer.com>; Vivek Ramachandran <vramachandran@daignaultiyer.com>;
`Christina Canino <christina.canino@eriseip.com>; Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: Re: IPR2023-00937, -00938, and -00939: Petitioner's Request for a Preliminary Reply
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Your Honors,
`
`Petitioner falsely represents to this Board that it conferred with DoDots on the requested relief. The
`parties were in the middle of a meet and confer when petitioner unilaterally decided to send its
`
`Exhibit 3001
`
`

`

`email to the Board. DoDots’ counsel specifically noted that any email to the Board on this issue
`should be a joint email in order to give both parties a fair opportunity to frame the dispute precisely.
`Petitioner ignored DoDots’ request and sent its email without giving DoDots a chance to review,
`consent, or set forth its position.
`
`Apple’s petitions explain the reasons it believes the appendices are part of the Slivka prior art
`reference. DoDots’ POPRs explain why Apple is incorrect. In other words, both parties have already
`explained in their respective papers the reasons why the appendices are or are not part of the Slivka
`prior art reference. No additional papers on this issue are needed. For this reason, DoDots does not
`believe that a do-over in the form of a reply should be permitted. If, however, the Board is inclined
`to give Apple an opportunity to file a reply, DoDots requests an opportunity to file a sur-reply.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`
`
`
`Chandran B. Iyer
`Partner
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`202.330.1666
`cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com
`daignaultiyer.com
`
`
`From: Paul Hart <paul.hart@eriseip.com>
`Date: Monday, October 16, 2023 at 10:54 AM
`To: Trials <trials@uspto.gov>
`Cc: Richard Juang <rjuang@daignaultiyer.com>, Ron Daignault
`<rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com>, kevin.rongish@eriseip.com <kevin.rongish@eriseip.com>,
`Adam Seitz <adam.seitz@eriseip.com>, PTAB@eriseip.com <PTAB@eriseip.com>, Konah
`Duche <kduche@daignaultiyer.com>, Vivek Ramachandran
`<vramachandran@daignaultiyer.com>, Christina Canino <christina.canino@eriseip.com>,
`Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: IPR2023-00937, -00938, and -00939: Petitioner's Request for a Preliminary Reply
`
`To the Board,
`
` I
`
` write on behalf of Petitioner Apple Inc. regarding IPR2023-00937, -00938, and -00939. The
`proposed grounds in all three proceedings rely on the Slivka prior art reference and each petition
`cites material contained in appendices that were submitted with the Slivka patent application, but
`that were not printed with the Slivka patent. Patent Owner's (“PO”) Preliminary Responses (“POPR”)
`challenge Petitioner’s reliance on Slivka’s appendices.
`
`

`

`
`Petitioner seeks permission to file a preliminary reply (1) of no more than five pages that is (2)
`limited to PO’s arguments concerning Slivka’s appendices. Petitioner further asks that a deadline for
`the requested preliminary reply be set one week after the Board grants its request.
`
`Petitioner has conferred with PO, and PO objects.
`
`Both parties are available for a conference call during the following windows (all times ET):
`
`10/18 Wednesday: 10:30am-1pm, 3pm-5pm
`10/19 Thursday: 10:30am-12pm; 1pm-5pm
`
`Respectfully,
`
`717 17th St.
`
` Paul Hart | Shareholder
`Erise IP, P.A.
`Suite 1400
`Denver, CO 80202
`(main) 913-777-5600
`(direct) 720-689-5441
`(fax) 913-777-5601
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`www.eriseip.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This transmission, and any attached files, may contain information from the law firm of Daignault
`Iyer LLP which is confidential and/or legally privileged. Such information is intended only for the use
`of the individual or entity to whom this transmission is addressed. If you are not the intended
`recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any
`action in reliance on the contents of this transmitted information is strictly prohibited, that copies of
`this transmission and any attached files should be deleted from your disk directories immediately,
`and that any printed copies of this transmission or attached files should be returned to this firm. If
`you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail immediately,
`and we will arrange for the return to Daignault Iyer LLP of any printed copies.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket