`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 29
`Entered: June 26, 2024
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., and
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ATI TECHNOLOGIES, ULC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2023-00922
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before JAMES P. CALVE, BRIAN J. McNAMARA, and
`KEVIN W. CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`Settlement as to TCL Industry Holdings Co., Inc.
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00922
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`
`
`As authorized by the panel, pursuant to a settlement, on June 21, 2024
`TCL Industries Holdings Co. Ltd (“TCL”) and ATI Technologies LLC
`(“ATI”) filed a Joint Motion to Terminate TCL From This Proceeding
`(Paper 24, “Joint Motion”) and a Joint Request that the Settlement
`Agreement Be Treated as Business Confidential Information and Kept
`Separate Under 37 C.F.R. 42.74(c). Paper 25. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a);
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72. The parties also filed a copy of related written settlement
`agreements. Ex. 2148, 2149, and 2150.
`A decision by the Board to institute a trial and join TCL was entered
`into this proceeding on March 29, 2024. 1 Paper 19. TCL’s participation in
`the proceeding has been limited to that of a joined party. Id. The parties
`have not identified any other related matters and have certified that there are
`no collateral agreements or understandings made in connection with, or in
`contemplation of, the termination of TCL from this proceeding. Joint
`Motion 1–2. Under these circumstances, the Board determines that it is
`appropriate to terminate TCL from the proceeding before rendering a final
`written decision. 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`ORDER
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate TCL from this
`proceeding is GRANTED;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Request That The
`Settlement Agreements Be Treated as Business Confidential Information
`
`
`1 See also TCL Industries Holdings v. ATI Technologies ULC, IPR2024-
`00366, Order Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder (Paper 9) (PTAB
`March 14, 2024).
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00922
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`
`And Kept Separate From The File of The Involved Patents under the
`provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is GRANTED.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00922
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER IPR2023-00922:
`
`Jeffrey Johnson
`BAKER BOTTS, LLP
`jeffrey.johnson@bakerbotts.com
`
`Christopher J. Higgins
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`OCHPTABDocket@orrick.com
`
`Steve Baik
`WHITE HAT LEGAL
`sbaik@whitehat.legal
`
`FOR PETITIONER IPR2024-00366:
`John Schnurer
`Yun (Louise) Lu
`Kevin J. Patariu
`Kyle R. Canavera
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`schnurer-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`lu-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`patariu-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`canavera-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`William A. Meunier
`Michael T. Renaud
`Adam S. Rizk
`Reza Dokhanchy
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`wameunier@mintz.com
`mtrenaud@mintz.com
`arizk@mintz.com
`rdokhanchy@mintz.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
